Incidence and prediction of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation: the REFLEJA scale.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with increased mortality. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence of HHF, identify the clinical predictors of its occurrence, and develop a new risk scale. METHODS: The incidence of HHF was estimated using data from the prospective single-center REFLEJA registry of outpatients with AF (October 2017-October 2018). A multivariate Cox regression model was calculated to detect HHF predictors, and a nomogram was created for individual risk assessment. RESULTS: Of the 1499 patients included (mean age 73.8±11.1 years, 48.1% women), 127 had HHF (incidence rate of 8.51 per 100 persons/y) and 319 died (rate of death from any cause of 21.1 per 100 persons/y) after a 3-year follow-up. The independent predictors of HHF were age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, pulmonary hypertension, previous pacemaker implantation, baseline use of diuretics, and moderate-severe aortic regurgitation. The c-statistic for predicting the event was 0.762 (95%CI after boostrapping resampling, 0.753-0.791). The cumulative incidences of the main outcome for the risk scale quartiles were 1.613 (Q1), 3.815 (Q2), 8.378 (Q3), and 20.436 (Q4) cases per 100 persons/y (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: HHF was common in this AF cohort. The combination of certain clinical characteristics can identify patients with a very high risk of HHF.

Clinical outcomes and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and recently diagnosed lung cancer in oncology outpatient settings.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and recently diagnosed lung cancer in the outpatient oncology clinic and to describe the clinical profile, management and outcomes of this population. METHODS: Among 6984 patients visited at the outpatient oncology clinics attending lung cancer patients in five university hospitals from 2017 to 2019, all consecutive subjects with recently diagnosed (<1 year) disease and AF were retrospectively selected and events in follow up were registered. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients (3.9 % of all attended, 71 ± 8 years, 91 % male) were included. Charlson, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED indexes were 6.7 ± 2.9, 2.9 ± 1.5 y 2.5 ± 1.2, respectively. Tumour stage was I, II, III and IV in 11 %, 11 %, 33 % and 45 % of them, respectively. Anticoagulants were prescribed to 226 patients (84 %): direct anticoagulants (n = 99;44 %), low molecular weight heparins (n = 69;30 %) and vitamin K antagonists (n = 58;26 %). After 46 months of maximum follow-up, 186 patients died (69 %). Cumulative incidences of events at 3 years were 3.3 ± 1.3 % for stroke/systemic embolism (n = 7); 8.9 ± 2.2 % for thrombotic events (n = 18); 9.9 ± 2.6 % for major bleeding (n = 16), and 15.9 ± 3,0 % for cardiovascular events (n = 33). In patients with early stages of cancer (I-II), 2-year mortality was significantly higher in those with cardiovascular events or major bleeding (85 % vs 25 %, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Nearly 4 % or all outpatients in the oncology clinic attending lung cancer present recently diagnosed disease and AF. Major bleeding and cardiovascular event rates are high in this population, with an impact on mortality in early stages of cancer.

Ranolazina en cardiopatía isquémica crónica: un factor protector frente a la fibrilación auricular de novo / Ranolazine in chronic ischaemic heart disease: a protective factor against de novo atrial fibrillation

Resumen Introducción: en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica crónica, ranolazina se ha mostrado eficaz ante casos de angina. Estudios recientes la valoran como fármaco para prevenir la fibrilación auricular poscardioversión eléctrica, posquirúrgica o posinfarto. Objetivos: valorar la presencia a largo plazo de episodios de fibrilación auricular de novo en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica crónica y nuevo episodio de angina inestable que inician ranolazina 350 o 500 mg/12 h, en comparación con el tratamiento habitual. Métodos: estudio observacional retrospectivo que compara la incidencia de fibrilación auricular de novo en 77 pacientes consecutivos, con diagnóstico de cardiopatía isquémica no revascularizable y nuevo ingreso por síndrome coronario agudo durante el año 2013, en comparación con los que iniciaron ranolazina frente a tratamiento convencional, en los 12 meses siguientes al evento. La detección de fibrilación auricular se basó en su presencia en un primer registro electrocardiográfico. Resultados: de 77 pacientes, 38 iniciaron ranolazina, sin diferencias en cuanto a las características basales de las dos poblaciones, con similares tasas de factores de riesgo cardiovascular clásicos, datos ecocardiográficos como tamaño auricular, o tratamiento previo empleado. Se observó una tasa de fibrilación auricular de novo del 5,3% en los pacientes tratados con ranolazina, frente al 23,1% en el grupo sin ranolazina (p<0,001). Al analizar el subgrupo de pacientes que presentó fibrilación auricular en su seguimiento, únicamente es significativa la no toma de ranolazina (p<0,001). Conclusión: el uso de ranolazina en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica crónica no revascularizable podría suponer un efecto protector para el desarrollo de fibrilación auricular durante un seguimiento de al menos doce meses.

Abstract Introduction: Ranolazine has shown to be effective in cases of angina in patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease. Recent studies have evaluated it as a drug to prevent electrical post-cardioversion, post-surgical or post-infarction atrial fibrillation. Objectives: To perform a long-term evaluation of de novo atrial fibrillation episodes in patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease and a new episode of unstable angina that are taking 350 or 500 mg/12 h of ranolazine, in comparison with usual treatment. Methods: An observational, retrospective study was performed to compare the incidence of de novo atrial fibrillation in 77 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of non-revascularisable ischaemic heart disease and a new hospital admission due to acute coronary syndrome during the year 2013. These were compared with those that started with ranolazine and those on conventional treatment in the 12 months following the event. The detection of atrial fibrillation was based on its presence in a first electrocardiographic register. Results: Of the 77 patients, 38 were started on ranolazine, with no differences as regards the baseline characteristics of the two populations. They had similar rates of classic cardiovascular risk factors, echocardiographic data, such as atrial size, or previous treatment employed. A de novo atrial fibrillation rate of 5.3% was observed in the patients treated with ranolazine, compared to 23.1% in the non-ranolazine group (P<.001). On analysing the sub-group of patients that had an atrial fibrillation in their follow-up, only not taking of ranolazine was significant (P<.001). Conclusion: The use of ranolazine in patients with non-revascularisable ischaemic heart disease could have a protective effect against the development of atrial fibrillation during a 12 months follow-up.