Provision of Behavioral Health Services at Community Health Centers and Hospital Emergency Department Visits.

BACKGROUND: Numerous US patients seek the hospital emergency department (ED) for behavioral health care. Community Health Centers (CHCs) offer a potential channel for redirecting many to a more patient-centered, lower cost setting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify unique market areas serviced by CHCs and to examine whether CHCs are effective in offsetting behavioral health ED visits. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified CHC-year specific service areas using patient origin zip codes. We then estimated random effects models applied to 42 federally qualified CHCs operating in New York State during 2013-2020. The dependent variables were numbers of ED mental health (substance use disorder) visits per capita in a CHC's service area, drawn from HCUP State Emergency Department Databases. Key explanatory variables measured CHC number of mental health (substance use disorder) visits, number of unique mental health (substance use disorder) patients, and mental health (substance use disorder) intensity, obtained from the HRSA Uniform Data System. RESULTS: Controlling for population, we observed small negative effects of CHC behavioral health integration in explaining ED behavioral health utilization. Measures of mental health utilization in CHCs were associated with 1.3%-9.3% fewer mental health emergency department visits per capita in Community Health Centers' service areas. Measures of substance use disorder utilization in Community Health Centers were associated with 1.3%-3.0% fewer emergency department visits per capita. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that behavioral health integration in CHCs may reduce reliance on hospital EDs, but that policymakers explore more avenues for regional coordination strategies that align services between CHCs and local hospitals.

Association between physician-hospital integration and inpatient care delivery in accountable care organizations: An instrumental variable analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between physician-hospital integration within accountable care organizations (ACOs) and inpatient care utilization and expenditure. DATA SOURCES: The primary data were Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database (2009-2013). STUDY SETTING: Fifteen provider organizations that entered a commercial ACO contract with a major private payer in Massachusetts between 2009 and 2013. STUDY DESIGN: Using an instrumental variable approach, the study compared inpatient care delivery between patients of ACOs demonstrating high versus low integration. We measured physician-hospital integration within ACOs by the proportion of primary care physicians in an ACO who billed for outpatient services with a place-of-service code indicating employment or practice ownership by a hospital. The study sample comprised non-elderly adults who had continuous insurance coverage and were attributed to one of the 15 ACOs. Outcomes of interest included total medical expenditure during an episode of inpatient care, length of stay (LOS) of the index hospitalization, and 30-day readmission. An inpatient episode was defined as 30, 45, and 60 days from the admission date. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The study examined 33,535 admissions from patients served by the 15 ACOs. Average medical expenditure within 30 days of admission was $24,601, within 45 days was $26,447, and within 60 days was $28,043. Average LOS was 3.5 days, and 5.4% of patients were readmitted within 30 days. Physician-hospital integration was associated with a 10.6% reduction in 30-day expenditure (95% CI, -15.1% to -5.9%). Corresponding estimates for 45 and 60 days were - 9.7% (95%CI, -14.2% to -4.9%) and - 9.6% (95%CI, -14.3% to -4.7%). Integration was associated with a 15.7% decrease in LOS (95%CI, -22.6% to -8.2%) but unrelated to 30-day readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our instrumental variable analysis shows physician-hospital integration with ACOs was associated with reduced inpatient spending and LOS, with no evidence of elevated readmission rates.

Mental health care provision in community health centers and hospital emergency department utilization.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether community health centers (CHCs) are effective in offsetting mental health emergency department (ED) visits. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: The HRSA Uniform Data System and the HCUP State ED Databases for Florida patients during 2012-2019. STUDY DESIGN: We identified CHC-year-specific service areas using patient origin zip codes. We then estimated panel data models for number of ED mental health visits per capita in a CHC's service area. Models measured CHC mental health utilization as number of visits, unique patients, and intensity (visits per patient). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: CHC mental health utilization increased approximately 100% during 2012-2019. Increased CHC mental health provision was associated with small reductions in ED mental health utilization. An annual increase of 1000 CHC mental health care visits (5%) was associated with 0.44% fewer ED mental health care visits (p = 0.153), and an increase of 1000 CHC mental health care patients (15%) with 1.9% fewer ED mental health care visits (p = 0.123). An increase of 1 annual mental health visit per patient was associated with 16% fewer ED mental health care visits (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that mental health provision in CHCs may reduce reliance on hospital EDs, albeit minimally. Policies that promote alignment of services between CHCs and local hospitals may accelerate this effect.

