Validation and comparison of non-hyperemic pressure reserve to fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary artery stenosis: A real world study.

BACKGROUND: The visual interpretation of an angiographic stenosis may not always reflect the physiological significance of a lesion. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a reliable index to assess the significance of a lesion during hyperemia. However, there are pitfalls that can lead to significant misinterpretation and adverse events. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the accuracy and predictability of the non-hyperaemic pressure ratio (NHPR) without hyperemic stimuli, compared to hyperemic FFR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of 700 patients who underwent a pressure recording during coronary angiography using NHPR and FFR measurements. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. NHPR sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy test were calculated. The most accurate NHPR cutoff was determined. RESULTS: Of the 700 procedures, 449 cases were included. By ROC analysis, the optimal cut-point for NHPR was 0.93 to predict an FFR of ≤0.80 with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 78.84%. The sensitivity of this NHPR cutoff was 85.06%, specificity of 75.59%, PPV of 64.53% and a NPV of 90.65%. There was an overall accuracy of about 80% for predicting non-hyperemic index (FFR < 0.80) using a cutoff of NHPR ≤ 0.93. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NHPR can be considered in certain clinical scenarios where adenosine is contraindicated or there are other challenges; with the knowledge that hyperemia might be necessary if there is any high clinical suspicion as it still remains the reference standard for diagnostic certainty.

Routine Angiographic Follow-Up After Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization: Is Seeing Believing?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Coronary artery disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the world, and PCI and CABG account for over a million procedures performed annually in the USA. The goal of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is to achieve complete revascularization (CR) if at all possible. However, restenosis and stent thrombosis (ST) remain the Achilles heel of contemporary PCI with restenosis rates between 10 and 30% with bare metal stents to 5-15% after drug-eluting stents and ST rates of around 0.8 vs 1.2%, respectively. Routine angiography after revascularization seems theoretically attractive as this may allow intervention before clinical events occur. In this manuscript, we review the literature regarding routine angiography after PCI or CABG and its outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: According to the 2016 update from the American Heart Association (AHA), 15.5 million people above the age of 20 have coronary heart disease (CHD) in the USA. The prevalence of CHD is now almost similar in both men and women, and one American suffers from a myocardial infarction (MI) every 42 s. Recent data from randomized clinical trials and observational studies does not support the use of routine coronary angiography after revascularization in asymptomatic patients. There are some studies which show that routine angiography may have a role in left main or complex coronary interventions; however, these findings are exploratory and were not seen in randomized trials. After reviewing the data on routine angiography after coronary revascularization, we came to the conclusion that current data does not support the use of routine angiography for asymptomatic patients. However, there is a lack of randomized controlled trial in this field with only one recent trial reporting negative outcomes.

Refractory Hypotension as an Initial Presentation of Bilateral Subclavian Artery Stenosis.

Bilateral subclavian stenosis is a rare clinical condition. An interbrachial pressure difference of 15 mm Hg can raise suspicion for unilateral subclavian artery stenosis, but the diagnosis of bilateral subclavian artery stenosis can be challenging. We present a case of a 75-year-old woman who presented with refractory hypotension after surgery. Initial vitals revealed blood pressure in the 60s/50s mm Hg in both arms. Cardiopulmonary examination was remarkable for diminished pulses in all 4 extremities and audible carotid bruits. She continued to be hypotensive despite aggressive fluid resuscitation. Troponin T peaked at 0.24 ng/mL (reference < 0.04), and an echocardiogram revealed a reduction in ejection fraction (37% from 50%). Left and right heart catheterization demonstrated normal filling pressures and cardiac output. During the procedure, however, it was noted that the patient's central blood pressure was 70-80 mm Hg higher than cuff pressures obtained in either arm. Selective angiography revealed 90% left subclavian ostial stenosis as well as 70% stenosis of the right subclavian artery.

The association between experience and proficiency with robotic-enhanced coronary intervention-insights from the PRECISE multi-center study.

