RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Restoring the nipple-areola complex completes the breast reconstructive process. Local flaps are often used for the nipple reconstruction; however, the number of techniques indicates the lack of a superior design. The aims of this study were to test the feasibility of a new triple flap design for nipple reconstruction and to evaluate complication rate and nipple projection. METHODS: From November 2015 to November 2018, we performed the triple flap nipple reconstruction guided by a template for preoperative mark-up. Patients were followed up postoperatively to evaluate healing and signs of complications including wound dehiscence, infection, and flap necrosis, and nipple projection. The areola was tattooed 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six nipple reconstructions were successfully performed in 22 women. Four nipple reconstructions (15%) were performed in irradiated tissue. One reconstruction had a superficial infection, while there were no cases of wound dehiscence or flap necrosis. Three nipple reconstructions (12%) experienced prolonged healing that did not require intervention. None of these reconstructions had received radiation therapy. The nipple projection was 7.3 mm (range 6-9 mm) at the time of surgery and 3.1 mm (range 0-6 mm), 2.5 mm (range 2-3 mm), and 1.6 mm (range 0-3 mm) at follow-up of 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We present the new triple flap design for nipple reconstruction guided by a template for mark-up. The preliminary results indicate a low complication rate in both irradiated and nonirradiated patients while sustaining the projection over time remains to be a challenge.
RESUMEN
Breast reconstruction using tissue expander is a frequently used method of reconstruction after mastectomy. We describe a rare complication of myospasms after subpectoral tissue expander reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. The patient gradually developed disturbing pectoral muscle spasms lasting almost a year. Botulinum toxin A was undesired due to its transient effect. Selective denervation of the medial pectoral nerve branches was performed and resulted in worse spasms where the breast bounced at a rapid speed. Complete denervation of the pectoral nerves led to immediate liberation. We recommend a cranial denervation of both medial and lateral pectoral nerves to secure complete denervation leading to permanent relief of involuntary spasms where selective denervation may lead to hyperspasticity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The popularization of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery calls for better anatomical understanding of chest wall innervation. When inserting subpectoral implants, pain from pocket dissection, stretching of muscle, and release of costal attachments may be relieved by blocking the pectoral nerves in the interpectoral (IP) space.We describe the variable anatomy of the pectoral nerves in the IP space in order to define the area to be covered for sufficient blockade, based on cadaver dissections. METHODS: Twenty-six fresh cadavers were dissected bilaterally. The number, location, and course of the pectoral nerves were recorded. Distances to surface landmarks (sternum, clavicle, and costae) and ultrasound landmarks (thoracoacromial artery [TAA] and pectoralis minor muscle [Pm]) were recorded. RESULTS: The lateral pectoral nerve and the TAA entered together into the IP space 8.9 cm (range, 8.0-12.0 cm) lateral to the midsternal line. The medial pectoral nerve (MPN) had between 1 and 4 branches that pierced the Pm, and 69% had additional branches lateral to the Pm. The muscle-piercing MPN branches were located 3.8 cm (range, 0.4-8.1 cm) and the lateral MPN branches 5.4 cm (range, 3.0-8.4 cm) from the lateral pectoral nerve. The IP course was 2.6 cm (range, 0.7-6.5 cm). All specimens were asymmetrical in location or number of MPN branches. CONCLUSIONS: The MPN branches that innervate the lower part of the pectoralis major muscle are asymmetrical and variable in location and length; all located in a triangular area easily defined by sonographic landmarks, lateral to the TAA.