Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 113(1): 279-285, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33484675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment selection for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma is predicated on clinical staging information, which is inaccurate in 20% to 30% of cases and could impact the delivery of guideline-concordant treatment. We aimed to evaluate the association between staging concordance at the patient and hospital levels with the delivery of guideline-concordant treatment among esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS: This was a national cohort study of resected esophageal adenocarcinoma patients in the National Cancer Data Base (2006 to 2015) treated either with upfront resection or neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Patient- and hospital-level clinical and pathologic staging concordance and deviations from treatment guidelines were ascertained. For neoadjuvant therapy patients, staging concordance was predicted through Bayesian analysis. Reliability adjustment was used when evaluating hospital-level concordance. RESULTS: Among 9393 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated at 927 hospitals, 41% had upfront surgery. Among upfront surgery patients, staging concordance was 85.1% for T1N0 and 86.9% for T3-T4N+ disease, but less than 50% for all others. Among patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy, treatment downstaging was observed in 33.9%. Deviations from treatment guidelines were identified in 38.5% of upfront surgery patients and 3.3% of neoadjuvant therapy patients. The proportion of concordantly staged patients ranged from 60.1% to 87.9%, and deviations from treatment guidelines were observed among 14.9% to 22.7% of the patients. Patient staging concordance increased, and deviations from guidelines decreased, as hospital-level concordance increased (trend test, P values less than .001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Deviations from treatment guidelines in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients appear to be a function of inaccurate clinical staging information, which should be a new focus for quality improvement efforts.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
2.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 160(2): 601-605, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32689703

RESUMEN

The extraordinary demands of managing the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the world's ability to care for patients with thoracic malignancies. As a hospital's COVID-19 population increases and hospital resources are depleted, the ability to provide surgical care is progressively restricted, forcing surgeons to prioritize among their cancer populations. Representatives from multiple cancer, surgical, and research organizations have come together to provide a guide for triaging patients with thoracic malignancies as the impact of COVID-19 evolves as each hospital.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Neoplasias Torácicas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Triaje/organización & administración , COVID-19 , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Consenso , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Interacciones Microbiota-Huesped , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades/organización & administración , Salud Laboral , Pandemias , Seguridad del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumonía Viral/virología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias Torácicas/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Tratamiento
3.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 110(2): 692-696, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32278755

RESUMEN

The extraordinary demands of managing the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the world's ability to care for patients with thoracic malignancies. As a hospital's COVID-19 population increases and hospital resources are depleted, the ability to provide surgical care is progressively restricted, forcing surgeons to prioritize among their cancer populations. Representatives from multiple cancer, surgical, and research organizations have come together to provide a guide for triaging patients with thoracic malignancies as the impact of COVID-19 evolves as each hospital.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neoplasias Torácicas/cirugía , Cirugía Torácica/organización & administración , Triaje , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Consenso , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos
4.
Surg Endosc ; 31(9): 3489-3494, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27928667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Esophageal fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) are indicated for the management of benign and malignant conditions of the esophagus including perforations, leaks, and strictures. FCSEMS are resistant to tissue ingrowth and are removable; however, stent migration occurs in 30-55% of cases. Endoscopic suture fixation of FCSEMS has been utilized to decrease the risk of stent migration though data supporting this practice remain limited. The primary aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and migration rate of patients who underwent placement of esophageal FCSEMS with and without endoscopic suture fixation. METHODS: Our single-center, retrospective, cohort study includes patients who underwent esophageal FCSEMS placement with and without endoscopic suture fixation between January 1, 2012, and November 11, 2015. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were abstracted. Logistic regression was performed to identify clinical and technical factors associated with outcomes and stent migration. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients underwent 62 FCSEMS placements, including 21 procedures with endoscopic suture fixation and 41 without. Suture fixation was associated with reduced risk of stent migration (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.47). Prior stent migration was associated with significantly higher risk of subsequent migration (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.6-26.0). Stent migration was associated with lower likelihood of clinical success (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.69). There was a trend toward higher clinical success among patients undergoing suture fixation (85.7 vs. 60.9%, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic suture fixation of FCSEMS was associated with a reduced stent migration rate. Appropriate patient selection for suture fixation of FCSEMS may lead to reduced migration in high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Esofagoscopía , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/prevención & control , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Técnicas de Sutura , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Nutr ; 146(12): 2594S-2600S, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27934650

RESUMEN

Arginine supplementation has the potential to improve the health of patients. Its use in hospitalized patients has been a controversial topic in the nutrition literature, especially concerning supplementation of septic patients. In this article, we review the relevant literature both for and against the use of arginine in critically ill, surgical, and hospitalized patients. The effect of critical illness on arginine metabolism is reviewed, as is its use in septic and critically ill patients. Although mounting evidence supports immunonutrition, there are only a few studies that suggest that this is safe in patients with severe sepsis. The use of arginine has been shown to benefit a variety of critically ill patients. It should be considered for inclusion in combinations of immunonutrients or commercial formulations for groups in whom its benefit has been reported consistently, such as those who have suffered trauma and those in acute surgical settings. The aims of this review are to discuss the role of arginine in health, the controversy surrounding arginine supplementation of septic patients, and the use of arginine in critically ill patients.


Asunto(s)
Arginina/administración & dosificación , Arginina/farmacología , Arginina/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crítica , Suplementos Dietéticos , Nutrición Enteral , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales
6.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 151(3): 852-858, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26614417

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the blood of patients with early-stage lung cancer and to show that sampling pulmonary vein (PV) blood using microfluidic chip technology will yield significantly more CTCs. Improving early detection of lung cancer is critical to improving lung cancer survival. Reproducible detection of CTCs is limited currently in early stage tumors. METHODS: Patients undergoing pulmonary resection had PV blood drawn before resection. Peripheral blood was sampled at preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative times. Samples were analyzed on microfluidic chips using antibody-based capture. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients with primary lung cancer were evaluated. Twenty patients had 1 or more CTCs detected in at least 1 sample (62.5%). The mean number of CTCs from peripheral vein sources at the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative time points was 1.3, 1.9, and 0.6 respectively. The average number of CTCs in the PV was 340.0 (range, 0.0-5422.50; P > .01). When PV CTCs were present, the number of CTCs was correlated with pathological tumor size (P = .0236). The number of PV CTCs was not correlated with any other clinical feature (eg, smoking status, preoperative or postoperative stage). Furthermore, the number of PV CTCs was significantly higher when preoperative bronchoscopic biopsy was performed, compared with computed tomography-guided biopsy (P = .0311). Seven patients had evidence of CTC clusters, or microemboli. CONCLUSIONS: With a single vein draining the entire tumor basin, lung cancers are unique, allowing the high-yield isolation of CTCs from the PV. This method may facilitate future studies to improve the detection and analysis of early-stage lung CTCs.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Venas Pulmonares , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Dispositivos Laboratorio en un Chip , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangre , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Procedimientos Analíticos en Microchip , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neumonectomía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA