Immediate Sequential Bilateral Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery Is Safe and Effective.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical outcomes and safety profiles of patients who underwent immediate sequential bilateral phakic lens surgery. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 254 consecutive patients (508 eyes) who underwent bilateral same-day Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) surgery. The authors focused on 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes and adverse events. RESULTS: In the initial cohort, 176 patients (352 eyes) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 335 eyes underwent myopic ICL placement, and 17 eyes received a hyperopic ICL. Notably, 87% of eyes achieved ±0.50 diopters (D) and 95% achieved ±1.00 D of the intended refraction. One year postoperatively, 78% of eyes demonstrated optimal vaulting (250 to 750 µm), with a significant 19% reduction in vaulting observed over the 12 months (P < .001). Only minor adverse events, including early cataract formation (1 case), secondary toric ICL rotation (3 cases), and ICL exchange due to inappropriate vaulting (6 cases), were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The findings corroborate the safety and efficacy of immediate sequential bilateral phakic lens surgery and indicate its potential as a treatment option. The low incidence of minor adverse events further reinforces its favorable safety profile. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e313-e320.].

Suboptimal visual outcome after femto-LASIK ablation in a high myopic patient.

A 28-year-old nurse had an aberration-free femto-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed for her myopia of -6.25 -0.50 × 096 and -6.75 -0.50 × 175 in the right and left eye, respectively. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) preoperatively was 20/16. Preoperatively, there were no abnormalities on Scheimpflug imaging, and a pachymetry of 585 µm was measured in both eyes. Flap thickness was 115 µm. The patient was quite nervous during the surgery. Since the surgery, her uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and CDVA are suboptimal at 20/30 and 20/20 in the right eye, and 20/20 and 20/16 in the left eye. 3 months postoperatively, there is a stable manifest refraction of +0.25 -1.25 × 030 and +0.25 -0.00 × 0. The keratometric astigmatism in the Scheimpflug imaging is 1.2 diopter (D) × 114 and 0.4 D × 78 in the right and left eyes, respectively (FIgures 1 and 2). Thinnest pachymetry is 505 µm and 464 µm in the right and left eye, respectively. Her wavefront analysis shows refraction in a 6 mm zone of -0.99 -1.22 × 32 and -0.91 -0.36 × 136. The cycloplegic refraction is 1.25 -1.00 × 023 and +1.00 -0.25 × 006 (Figures 3 and 4). What is the cause of the suboptimal visual outcome in this case? What would be your treatment strategy to improve visual outcome?

Recommendation for Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: A Delphi Consensus Statement by the ESASO Study Group.

PURPOSE: To establish consensus among experts in lens and refractive surgery to guide general ophthalmologists on issues related to presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). DESIGN: A modified Delphi method to reach a consensus among experts. METHODS: A steering committee formulated 105 relevant items grouped into four sections (preoperative considerations, IOL selection, intraoperative considerations, and postoperative considerations). The consensus was defined as ≥ 70% of experts agreeing with the evaluation of a statement. RESULTS: Ten experts participated and completed all rounds of questionnaires (100% response rate). Of 68 items considered in the preoperative considerations, consensus was achieved in 48 (70.6%). There was a lack of consensus over IOL selection, the experts only agreed on the importance of the patient's habits for the optical IOL design selection. Of the 14 considerations related to intraoperative issues, the experts reached a consensus on 10 (71.4%). The postoperative considerations section reached the highest consensus in 10 items of 13 (76.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Key recommendations for a diffractive multifocal IOL were a potential postoperative visual acuity > 0.5, a keratometry between 40-45 diopters, a pupil >2.8 mm under photopic conditions and <6.0 mm under scotopic conditions, a root mean square of higher order corneal aberrations <0.5 µm for 6-mm pupil size, while monofocal or non-diffractive IOLs should be considered for patients with coexisting eye disorders. A lack of agreement was found in the issues related to the IOL selection.

Effects of Serial Sessions of Activa Mask for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: To analyze outcomes on objective ocular surface parameters and subjective symptoms of serial weekly sessions using the Activa mask in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: This is a prospective study including patients with symptomatic MGD who were treated with four weekly sessions using the Activa mask (SBM Sistemi, Turin, Italy). Noninvasive ocular surface examination was carried out before (T0) and 2 weeks after the last mask session (T1) using Idra (SBM Sistemi, Turin, Italy) for the measurement of: (1) noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT); (2) lipid layer thickness (LLT); (3) tear meniscus height (TMH); (4) meibomian gland loss (MGL) of upper and lower eyelids. The I-Pen tear osmolarity system (I-Med Pharma Inc, Dollard-des Ormeaux, Quebec, Canada) was used to measure tear osmolarity values. Ocular discomfort symptoms were ascertained by means of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. RESULTS: All 25 patients (11 males, 14 females; mean age 57.1 ± 11.9 years) regularly completed the cycle of four mask sessions. No patients used prohibited medications, and no device-related adverse events were noted. At T1, mean values of NIBUT and LLT increased significantly compared to T0 (respectively from 6.0 ± 1.4 to 6.6 ± 1.2 s, P = 0.043, and from 53.2 ± 17.4 to 65.3 ± 16.3 nm, P < 0.001), while mean values of MGL and tear osmolarity decreased significantly (respectively from 17.1 ± 9.3 to 15.1 ± 8.0%, P = 0.014, and from 307.3 ± 12.2 to 301.5 ± 6.8 mOsm/l, P = 0.005). In parallel, OSDI score reduced significantly from 62.4 ± 11.7 at T0 to 34.5 ± 11.2 at T1 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Weekly serial sessions using the Activa mask significantly improved objective parameters of the ocular surface as well as subjective ocular discomfort symptoms in patients with recalcitrant MGD. As a further benefit from the treatment, patients were able to avoid the use of concomitant medications, apart from tear substitutes, throughout the study.

Outcomes of serial sessions of Activa mask combined with intense pulsed light therapy in patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effects on ocular surface signs and symptoms of serial sessions of heating and vibrating eye mask followed by intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for the treatment of dry eye disease owing to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: Consecutive patients with MGD whose signs and symptoms were not satisfactorily controlled with conventional therapy were included. Patients received 3 treatments performed at day 1, 15, and 45 incorporating a session with a newly-developed eye mask (Activa, SBS Sistemi, Turin, Italy) immediately followed by IPL therapy (E > Eye device, E-Swin, Paris, France). Patients were examined before the first session (T0) and 30 days after the last session (T1) for the measurement of: noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT); lipid layer thickness (LLT); tear meniscus height (TMH); meibomian gland loss (MGL); tear osmolarity. Ocular discomfort symptoms were ascertained by ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirty patients were ultimately included in the study. At T1, all objective ocular surface parameters improved significantly, except for TMH: NIBUT and LLT increased from 6.4 ± 1.7 to 8.6 ± 1.7 s and from 57.7 ± 15.5 to 81.3 ± 12.0 µm (all P < 0.001), while MGL and tear osmolarity decreased from 21.1 ± 17.3 to 17.0 ± 14.1% and from 302.0 ± 8.5 to 295.7 ± 6.9 mOsm/L (respectively, P = 0.004 and P < 0.001). In parallel, OSDI score decreased significantly from 49.8 ± 13.5 to 29.8 ± 10.6 (P < 0.001). In the historical control group of patients who underwent only IPL, NIBUT, LLT, tear osmolarity and OSDI improved significantly but not MGL and TMH. CONCLUSIONS: Serial sessions incorporating the application of an eye mask producing heating and vibration immediately followed by IPL therapy are able to improve all ocular surface parameters as well as ocular discomfort symptoms in MGD patients.

Effects of a New Formulation of Multiple-Action Tear Substitute on Objective Ocular Surface Parameters and Ocular Discomfort Symptoms in Patients with Dry Eye Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, there has been a progressive shift from simple water-adding medications towards complex multi-action combined formulas aimed at disrupting different mechanisms within the dry eye disease (DED) vicious cycle. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of Trimix eye drops (Off Health Italia, Italy), a combination of viscosity-enhancing hyaluronic acid, trehalose, and cationic liposomes comprising stearylamine and phospholipids, in patients with DED. METHODS: In this prospective, pilot study patients diagnosed with mild to moderate DED were enrolled and treated with Trimix eye drops three times daily for 2 months. Ocular surface workup was performed before (V0) and after therapy (V1) by means of IDRA (SBM Sistemi, Turin, Italy), for the measurement of (i) noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT); (ii) tear meniscus height (TMH); (iii) lipid layer thickness (LLT); (iv) infrared meibography (percentage of meibomian gland loss); (v) bulbar redness (Efron scale). Treatment tolerability was scored on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (none/not at all) to 100 (much/very) for eight questions. Ocular discomfort symptoms were scored using the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 25 subjects (mean age 60.32 ± 14.55 years) were included in the study. At V1, TMH, NIBUT, and LLT significantly increased compared to V0 (from 0.29 ± 0.06 to 0.46 ± 0.06 mm, 6.34 ± 2.61 to 7.58 ± 2.52 s, and from 63.26 ± 17.15 to 68.42 ± 15.63 nm, respectively; all P < 0.04). Concerning ocular discomfort symptoms, SPEED score significantly improved at V1 (from 16.63 ± 6.32 to 8.30 ± 5.98; P < 0.001); moreover, treatment tolerability was high for all eight items investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Two-month treatment with Trimix formulation improved objective signs and subjective symptoms in patients with DED, showing also a good tolerability profile.