Safety-net hospital performance under Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative progress of safety-net hospitals (SNHs) under Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) mandatory bundled payment model over 2016-2020 and to identify the contributors to SNHs' realization of success under the program. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Secondary data on all CJR hospitals were collected from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) public use files and from the American Hospital Association. STUDY DESIGN: We addressed whether SNHs can achieve progress in financial performance under CJR by focusing on the relative change in reconciliation payments or the difference between episode spending and target prices. We applied the method of dominance analysis to ordinary least squares regression to determine the relative importance of predictors of change in reconciliation payments over time. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Compared to CJR hospitals overall, SNHs were less successful in meeting episode spending targets. Hospital factors dominated socioeconomic factors in explaining progress among SNHs, but not among non-SNHs. The contribution of nurse staffing was negligible across all CJR hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The formula used by CMS to determine spending targets may not be sufficient to address disparities in SNH financial performance under mandatory bundled payment.

A Comparison of Telemedicine and Office Visit Payments in a Commercially Insured Population.

In recent years, commercial insurers have been slowly advancing coverage for telemedicine, raising questions regarding payment. Many states now have laws that address telemedicine reimbursement and as of 2019, 10 required full payment parity. Using a large commercial insurance claims database, this study conducted two natural experiments to better understand whether payment parity is effective in driving more telemedicine provision. Payments for common outpatient procedures provided by telemedicine and in offices during 2018-2019 were examined according to whether the service was subject to payment parity. For medical visits, evidence of payment incentives in promoting telemedicine was limited, and for psychotherapy telemedicine payments were comparable or greater than office visit payments. As telemedicine escalated during the COVID-19 peak and continues to grow beyond the pandemic, a valuable message is that payment parity laws may be a less effective strategy for encouraging telemedicine use than presumed by many state policymakers.

Comparison of Visit Rates Before vs After Telehealth Expansion Among Patients With Mental Health Diagnoses Treated at Federally Qualified Health Centers.

This cohort study assesses visit rates before and after telehealth expansion to assess whether telehealth availability at federally qualified health centers is associated with visit rates for patients with mental health diagnoses.

Quality and Cost in Community Health Centers.

BACKGROUND: Quantifying health care quality has long presented a challenge to identifying the relationship between provider level quality and cost. However, growing focus on quality improvement has led to greater interest in organizational performance, prompting payers to collect various indicators of quality that can be combined at the provider level. OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between quality and average cost of medical visits provided in US Community Health Centers (CHCs) using composite measures of quality. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using the Uniform Data System collected by the Bureau of Primary Care, we constructed composite measures by combining 9 process and 2 outcome indicators of primary care quality provided in 1331 US CHCs during 2015-2018. We explored different weighting schemes and different combinations of individual quality indicators constructed at the intermediate domain levels of chronic condition control, screening, and medication management. We used generalized linear modeling to regress average cost of a medical visit on composite quality measures, controlling for patient and health center factors. We examined the sensitivity of results to different weighting schemes and to combining individual quality indicators at the overall level compared with the intermediate domain level. RESULTS: Both overall and domain level composites performed well in the estimations. Average cost of a medical visit was negatively associated with quality, although the magnitude of the effect varied across weighting schemes. CONCLUSION: Efforts toward improvement of primary health care quality delivered in CHCs need not involve greater cost.

The Effect of Telehealth Services on Provider Productivity.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth services historically have played a small role in the provision of health care in the United States. However during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, public and private insurers rapidly expanded access to telehealth in order to reduce exposure and avoid transmission. It is unknown whether telehealth will become a more regular substitute for in-person care beyond the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to provide evidence on the value of telehealth by comparing the productivity of physicians and other specialized clinicians who provide telehealth with the productivity of those who do not. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective data analysis of 17,705 unique providers in the areas of internal medicine, cardiology, dermatology, psychiatry, psychology, and optometry practicing in the US veterans affairs health care system during the period 2015 to 2018. For each year, we measured individual providers productivity by the total number of relative value units (RVUs) per full-time equivalent (FTE). We estimated the impact of providing telehealth on RVUs/FTE using fixed effects regression models estimated on a panel dataset of 58,873 provider-year observations and controlling for provider and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall provider productivity increased in veterans affairs over the period, particularly in cardiology and dermatology. Providers of telehealth had above average productivity by 124 RVUs/FTE, or ∼4% of average total provider productivity. For the highest quartile of telehealth providers, average productivity was 188 RVUs/FTE higher than productivity of other providers. CONCLUSION: Strategies that encourage long-term integration of telehealth into provider practices may contribute to overall health care value.

