Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
1.
Int J STD AIDS ; 25(5): 360-2, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24047881

RESUMEN

Effective asymptomatic screening for sexually transmitted infections is an important public health service because a significant proportion of sexually transmitted infections do not present with symptoms. In 2009, the National Audit Group of the British Association of Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) audited the management of asymptomatic patients and recommended increased documentation about oral and anal sex, regional strategies for nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) use for gonorrhoea, improved screening for hepatitis B in men who have sex with men and an increase in screening for HIV. The 2012 audit used web-based forms to collect submissions from 180 consultant-led centres (65% response rate) that included episodes of care from 6669 asymptomatic patients. An improvement was demonstrated for all the areas measured during the 2009 audit. A doubling of gonorrhoea testing using NAATs was seen and yet 10% of asymptomatic patients continued to have microscopy despite these tests not being recommended by BASHH guidelines. This audit recommends universal adoption of gonorrhoea NAATs across the United Kingdom.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Auditoría Médica , Anamnesis , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis , Femenino , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Salud Reproductiva , Reino Unido
2.
Int J STD AIDS ; 24(4): 273-7, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23970658

RESUMEN

We conducted a study of the prevalence, clinical features and microscopy findings, by retrospective case-notes survey, of six non-viral organisms, among 1718 attendees at a genitourinary (GU) medicine clinic in England. An in-house assay for six non-viral infections was used and quantitation of ureaplasmas performed. The prevalences of the six organisms were: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), 7.1%; Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), 0.6%; Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), 1.0%; Trichomonas vaginalis, 0.2%; Ureaplasma urealyticum, 16.1%; Ureaplasma parvum, 35.6%. Among men (but not women) there were significantly raised odds ratios compared with that for U. parvum, for the symptom of discharge with CT, 7.30; MG, 6.43; NG 19.29; dysuria with CT, 5.89 and MG, 5.95; and the microscopy finding of >4 pus cells per high power field with: CT, 7.22; MG, 4.58 and NG 22.31. Evaluation of a possible link between quantitation of U. urealyticum and urethritis did not confirm research findings elsewhere.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Genital/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Genital/microbiología , Vaginitis por Trichomonas/epidemiología , Trichomonas vaginalis/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Prevalencia , Infecciones del Sistema Genital/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vaginitis por Trichomonas/diagnóstico
3.
Int J STD AIDS ; 23(10): 742-7, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23104750

RESUMEN

A national audit of practice performance against the key performance indicators in the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) and HIV Medical Foundation for AIDS Sexual Health Standards for the Management of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) was conducted in 2011. Approximately 60% and 8% of level 3 and level 2 services, respectively, participated. Excluding partner notification performance, the five lowest areas of performance for level 3 clinics were the STI/HIV risk assessment, care pathways linking care in level 2 clinics to local level 3 services, HIV test offer to patients with concern about STIs, information governance and receipt of chlamydial test results by clinicians within seven working days (the worst area of performance). The five lowest areas of performance for level 2 clinics were participating in audit, having an audit plan for the management of STIs for 2009-2010, the STI/HIV risk assessment, HIV test offer to patients with concern about STIs and information governance. The results are discussed with regard to the importance of adoption of the standards by commissioners of services because of their relevance to other national quality assurance drivers, and the need for development of a national system of STI management quality assurance measurement and reporting.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Auditoría Médica , Salud Reproductiva/normas , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/terapia , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica , Trazado de Contacto , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Fundaciones , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Reino Unido/epidemiología
4.
Int J STD AIDS ; 23(10): 748-52, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23104751