OBJECTIVES: The PRECISE multi-center study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic-enhanced coronary intervention (PCI). We studied the learning curve associated with the robotic PCI approach. METHODS: The CorPath 200 robotic system was used to perform clinically indicated PCI. The first 3 cases performed by each interventional cardiologist were considered early-experience cases and subsequent procedures were regarded as advanced-experience cases. We compared procedure efficiency, patient radiation exposure, and clinical outcomes in early and advanced-experience cases. RESULTS: A total of 164 robotic-enhanced PCI procedures were performed, with 60 early-experience cases. Advanced-experience cases were associated with shorter procedure duration (51.3 ± 25.5 min vs. 42.2 ± 16.4 min, P = 0.008) and fluoroscopy time (12.9 ± 7.8 min vs. 10.1 ± 4.8 min, 0.009) as compared to early-experience cases. CONCLUSIONS: After performing 3 cases, interventionalists were able to complete robotic-enhanced PCI faster, with reduced radiation, and without compromising safety. The steep learning curve highlights the easy adoption of remote-control robotic technology for PCI.

Nonemergency PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery has become a rare event after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether having cardiac-surgery services available on-site is essential for ensuring the best possible outcomes during and after PCI remains uncertain. METHODS: We enrolled patients with indications for nonemergency PCI who presented at hospitals in Massachusetts without on-site cardiac surgery and randomly assigned these patients, in a 3:1 ratio, to undergo PCI at that hospital or at a partner hospital that had cardiac surgery services available. A total of 10 hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery and 7 with on-site cardiac surgery participated. The coprimary end points were the rates of major adverse cardiac events--a composite of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or stroke--at 30 days (safety end point) and at 12 months (effectiveness end point). The primary end points were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle and were tested with the use of multiplicative noninferiority margins of 1.5 (for safety) and 1.3 (for effectiveness). RESULTS: A total of 3691 patients were randomly assigned to undergo PCI at a hospital without on-site cardiac surgery (2774 patients) or at a hospital with on-site cardiac surgery (917 patients). The rates of major adverse cardiac events were 9.5% in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery and 9.4% in hospitals with on-site cardiac surgery at 30 days (relative risk, 1.00; 95% one-sided upper confidence limit, 1.22; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and 17.3% and 17.8%, respectively, at 12 months (relative risk, 0.98; 95% one-sided upper confidence limit, 1.13; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The rates of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke (the components of the primary end point) did not differ significantly between the groups at either time point. CONCLUSIONS: Nonemergency PCI procedures performed at hospitals in Massachusetts without on-site surgical services were noninferior to procedures performed at hospitals with on-site surgical services with respect to the 30-day and 1-year rates of clinical events. (Funded by the participating hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery; MASS COM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01116882.).

Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety as well as the clinical and technical effectiveness of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Robotic systems have been suggested to enhance the performance of cardiovascular procedures, as well as to provide protection from the occupational hazards that are associated with interventional practice. METHODS: Patients with coronary artery disease and clinical indications for percutaneous intervention were enrolled. The coronary intervention was performed with the CorPath 200 robotic system, which consists of a remote interventional cockpit and a bedside disposable cassette that enables the operator to advance, retract, and rotate guidewires and catheters. The primary endpoints were clinical procedural success, defined as <30% residual stenosis at the completion of the robotic-assisted procedure without major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days, and device technical success, defined as the successful manipulation of the intracoronary devices using the robotic system only. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were enrolled at 9 sites. Percutaneous coronary intervention was completed successfully without conversion to manual operation, and device technical success was achieved in 162 of 164 patients (98.8%). There were no device-related complications. Clinical procedural success was achieved in 160 of 164 patients (97.6%), whereas 4 (2.4%) had periprocedural non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. No deaths, strokes, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or revascularization occurred in the 30 days after the procedures. Radiation exposure for the primary operator was 95.2% lower than the levels found at the traditional table position. CONCLUSIONS: This pivotal multicenter study with a robotic-enhanced coronary intervention system demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the system. The robotic remote-control procedure met the expected technical and clinical performance, with significantly lower radiation exposure to the operator. (Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the CorPath 200 System in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions [PCI] [PRECISE]; NCT01275092).