Glasses-Assisted 3D Display System-Guided Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue Preparation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue preparation using a glasses-assisted 3-dimensional (3D) display system and to compare it with a conventional surgical microscope. METHODS: Healthy pairs of human corneas suitable for penetrating keratoplasty surgery were selected for this study. The tissues were randomly divided into 2 groups. Each pair of corneas had 1 cornea (group 1) prepared with NGENUITY (Alcon) with a 5-second staining time with vision blue, and the fellow cornea (group 2) was prepared using a OPMI Lumera 700 surgical microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) with a 30-second staining time. DMEK graft preparation time, speed of stripping, graft width, and endothelial cell loss were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-eight pairs of corneas were included in this study. The graft preparation time was significantly higher in the 3D group than in the conventional group (498 ± 147 vs. 418 ± 85 seconds, P value = 0.031). The mean speed of stripping was 0.59 ± 0.081 mm/s in group 1 and 0.089 ± 0.005 mm/s in group 2 ( P value = 0.024). The mean endothelial cell density in group 1 and group 2 before tissue preparation was 2162 ± 115.21 and 2153 ± 122.45, respectively ( P value > 0.1). After tissue preparation, the endothelial cell density reduced to 1911 ± 150.72 in group 1 and 1998 ± 90.72 in group 2 ( P value = P value > 0.05). The graft width was 5.05 ± 0.71 mm in group 1 and 4.92 ± 0.23 mm in group 2 ( P value > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK tissue preparation with 3D display system NGENUITY is feasible with a slightly increased preparation time. The improved visualization allows a reduced staining time that could be beneficial for eye banks because it may reduce the toxic effect of staining colorants.

Traumatic cataract in a young patient with myopia.

A 36-year-old man was referred to our clinic because of traumatic cataract in his right eye, which had developed after being hit in the eye with a badminton shuttle as a child. He noticed that his vision in his right eye was gradually becoming worse. His refraction, corrected with spectacles, was -4.25 -2.00 × 115 in his right eye and -5.50 -1.50 × 57 in his left eye, with a corrected distance visual acuity of 20/32 and 20/20, respectively. Because of allergies, the patient never tolerated contact lens wear for more than 2 hours. On a slitlamp examination, we confirmed anterior subcapsular star-like cataract without any signs of zonulolysis. Optical biometry showed an axial length of 25.73 mm and 26.66 mm and an anterior chamber depth of 3.70 mm and 3.78 mm in the right and left eyes. Keratometric astigmatism measured by optical biometry was 1.56 diopters (D) at 30 degrees and 1.12 D at 138 degrees for the right and left eyes, and Scheimpflug tomography showed 1.1 D of regular astigmatism at 33 degrees in the right eye, and 0.9 D of regular astigmatism at 130 degrees in the left eye. The patient is a professional photographer and asked for a treatment that would still allow him to be able to perform his job: he wants to read all the buttons on the camera up close and focus on the scenery in the distance. What is your advice on this challenging case?