Do accountable care organizations differ according to physician-hospital integration?: A retrospective observational study.

ABSTRACT: Physician-hospital integration among accountable care organizations (ACOs) has raised concern over impacts on prices and spending. However, characteristics of ACOs with greater integration between physicians and hospitals are unknown. We examined whether ACOs systematically differ by physician-hospital integration among 16 commercial ACOs operating in Massachusetts.Using claims data linked to information on physician affiliation, we measured hospital integration with primary care physicians for each ACO and categorized them into high-, medium-, and low-integrated ACOs. We conducted cross-sectional descriptive analysis to compare differences in patient population, organizational characteristics, and healthcare spending between the three groups. In addition, using multivariate generalized linear models, we compared ACO spending by integration level, adjusting for organization and patient characteristics. We identified non-elderly adults (aged 18-64) served by 16 Massachusetts ACOs over the period 2009 to 2013.High- and medium-integrated ACOs were more likely to be an integrated delivery system or an organization with a large number of providers. Compared to low-integrated ACOs, higher-integrated ACOs had larger inpatient care capacity, smaller composition of primary care physicians, and were more likely to employ physicians directly or through an affiliated hospital or physician group. A greater proportion of high-/medium-integrated ACO patients lived in affluent neighborhoods or areas with a larger minority population. Healthcare spending per enrollee in high-integrated ACOs was higher, which was mainly driven by a higher spending on outpatient facility services.This study shows that higher-integrated ACOs differ from their counterparts with low integration in many respects including higher healthcare spending, which persisted after adjusting for organizational characteristics and patient mix. Further investigation into the effects of integration on expenditures will inform the ongoing development of ACOs.

Payments for outpatient joint replacement surgery: A comparison of hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgery centers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare commercial insurance payments for outpatient total knee and hip replacement surgeries performed in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). DATA SOURCES: A large national claims database that contains information on actual prices paid to providers over the period 2014-2017. DATA COLLECTION: We identified all patients receiving total knee replacement surgery and total hip replacement surgery in HOPDs and in ASCs for each of the 4 years. STUDY DESIGN: For each year, we conducted descriptive and statistical patient-level analyses of the facility component of payments to HOPDs and to ASCs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For each procedure and for each year, ASC payments exceeded HOPD payments by a wide margin; however, the gap across settings declined over time. In 2014, knee replacement payments to HOPDs (n = 67) were $6016 compared to $23 244 in ASCs (n = 68). By 2017, payments to HOPDs (n = 223) had grown to $10 060 compared to $18 234 in ASCs (n = 602). Similarly, for hip replacements, HOPD payments (n = 43) rose from $6980 in 2014 to $11 139 in 2017 (n = 206) and in ASCs fell from $28 485 in 2014 (n = 82) to $18 595 in 2017 (n = 465). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that for total joint replacement, common perceptions of cost savings from transition of services from hospitals to ASCs may be misguided.

Patient Outcomes Following Total Joint Replacement Surgery: A Comparison of Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgery Centers.

BACKGROUND: For several years, many orthopedic surgeons have been performing total joint replacements in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and more recently in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). In a recent shift, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began reimbursing for total knee replacement surgery in HOPDs. Some observers have expressed concerns over patient safety for the Medicare population particularly if Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services extends the policy to include total hip replacement surgery and coverage in ASCs. METHODS: This study used a large claims database of non-Medicare patients to examine inpatient and outpatient total knee replacement and total hip replacement surgery performed on a near-elderly population during 2014-2016. We applied propensity score methods to match inpatients with ASC patients and HOPD patients with ASC patients adjusting for risk using the HHS Hierarchical Condition Categories risk adjustment model. We conducted statistical tests comparing clinical outcomes across the 3 settings and examined relative costs. RESULTS: Readmissions, postsurgical complications, and payments were lower for outpatients than for inpatients. Within outpatient settings, readmissions and postsurgical complications were lower in ASCs than in HOPDs but payments for ASC patients were higher than payments for HOPD patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the argument that outpatient total joint replacement is appropriate for select patients treated in both HOPDs and ASCs, although in the commercially insured population, the latter services may come at a cost. Until further study of outpatient total joint replacement in the Medicare population becomes available, how this will extrapolate to the Medicare population is unknown.

