Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 64: 169-173, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of children with SARs-CoV-2-related illnesses have been admitted to the Pediatric intensive care unit (ICU), although often for closer monitoring or concerns related to comorbidities or young age. This may have resulted in inappropriate ICU admissions, waste of resources, ICU overcrowding, and stress for young patients and caregivers. The Pediatric Intermediate Care Unit (IMCU) may represent an appropriate setting for the care of children whose monitoring and treatment needs are beyond the resources of a general pediatric ward, but who do not qualify for critical care. However, research on pediatric IMCUs and data on their performance is very limited. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study including all patients aged 0-18 with acute COVID-19 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), admitted to a newly established stand-alone 12-bed pediatric IMCU at Gaslini Hospital, Genoa, Italy, between 1 March 2020 and 31 January 2022. Each IMCU room has a multiparameter monitor connected to a control station and can be equipped as an ICU room in case of need for escalation of care, up to ECMO support. IMCU and ICU are adjacent and located on the same floor, allowing a timely escalation from intermediate to critical care in the IMCU, with staff changes without the need for patient transfer. RESULTS: Among 550 patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19 or MIS-C, 106 (19.2%, 80 with acute COVID-19, and 26 MIS-C) were admitted to IMCU. Three of them (2.8%) required escalation to critical care due to the worsening of their conditions. Forty-seven patients (44%) were discharged home from the IMCU, while the remaining 57 (55%) were transferred to low-intensity care units after clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the need for pediatric ICU admission was low for both acute COVID-19 patients (0.8%) and MIS-C patients (3.1%) compared to the literature data. The IMCU represented an adequate setting for children with COVID-19-related illness who need a higher level of care, but lack strict indications for ICU admission, thus preventing ICU overcrowding and wasting of economic and logistical resources. Further studies are needed to better assess the impact of an IMCU on hospital costs, ICU activity, and long-term psychological sequelae on children and their families.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico
3.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 9(3): 918-922, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34002933

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Early introduction oral immunotherapy (E-OIT) in the first year of life can be a safe treatment for infants with cow's milk allergy (CMA). Once the protocol is completed, doubts remain whether children achieve tolerance or remain desensitized. According to current guidelines, this is determined by an avoidance period followed by a re-exposure to the food allergen during an in-hospital oral food challenge (OFC). In real life, this approach can be complicated, time-consuming, and anxiety-provoking for parents. We assessed the long-term safety of E-OIT for CMA in a cohort of children who switched to an unrestricted diet without testing the achievement of tolerance at the end of the OIT protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a descriptive analysis of the clinical follow-up of a cohort of children diagnosed with IgE-mediated CMA and undergoing E-OIT protocol in their first year of life. In a previous publication, the same cohort of patients had been studied to assess the feasibility of E-OIT for CMA. In the present study, we reported the results of a telephone survey, carried out through a questionnaire to their families enquiring about milk consumption and other ongoing atopic conditions of children. RESULTS: After an average of 4 years from the start of E-OIT, 62/73 patients (85% of the historical cohort) participated in the survey. Among them, all 56 patients who had previously successfully completed the protocol reported an unrestricted cow's milk intake. Ninety-three percent of these children did not experience any further allergic reactions, while the remaining 7% described only mild and transitory reactions until the 6-month period after the end of the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the long-term safety of E-OIT for CMA and challenged the paradigm of the need for allergen food withdrawal to discern between desensitization and tolerance. It could be a starting point for planning future trials on this issue.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a la Leche , Animales , Bovinos , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/terapia , Padres
4.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 56(1): 176, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31943481
7.
Arch Dis Child ; 101(2): 172-6, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26578746

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the consequences of the last European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) by means of a prospective study. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo (Trieste, Italy). PATIENTS: Children diagnosed with CD without a duodenal biopsy (group 1), following the last ESPGHAN and BSPGHAN guidelines, and children diagnosed with a duodenal biopsy, matched for sex, age and year of diagnosis (group 2), were prospectively enrolled over a 3-year period. All patients were put on a gluten-free diet (GFD) and were followed up for clinical conditions and laboratory testing at 6 months every year since diagnosis (median follow up: 1.9 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: Resolution of symptoms, body mass index, laboratory testing (haemoglobin, anti-transglutaminase IgA), adherence to a GFD, quality of life, and supplementary post-diagnosis medical consultations. RESULTS: 51 out of 468 (11%) patients were diagnosed without a duodenal biopsy (group 1; median age 2.1 years) and matched to 92 patients diagnosed with a biopsy (group 2; median age 2.4 years). At the end of follow-up the two groups were statistically comparable in terms of clinical and nutritional status, anti-transglutaminase IgA antibody titres, quality of life, adherence to a GFD, and number of supplementary medical consultations. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this prospective study, diagnosis of CD can be reliably performed without a duodenal biopsy in approximately 11% of cases. At least during a medium-term follow-up, this approach has no negative consequences relating to clinical remission, adherence to diet, and quality of life of children with CD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Celíaca/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Biopsia , Enfermedad Celíaca/dietoterapia , Enfermedad Celíaca/inmunología , Enfermedad Celíaca/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Dieta Sin Gluten , Duodeno/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Italia , Masculino , Cooperación del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Transglutaminasas/inmunología , Procedimientos Innecesarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...