Multicentric Standardization of Protocols for the Diagnosis of Human Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Defects.

The quantification of mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) enzymatic activities is essential for diagnosis of a wide range of mitochondrial diseases, ranging from inherited defects to secondary dysfunctions. MRC lesion is frequently linked to extended cell damage through the generation of proton leak or oxidative stress, threatening organ viability and patient health. However, the intrinsic challenge of a methodological setup and the high variability in measuring MRC enzymatic activities represents a major obstacle for comparative analysis amongst institutions. To improve experimental and statistical robustness, seven Spanish centers with extensive experience in mitochondrial research and diagnosis joined to standardize common protocols for spectrophotometric MRC enzymatic measurements using minimum amounts of sample. Herein, we present the detailed protocols, reference ranges, tips and troubleshooting methods for experimental and analytical setups in different sample preparations and tissues that will allow an international standardization of common protocols for the diagnosis of MRC defects. Methodological standardization is a crucial step to obtain comparable reference ranges and international standards for laboratory assays to set the path for further diagnosis and research in the field of mitochondrial diseases.

Implementation of second-tier tests in newborn screening for the detection of vitamin B12 related acquired and genetic disorders: results on 258,637 newborns.

BACKGROUND: Alteration of vitamin B12 metabolism can be genetic or acquired, and can result in anemia, failure to thrive, developmental regression and even irreversible neurologic damage. Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention is critical. Most of the neonatal cases with acquired vitamin B12 deficiency have been detected by clinical symptoms and only few of them trough NBS programs. We aim to assess the usefulness of the second-tier test: methylmalonic acid (MMA), methylcitric acid (MCA) and homocysteine (Hcys) in our newborn screening program and explore the implications on the detection of cobalamin (vitamin B12) related disorders, both genetic and acquired conditions. METHODS: A screening strategy using the usual primary markers followed by the analysis of MMA, MCA and Hcys as second tier-test in the first dried blood spot (DBS) was developed and evaluated. RESULTS: During the period 2015-2018 a total of 258,637 newborns were screened resulting in 130 newborns with acquired vitamin B12 deficiency (incidence 1:1989), 19 with genetic disorders (incidence 1:13,613) and 13 were false positive. No false negatives were notified. Concerning the second-tier test, the percentage of cases with MMA above the cut-off levels, both for genetic and acquired conditions was very similar (58% and 60%, respectively). Interestingly, the percentage of cases with increased levels of Hcys was higher in acquired conditions than in genetic disorders (87% and 47%, respectively). In contrast, MCA was high only in 5% of the acquired conditions versus in 53% of the genetic disorders, and it was always very high in all patients with propionic acidemia. CONCLUSIONS: When screening for methylmalonic acidemia and homocystinuria, differential diagnosis with acquired vitamin B12 deficiency should be done. The results of our strategy support the inclusion of this acquired condition in the NBS programs, as it is easily detectable and allows the adoption of corrective measures to avoid the consequences of its deficiency.

Leigh syndrome associated with TRMU gene mutations.

tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase (TRMU) deficiency causes an early onset potentially reversible acute liver failure, so far reported in less than 30 patients. We describe two new unrelated patients with an acute liver failure and a neuroimaging compatible with Leigh syndrome (LS) due to TRMU deficiency, a combination not previously reported. Our report enlarges the phenotypical spectrum of TRMU disease.

