Effect of thoracolumbosacral braces on running ground reaction force components in male individuals with kyphosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Braces are one of the methods for kyphosis treatment, but they can relocate the center of gravity of the trunk, affecting the ground reaction force (GRF) during running. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of two types of thoracolumbosacral braces on running GRF components in individuals with kyphosis. MATERIALS & METHODS: Participants were 15 males diagnosed with kyphosis who volunteered in this quasi-experimental study. Each subject performed the barefoot running trials on the force plate with one simple brace, with a sensor brace, and without the brace condition. The ground reaction forces components were calculated in the stance phase. Statistical analysis was done with repeated measures test with a significant level of 0.05. RESULTS: Peak medial ground reaction force when running with a sensor brace was lower than running with a simple brace (p = 0.017). Free moments were similar during three running conditions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Lower maximum medial ground reaction force while using a sensor brace may possibly demonstrate the beneficial effects of a sensor brace in individuals with kyphosis.

Secondary hyperalgesia occurs regardless of unilateral or bilateral knee osteoarthritis involvement in individuals with mild or moderate level.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperalgesia in individuals with less severe levels of knee osteoarthritis remains unclear. The objective of this study was to measure the pressure pain threshold of individuals with mild or moderate knee osteoarthritis and compare with no osteoarthritis. METHODS: Ten healthy controls and 30 individuals with mild or moderate knee osteoarthritis divided into two groups (unilateral and bilateral involvement) were included. Dermatomes in lumbar levels (L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5) and sacral level (S1 and S2), myotomes (vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, adductor longus, tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, iliacus, quadratus lumborum, and popliteus muscles), and sclerotomes in lumbar levels (L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5 supraspinous ligaments), over the L5-S1 and S1-S2 sacral areas, pes anserinus bursae, and at the patellar tendon pressure pain threshold were assessed and compared between individuals with and without knee osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Knee osteoarthritis groups (unilateral and bilateral) reported lower pressure pain threshold compared to the control group in most areas (dermatomes, myotomes, and sclerotomes). There were no between group differences in the supra-spinous ligaments and over the L5-S1 and S1-S2 sacral areas of the sclerotomes. No difference was seen between knee osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that individuals with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis had primary and secondary hyperalgesia, independent of unilateral or bilateral involvement. These results suggest that the pain have to be an assertive focus in the clinical practice, independent of the level of severity or involvement of knee osteoarthritis.