Nasogastric tube care and flushing in a Portuguese general medicine ward: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: To implement evidence-based practice related to care and flushing of nasogastric tubes inserted for feeding, in a general medicine ward. INTRODUCTION: Nasogastric tube feeding is a widely used nutritional support form. Although performed by qualified professionals, it is not a harm-free intervention. Progression to the trachea during initial insertion, aspiration of gastric contents, improper position for patient feeding, and/or a blocked tube are examples of problems that can occur. METHODS: The project used JBI's methodological approach of the Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice audit and feedback tool. A baseline audit focused on nursing procedures related to the maintenance of nasogastric tube feeding, based on 14 criteria informed by the JBI evidence summaries, was performed for a month. Education sessions and other engagement strategies and resources were used to increase nasogastric tube maintenance. This best-practice implementation was conducted in Portugal, between January 2020 and April 2021, in a 33-bed general medicine ward with a staff of 30 registered nurses. RESULTS: Different samples, for each audited procedure, were obtained from a universe of 25 nurses and 14 episodes of patients with nasogastric tube in baseline and 10 in follow-up audit. At baseline, compliance with the criteria ranged from 0 to 88%. Ten of the 14 criteria were below 50%. The follow-up audit showed significant improvement in all compliance criteria (ranging from 44.4 to 100%). Criteria 1 and 2, which were aimed at preventing adverse consequences related to wrong placement or displacement of the nasogastric tube, showed a high postimplementation compliance level (89.3 and 90%). CONCLUSION: With an integrated plan incorporating interventions, strategies, and resources, tailored for this context, we improved nurses' knowledge of nasogastric tube maintenance and achieved significantly increased compliance with nasogastric tube care best-practice. We suggest maintaining current strategies, and reinforcing clinical supervision and regular assessment.

Impact of physical activity and exercise on bone health in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of observational and experimental studies.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients frequently develop life-impairing bone mineral disorders. Despite the reported impact of exercise on bone health, systematic reviews of the evidence are lacking. This review examines the association of both physical activity (PA) and the effects of different exercise interventions with bone outcomes in CKD. METHODS: English-language publications in EBSCO, Web of Science and Scopus were searched up to May 2019, from which observational and experimental studies examining the relation between PA and the effect of regular exercise on bone-imaging or -outcomes in CKD stage 3-5 adults were included. All data were extracted and recorded using a spreadsheet by two review authors. The evidence quality was rated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Six observational (4 cross-sectional, 2 longitudinal) and seven experimental (2 aerobic-, 5 resistance-exercise trials) studies were included, with an overall sample size of 367 and 215 patients, respectively. Judged risk of bias was low and unclear in most observational and experimental studies, respectively. PA was positively associated with bone mineral density at lumbar spine, femoral neck and total body, but not with bone biomarkers. Resistance exercise seems to improve bone mass at femoral neck and proximal femur, with improved bone formation and inhibited bone resorption observed, despite the inconsistency of results amongst different studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is partial evidence supporting (i) a positive relation of PA and bone outcomes, and (ii) positive effects of resistance exercise on bone health in CKD. Prospective population studies and long-term RCT trials exploring different exercise modalities measuring bone-related parameters as endpoint are currently lacking.

Comparison between the growth response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with partial GH insensitivity or mild GH deficiency.

OBJECTIVES: GH therapy is still controversial, except in severe GH deficiency (SGHD). The objective of this study was to compare the response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with partial GH insensitivity (PGHIS) and mild GH deficiency (MGHD) with those with SGHD. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifteen PGHIS, 11 MGHD, and 19 SGHD subjects, followed up for more than one year in the Brazilian public care service, were evaluated regarding anthropometric and laboratory data at the beginning of treatment, after one year (1st year) on treatment, and at the last assessment (up to ten years in SGHD, up to four years in MGHD, and up to eight years in PGHIS). RESULTS: Initial height standard deviation score (SDS) in SGHD was lower than in MGHD and PGHIS. Although the increase in 1 st year height SDS in comparison to initial height SDS was not different among the groups, height-SDS after the first year of treatment remained lower in SGHD than in MGHD. There was no difference in height-SDS at the last assessment of the children among the three groups. GH therapy, in the entire period of observation, caused a trend towards lower increase in height SDS in PGHIS than SGHD but similar increases were observed in MGHD and SGHD. CONCLUSION: GH therapy increases height in PGHIS and produces similar height effects in MGHD and SGHD.