RESUMEN

This paper reports on chlamydial partner notification (PN) performance in the 2011 BASHH national audit against the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) Medical Foundation for AIDS Sexual Health (MedFASH) Sexually Transmitted Infection Management Standards (STIMS). There was wide regional variation in level 3 clinic PN performance against the current standard of index case-reported chlamydial PN, with 43% (regional range 0-80%) of clinics outside London meeting the ≥0.6 contacts seen per index standard, and 85% of clinics (regional range 82-88%) in London meeting the ≥0.4 standard. For level 2 clinics, 39% (regional range 0-100%) of clinics outside London met the ≥0.6 standard, and 43% (regional range 40-50%) of clinics in London met the ≥0.4 standard. Performance for health-care worker (HCW)-verified contact attendance is also reported. New standards for each of these performance measures are proposed for all level 3 clinics: ≥0.6 contacts seen per index case based on index case report, and ≥0.4 contacts seen per index case based on HCW verification, both within four weeks of the first partner notification interview. The results are discussed with regard to the importance of adoption of standards by commissioners of services, relevance to national quality agendas, and the need for development of a national system of PN quality assurance measurement and reporting.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/prevención & control , Trazado de Contacto , Auditoría Médica , Salud Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/normas , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Fundaciones/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , Londres/epidemiología , Salud Reproductiva/normas
6.
Int J STD AIDS ; 23(3): 207-9, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22581876

RESUMEN

A focused repeat national audit of sexual history-taking was conducted in genitourinary (GU) medicine clinics in the UK in 2010, addressing several areas of practice under-performance identified in the baseline 2008 national audit. The case-notes of 4285 patients were audited. An increase in documentation was observed for all measures, except legibility which was unchanged. Despite the overall improvement, several measures (chaperone offer, condom usage and four of five aspects of HIV risk assessment) remained below target.


Asunto(s)
Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Anamnesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Anamnesis/normas , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/terapia , Reino Unido
7.
Int J STD AIDS ; 21(7): 506-11, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20852202

RESUMEN

A national audit of screening of asymptomatic patients seen in UK genitourinary medicine clinics in 2009 was conducted against the national guidelines. Data were aggregated by regions and clinics in regions, allowing practice to be compared within and between regions, as well as to national averages and against national guidelines. The case-notes of 4428 patients were audited. Performance was over 80% against the national guidelines for screening of asymptomatic heterosexual men, men who have sex with men (MSM) and women for chlamydial, gonorrhoeal, syphilis and HIV infections. However, the recommended method of endocervical culture for gonorrhoea was performed in only 65% of women, with a further one-quarter being screened with endocervical or vulvovaginal nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Although significant NAAT use for gonorrhoea was seen in all groups, testing for gonorrhoea by culture is still recommended as a first-line test on invasive samples. Over 80% of MSM, who were not known to be immune, were screened for hepatitis B. Urethral microscopy was performed in 22% of heterosexual men and 17% of MSM, and cervical microscopy in 12% of women.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Reino Unido , Adulto Joven
8.
Int J STD AIDS ; 21(7): 512-5, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20852203

RESUMEN

Of clinics responding to the audit, 99 and 97% have policies that are compliant with the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV National Guidelines for testing of asymptomatic men and women for HIV and syphilis, respectively. All clinics offer men, and all but one clinic offer women, screening for chlamydial infection with nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), as recommended by the guidelines. However, for gonorrhoea screening one-third of clinics offer men urine or urethral NAATs, and one quarter of clinics offer women endocervical, vulvovaginal or urinary NAATs, and not endocervical culture, and these practices are not compliant with the guidelines. Eight clinics did not specify whether they routinely offer testing for gonorrhoea in women. One-third of clinics routinely perform rectal and oropharyngeal screening for gonorrhoea in men who have sex with men (MSM), but fewer screen for chlamydia, regardless of sexual history which is stated as a determinant of offering screening at these anatomical sites. Finally, one-fifth of clinics offer urethral microscopy to asymptomatic heterosexual men and MSM, and about one half of clinics offer urethral culture for detection of gonorrhoea in asymptomatic women, even though these practices are not compliant with the guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Femenino , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Política Organizacional , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Recto/microbiología , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Reino Unido , Vagina/microbiología , Vulva/microbiología
9.
Int J STD AIDS ; 21(5): 317-9, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20498098

