Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 15(3): e36861, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37123780

RESUMEN

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating condition characterized by autonomic and inflammatory features, often caused by fractures, surgeries, or other injuries. Multimodal treatment is utilized, which often includes neuropathic medications and physical therapy. We had a case of a 24-year-old man who was diagnosed with CRPS II following an open reduction and internal fixation of a trimalleolar fracture. Significant improvement of edema, pain, and function was achieved with early initiation of gabapentin, nortriptyline, and physical therapy. In this case report, we discuss the therapeutic challenges regarding his recovery and review the literature on the utility of medications and interventional methods in treating CRPS II. We note that early treatment response may be an important prognostic indicator for the progression of CRPS II and additional studies targeting interventions for the specific type and clinical stage of CRPS are needed.

2.
Neurology ; 96(18): e2323-e2331, 2021 05 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33762421

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether IV metoclopramide 20 mg + diphenhydramine 25 mg (M + D) was more efficacious than IV placebo for acute moderate or severe posttraumatic headache in the emergency room. METHODS: We conducted this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 2 urban emergency departments (EDs). Participants who experienced head trauma and presented to our EDs within 10 days with a headache fulfilling criteria for acute posttraumatic headache were included. We randomized participants in a 1:1 ratio to M + D or placebo. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were blinded to assignment. The primary outcome was improvement in pain on a scale of 0 to 10 between baseline and 1 hour after treatment. RESULTS: This study was completed between August 2017 and March 2020. We screened 414 patients for participation and randomized 160: 81 to M + D and 79 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. All enrolled participants provided primary outcome data. Patients receiving placebo reported mean improvement of 3.8 (SD 2.6), while those receiving M + D improved by 5.2 (SD 2.3), for a difference favoring metoclopramide of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-2.2, p < 0.01). Adverse events were reported by 35 of 81 (43%) patients who received metoclopramide and 22 of 79 (28%) of patients who received placebo (95% CI 1-30 for difference of 15%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: M + D was more efficacious than placebo with regard to relief of posttraumatic headache in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03220958. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with acute moderate or severe posttraumatic headache, IV M + D significantly improved pain compared to placebo.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Difenhidramina/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de los Receptores de Dopamina D2/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Metoclopramida/administración & dosificación , Cefalea Postraumática/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Cefalea Postraumática/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA