Real-world data of fulvestrant as first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Goals of endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC) include prolonging survival rates, maintaining the quality of life, and delaying the initiation of chemotherapy. We evaluated the effectiveness of fulvestrant as first-line in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive ABC with relapse during or after adjuvant anti-estrogenic therapy in real-world settings. Retrospective, observational study involving 171 postmenopausal women with ER-positive ABC who received fulvestrant as first-line between January 2011 and May 2018 in Spanish hospitals. With a median follow-up of 31.4 months, the progression-free survival (PFS) with fulvestrant was 14.6 months. No differences were seen in the visceral metastatic (14.3 months) versus non-visceral (14.6 months) metastatic subgroup for PFS. Overall response rate and clinical benefit rate were 35.2% and 82.8%. Overall survival was 43.1 months. The duration of the clinical benefit was 19.2 months. Patients with ECOG performance status 0 at the start of treatment showed a significant greater clinical benefit rate and overall survival than with ECOG 1-2. Results in real-world settings are in concordance with randomized clinical trials. Fulvestrant continues to demonstrate clinical benefits in real-world settings and appears be well tolerated as first-line for the treatment of postmenopausal women with ER-positive ABC.

Correction to: Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

A sentence under 'Results' heading in the Abstract section was published incorrectly. The correct sentence should read as follows.

Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice

Introduction: This study aimed to describe the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had disease progression after receiving anti-estrogen therapy in clinical practice, getting real-world data. Materials and methods: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in Spain. Postmenopausal women with locally advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer who received treatment with fulvestrant 500 mg after progression with a previous anti-estrogen therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), and safety profile. Results: A total of 263 women were evaluated (median age, 65.8 years). At a median follow-up of 21.5 months, median PFS and OS were 10.6 and 43.2 months, respectively. PFS according to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and ≥ 4th lines were 11.5, 10.6, 9.9, and 8.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0245). PFS in patients with visceral involvement was 10 months vs 10.6 months in patients without visceral involvement (p = 0.6604), 9.6 months in patients with high Ki67 vs 10 months in patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.7224), and 10.2 months in HER2+ patients vs 10.3 months in HER2− patients (p = 0.6809). The CBR was 56.5% and the DoCB was 18.4 months. The most frequently adverse events were injection site pain (10.3%) and musculoskeletal disorders (7.6%). Conclusions: Fulvestrant 500 mg administered in clinical practice was shown to be effective (PFS, 10.6 months; CBR, 56.5%) and well tolerated, in accordance with previous trials

No disponible

Safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: results of phase IIIb BALLET trial in Spain

Background: Everolimus with exemestane has shown promising activity in patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer. It is necessary, therefore, to characterize the safety profile of this new combination in the real-world clinical setting and in the broadest possible population. Patients and methods: Post-menopausal women with HR-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer progressing after prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) were included. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the safety profile of this combination in a subset of Spanish patients in the BALLET trial and to characterize grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) in routine clinical practice in Spain. Results: Between September 2012 and July 2013, 429 patients (20% of the overall study population) were included in the BALLET study in 52 hospitals in Spain, of whom 100 (23%) were ≥ 70 years. The median treatment duration was 3.14 and 3.03 months for exemestane and everolimus, respectively. The most common reasons for discontinuation of treatment were local reimbursement of everolimus (43%), followed by disease progression (31%) and the incidence of AEs (15%). The most frequent AEs causing permanent discontinuation were pneumonitis (4%), asthenia (2%) and stomatitis (2%). Overall, 87% of patients experienced at least one AE of any grade, 30% of patients at least one grade 3 AE and 2% of patients a grade 4 AE. Conclusion: The safety profile in Spanish patients of the BALLET trial is consistent with the results obtained in the overall population of the trial, as well as in previous clinical trials

No disponible

Safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: results of phase IIIb BALLET trial in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus with exemestane has shown promising activity in patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer. It is necessary, therefore, to characterize the safety profile of this new combination in the real-world clinical setting and in the broadest possible population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post-menopausal women with HR-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer progressing after prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) were included. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the safety profile of this combination in a subset of Spanish patients in the BALLET trial and to characterize grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) in routine clinical practice in Spain. RESULTS: Between September 2012 and July 2013, 429 patients (20% of the overall study population) were included in the BALLET study in 52 hospitals in Spain, of whom 100 (23%) were ≥ 70 years. The median treatment duration was 3.14 and 3.03 months for exemestane and everolimus, respectively. The most common reasons for discontinuation of treatment were local reimbursement of everolimus (43%), followed by disease progression (31%) and the incidence of AEs (15%). The most frequent AEs causing permanent discontinuation were pneumonitis (4%), asthenia (2%) and stomatitis (2%). Overall, 87% of patients experienced at least one AE of any grade, 30% of patients at least one grade 3 AE and 2% of patients a grade 4 AE. CONCLUSION: The safety profile in Spanish patients of the BALLET trial is consistent with the results obtained in the overall population of the trial, as well as in previous clinical trials.

Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had disease progression after receiving anti-estrogen therapy in clinical practice, getting real-world data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in Spain. Postmenopausal women with locally advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer who received treatment with fulvestrant 500 mg after progression with a previous anti-estrogen therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), and safety profile. RESULTS: A total of 263 women were evaluated (median age, 65.8 years). At a median follow-up of 21.5 months, median PFS and OS were 10.6 and 43.2 months, respectively. PFS according to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and ≥ 4th lines were 11.5, 10.6, 9.9, and 8.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0245). PFS in patients with visceral involvement was 10 months vs 10.6 months in patients without visceral involvement (p = 0.6604), 9.6 months in patients with high Ki67 vs 10 months in patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.7224), and 10.2 months in HER2+ patients vs 10.3 months in HER2- patients (p = 0.6809). The CBR was 56.5% and the DoCB was 18.4 months. The most frequently adverse events were injection site pain (10.3%) and musculoskeletal disorders (7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Fulvestrant 500 mg administered in clinical practice was shown to be effective (PFS, 10.6 months; CBR, 56.5%) and well tolerated, in accordance with previous trials.

Incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and current practice of prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients in Spain: a prospective, observational study.

We aimed to describe the incidence of neutropenia in breast cancer and lymphoma patients and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) use in clinical practice. We conducted a multicentre, prospective, observational study including breast cancer and lymphoma patients initiating chemotherapy (≥ 10% febrile neutropenia risk). We included 734 patients with breast cancer and 291 with lymphoma. Over the first four chemotherapy cycles, patients had an incidence of 11.0% grade 3-4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1.0 × 10(9) /L) and 4.3% febrile neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <0.5 × 10(9) /L and fever ≥ 38 °C) in the breast cancer cohort, and 40.5% and 14.8% in the lymphoma cohort. Full dose on schedule (>85% of planned chemotherapy dose and ≤ 3 days delay) was achieved by 85.6% of breast cancer and 68.9% of lymphoma patients. Hospitalisation due to febrile neutropenia was required in 2.0% and 12.0% of breast cancer and lymphoma patients respectively. G-CSF was administered to 70.0% of breast cancer and 83.8% of lymphoma patients, and initiated from the first chemotherapy cycle (primary prophylaxis) in 60.6% and 64.2% of cases. Severe neutropenia affects approximately one in 10 breast cancer patients and one in two lymphoma patients receiving chemotherapy with moderate or greater risk of febrile neutropenia. Most patients received treatment with G-CSF in Spanish clinical practice.

MHC class I chain-related gene A transmembrane polymorphism in Spanish women with breast cancer.

The NKG2D-major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) system plays a key role in the antitumoral immune response. We studied five alleles of a microsatellite in the MICA transmembrane region; one of which (MICA-A5.1) gives rise to a truncated protein. The MICA-A5 allele was reduced in breast cancer patients compared with healthy controls (P = 0.04). Given the association between the HLA-B7 allele and the susceptibility to breast cancer in our area, we also analyzed the distribution of the frequency of the MICA alleles in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B7 patients compared with patients with the other alleles. The MICA-A5.1 allele was increased in HLA-B7 patients (P = 0.0003). These results suggest that the MICA-A5 allele appears to confer protection against human breast cancer and that the MICA-A5.1 appears to increase the susceptibility to breast cancer in HLA-B7 patients in our area.

A carboxylesterase 2 gene polymorphism as predictor of capecitabine on response and time to progression.