Hospital Response to CMS Public Reports of Hospital Charge Information.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to increase price transparency, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began reporting charges for Medicare inpatients treated in ∼3400 hospitals online in 2013. As of 2019, CMS began to require hospitals themselves to publicize a more comprehensive list of their underlying procedure charges. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the responses of hospitals to broad-scale public reporting of their charges for inpatient services. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used descriptive analysis to examine the trend in CMS charge data for high charge hospitals before and after the 2013 intervention. We also applied difference-in-differences analysis to comprehensive inpatient charge data from New York and Florida for the years 2011-2016, defining the reported high-volume diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) as the intervention group. RESULTS: At the national level, the CMS charge data showed relatively lower growth in high charge hospitals following the intervention. From the state data, we found that after 3 years, the growth in charges for reported DRGs in New York hospitals was 4%-9% lower than for unreported diagnosis-related groups. In Florida, it was 2%-8% lower. CONCLUSION: Public reports of hospital inpatient charges by DRG appear to influence subsequent charges, slowing their growth.

Unrestricted Direct Access to Physical Therapist Services Is Associated With Lower Health Care Utilization and Costs in Patients With New-Onset Low Back Pain.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent conditions for which patients seek physical therapy in the United States. The American Physical Therapy Association categorizes direct access to physical therapist services into 3 levels: limited, provisional, and unrestricted. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of level of access to physical therapist services with LBP-related health care utilization and costs. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with new-onset LBP between 2008 and 2013; data were from OptumLabs Data Warehouse. METHODS: We identified 59,670 individuals who were 18 years old or older, who had new-onset LBP, and who had commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance through a private health plan. We examined 2 samples. The first was health care utilization among individuals who saw a physical therapist first in states with either unrestricted access or provisional access. The second was LBP-related costs among individuals who saw either a physical therapist or a primary care physician first. RESULTS: Individuals who saw a physical therapist first in states with provisional access had significantly higher measures of health care utilization within 30 days, including plain imaging and frequency of physician visits, than individuals who saw a physical therapist first in states with unrestricted access. Compared with individuals who saw a primary care physician first, pooled across provisional-access and unrestricted-access states, those who saw a physical therapist first in provisional-access states had 25% higher relative costs at 30 days and 32% higher relative costs at 90 days, whereas those who saw a physical therapist first in unrestricted-access states had 13% lower costs at 30 days and 32% lower costs at 90 days. LIMITATIONS: This was a claims-based study with limited information on patient characteristics, including severity and duration of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term LBP-related health care utilization and costs were lower for individuals in unrestricted-access states than in provisional-access states.

Observational retrospective study of the association of initial healthcare provider for new-onset low back pain with early and long-term opioid use.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association of initial provider treatment with early and long-term opioid use in a national sample of patients with new-onset low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of patients with new-onset LBP from 2008 to 2013. SETTING: The study evaluated outpatient and inpatient claims from patient visits, pharmacy claims and inpatient and outpatient procedures with initial providers seen for new-onset LBP. PARTICIPANTS: 216 504 individuals aged 18 years or older across the USA who were diagnosed with new-onset LBP and were opioid-naïve were included. Participants had commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance. EXPOSURES: The primary independent variable is type of initial healthcare provider including physicians and conservative therapists (physical therapists, chiropractors, acupuncturists). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term opioid use (within 30 days of the index visit) following new LBP visit and long-term opioid use (starting within 60 days of the index date and either 120 or more days' supply of opioids over 12 months, or 90 days or more supply of opioids and 10 or more opioid prescriptions over 12 months). RESULTS: Short-term use of opioids was 22%. Patients who received initial treatment from chiropractors or physical therapists had decreased odds of short-term and long-term opioid use compared with those who received initial treatment from primary care physicians (PCPs) (adjusted OR (AOR) (95% CI) 0.10 (0.09 to 0.10) and 0.15 (0.13 to 0.17), respectively). Compared with PCP visits, initial chiropractic and physical therapy also were associated with decreased odds of long-term opioid use in a propensity score matched sample (AOR (95% CI) 0.21 (0.16 to 0.27) and 0.29 (0.12 to 0.69), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Initial visits to chiropractors or physical therapists is associated with substantially decreased early and long-term use of opioids. Incentivising use of conservative therapists may be a strategy to reduce risks of early and long-term opioid use.