Analytical and Biological Variability of Urinary Epidermal Growth Factor-to-Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Urinary levels of epidermal growth factor to creatinine ratio are considered as an early predictor of interstitial kidney fibrosis but so far no data are available on their biological variation (BV) and derived parameters. The aim of this study is to determine the BV of epidermal growth factor to creatinine ratio in patients with chronic kidney disease and in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 150 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 150 healthy volunteers (HV). In both groups, spot second-morning urine samples were collected once a week for 4 consecutive weeks. Measurements of EGF were done by ELISA and expressed as EGF/creatinine ratio. The components of BV, individuality index (II), and reference change values (RCV) were calculated. RESULTS: The analytical coefficient of variation (CVa) of EGF/creatinine ratio was 3.8% in patients with CKD and 3.9% in HV. The within-patient variation coefficient (CVw) was 11.2% in CKD and 12.1% in HV. The between-patient coefficient of variation (CVg) was 34% in CKD and 22% in HV. In both groups, CVa met the optimum analytical quality specifications for imprecision, since it was lower than 25% of CVw. There were no significant differences between CKD and HV in the analytical or in the within-patient variances of the EGF/creatinine ratio. The between-patient EGF/creatinine ratio variance was significantly higher in patients with CKD than in HV (F: 48.3, p: 0.000). The EGF/creatinine ratio showed an individuality index (II) of 0.3 in CKD and 0.5 in HV. The reference change value (RCV) was 29.2% in CKD and 31.6% in HV. CONCLUSIONS: The CVa associated with the measurement techniques used in our study meets the optimal criteria of analytical imprecision. The urine EGF/creatinine ratio shows a high index of individuality both in patients with CKD and in HV, so the comparison of an isolated value with a reference interval is of little use. In the monitoring of repeated levels in the same individual or patient, the changes can only be considered significant when they are greater than 30% in relation to the previous values.

Accuracy of Urinary Epidermal Growth Factor to Creatinine Ratio to Predict 24-Hour Urine Epidermal Growth Factor and Interstitial Kidney Fibrosis in Patients with IgA Nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Urinary levels of EGF may be a noninvasive biomarker of the degree of interstitial fibrosis. However, all the available data are based on studies that examined the EGF/creatinine ratio in spot urine samples. The agreement between EGF/creatinine ratio and 24-hours EGF excretion has not been analyzed, neither has it been established which of these two measurements is a better predictor of the degree of interstitial fibrosis. To investigate whether the EGF/creatinine ratio can predict 24-hours EGF, and which of these two measures is a better predictor of interstitial fibrosis in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including 80 patients with IgAN. EGF levels were measured by ELISA in spot second-morning and 24-hours urine samples. We analyzed the concordance between these two measures and their respective ability to predict interstitial kidney fibrosis. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient between 24-hours and spot EGF/creatinine was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54 - 0.70), bias was 2.7 µg/mL (95% CI: 2.1 - 7.5). Passing-Bablok regression did not show a significant deviation from linearity (p = 0.72). Bland-Altman showed a systematic and proportional error between both EGF measures. Spot EGF/creatinine ratios overestimated the 24-hours EGF at low excretion values and underestimated it at high excretion values. In univariate analyses, 24-hours excretion of EGF was a better predictor of interstitial fibrosis than spot EGF/creatinine ratio (R2: 0.43 vs. 0.30, p = 0.000). In multivariate analyses, the 24-hours excretion of EGF plus GFR, significantly improved the prediction of interstitial fibrosis when compared with GFR alone (R2: 0.52 vs. 0.39, p = 0.000). When spot-urine EGF was introduced instead of the 24-hours excretion, the model was statistically significant but had a lower predictive capacity (R2: 0.46 spot EGF/creatinine vs. R2: 0.52 24-hours EGF excretion, p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The 24-hours excretion of EGF should be considered as the first-choice measure to estimate the interstitial fibrosis. The EGF/creatinine ratio cannot accurately estimate the total EGF excretion of but it also improves the estimation of the fibrosis surface, and, consequently, could be an alternative whenever 24-hours urine samples cannot be obtained.