Short-Term Effects of a Novel Eye Mask Producing Heat and Vibration for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the short-term effects on tear film parameters and ocular symptoms of a novel eye mask producing heat and vibration developed for the treatment of dry eye disease owing to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: This is a pilot study including the first 20 consecutive patients (6 males, 14 females; mean age 52.4 ± 16.8 years) who were treated with a novel eye mask producing heat (42°) and vibration (up to 20 Hz) (Activa, SBS Sistemi, Turin, Italy) for 15 minutes. The treatment incorporates 2 phases in the following chronological order: 5 minutes of heating (phase I); 10 minutes of combination of heating and vibration (phase II). Noninvasive ocular surface examination was carried out before (T0) and 30 minutes after the mask session (T1) by means of Idra (SBS Sistemi, Turin, Italy) for the measurement of noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT) and lipid layer thickness (LLT). Patients' satisfaction after treatment was ascertained by asking the patients whether they perceived improvement from their baseline symptoms according to a 5-grade scale: none = 0; trace = 1; mild = 2; moderate = 3; high = 4. RESULTS: All patients completed regularly the mask session and no device-related adverse events were noted. NIBUT improved significantly from T0 to T1 (from 7.2 ± 1.8 s to 8.1 ± 2.1; P = 0.014). In parallel, also LLT improved from from T0 to T1 (72.5 ± 13.9 nm to 83.1 ± 16.1; P = 0.016). Seven patients (35% of the total) had a moderate satisfaction (grade 3) while 13 patients (65%) had a high satisfaction (grade 4) with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This eye mask represents a novel well tolerated tool in the armamentarium of MGD treatments. Thirty minutes after the session, NIBUT and LLT increased significantly; furthermore, all patients reported an improvement of discomfort symptoms with a moderate to high satisfaction with treatment.

Comparative analysis of objective and subjective outcomes of two different intraocular lenses: trifocal and extended range of vision.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate objective and subjective outcomes after bilateral implantation of two different multifocal intraocular lenses, which correct pseudophakic presbyopia in an adequate and homogeneous population court. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Fifty patients were evaluated at 3 months after bilateral implantation, at the Eye Clinic of University of Verona and at the Carones Ophthalmology Center Milano, as follows: Tecnis Symfony (25 patients), Alcon PanOptix (25 patients). Main outcomes were uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and BCVA) at 4 m, 60 cm (best distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (BDCIVA) and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity), 40 cm (best distance corrected near visual acuity (BDCNVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)), objective refractive outcome, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) cut-off), optical quality (Strehl ratio), aberrometry (root mean square RMS 4 mm), subjective quality of life (National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life score (NEI-RQL-42 score) test). RESULTS: Symfony and PanOptix showed BCVA and UDVA comparable results. Symfony presented significant better outcomes at BDCIVA (p=0.001), while PanOptix showed better performances at BDCNVA and UNVA (p=0.01). Symfony achieved better results in RMS 4 mm (p=0.024) and in MTF cut-off (p=0.041). In the questionnaire NEI-RQL-42, PanOptix presented better scores in 'near vision' and 'spectacles independence', whereas Symfony in 'symptoms' and 'clarity of vision'. CONCLUSION: Both intraocular lenses are valid options to avoid pseudophakic presbyopia, even though they present different features which make them unique. Symfony allows patients to achieve a better objective and subjective quality of vision and contrast sensitivity; PanOptix provides better outcomes in near vision and spectacles independence requirements.

Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Noninvasive Workup in the Setting of Dry Eye Disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel noninvasive automated workup employed for the diagnosis of dry eye disease (DED). METHODS: One hundred patients with mild to moderate DED and 100 matched control subjects were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Ocular surface examinations were carried out by means of IDRA Plus (SBM Sistemi, Turin, Italy), which allows the automated evaluation of noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT), lipid layer thickness (LLT), tear meniscus height (TMH), infrared meibography for the measurement of meibomian gland loss (MGL), and blinking analysis. Continuous variables were compared between patients with DED and controls by using the Mann-Whitney U test. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves was calculated. The correlations between ocular surface parameters were evaluated with Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS: Patients with DED showed significantly lower values of NIBUT, LLT, and TMH compared to controls (6.9 ± 2.5 vs 10.4 ± 2.4 s, P < 0.001; 64.6 ± 20.3 vs 73.4 ± 21.9 nm, P = 0.003; 0.231 ± 0.115 vs 0.289 ± 0.164, P = 0.012, respectively). Conversely, no significant differences were observed for MGL and blinking analysis (both P > 0.05). NIBUT had the highest diagnostic power (AUC = 0.841, sensitivity = 0.89, and specificity = 0.69), followed by LLT (AUC = 0.621, sensitivity = 0.89, and specificity = 0.55), TMH (AUC = 0.606, sensitivity = 0.57, and specificity = 0.63), blink analysis (AUC = 0.533, sensitivity = 0.48, and specificity = 0.59), and MGL (AUC = 0.531, sensitivity = 0.54, and specificity = 0.48). In patients with DED, NIBUT showed a significant correlation with TMH (R = 0.347, P = 0.002) and blinking analysis (R = 0.356, P < 0.001), while blinking analysis was negatively correlated with MGL (R = -0.315, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The automated noninvasive workup validated in this study may be a useful tool for reaching a noninvasive diagnosis of DED with a good performance, especially for NIBUT.

