Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
2.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 142(12): 1357-64, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22130436

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is a congenital disorder that involves a somatic overgrowth during the patient's first years of life. Exomphalos, macroglossia and gigantism are the main clinical symptoms. CASE DESCRIPTION: The authors describe a 15-year follow-up in a patient with BWS. They focus on a multidisciplinary approach to treating the patient's oral manifestations from age 9 months. The approach included an initial physiotherapy treatment, a partial glossectomy, a first phase of orthopedic treatment with a tongue crib and chin cap, and a second phase of orthodontic treatment with an edgewise appliance. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: To obtain long-term positive and stable results, an appropriate treatment plan for patients with BWS and dentoskeletal alterations, including macroglossia, requires surgical tongue reduction when the patient is young, combined with physiotherapeutic phases and orthopedic and orthodontic treatment.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Boca/terapia , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Aparatos de Tracción Extraoral , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glosectomía , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Longitudinales , Macroglosia/cirugía , Macrostomía/terapia , Masculino , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III/terapia , Mandíbula/crecimiento & desarrollo , Maxilar/crecimiento & desarrollo , Terapia Miofuncional/instrumentación , Terapia Miofuncional/métodos , Mordida Abierta/terapia , Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico , Técnica de Expansión Palatina/instrumentación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Técnicas de Movimiento Dental
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20580576

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The influence of oral health status, the number of teeth extracted, and the anesthetic modality used is currently a matter of debate in the prevalence of bacteremia following dental extractions (BDE). The aim of the present study was to analyze the factors affecting the prevalence, duration, and etiology of BDE. STUDY DESIGN: Blood samples were collected from 210 patients at baseline, 30 seconds, 15 minutes, and 1 hour after performing dental extractions. Samples were processed in the Bactec 9240 and the subculture and further identification of the isolates were performed using conventional microbiological techniques. RESULTS: The prevalence of BDE at 30 seconds, 15 minutes, and 1 hour were 71%, 45%, and 12%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the "anesthetic modality" (local anesthesia versus general anesthesia) was the only variable related to BDE. CONCLUSION: General anesthesia represents a risk factor for BDE, increasing its prevalence and duration.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Dental , Anestesia General , Bacteriemia/etiología , Extracción Dental , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestesia Dental/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Cálculos Dentales/complicaciones , Caries Dental/complicaciones , Placa Dental/complicaciones , Femenino , Hemorragia Gingival/complicaciones , Humanos , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neisseria/clasificación , Absceso Periapical/complicaciones , Bolsa Periodontal/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Staphylococcus/clasificación , Streptococcus/clasificación , Factores de Tiempo , Extracción Dental/efectos adversos , Movilidad Dentaria/complicaciones , Adulto Joven
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19138640

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the oral health status of patients with mildly decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR). STUDY DESIGN: The study group comprised 80 adults with GFR 60-89 mL/min. A group of 80 age- and gender-matched control subjects with GFR > or =90 mL/min were selected. Medical history, clinical examination, and biochemistry blood tests were performed in patients and control subjects. Renal function was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. A single dentist performed an intraoral examination of each patient and control subject. RESULTS: No significant differences were detected between patients and controls in the number of decayed, missing, or filled teeth, supragingival plaque accumulation, calculus deposits, gingival inflammation, depth of periodontal pockets, clinical attachment loss, or dental mobility. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study on dental health in the early stages of chronic renal failure. The results suggest that in patients with mildly decreased GFR, there are no alterations of the oral health status.


Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Enfermedades Periodontales/etiología , Enfermedades Dentales/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Albuminuria/diagnóstico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Índice CPO , Cálculos Dentales/etiología , Placa Dental/etiología , Femenino , Gingivitis/etiología , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Bucal , Pérdida de la Inserción Periodontal/etiología , Bolsa Periodontal/etiología , Bolsa Periodontal/patología , Movilidad Dentaria/etiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Quintessence Int ; 40(2): 141-4, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19169446

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vivo antimicrobial activity of different forms of application of chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). METHOD AND MATERIALS: A group of 10 volunteers performed mouth rinsings with a 0.2% and 0.12% solution of CHX and applied CHX in the form of a 0.2% gel, a 0.2% and a 0.12% spray and a swab impregnated with a 0.2% solution. Samples of saliva were taken at baseline; 30 seconds; and 1, 3, 5, and 7 hours after each application. An epifluorescence microscopy technique (BacLight Live/Dead stain) was used to evaluate bacterial vitality. RESULTS: Bacterial vitality under basal conditions was 92%. At 30 seconds after CHX application, the lowest levels of viable bacteria were detected with the 0.2% and 0.12% solutions (1% and 8%, respectively). After 3 hours, the percentage of live bacteria achieved with the gel and sprays was similar to the basal figures (80% to 91%). At 7 hours, bacterial vitality recovered basal percentages, except with the 0.2% solution (77%). CONCLUSION: The 0.2% solution of CHX had the greatest sustained antimicrobial effect on the salivary flora, confirming the influence of the concentration and form of application on CHX substantivity.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Viabilidad Microbiana/efectos de los fármacos , Saliva/microbiología , Adulto , Aerosoles , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Geles , Humanos , Microscopía Fluorescente/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antisépticos Bucales , Adulto Joven
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12142872

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to evaluate the evidence implicating dental procedures in bacterial endocarditis (BE) development and the basis for antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP). STUDY DESIGN: In this article, the literature is reviewed and meaningful findings about epidemiology, pathogenesis, and AP guidelines for BE of oral origin are highlighted. Available results are used to formulate clinical recommendations for the dental practitioner. RESULTS: The nature of dental procedures that cause bacteremia, patients at risk for BE, and the effectiveness of AP guidelines, continue to be points of controversy. There appears to be further evidence to support the important role of oral health status in the prevention of BE of dental origin. CONCLUSIONS: One objective of the dental practitioner in caring for patients at risk for BE should be to promote oral health care. There are no hard data on which to scientifically base the need for AP in patients at risk for BE. However, it would appear prudent, at least from the medicolegal perspective, to provide AP, at least to persons with previous BE or prosthetic heart valves and to those undergoing oral surgery, periodontal treatment, or implant placement.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dental para Enfermos Crónicos , Endocarditis Bacteriana/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Atención Dental para Enfermos Crónicos/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Dental/efectos adversos , Endocarditis Bacteriana/etiología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/complicaciones , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...