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is to gain an understanding of the services available to subjects of sexual assault at genitourinary medicine (GU medicine) clinics throughout the United Kingdom, and to determine whether these services are adequate. By means of a questionnaire, consultants in 106 clinics provided information on the number of patients who reported sexual assault and the services available to them. The study found a marked regional variation in attendances by subjects of sexual assault. However, only a minority of clinics kept accurate data (36.7% regarding female victims and 37.75% regarding male victims). The number of subjects who were aged under 16 years was disproportionately high (under 16s: 6.9% of female victims and 1.2% male victims; 16 and over: 1.3% of female victims and 0.14% of male victims). This survey highlights deficiencies in services that need to be addressed by clinics, management and the speciality.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Víctimas de Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud , Delitos Sexuales , Adolescente , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Distribución por Sexo , Reino Unido
10.
Int J STD AIDS ; 18(9): 617-21, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17785006

RESUMEN

High-risk subtypes of human papillomavirus (HPV) are the main causative agents of cervical cancer, for which Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) may sometimes be a co-factor. Vaccines have been developed against some subtypes of human papillomavirus and a vaccine against CT is in development. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of the subtypes of HPV and CT in genitourinary (GU) medicine clinic attenders. In total, 1000 consecutive patients attending the GU clinic participated in this anonymized point-prevalence study. Urethral swabs from 437 men and urethral plus cervical swabs as a single specimen from 563 women were tested for the subtypes of both organisms. Nested major outer membrane protein (MOMP) polymerase chain reaction detected CT chromosomal DNA in 44/437 (10%) of the men and 73/563 (13%) of the women. Genotypes E, F, and D were the most common. In all, 55/437 (13%) of men and 244/563 (43%) of women were infected with at least one high-risk HPV type. In conclusion, the new HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, would have protected against 58% and 45%, respectively, of the high-risk subtypes found in women in this population. The rate of high-risk HPV infection (43%) found in women in this study raises concern.


Asunto(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/genética , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alphapapillomavirus/clasificación , Infecciones por Chlamydia/complicaciones , Infecciones por Chlamydia/prevención & control , Chlamydia trachomatis/clasificación , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Epidemiología Molecular , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Filogenia , Prevalencia , Reino Unido/epidemiología
11.
Int J STD AIDS ; 17(4): 230-3, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16595044

RESUMEN

A questionnaire was circulated to all lead genitourinary (GU) medicine physicians in the UK in November 2003 to obtain data on access, waiting times and triaging. Of the 143 responders, 92.3% departments had limited access to some or all GU medicine clinics. Where access was limited, 5.3% had no identifiable process in place to see urgent patients. The mean waiting times in clinics with an open appointment system only for a routine female and male appointment were 2.9 weeks and 2.8 weeks (range 2 days-10 weeks), respectively, and for an urgent appointment, two days (range same day-14 days), for both sexes. The survey has raised concerns that a number of departments did not consider as urgent for prioritizing, patients with documented untreated gonorrhoea, syphilis, or HIV, or contacts of patients with these conditions. This survey has highlighted a need for the national specialist society to provide guidance on prioritizing patients where access is limited.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Citas y Horarios , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/terapia , Triaje , Urología/organización & administración , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Prioridades en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Medicina Estatal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Urología/normas , Listas de Espera
13.
Int J STD AIDS ; 16(5): 348-52, 2005 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15949063

RESUMEN

New diagnoses of syphilis in the UK increased eight-fold between 1997 and 2002. This study, conducted in 2002, demonstrated that 31% of clinics were not confident of their expertise to obtain an adequate specimen for dark ground microscopy (DGM), and 35% were not confident of their expertise to detect treponemes on DGM. In all, 64% of clinics had observed adherence problems in HIV-positive patients treated with parenteral regimens, as against 42% with oral regimens. Also, 51% of clinics waited more than a week for the results of initial serological tests for syphilis, and 88% of clinics waited more than a week for confirmatory test results. Other concerns include the failure to perform syphilis serology consistently whenever HIV-positive patients were at risk, and the widespread use of doxycycline as a therapy for syphilis in HIV-positive patients despite concerns that this is not known to be fully treponemicidal in cerebrospinal fluid.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo , Sífilis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Enfermedades Urogenitales Femeninas , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades Urogenitales Masculinas , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sífilis/microbiología , Serodiagnóstico de la Sífilis , Reino Unido
15.
Sex Transm Infect ; 79(3): 240-2, 2003 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12794212