Ocular Surface Workup in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Treated with Intense Regulated Pulsed Light.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate changes of signs and symptoms in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) treated with intense regulated pulsed light (IRPL), and to further investigate which parameter could predict positive outcomes of the procedure. Twenty-eight patients who bilaterally received three IRPL sessions at day 1, 15, and 45 satisfied the criteria and were included in the study. Non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), lipid layer thickness (LLT), meibography, tear osmolarity, and ocular discomfort symptoms were measured before and 30 days after the last IRPL session. Qualified or complete success was defined in the presence of an improvement of symptoms associated with an increase of NIBUT (< or ≥ 20%). After IRPL treatment, median NIBUT and LLT increased from 7.5 to 10.2 s and 2.0 to 3.0, respectively (p <0.001); tear osmolarity decreased from 304.0 to 301.0 mOsm/L (p = 0.002). Subjective symptoms improved after IRPL in 26 patients. Qualified success was reached in 34 eyes, while complete success in 16 eyes. Patients with lower baseline break-up time (BUT) values showed better response to treatment (p = 0.04). In conclusion, IRPL improved signs and symptoms in MGD patients, while lower baseline NIBUT values were predictive of better response to IRPL.

Intense Pulsed Light for the Treatment of Dry Eye Owing to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Dry eye disease (DED) is an increasingly common condition and one of the most common complaints of patients. The vast majority of DED is caused by the so-called "evaporative" subtype, that is mainly caused by meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Intense pulsed light (IPL) devices employ high intensity pulses of polychromatic lights with a broad range of wavelength (515-1200 nm). IPL treatment has been utilized for years in the field of dermatology, and then its use was applied to ophthalmology for the treatment of MGD. Recently, a new device employing IPL was specifically designed for the periocular application. This procedure determines the thermal selective coagulation and ablation of superficial blood vessels and telangiectasias of the eyelids skin, reducing the release of inflammatory mediators and tear cytokines levels, and improving meibomian glands outflow. IPL treatment is noninvasive and easy to perform, lasts for only a few minutes and can be conducted in an office setting. In the present study, 19 patients underwent 3 sessions of IPL treatment. After treatment, both mean noninvasive break-up time and lipid layer thickness grade significantly increased, as a result of an improvement of tear film stability and quality, respectively. Conversely, no statistically significant changes were found for meibomian gland loss and tear osmolarity. Furthermore, the vast majority of the treated patients (17/19; 89.5% of the total) perceived an improvement of their ocular discomfort symptoms after IPL treatment. Although IPL treatment provides an improvement of both ocular surface parameters and ocular discomfort symptoms after one cycle of three sessions, regular repeated treatments are usually required to maintain the persistence over the time of its beneficial effects.

Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: Monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and quality of vision in patients with bilateral implantation of 4 intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTINGS: Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Verona, Verona, and Carones Ophthalmology Center, Milano, Italy. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: The study included patients who had bilateral cataract surgery with the implantation of 1 of 4 IOLs as follows: Tecnis 1-piece monofocal (monofocal IOL), Tecnis Symfony extended range of vision (extended-range-of-vision IOL), Restor +2.5 diopter (D) (+2.5 D multifocal IOL), and Restor +3.0 D (+3.0 D multifocal IOL). Visual acuity, refractive outcome, defocus curve, objective optical quality, contrast sensitivity, spectacle independence, and glare perception were evaluated 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The study comprised 185 patients. The extended-range-of-vision IOL (55 patients) showed better distance visual outcomes than the monofocal IOL (30 patients) and high-addition apodized diffractive-refractive multifocal IOLs (P ≤ .002). The +3.0 D multifocal IOL (50 patients) showed the best near visual outcomes (P < .001). The +2.5 D multifocal IOL (50 patients) and extended-range-of-vision IOL provided significantly better intermediate visual outcomes than the other 2 IOLs, with significantly better vision for a defocus level of -1.5 D (P < .001). Better spectacle independence was shown for the +2.5 D multifocal IOL and extended-range-of-vision IOL (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The extended-range-of-vision IOL and +2.5 D multifocal IOL provided significantly better intermediate visual restoration after cataract surgery than the monofocal IOL and +3.0 D multifocal IOL, with significantly better quality of vision with the extended-range-of-vision IOL.