Mesangial C4d Deposits in Early IgA Nephropathy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prognostic value of mesangial C4d deposits in IgA nephropathy has been analyzed in patients with reduced GFR but has not been analyzed in those with normal kidney function. The main objective of the study was to analyze the prognostic value of C4d deposits and association with response to treatment in patients with IgA nephropathy and normal GFR. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective cohort study included 190 patients with idiopathic IgA nephropathy diagnosed by kidney biopsy between 1988 and 2005. The patients had GFR≥80 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at the time of diagnosis, and they had a paraffin-embedded kidney biopsy with eight glomeruli available. RESULTS: In total, 170 (89%) and 20 (11%) patients were >18 and <18 years old, respectively; median (interquartile range) follow-up was 15 (12-22) years. Mesangial C4d deposit prevalence was 20% (38 of 190). At diagnosis, C4d-positive versus -negative patients had higher protein-to-creatinine ratio (median [interquartile range]: 1.94 g/g [0.9-3.1] versus 1.45 g/g [0.9-2.2]; P=0.04). During follow-up, C4d-positive patients showed a higher number of nephritic flares (median [range]: 1.4 [0-5] versus 0.9 [0-2]; P=0.04), had a higher protein-to-creatinine ratio (median [interquartile range]: 1.32 g/g [0.7-1.7] versus 0.89 g/g [0.1-1.3]; P<0.01), were more prone to receive repeated treatment with corticosteroids (45% versus 24%; P<0.01), and showed a larger reduction in eGFR (-1.6 versus -0.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year; P=0.04). Furthermore, the presence of mesangial C4d deposits was an independent predictor of long-term kidney survival. CONCLUSIONS: C4d deposits may be one of the earliest poor prognostic variables available for patients with idiopathic IgA nephropathy and normal kidney function at the time of diagnosis. However, Cd4 deposits alone are not associated with the response to angiotensin blockers or corticosteroid treatment.

Valor diagnóstico de los niveles séricos del receptor soluble de la uroquinasa en adultos con síndrome nefrótico idiopático / Diagnostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor serum levels in adults with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Introducción: Estudios recientes sugieren que los niveles del receptor soluble de la uroquinasa (suPAR) podrían ser útiles para diferenciar la glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria (GFS) idiopática de otras glomerulopatías causantes de síndrome nefrótico, pero estos datos no han sido confirmados en estudios independientes. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es analizar si los niveles circulantes de suPAR son útiles para identificar la enfermedad renal primaria en enfermos afectos de síndrome nefrótico secundario a GFS, enfermedad por cambios mínimos o nefropatía membranosa (NM) idiopática. Métodos: Se realizaron mediciones de niveles de suPAR circulante en el momento del diagnóstico en 60 pacientes con síndrome nefrótico secundario a GFS, enfermedad por cambios mínimos (ECM) y NM. Se analizaron las correlaciones entre niveles de suPAR y variables demográficas, clínicas y bioquímicas. La sensibilidad y la especificidad de suPAR para diferenciar a los enfermos con GFS se analizaron mediante curvas ROC. Resultados: Tras ajustar por edad y función renal, los niveles de suPAR fueron significativamente más elevados en enfermos con GFS que en ECM (p < 0,001), pero no hubo diferencias entre GFS y NM (p = 0,12). Un valor de suPAR ≥ 3452 pg/ml tuvo una sensibilidad del 73,7 % y una especificidad del 72,5 %, con un área bajo la curva (ABC) de 0,782 ± 0,124, p = 0,001, para identificar a los enfermos con GFS. Tras excluir a los enfermos con NM, un valor ≥ 3531 pg/ml tuvo una especificidad del 99,93 % para diferenciar entre ECM y GFS. Conclusiones: Los valores de suPAR por sí solos no diferencian entre los tres tipos de glomerulopatía. Sin embargo, tras excluir el diagnóstico de NM, un nivel de suPAR > 3531 pg/ml podría tener una elevada especificidad (pero baja sensibilidad) para el diagnóstico de GFS

Introduction: Recent studies suggest that soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels could be useful for distinguishing idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) from other glomerulopathies that cause nephrotic syndrome, but these data have not been confirmed in independent studies. The objective of our study is to analyse whether circulating levels of suPAR are useful for identifying primary kidney disease in patients with nephrotic syndrome secondary to FSGS, minimal change disease or idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN). Methods: We measured circulating suPAR at diagnosis in 60 patients with nephrotic syndrome secondary to FSGS, minimal change disease (MCD) and membranous nephropathy (MN). The correlations between suPAR levels and demographic, clinical and biochemical variables were analysed. The sensitivity and specificity of suPAR in distinguishing FSGS patients were analysed by ROC curves. Results: After adjusting for age and renal function, suPAR levels were significantly higher in patients with FSGS than in those with MCD (p<.001), but there were no differences between FSGS and MN (P=.12). A suPAR value ≥3452pg/ml had a sensitivity of 73.7% and a specificity of 72.5%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.782±0.124, p=.001, for identifying patients with FSGS. After excluding patients with MN, a value ≥3531pg/ml had a specificity of 99.93% for distinguishing between MCD and FSGS. Conclusions: suPAR values alone do not distinguish between the three types of glomerulopathy. Nevertheless, after excluding the diagnosis of MN, a suPAR level >3531pg/ml could have a high specificity (but a low sensitivity) in the diagnosis of FSGS