Left and codominant coronary artery circulations are associated with higher in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: report From the National Cardiovascular Database Cath Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CathPCI) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Left or codominant coronary arterial circulation may represent less well-balanced myocardial perfusion and thus confer worse prognosis in acute coronary syndrome, especially for culprit lesions arising from the left coronary artery. METHODS AND RESULTS: We related left and codominance, relative to right dominance, with in-hospital mortality in 207 926 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Cath Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CathPCI) Registry database version 4. Generalized estimating equations and logistic regression analyses were used in unadjusted and multivariable adjusted models. Models were adjusted using the validated National Cardiovascular Data Registry mortality risk model. We performed subgroup analyses and formally tested for effect modification by the epicardial coronary artery containing the culprit lesion. Left coronary dominance was associated with higher in-hospital mortality in unadjusted (odds ratio=1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.42) and adjusted models (1.19, 95% CI, 1.06-1.34). Codominance was associated with worsened mortality only in adjusted models (odds ratio=1.16, 95% CI, 1.01-1.34). Addition of coronary dominance to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry risk model did not materially change model discrimination or calibration. The odds of death for left versus right dominance among those with left circumflex or left main culprit lesions was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.02-1.53), for right coronary artery lesions was 1.19 (95% CI, 0.83-1.71), and for left anterior descending artery lesions was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.93-1.28). There was no statistical evidence for effect modification by culprit lesion vessel (P=0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Left and codominance are associated with modestly increased post-percutaneous coronary intervention in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Confirmation of these findings with angiographic core laboratory verification of coronary dominance and longer term follow-up will be desirable.

Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention--filling an unmet need.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has undergone a remarkable evolution over the past 25 years. Initially, the procedure was limited to relatively straightforward lesions and was associated with significant risk and unpredictable long-term efficacy. With the incorporation of new technologies such as stents, the safety and efficacy of the procedure has improved dramatically. However, the fundamental way in which the procedure is performed has changed little since the time of Gruntzig's first successful case. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation, orthopedic injuries resulting from wearing shielding aprons, and fatigue from standing for hours at the table have made the catheterization laboratory a "high-risk workplace" for the interventional cardiologist. Robotic-assisted PCI was developed to allow the operator to precisely manipulate angioplasty guidewires, balloons, and stents from a radiation-shielded cockpit. A small first-in-man study demonstrated that PCI can be performed with robotic assistance. The pivotal Percutaneous Robotically Enhanced Coronary Intervention Study trial is currently enrolling patients and evaluating the safety and efficacy of the CorPath® robotically assisted PCI system.

Differential outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: comparing on-label versus off-label patients in the 'real world'.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials indicate that sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) reduce the rates of restenosis and need for subsequent revascularization procedures, but patients enrolled in randomized trials represent a highly selected population. This study examined the performance of SES in a 'real world' setting by comparing the outcomes of trial-eligible versus ineligible patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: From the US commercial introduction of SES in April 2003 until December 2003, all patients that received an SES at our institution were followed in a prospective registry (n=838). For the purpose of this analysis, the registry population was divided into two groups based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the stenosis in a native coronary artery (SIRIUS) trial. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at follow-up. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) such as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Clinical follow-up was complete for 92% of patients with a median duration of 14.2 months. RESULTS: Overall, 296 patients (35.3%) met entry criteria for the SIRIUS trial and thus comprised the SIRIUS eligible group. Patients in the SIRIUS ineligible group (n=542) were more likely to have chronic kidney disease and earlier bypass surgery and had longer mean stent length. At 1 year, TLR occurred in 3.0% of the SIRIUS eligible population and in 9.2% of the SIRIUS ineligible group (P=0.001). The secondary endpoint of cumulative MACE occurred in 6.6% of the SIRIUS eligible versus in 17.7% of the SIRIUS ineligible population (P<0.001). Two patients (0.4%) in the SIRIUS ineligible group had a late stent thrombosis on days 39 and 99, respectively, versus none in the SIRIUS eligible group. CONCLUSION: Among 'real world' patients treated with SES, the incidence of TLR and MACE at 1 year was substantially greater among SIRIUS ineligible patients compared with SIRIUS eligible patients. These findings confirm that pivotal clinical trials of drug-eluting stents tend to enroll low-risk patients and that the estimated rates of TLR and MACE derived from such trials may not reflect subsequent outcomes with unrestricted clinical use.

