Telemedicina en el control de la hipertensión arterial

está disponible en el texto completo

Introduction: Arterial hypertension is the great challenge of health policies in the world. Its high prevalence, the lack of control (linked to poor adherence to antihypertensive treatment) and its high "burden" (as a non-communicable disease) are responsible for the increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Objetive: To evaluate, as a pilot test, the benefit of real-time telemonitoring applied to blood pressure (BP) control. Metodology: Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed hypertensives, under pharmacological treatment, assisted in the Maciel Hospital polyclinic in the period June-October 2019. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy and upper arm circumference less than 22 cm or greater than 42 cm. Home blood pressure monitoring was implemented, using a validated electronic blood pressure monitor and a smart cell phone connected to a private web platform in real time. Analytical, experimental, prospective study. Qualitative variables were expressed in absolute frequency and percentage relative frequency. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation. The normality of the distribution was verified using the Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Results: Of a total of 57 patients, the mean age was 59 ± 12.8 years, female sex 64.9%. Presenting 22.8% poor knowledge of the disease. Regarding the control of BP figures, 31.6% reported not checking regularly. Adherence to pharmacological treatment at the beginning of the monitoring was 33.3%. Figures lower than those described by RENATA-2, where half of the treated hypertensives complied with the treatment. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were analyzed at the beginning and end of the study. Pre-monitoring measurements were mean SBP: 138.6 ± 17.8 mmHg and mean DBP: 85.4 ± 14.8 mmHg. The records at the end of the immediate monitoring were 131.5 ± 19.9 mmHg and 81.5 ± 14.2 mmHg for PAS and PAD, respectively. Finding a significant difference between the means of the PAS (p 0.019), but not between the means of the DBP (p 0.06). Discussion: Although the percentage of patients achieving good BP control was significant, these results may be closely related to a subtype of observed performance bias, rather than the outcome of the intervention. The mean days of telemonitoring were 8, 85, number of shots was 34.12, and number of interventions performed by the observer (medication change) was 0.30. User satisfaction with the method used was 96.4%, and 100% considered it Easy or very easy to use. 87.5% would use it for long periods of time, including older adults. Conclusions: The studied method shows potential benefits for the control of BP figures, with a wide acceptance by users, facilitating access to the health system, and quality medical care.

Introdução: A hipertensão arterial é o grande desafio das políticas de saúde no mundo. Sua alta prevalência, o descontrole (ligado à baixa adesão ao tratamento anti-hipertensivo) e sua alta "carga" (como doença não transmissível) são responsáveis ​​pelo aumento da morbimortalidade cardiovascular. Objetivo: foi avaliar como teste piloto, o benefício do telemonitoramento em tempo real, aplicado ao controle da pressão arterial (PA). Metodologia: Critérios de inclusão: Hipertensos diagnosticados, em tratamento farmacológico, atendidos na policlínica do Hospital Maciel no período de junho a outubro de 2019. Critérios de exclusão: gravidez e circunferência do braço menor que 22 cm ou maior que 42 cm. Foi implementado o monitoramento domiciliar da pressão arterial, utilizando um monitor eletrônico de pressão arterial validado e um telefone celular inteligente conectado a uma plataforma web privada em tempo real. Estudo analítico, experimental, prospectivo.As variáveis ​​qualitativas foram expressas em frequência absoluta e frequência relativa percentual. As variáveis ​​quantitativas foram expressas como média e desvio padrão. A normalidade da distribuição foi verificada por meio do teste de Kolmogorov Smirnov. Resultados: De um total de 57 pacientes, a média de idade foi de 59 ± 12,8 anos, sexo feminino 64,9%. Apresentando 22,8% conhecimento ruim sobre a doença. Em relação ao controle dos valores da PA, 31,6% relataram não verificar regularmente. A adesão ao tratamento farmacológico no início do acompanhamento foi de 33,3%, valores inferiores aos descritos pelo RENATA-2, onde metade dos hipertensos tratados aderiu ao tratamento. A pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) e a pressão arterial diastólica (PAD) foram analisadas no início e no final do estudo. As medições de pré-monitoramento foram PAS média: 138,6 ± 17,8 mmHg e PAD média: 85,4 ± 14,8 mmHg. Os registros ao final do monitoramento imediato foram de 131,5 ± 19,9 mmHg e 81,5 ± 14,2 mmHg para PAS e PAD, respectivamente. Encontrando diferença significativa entre as médias do PAS (p 0,019), mas não entre as médias do DBP (p 0,06). Discussão: Embora a porcentagem de pacientes que alcançaram um bom controle da PA tenha sido significativa, esses resultados podem estar intimamente relacionados a um subtipo de viés de desempenho observado, e não ao resultado da intervenção. A média de dias de telemonitoramento foi 8, 85, o número de disparos foi 34,12, e o número de intervenções realizadas pelo observador (mudança de medicação) foi de 0,30. A satisfação dos usuários com o método utilizado foi de 96,4%, sendo que 100% consideraram fácil ou muito fácil de usar. 87,5% usariam por longos períodos de tempo, inclusive idosos adultos. Conclusões: O método estudado apresenta potenciais benefícios para o controle dos valores da PA, com ampla aceitação pelos usuários, facilitando o acesso ao sistema de saúde e assistência médica de qualidade.

Results of the implementation of a triage system of vascular access performance in haemodialysis patients: experience of a single dialysis centre.

BACKGROUND: Routine systems for monitoring vascular access (VA) performance are lacking. We developed a vascular access triage system to evaluate the monthly performance of the access, developed a specific score and assessed the association between score improvement and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Vascular access was triaged (Green, Yellow or Red) according to a score generated by dialytic and clinical parameters in all patients who, from 1/1/2014 to 31/03/2014, had been receiving haemodialysis treatment for at least 3 consecutive months in our Unit and who were then followed up for 4 years. RESULTS: We enrolled 130 patients, 78 with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and 52 with tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC). During a median of 29 ± 11 months of follow up (range 3-46 months), 28 deaths and 303 hospitalizations (lasting 16 ± 30 days) were recorded. Vascular access triage scores improved over time (2014 vs 2015 vs 2016 vs 2017) in the population with an AVF (Green from 25% to 58% to 77% to 79%, Yellow from 65% to 39% to 18% to 20% and Red from 10% to 3% to 5% to 1%, respectively; χ2 p < 0.01) but not in the CVC group (Green 58% to 57% to 80% to 92%; Yellow 37% to 36% to 20% to 8%; Red 5% to 7% to 0%; χ2 = n.s). Blood pressure and dialysis efficiency improved in the population as a whole and in the two subgroups (AVF and CVC) separately. AVF and CVC populations, stratified separately according to median VA score, had different event-free follow-up, which was higher (p = 0.0085) in patients with lower scores in the AVF population only. CONCLUSION: The vascular access monitoring system improved the vascular access score as well as some clinical and dialytic parameters. Green triage in AVF patients identify those with better outcomes, in agreement with the commonly recognized clinical value of a well-functioning vascular access.