Capecitabine is a drug that requires the consecutive action of three enzymes: carboxylesterase 2 (CES 2), cytidine deaminase (CDD), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) for transformation into 5-fluorouracil (5FU). The metabolism of 5FU requires the activity of thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) among other enzymes. The present study prospectively examined the possible relationship between the toxicity and efficacy of capecitabine and 14 different polymorphisms in CES 2, CDD, TS and DPD. Between 2003 and 2005, a total of 136 patients with advanced breast or colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine were prospectively enrolled. The presence of two polymorphisms (CDD 943insC and CES 2 Exon3 6046 G/A) were associated with a non-statistically significant higher incidence of grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (p=0.07) and grade 3-4 diarrhoea (p=0.09), respectively. Patients heterozygous or homozygous for the polymorphism CES 2 5'UTR 823 C/G exhibited a significantly greater response rate to capecitabine, and time to progression of disease (59%, 8.7 months) than patients with the wild type gene sequence (32%, p=0.015; 5.3 months, p=0.014). For the first time, an association between a polymorphism in the CES2 gene and the efficacy of capecitabine has been described, providing preliminary evidence of its predictive and prognostic value.

Primary signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder: A case report

El adenocarcinoma de células en anillo de selloprimario de vejiga es un tumor raro. Describimos uncaso de un varón de 53 años que consultó por hematuriamacroscópica. La imagen de la tomografíaaxial computerizada mostró un hidronefrosis derechay un tumor invasivo de la vejiga urinaria. Labiopsia mostró un carcinoma de células en anillo desello. No se detectó localización primaria digestivaen la exploración del tracto grastrointestinal. El pacientese trató con cistoprostatectomía total y quimioterapiaadyuvante con cisplatino y gemcitabina.El objetivo de este caso es presentar las característicasanatomoclínicas, tratamiento y evolución de esteinfrecuente tumor

Primary signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma of theurinary bladder is a rare tumor. We report in thisstudy the case of a 53 year old man consulting forgross hematuria. Computed tomography imagingdemonstrated right hydronephrosis and an invasivebladder tumor. The bladder biopsy showed a signetringcell carcinoma; the exploration of the gastrointestinaltract did nor reveal any other tumor localization.A total cystoprostatectomy was performedfollowed by adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatinand gemcitabine. The aim of this study is to determinethe anatomoclinical, therapeutic and evolutionarycharacteristics of this rare tumor

Weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) in 5-FU heavily pretreated and poor-performance-status patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an effective drug in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Little is known about its efficacy and safety in previously treated patients with poor performance status. We prospectively evaluated the antitumor efficacy and safety of CPT-11 monotherapy in this setting. Thirty-four patients with poor performance status (Karnofsky score between 60 and 80) and/or progressing on one or more previous 5-FU-based chemotherapy lines for advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. Treatment consisted of irinotecan (CPT-11) at 100 mg/m(2) administered as a 60-min iv infusion every week for four consecutive weeks followed by a 2-wk rest period until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The overall objective response rate (WHO criteria) for the 34 patients included was 20.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.3%-34.9%]. Stable disease was obtained in 13 patients (38.2%) and 14 patients (41.2%) progressed. The median time to disease progression was 5.5 mo (range: 0.9-17.5) and the median survival was 8.3 mo (95% CI: 1.7-16.9). Overall, weekly CPT-11 was well tolerated with grade 3/4 neutropenia as the main hematological toxicity (11 patients: 32.4%; 14 infusions: 3.3%), and delayed diarrhea (10 patients: 29.4%; 16 infusions: 3.8%) as the main grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity. In conclusion, weekly CPT-11 at 100 mg/m(2) for four consecutive weeks followed by a 2-wk rest period showed antitumor efficacy and may be safely administered to heavily pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer and a poor performance status. Weekly CPT-11 monotherapy may be considered as a therapeutic option for this population of patients.

Phase II study of capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer.

The addition of oral capecitabine to docetaxel improves response rate, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase II study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a 21-day cycle of oral capecitabine (1000 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14) plus i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg m(-2), day 1) in anthracycline-pretreated advanced/MBC. In all, 73 patients were enrolled at 13 Swedish and Spanish centres. The objective response rate was 52% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40-63%) in the intent-to-treat population, including complete responses in 11%. Disease was stabilised in a further 29%. The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 8.1 months and the median overall survival was 16.5 months. The combination was generally well tolerated with a predictable safety profile. The most common treatment-related nonhaematological adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (42%), alopecia (30%) and diarrhoea (26%). The only treatment-related Grade 3/4 adverse events occurring in >5% of patients were alopecia (22%) and hand-foot syndrome (11%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and lymphocytopenia were reported in 12 and 14% of patients, respectively. Capecitabine plus paclitaxel is highly active with a favourable safety profile in anthracycline-pretreated MBC.