Effect of root canal sealers on bond strength of fibreglass posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cements.

AIM: This study evaluated the effects of different root canal sealers on the bond strength of a fibreglass post cemented with self-adhesive resin cements. METHODOLOGY: The root canals of 50 extracted maxillary single-rooted canine teeth were prepared with the crown-down technique and randomly divided into five groups according to the sealer used: group 1: control group, gutta-percha points only (no sealer); group 2: AH Plus (resin-based sealer); group 3: self-etch Epiphany (resin-based sealer); group 4: Sealer 26 (calcium hydroxide-based sealer); and group 5: Endomethasone (zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer). The root canals were filled with gutta-percha, the cold lateral compaction technique, except for group 3 where Resilon was used. Post spaces were prepared, and fibreglass posts were cemented with the self-adhesive cement RelyX Unicem. Bonded specimens were sectioned into 1-mm-thick slabs, and a push-out test was performed in a universal machine. Failure modes were observed and classified into five types: (i) adhesive between the post and resin cement; (ii) mixed, with resin cement covering 0-50% of the post diameter; (iii) mixed, with resin cement covering 50-100% of the post surface; (iv) adhesive between resin cement and root canal; and (v) cohesive in dentine. Data of bond strength were submitted to anova and Tukey test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: No significant difference was detected between control group, AH Plus, Epiphany and Sealer 26 (P > 0.05). The Endomethasone group had significantly lower bond strength values than the other sealers (P < 0.05). The prevalence of mixed fractures and adhesive cement-dentine failure was verified in the eugenol-containing sealer group; in the control group, the resin-based and calcium hydroxide-based sealer groups, the predominant mode of failure was the mixed type. CONCLUSION: Endomethasone interfered negatively with the bond to root dentine; however, AH Plus, Epiphany and Sealer 26 did not interfere in the bond strength of a fibreglass post cemented with self-adhesive resin cements.

Fracture resistance of roots prosthetically restored with intra-radicular posts of different lengths.

The purpose of this study was to assess the fracture resistance of roots that were prosthetically restored with intra-radicular posts of different lengths. Forty-five bovine incisors were sectioned 17 mm from their apices, endodontically treated and randomly divided into three experimental groups: GI, fibreglass posts luted at a depth of 12 mm; GII, 8 mm and GIII, 4 mm. All posts were luted with dual resin cement. Resin composite cores were prepared with standardized measurements, and all teeth were restored with metal crowns. The samples were submitted to the fracture resistance test in a universal testing machine, at an angle of 135 degrees and speed of 0.5 mm min(-1), until fracture occurred. The data, in MPa, were submitted to the analysis of variance (anova) followed by Tukey's test (alpha = 0.01). No statistically significant difference (P > 0.01) was found between GI (129.72 +/- 12.14) and GII (154.3 +/- 12.08), which presented the highest fracture resistance values. Group GIII (100.5 +/- 8.07) showed lower fracture resistance (P < 0.01) when compared with GI and GII. Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the post lengths influenced the fracture resistance of prosthetically restored roots. These results suggest that it is not necessary to perform excessive intra-radicular post-space preparation to improve the fracture resistance of roots.