Correlates of adverse events during saphenous vein graft intervention with distal embolic protection: a PRIDE substudy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify correlates of 30-day adverse events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG). BACKGROUND: Although the use of distal embolic protection devices during SVG intervention reduces major adverse cardiac events (MACE), many patients still experience MACE despite distal embolic protection, and the major predictors of MACE among these patients are not well-characterized. METHODS: Correlates of 30-day MACE and peri-procedural creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) elevation were assessed among 631 patients undergoing SVG intervention with distal embolic protection enrolled in the PRIDE (PRotection during saphenous vein graft Intervention to prevent Distal Embolization) study, a randomized comparison of the TriActiv System (Kensey-Nash Corp., Exton, Pennsylvania) with an active control group (Guardwire [Medtronic, Santa Clara, California] or Filterwire [Boston Scientific, Minneapolis, Minnesota]). RESULTS: Baseline covariates associated with MACE were longer lesion length, greater angiographically assessed estimated plaque volume, and higher SVG degeneration score. Graft age and angina class were not associated with adverse events. Angiographic lesion length was significantly correlated with more complex angiographic metrics such as estimated plaque volume and the SVG degeneration score. In multivariable analyses, angiographic lesion length was the strongest independent correlate of MACE (odds ratio [OR] 2.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82 to 4.34]/log-increase in lesion length, p < 0.001) with a graded increase in MACE observed with increasing lesion lengths. Similarly, the strongest independent correlate of CK-MB elevation was lesion length (OR 2.54 [95% CI 1.59 to 4.04]/log-increase in lesion length, p < 0.001). The associations between lesion length and both MACE and CK-MB elevation were consistent among the studied embolic protection devices (TriActiv, Guardwire, or Filterwire). CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic lesion length was the strongest correlate of short-term adverse events among patients undergoing SVG intervention with distal embolic protection, with incremental effects noted at even relatively short lesion lengths.

Comparison of outcomes using sirolimus-eluting stenting in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with comparison of insulin versus non-insulin therapy in the diabetic patients.

The effect of insulin therapy on adverse cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients has been debated and a reduced benefit in clinical restenosis outcomes after sirolimus stenting has been reported among diabetic patients requiring insulin therapy. We analyzed 297 diabetic patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents, including 115 (39%) on insulin therapy, and compared outcomes with 541 nondiabetic patients treated consecutively during the same interval. The rates of target lesion revascularization (9.5% vs 3.5%, p = 0.003) and cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI, 7.1% vs 3.1%, p = 0.012) were significantly higher for diabetic patients. Insulin treatment was independently associated with increased risk for target lesion revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 5.00) and cardiac death or MI (hazard ratio [HR] 2.85, 95% CI 1.41 to 5.77), whereas the adjusted risk for diabetic patients not treated with insulin was not significantly different from patients without diabetes for target lesion revascularization (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.62) or cardiac death or MI (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.17). In conclusion, diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk for target lesion revascularization and cardiac death or MI after receiving sirolimus-eluting stenting, and is significantly exaggerated by the requirement for insulin therapy.

Physiologic evaluation of translesion pressure gradients in peripheral arteries: comparison of pressure wire and catheter-derived measurements.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-derived pressure gradient (CPG) measurements across vascular lesions are used to determine the hemodynamic significance of a stenosis prior to peripheral vascular intervention. We tested the hypothesis that CPGs overestimate the true translesion gradient during hemodynamic interrogation. METHODS: We evaluated 20 lesions (iliac, subclavian, or renal) in 16 patients undergoing angiography for peripheral vascular disease. Mean arterial pressure gradients were measured across each lesion using a 4- or 5-Fr fluid-filled catheter and compared to gradients measured with a 0.014'' pressure wire (PWG). RESULTS: In all lesions, the CPG was higher than the PWG (28.3 +/- 4.5 mmHg vs 11.6 +/- 1.8 mmHg; P < 0.05). Both CPG and PWG correlated with diameter stenosis (CPG = 0.78 [DS]- 29; r(2)= 0.44; P < 0.05 and PWG = 0.30 [DS]- 10.5; r(2)= 0.43; P < 0.05), but the CPG overestimated the pressure gradient compared with the PWG. CONCLUSION: Peripheral arterial vascular lesion pressure gradients assessed with large diameter catheters consistently overestimate the actual PG. Although both CPG and PWG correlated with anatomic stenosis, the overestimation of the physiologic significance of these lesions may lead to inappropriate intervention. Use of a pressure wire for hemodynamic interrogation may be a better tool for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of a peripheral vascular lesion.

Drug-eluting stents and stent thrombosis: a cause for concern?