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to examine the variation in clinical practice in genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom in early 2002. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to all 234 consultants in charge of genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom in March-May 2002. The questions concerned clinical practice in respect of asymptomatic patients presenting for an infection screen, and practice in respect of some specific sexually transmitted and other genitourinary infections. RESULTS: The test for infection least likely to be offered to heterosexuals is an HIV test (71% and 70% of clinics routinely offer this to male and female heterosexuals respectively). The practice of permitting "low risk" patients to telephone for their HIV results now extends to 24% of clinics. 34% of clinics do not require patients with non-specific urethritis to attend for follow up. 41% of clinics routinely ask patients treated for Chlamydia trachomatis to return for a follow up chlamydia detection test. 25% of clinics routinely offer two tests of cure to all patients with gonorrhoea. 6% of clinics do not routinely offer syphilis serology to heterosexuals. Other significant variations in clinical practice were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings indicate the need for further evidence to guide clinical practice and a wider knowledge and debate of national guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Venereología/normas , Consultores , Femenino , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Homosexualidad Masculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido , Uretritis/diagnóstico
16.
Sex Transm Infect ; 78(2): 130-2, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12081175

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency and nature of requests for post-exposure prophylaxis following nonoccupational exposure (NONOPEP) to HIV and to describe variations in practice and opinions on the need for its administration at UK genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. METHOD: A retrospective survey was carried out of physicians representative of all UK GUM clinics using self completed questionnaires requesting information for January to December 1999. The number of requests for NONOPEP, reasons for the requests, the number prescribed, and physician opinions regarding the justification for its administration were noted. RESULTS: The number of requests and prescriptions for NONOPEP increased fourfold and sevenfold respectively in comparison with a survey from 1997. Of 242 requests, 130 people were prescribed NONOPEP. Half the requests followed sexual exposures between known HIV discordant couples. Requests for NONOPEP were received by 56 of 132 (42%) clinics, with nine clinics receiving over half of them (145/242, 60%). Similarly, over half the prescriptions for NONOPEP (83/130, 64%) were given by six of 39 prescribing clinics. Most physicians thought that post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) was justified for people exposed to a known HIV positive source patient resulting from sexual assault or unprotected receptive anal or penovaginal sex. CONCLUSION: The use of NONOPEP has increased since the last survey and there is considerable variation between GUM clinics in practice and beliefs regarding administration of NONOPEP.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Ambulatoria , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Premedicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido
20.
Genitourin Med ; 73(1): 12-5, 1997 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9155548

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the evidence for value of using epidemiological treatment and of using tests of cure in the management of gonococcal infections. METHODS: Medline was used to search the literature for well-conducted studies that had a bearing on the evaluation of these issues. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological treatment is treatment given to named contacts of patients after a history of exposure to disease but without or in advance of confirmatory pathological findings. It may be given when the clinician considers that the risk to the patient of unnecessary treatment is outweighed by the risk of complications of the infection or the probability of transmission of the infection to other contacts. It may be appropriate where detection by microscopy is relatively unreliable such as when infection of the cervix, rectum, or pharynx is suspected. If epidemiological treatment is given, then it does not obviate the need for confirmatory tests to be sent, tests of cure to be done, or for contact tracing. At least one test of cure is mandatory following treatment of gonorrhoea. The test of cure in women should include a blind rectal swab. For infection of the pharynx and rectum the chances of a false negative test of cure are higher and, therefore, more than one test of cure is required. An additional test of cure is also necessary in patients with salpingitis or disseminated gonococcal infection. This paper is a discussion of two interrelated issues in the management of gonorrhoea. It is based on two presentations by the author at a workshop organised by Dr Mark Fitzgerald entitled Development of audit measures and guidelines for good practice in the management of gonorrhoea and held at the Royal College of Physicians, London, in May 1995. The conclusions reached are based on the consensus view of the participants. For simplicity the two issues are dealt with consecutively.


Asunto(s)
Trazado de Contacto , Gonorrea/terapia , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economía , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/normas , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Salud Global , Gonorrea/complicaciones , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/complicaciones , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...