RESUMEN
Purpose: An integrated magnetic resonance scanner and linear accelerator (MR-linac) was implemented with daily online adaptive radiation therapy (ART). This study evaluated patient-reported experiences with their overall hospital care as well as treatment in the MR-linac environment. Methods: Patients pre-screened for MR eligibility and claustrophobia were referred to simulation on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Patient-reported experience measures were captured using two validated surveys. The 15-item MR-anxiety questionnaire (MR-AQ) was administered immediately after the first treatment to rate MR-related anxiety and relaxation. The 40-item satisfaction with cancer care questionnaire rating doctors, radiation therapists, the services and care organization and their outpatient experience was administered immediately after the last treatment using five-point Likert responses. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 205 patients were included in this analysis. Multiple sites were treated across the pelvis and abdomen with a median treatment time per fraction of 46 and 66 min respectively. Patients rated MR-related anxiety as "not at all" (87%), "somewhat" (11%), "moderately" (1%) and "very much so" (1%). Positive satisfaction responses ranged from 78 to 100% (median 93%) across all items. All radiation therapist-specific items were rated positively as 96-100%. The five lowest rated items (range 78-85%) were related to general provision of information, coordination, and communication. Overall hospital care was rated positively at 99%. Conclusion: In this large, single-institution prospective cohort, all patients had low MR-related anxiety and completed treatment as planned despite lengthy ART treatments with the MR-linac. Patients overall were highly satisfied with their cancer care involving ART using an MR-linac.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe a comprehensive workflow for MRI-guided online adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) specific to upper gastrointestinal cancer patients with abdominal compression on a 1.5T MR-Linac system. Additionally, we discuss the workflow's clinical feasibility and early experience in the case of 16 liver and pancreas patients. METHODS: Eleven patients with liver cancer and five patients with pancreas cancer were treated with online adaptive MRI-guidance under abdominal compression. Two liver patients received single-fraction treatments; the remainder plus all pancreas cancer patients received five fractions. A total of 65 treatment sessions were investigated to provide analytics relevant to the online adaptive processes. The quantification of target and organ motion as well as definition and validation of internal target volume (ITV) margins were performed via multi-contrast imaging provided by three different 2D cine sequences. The plan generation was driven by full re-optimization strategies and using T2-weighted 3D image series acquired by means of a respiratory-triggered exhale phase or a time-averaged imaging protocol. As a pre-requisite for the clinical development of the procedure, the image quality was thoroughly investigated via phantom measurements and numerical simulations specific to upper abdominal sites. The delivery of the online adaptive treatments was facilitated by real-time monitoring with 2D cine imaging. RESULTS: Liver 1-fraction and 5-fraction online adaptive session time were on average 80 and 67.5 min, respectively. The total session length varied between 70-90 min for a single fraction and 55-90 min for five fractions. The pancreas sessions were 54-85 min long with an average session time of 68.2 min. Target visualization on the 2D cine image data varied per patient, with at least one of the 2D cine sequences providing sufficient contrast to confidently identify its location and confirm reproducibility of ITV margins. The mean/range of absolute and relative dose values for all treatment sessions evaluated with ArcCheck were 90.6/80.9-96.1% and 99/95.4-100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MR-guidance is feasible for liver and pancreas tumors when abdominal compression is used to reduce organ motion, improve imaging quality, and achieve a robust intra- and inter-fraction patient setup. However, the treatment length is significantly longer than for the conventional linac, and patient compliance is paramount for the successful completion of the treatment. Opportunities for reducing the online adaptive session time should be explored. As the next steps, dose-of-the-day and dose accumulation analysis and tools are needed to enhance the workflow and to help further refine the online re-planning processes.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Practical considerations dictated a change in the craniospinal irradiation (CSI) technique. We report our experience in developing and refining CSI planning and treatment parameters, using a 3-isocenter image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two institutional values guided development: multidisciplinary decision-making and coordinated considerations throughout simulation, planning, and delivery. Patient immobilization and simulation parameters were selected based on treatment delivery system limitations. Commissioning fluence verification maps were acquired to verify dose in regions of overlapping fields. Robustness analysis was performed to assess impact of potential setup errors measured through IGRT verification. Treatment considerations included order of isocenter imaging and treatment and respective IGRT frequency, modality, and image registration thresholds. RESULTS: Overall film measurements were within 3% of planned dose, confirmed by phantom composite measurements showing all points were within 97% of planned dose. Setup sensitivity analysis suggested a 3-mm setup tolerance was sufficient to ensure confidence in the delivered plan. As the most critical organs at risk were in the superior isocenter, the daily isocenter treatment order was confirmed as superior, middle, and inferior. Daily cone beam computed tomography guidance was chosen for all isocenters (3° rotational threshold). Except for the superior/inferior direction of the middle and inferior isocenters, which were adjusted to 3 mm based on sensitivity analysis, a 1-mm translational threshold was used. CONCLUSIONS: An IG-IMRT CSI technique has been developed and implemented in our institution through a multidisciplinary approach. This process highlights the collaborative, iterative approach used to successfully integrate a new treatment technique in an image-guidance era.