Valor de los niveles séricos del receptor soluble de la uroquinasa en el diagnóstico diferencial entre glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria idiopática y secundaria / Value of soluble urokinase receptor serum levels in the differential diagnosis between idiopathic and secondary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

Antecedentes: Se ha descrito que el nivel circulante del receptor soluble de la uroquinasa (suPAR) podría ser útil para diferenciar la glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria idiopática de las formas secundarias, pero los resultados publicados son discordantes. En el presente estudio, se analiza la variabilidad intraindividual, las variables clínicas y anatomopatológicas asociadas con los niveles de suPAR y si los niveles circulantes de suPAR permiten diferenciar las formas de glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria (GFS) idiopáticas de las GFS secundarias, independientemente de la presencia de síndrome nefrótico y de la fase de actividad. Métodos: Se estudiaron 35 pacientes afectos de GFS idiopática y 48 con GFS secundaria (83 en total). Se realizaron mediciones de suPAR circulante en el momento del diagnóstico y/o tras la remisión y se analizaron las correlaciones entre niveles de suPAR y variables demográficas, clínicas y bioquímicas. La capacidad de suPAR para diferenciar entre ambas formas de GFS se analizó mediante curvas ROC y análisis de regresión logística. Resultados: En ambas formas de GFS, los niveles de suPAR fueron independientes de la proteinuria y del subtipo histopatológico de GFS y se asociaron significativamente a la edad y a la función renal. Tras ajustar por ambas variables, los niveles de suPAR fueron significativamente superiores en los enfermos con GFS idiopática, tanto en fase de síndrome nefrótico como en situación de remisión parcial o total. El nivel de suPAR con mayor sensibilidad (80 %) y mayor especificidad (73 %) para discriminar entre formas idiopáticas y secundarias fue de 3443,6 pg/ml (área bajo la curva [ABC] 0,78 ± 0,083, p < 0,001). En el análisis de regresión logística, tras ajustar por edad, función renal y presencia de síndrome nefrótico, los niveles de suPAR se asociaron de forma independiente con el diagnóstico de GFS idiopática, pero el modelo tuvo un mal ajuste para categorías de riesgo bajas, en las que tendió a clasificar las formas primarias como secundarias (χ 2 = 11,2 p = 0,027). Conclusiones: Los niveles de suPAR carecen de sensibilidad para diferenciar entre GFS idiopática y secundaria. Sin embargo, valores de suPAR superiores a 4000 ng/ml son altamente específicos de GFS primaria, por lo que, ante un patrón morfológico de GFS asociado a proteinuria no nefrótica, indicarían una baja probabilidad de GFS secundaria (AU)

Background: It has been reported that the circulating level of the soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) could be useful for distinguishing idiopathic from secondary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, but the results published are conflicting. In this study, we analyse the intraindividual variability and clinical and anatomopathological variables associated with the suPAR levels and if circulating suPAR levels allow the different forms of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) to be distinguished, i.e., idiopathic forms from secondary FSGS, regardless of the presence of nephrotic syndrome and the activity phase. Method: We studied 35 patients affected by idiopathic FSGS and 48 with secondary FSGS (83 in total). We carried out measurements of circulating suPAR at the time of diagnosis and/or after remission and we analysed correlations between suPAR levels and demographic, clinical and biochemical variables. The ability of suPAR to distinguish between both forms of FSGS was analysed by ROC curves and logistic regression analysis. Results: In both forms of FSGS, suPAR levels were independent of proteinuria and the histopathological subtype of FSGS and they were significantly associated with age and renal function. After adjusting for both variables, suPAR levels were significantly higher in patients with idiopathic FSGS, both in the nephrotic syndrome phase and in partial or complete remission. The most sensitive suPAR level (80%) and the most specific (73%) for discriminating between idiopathic and secondary forms was 3443.6pg/ml (area below curve [ABC] 0.78±0.083, P<.001). In the logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for age, renal function and presence of nephrotic syndrome, suPAR levels were independently associated with the diagnosis of idiopathic FSGS, but the model was poorly adjusted for low risk categories in which it tended to classify primary forms as secondary forms (χ 2 = 11.2 p=.027). Conclusions: SuPAR levels lack sensitivity for differentiating between idiopathic and secondary FSGS. However, suPAR values greater than 4000ng/ml are highly specific to primary FSGS, and as such, with a morphological FSGS pattern associated with non-nephrotic proteinuria, they would indicate a low probability of secondary FSGS (AU)

[Diagnostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor serum levels in adults with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome]. / Valor diagnóstico de los niveles séricos del receptor soluble de la uroquinasa en adultos con síndrome nefrótico idiopático.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggest that soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels could be useful for distinguishing idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) from other glomerulopathies that cause nephrotic syndrome, but these data have not been confirmed in independent studies. The objective of our study is to analyse whether circulating levels of suPAR are useful for identifying primary kidney disease in patients with nephrotic syndrome secondary to FSGS, minimal change disease or idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN). METHODS: We measured circulating suPAR at diagnosis in 60 patients with nephrotic syndrome secondary to FSGS, minimal change disease (MCD) and membranous nephropathy (MN). The correlations between suPAR levels and demographic, clinical and biochemical variables were analysed. The sensitivity and specificity of suPAR in distinguishing FSGS patients were analysed by ROC curves. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and renal function, suPAR levels were significantly higher in patients with FSGS than in those with MCD (p<.001), but there were no differences between FSGS and MN (P=.12). A suPAR value ≥3452 pg/ml had a sensitivity of 73.7% and a specificity of 72.5%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.782 ± 0.124, p=.001, for identifying patients with FSGS. After excluding patients with MN, a value ≥3531 pg/ml had a specificity of 99.93% for distinguishing between MCD and FSGS. CONCLUSIONS: suPAR values alone do not distinguish between the three types of glomerulopathy. Nevertheless, after excluding the diagnosis of MN, a suPAR level >3531 pg/ml could have a high specificity (but a low sensitivity) in the diagnosis of FSGS.

[Value of soluble urokinase receptor serum levels in the differential diagnosis between idiopathic and secondary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis]. / Valor de los niveles séricos del receptor soluble de la uroquinasa en el diagnóstico diferencial entre glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria idiopática y secundaria.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that the circulating level of the soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) could be useful for distinguishing idiopathic from secondary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, but the results published are conflicting. In this study, we analyse the intraindividual variability and clinical and anatomopathological variables associated with the suPAR levels and if circulating suPAR levels allow the different forms of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) to be distinguished, i.e., idiopathic forms from secondary FSGS, regardless of the presence of nephrotic syndrome and the activity phase. METHOD: We studied 35 patients affected by idiopathic FSGS and 48 with secondary FSGS (83 in total). We carried out measurements of circulating suPAR at the time of diagnosis and/or after remission and we analysed correlations between suPAR levels and demographic, clinical and biochemical variables. The ability of suPAR to distinguish between both forms of FSGS was analysed by ROC curves and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In both forms of FSGS, suPAR levels were independent of proteinuria and the histopathological subtype of FSGS and they were significantly associated with age and renal function. After adjusting for both variables, suPAR levels were significantly higher in patients with idiopathic FSGS, both in the nephrotic syndrome phase and in partial or complete remission. The most sensitive suPAR level (80%) and the most specific (73%) for discriminating between idiopathic and secondary forms was 3443.6 pg/ml (area below curve [ABC] 0.78 ± 0.083, P<.001). In the logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for age, renal function and presence of nephrotic syndrome, suPAR levels were independently associated with the diagnosis of idiopathic FSGS, but the model was poorly adjusted for low risk categories in which it tended to classify primary forms as secondary forms (χ(2) = 11.2 p=.027). CONCLUSIONS: SuPAR levels lack sensitivity for differentiating between idiopathic and secondary FSGS. However, suPAR values greater than 4000 ng/ml are highly specific to primary FSGS, and as such, with a morphological FSGS pattern associated with non-nephrotic proteinuria, they would indicate a low probability of secondary FSGS.