Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Individuals with Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States, 2017-2019.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common bloodborne chronic infection in the US. Following approval of highly effective, direct-acting antivirals in 2014, the diagnostic and treatment rates for HCV infection in the US have evolved. This study assessed the number of individuals with HCV screening or diagnostic testing and the clinical characteristics and treatment of HCV-infected individuals between 2017 and 2019. METHODS: Individuals screened for HCV antibody and/or tested for HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) from 2017 to 2019 by two large US laboratory companies were included in this analysis. Clinical characteristics, such as HCV genotype, fibrosis stage, HIV coinfection and demographics, were assessed in HCV RNA-positive individuals. HCV treatment and subsequent achievement of sustained virologic response were imputed using data-driven algorithms based on successive viral load decline and negativity. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2019, the number of individuals tested for HCV antibody increased by 5.7%, from 7,580,303 in 2017 to 8,009,081 in 2019. The percentage of individuals tested who were HCV antibody positive was stable, ranging from 5.0% in 2017 to 4.9% in 2018 and 2019. The number of HCV RNA-positive individuals decreased by 5.0% from 382,500 in 2017 to 363,532 in 2019. Of HCV RNA-positive individuals, the proportions with genotype (GT) 3 and minimal fibrosis increased over time; proportions of individuals aged < 40 years increased, while the proportion aged 50 to 59 years decreased. Treatment rates increased from 23.4% in 2017 to 26.8% in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of HCV antibody-positive individuals remained stable from 2017 to 2019. The number of individuals tested HCV RNA positive decreased over the years. Demographics shifted toward a younger population with less fibrosis and higher rates of GT3. More than 70% of diagnosed individuals were not treated during this interval, highlighting a need for unfettered access to treatment.

Insulin glargine: a systematic review of a long-acting insulin analogue.

BACKGROUND: Insulin glargine is the first long-acting basal insulin analogue indicated for subcutaneous administration once daily at bedtime in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and pediatric patients aged > or = 6 years with type 1 diabetes. It differs in structure from native human insulin by 3 amino acids, a structural modification that provides a delayed onset of action and a constant, peakless effect that has a duration of at least 24 hours. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article was to help determine the current place in therapy of insulin glargine by reviewing all available efficacy and tolerability data published since its introduction onto the market. METHODS: Relevant English-language articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE from 1966 to October 2002 and PREMEDLINE for November 2002. The search terms used were insulin, analogs, analogues, diabetes mellitus, glargine, HOE901, HOE-901, efficacy, safety, comparative study, treatment outcome, and case report. The reference lists of the identified articles were searched for additional relevant publications. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were reviewed and summarized. All large clinical trials (> or = 100 patients) evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were included in the review. Studies were compared in terms of their designs, primary and secondary efficacy parameters (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], fasting plasma glucose [FPG] and/or fasting blood glucose [FBG] level, incidence of hypoglycemia), and tolerability assessments. RESULTS: Fourteen trials met the criteria for inclusion in this review, 7 of them published only in abstract form. All were multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trials conducted in Europe or the United States, and ranged in duration from 4 to 52 weeks. They compared insulin glargine with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin given once or twice daily in >5000 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, or in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes that was poorly controlled by oral antidiabetic agents. Insulin doses were individually titrated to achieve a target FBG level < or =120 mg/dL (6.7 mmol/L). The studies were typically statistically underpowered to detect a significant difference in HbA(1c) between treatment groups; only 3 trials were of an adequate size to have 90% statistical power to detect a mean 0.5% difference in HbA(1c). Furthermore, analysis of the data from these trials was associated with a number of methodologic problems relating to inconsistencies in reporting. Given these limitations, the available data suggest that insulin glargine treatment produces statistically significant reductions in FPG or FBG levels at end point both compared with baseline and compared with NPH insulin (P < 0.001) without achieving overall significant improvements in HbA(1c) values. However, a recent abstract of a small 52-week trial in patients with type 1 diabetes reported a 0.4% additional decrease in HbA(1c) with insulin glargine treatment compared with NPH insulin. Patients have reported greater treatment satisfaction with insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin. The findings varied regarding weight gain, overall incidence of hypoglycemia, and incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia. Currently, the cost of insulin glargine is twice that of NPH insulin on a per-unit basis. CONCLUSIONS: As a basal insulin replacement, insulin glargine administered once daily demonstrates a steady time-action profile over 24 hours without a pronounced peak. Based on the evidence from published clinical trials, insulin glargine appears to have equal clinical efficacy to NPH insulin, produces similar reductions in HbA(1c), and is associated with lower FPG and FBG levels and a consistent and significant reduction in the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.