Drug-eluting stents, most commonly sirolimus-eluting stents and polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents, are now widely used during percutaneous coronary interventions, and have largely replaced bare-metal stents to treat a variety of native coronary artery and saphenous vein graft lesions. Stent thrombosis, a complication of both bare-metal and drug-eluting stents, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality including high rates of myocardial infarction and death. Recently, several studies in the literature have raised concern about increased rates of overall stent thrombosis and late stent thrombosis in drug-eluting stents in the so-called 'real world' where off-label uses of drug-eluting stents are common. Hypersensitivity reactions to the polymers used in drug-eluting stents, delayed endothelialization of the stents, and discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy have all been implicated in the pathophysiology of drug-eluting stents stent thrombosis. The incidence of total stent thrombosis as well as late stent thrombosis, however, does not seem to be significantly higher in drug-eluting stents than in bare-metal stents. An important risk factor for stent thrombosis in both types of stents appears to be the premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy, and physicians should educate their patients about the importance of adhering to dual antiplatelet therapy, given the dire clinical consequences of stent thrombosis.

Hospital delays in reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: implications when selecting a reperfusion strategy.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the survival benefit associated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction may be attenuated if door-to-balloon (DB) time is delayed by >1 hour beyond door-to-needle (DN) times for fibrinolytic therapy. Whereas DB times are rapid in randomized trials, they are often prolonged in routine practice. We hypothesized that in clinical practice, longer DB-DN times would be associated with higher mortality rates and reduced PPCI survival advantage. We also hypothesized that in addition to PPCI delays, patient risk factors would significantly modulate the relative survival advantage of PPCI over fibrinolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: DB-DN times were calculated by subtracting median DN time from median DB time at a hospital using data from 192,509 patients at 645 National Registry of Myocardial Infarction hospitals. Hierarchical models that adjusted simultaneously for both patient-level risk factors and hospital-level covariates were used to evaluate the relationship between PCI-related delay, patient risk factors, and in-hospital mortality. Longer DB-DN times were associated with increased mortality (P<0.0001). The DB-DN time at which mortality rates with PPCI were no better than that of fibrinolysis varied considerably depending on patient age, symptom duration, and infarct location. CONCLUSIONS: As DB-DN times increase, the mortality advantage of PPCI over fibrinolysis declines, and this advantage varies considerably depending on patient characteristics. As indicated in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, both the hospital-based PPCI-related delay (DB-DN time) and patient characteristics should be considered when a reperfusion strategy is selected.

Suture-mediated closure of a patent foramen ovale during surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass.

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks due to paradoxical emboli in patients with prior neurological events. We report a case of a surgical suture-mediated of a PFO closure without cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with recurrent cerebral ischemic events, who was intolerant of medical therapy, was a poor candidate for catheter-based PFO closure, and presented as a potentially high risk for poor wound healing from traditional surgical closure.

Effect of diabetes mellitus on five-year clinical outcomes after single-vessel coronary stenting (a pooled analysis of coronary stent clinical trials).

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of clinically driven, repeat revascularization of the stented lesion in the first year after coronary stenting. The effect of DM on the risk of repeat revascularization of the stented lesion beyond 1 year, revascularization at other coronary sites, and clinical outcomes of cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI) has not been reported. We pooled primary data from 4 multicenter trials of second-generation coronary stents that included 1,228 patients, 263 of whom (21%) had DM. Patients were followed annually to assess for prespecified end points, including repeat revascularization procedures, death, or MI. Repeat revascularization of the stented lesion was performed more frequently during the first year in patients with DM (16.0% vs 10.9%, p = 0.01) but decreased to a low frequency (1.8% vs 1.3% per year) thereafter in patients with and without DM. Repeat revascularization of other coronary segments was more frequent in patients with DM during the first and subsequent years (5-year rates, 32.2% vs 24.1%, p = 0.005). Cardiac death or MI was also more frequent among patients with DM (5-year rates, 25.4% vs 17.9%, p = 0.008) and remained significant after adjustment for all differences in baseline characteristics (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.0, p = 0.01). In conclusion, diabetic patients are at increased risk for revascularization of the stented lesion only in the first year after single-lesion stenting but are at increased risk for other clinical events, including cardiac death and MI, over the next 4 years.