Comparison between the growth response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with partial GH insensitivity or mild GH deficiency / Comparação entre a resposta de crescimento ao tratamento com hormônio de crescimento (GH) em crianças com insensibilidade parcial ao GH ou deficiência de GH leve

Objectives: GH therapy is still controversial, except in severe GH deficiency (SGHD). The objective of this study was to compare the response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with partial GH insensitivity (PGHIS) and mild GH deficiency (MGHD) with those with SGHD.Subjects and methods: Fifteen PGHIS, 11 MGHD, and 19 SGHD subjects, followed up for more than one year in the Brazilian public care service, were evaluated regarding anthropometric and laboratory data at the beginning of treatment, after one year (1 st year) on treatment, and at the last assessment (up to ten years in SGHD, up to four years in MGHD, and up to eight years in PGHIS).Results: Initial height standard deviation score (SDS) in SGHD was lower than in MGHD and PGHIS. Although the increase in 1 st year height SDS in comparison to initial height SDS was not different among the groups, height-SDS after the first year of treatment remained lower in SGHD than in MGHD. There was no difference in height-SDS at the last assessment of the children among the three groups. GH therapy, in the entire period of observation, caused a trend towards lower increase in height SDS in PGHIS than SGHD but similar increases were observed in MGHD and SGHD.Conclusion: GH therapy increases height in PGHIS and produces similar height effects in MGHD and SGHD.

Objetivos: O tratamento com GH é ainda controverso, salvo na deficiência grave de GH (SGHD). O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a resposta ao tratamento com GH em indivíduos com insensibilidade parcial ao GH (PGHIS) e na deficiência moderada do GH (MGHD) com SGHD.Sujeitos e métodos: Quinze pacientes com PGHIS, 11 com MGHD e 19 com SGHD, seguidos por mais de um ano no Sistema Único de Saúde, foram avaliados antropométrica e laboratorialmente, no início, com um ano de tratamento e na última avaliação (tempo máximo de dez anos na SGHD, quatro anos na MGHD e oito anos na PGHIS).Resultados: O escore de desvio-padrão (EDP) da estatura inicial foi menor nos indivíduos com SGHD do que naqueles com MGHD e PGHIS. Embora o aumento no EDP da estatura no primeiro ano em comparação com o inicial não fosse diferente entre os grupos, o EDP da altura no primeiro ano de tratamento permaneceu menor na SGHD que na MGHD. Não houve diferença no EDP da estatura na última avaliação entre os três grupos. O tratamento com GH, no período completo da observação, provocou uma tendência a menor aumento no EDP da estatura nos pacientes com PGHIS que naqueles com SGHD, entretanto aumentos semelhantes foram encontrados nos grupos MGHD e SGHD.Conclusão: O tratamento com GH aumentou a estatura nos indivíduos com PGHIS e produziu efeitos similares na estatura em MGHD e SGHD.

Voice quality in short stature with and without GH deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the individual impact of short stature (SS) or untreated isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD) on voice quality and the influence of IGHD on voice aging. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 73 adults: 33 IGHD, 10 SS, and 30 normal controls (CO), by evaluating vocal perception using Voice-Related Quality-of-Life (V-RQOL) scores and fundamental frequency (ƒ0). Analysis of variance with Bonferroni post-test was used to compare groups, and the Student t test was used to verify the influence of aging. RESULTS: Stature of the SS and IGHD groups was similarly reduced in comparison to CO. Cephalic perimeter (CP) in SS males was larger than CO (P<0.05), and this was larger than in IGHD (P<0.0001). CP was similar in SS and CO females, and both were larger than in IGHD (P<0.0001). V-RQOL scores were lower in IGHD than in SS and CO. ƒ0 (Hz) was similar in IGHD females and SS and higher than in CO (P<0.05). f0 of IGHD males was higher than in SS (P=0.01) and CO (P=0.001). IGHD abolished the effect of aging on ƒ0 exhibited by CO. CONCLUSIONS: Lower vocal perception and higher ƒ0 were found in IGHD in comparison to CO in both genders; in comparison to SS, higher ƒ0 was only found in IGHD males. Because SS males have higher CP than IGHD, this suggests that CP and craniofacial growth can influence voice in IGHD. Finally, IGHD seems to abolish the effects of aging on voice.