Health insurance design and conservative therapy for low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of health insurance benefit design features with choice of early conservative therapy for patients with new-onset low back pain (LBP). STUDY DESIGN: Observational study of 117,448 commercially insured adults 18 years or older presenting with an outpatient diagnosis of new-onset LBP between 2008 and 2013 as recorded in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. METHODS: We identified patients who chose a primary care physician (PCP), physical therapist, or chiropractor as their entry-point provider. The main analyses were logistic regression models that estimated the likelihood of choosing a physical therapist versus a PCP and choosing a chiropractor versus a PCP. Key independent variables were health plan type, co-payment, deductible, and participation in a health reimbursement account (HRA) or health savings account (HSA). Models controlled for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Selection of entry-point provider was moderately responsive to the incentives that patients faced. Those covered under plan types with greater restrictions on provider choice were less likely to choose conservative therapy compared with those covered under the least restrictive plan type. Results also indicated a general pattern of higher likelihood of treatment with physical therapy at lower levels of patient cost sharing. We did not observe consistent associations between participation in HRAs or HSAs and choice of conservative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Modification of health insurance benefit designs offers an opportunity for creating greater value in treatment of new-onset LBP by encouraging patients to choose noninvasive conservative management that will result in long-term economic and social benefits.

Specialization as an Organizing Principle: The Case of Ambulatory Surgery Centers.

Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) recently have grown to become the dominant provider of specific surgical procedures in the United States. While the majority of ASCs focus primarily on a single specialty, many have diversified to offer a wide range of surgical specialties. We exploited a unique data set from Pennsylvania for the years 2004 to 2014 to conduct an empirical investigation of the relative cost of production in ASCs over varying degrees of specialization. We found that for the majority of ASCs, focus on a specialty was associated with lower facility costs. In addition, ASCs appeared to be capturing economies of scale over a broad range of service volume. In contrast to studies of cost efficiency in specialty hospitals, our results provide evidence that supports the focused factory model of production in the ASC sector.

Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Bronchitis in Children and Impact on Subsequent Episodes of Care and Treatment.

BACKGROUND: To examine whether inappropriate antibiotic treatment for an initial bout of acute bronchitis in childhood affects patterns of future healthcare utilization and antibiotic prescribing. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of children with at least 1 acute bronchitis episode, defined as the 14-day period after an acute bronchitis visit, born in 2008 and followed through 2015 in a nationally representative commercial claims database. We predicted the likelihood of returning for a subsequent acute bronchitis episode, and being prescribed an antibiotic as part of that episode, as a function of whether or not the child was prescribed an antibiotic as part of the first acute bronchitis episode controlling for patient, provider and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Children prescribed an antibiotic as part of their initial acute bronchitis episode were more likely both to have a subsequent acute bronchitis episode (hazard ratio = 1.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.30) and to be prescribed an antibiotic as part of that second episode (hazard ratio = 2.13; 95% confidence interval: 1.99-2.28) compared with children who were not prescribed as part of their first episode. Children diagnosed with asthma were more likely to experience a second visit for acute bronchitis, but less likely to receive an antibiotic as part of that second episode. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for a child's initial acute bronchitis episode of care predicted likelihood of subsequent acute bronchitis episodes and antibiotic prescriptions. Providers should consider the downstream effect of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis in childhood.

The relationship between nursing home quality and costs: Evidence from the VA.

Ensuring quality of care in nursing homes is a public health priority, yet how nursing home quality relates to cost is not well understood. This paper addresses this relationship for 132 VA community living centers (nursing homes), for fiscal years 2014 and 2015. We estimated cost models using the VA Decision Support System which tracks total direct costs and nursing direct costs for individual resident segments of care. We summed residents' total costs and nursing costs to the community living center level for each year. Annual facility costs then were regressed on quality of care measured with composite scores based on 13 distinct adverse events. Results indicated that higher quality was associated with higher predicted cost. However, we did not find evidence that higher costs were driven by high nurse staffing levels.