Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cyst Fibros ; 18(3): 378-381, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29551462

RESUMEN

The aim of this report is to assess whether the research issues priorities are perceived differently according to the Stakeholders (SH)'s individual knowledge of research topics and degree of training in biomedical research. Four groups of SH were enrolled in this study: 1. Skilled SH, specifically trained in biomedicine; 2. Unskilled untrained SH who responded to a written questionnaire in 2015; 3. SH who were trained for one year in a course delivered by professionals; 4. Untrained SH who responded to an online questionnaire in 2017. The large ranking order variability observed among groups addresses the question that the choices are markedly influenced by the SH's backgrounds. Such results emphasize the need to consider the education level and the delivery of ad hoc training activities by professionals to broaden the base of SH who may be considered qualified to transfer the Patient Centered Outcome Research principles into practice.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Fibrosis Quística , Participación del Paciente , Investigación/organización & administración , Participación de los Interesados , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Investigación Biomédica/educación , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Evaluación Educacional , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/educación , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/organización & administración
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...