Ocular Surface Workup With Automated Noninvasive Measurements for the Diagnosis of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

PURPOSE: To analyze diagnostic performance of an ocular surface workup based on automated noninvasive measurements in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: Two hundred ninety-eight eyes of 149 patients with MGD and 54 eyes of 27 control patients were analyzed. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), noninvasive breakup time (BUT), lipid layer thickness, meibomian gland loss, and tear osmolarity were calculated. The correlations among variables in the MGD group were analyzed. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves was calculated. RESULTS: OSDI, noninvasive BUT, and meibomian gland loss were significantly different between MGD and control groups (respectively, 37.9 ± 19.6 vs. 7.1 ± 2.8; 8.8 ± 3.6 vs. 11.0 ± 3.0; 28.0 ± 17.6 vs. 21.2 ± 13.0; always P < 0.05). Positive correlations were found between lipid layer thickness and noninvasive BUT and between meibomian gland loss and OSDI (respectively, r = 0.169, P = 0.004; r = 0.187, P = 0.004). Noninvasive BUT had the highest diagnostic power as a single parameter, followed by meibomian gland loss (respectively AUC = 0.686, AUC = 0.598). When the diagnosis of MGD was made based on either noninvasive BUT or meibomian gland loss being abnormal, sensitivity was 86.2% and specificity 38.5%. When the diagnosis was made on both noninvasive BUT and meibomian gland loss being abnormal, sensitivity was 39.3% and specificity 85.6%. CONCLUSIONS: This automated noninvasive ocular surface workup may represent a useful screening tool for the diagnosis of MGD. In case of positivity of either noninvasive BUT or meibomian gland loss, subsequent qualitative clinical tests should be performed to achieve a reliable diagnosis and more precise characterization of MGD.

Corneal ray tracing versus simulated keratometry for estimating corneal power changes after excimer laser surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the refractive changes induced by excimer laser surgery can be accurately measured by corneal ray tracing performed by a combined rotating Scheimpflug camera-Placido-disk corneal topographer (Sirius). SETTING: Private practices. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic test. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study comprised patients who had myopic or hyperopic excimer laser refractive surgery. Preoperatively and postoperatively, 2 corneal power measurements--simulated keratometry (K) and mean pupil power--were obtained. The mean pupil power was the corneal power calculated over the entrance pupil by ray tracing through the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces using Snell's law. Agreement between the refractive and corneal power change was analyzed according to Bland and Altman. Regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement between measurements. RESULTS: The study evaluated 72 eyes (54 patients). The difference between the postoperative and preoperative simulated K values underestimated the refractive change after myopic correction and overestimated it after hyperopic correction. Agreement between simulated K changes and refractive changes was poor, especially for higher amounts of correction. A proportional bias was detected (r = -0.77; P<.0001), and the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were -0.15 -0.14 × ±0.62 diopters (D). The difference between the postoperative and preoperative mean pupil power showed an excellent correlation with the refractive change (r(2) = 0.98). The mean pupil power did not overestimate or underestimate the refractive change. The 95% LoA ranged between -0.97 D and +0.56 D. CONCLUSION: Corneal ray tracing accurately measured corneal power changes after excimer laser refractive surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Dr. Calossi is consultant to Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici. Dr. Carones is consultant to Wavelight Laser Technologie AG. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Influence of co-payment levels on patient and surgeon acceptance of advanced technology intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To investigate patients' willingness to pay for advanced technology intraocular lenses and surgeons' willingness to recommend them. METHODS: In this study, 370 cataract surgeons and 700 patients undergoing cataract surgery from seven countries underwent online interviews in which they were shown unbranded profiles of three advanced technology intraocular lenses (ie, biconvex toric aspheric optic, symmetric biconvex diffractive optic, and biconvex diffractive aspheric toric) and asked to indicate their willingness to accept (for patients) or suggest (for surgeons) each lens. Acceptance was assessed assuming there was either no co-payment or co-payments of €500 to €1,500 +15%. RESULTS: All three lenses were widely accepted by patients, with 68% to 99% indicating acceptance when there was no co-payment. In contrast, surgeons' willingness to suggest them was markedly lower (20% to 43%). Both patients' acceptance of the lenses and surgeons' willingness to suggest them decreased with increasing co-payment levels to 19% to 74% (patients) and 5% to 31% (surgeons) at the highest co-payment levels. CONCLUSIONS: There is a marked discrepancy between patients' acceptance of the three lenses and surgeons' willingness to suggest them. Although patients' acceptance is high, it decreases with increasing out-of-pocket expenditure. Manufacturers should communicate the relative benefits and costs of their lenses to both surgeons and patients.