RESUMEN
Background: Various regional anaesthesia approaches to branches of the anterior lumbar plexus have been proved effective in providing analgesia in hip surgery. However, some patients still experience significant residual posterior hip pain attributed to the posterior nerve supply of the hip. This not only suggests that anterior approaches may not always provide sufficient pain relief, but also that the blocking of major nerves supplying the posterior pericapsular region is needed. Methods: We present an ultrasound-guided technique to block all major nerves supplying the posterior capsule of the hip joint. The optimal target area was determined by ultrasound imaging, cross-sectional digitised anatomy, and cadaver research, and was found in the deep gluteal compartment. Furthermore, this posterior pericapsular deep-gluteal block was evaluated in two patients. Results: The spread of dye in the cadaver was observed deep to the gluteus maximus and in between the quadratus femoris and piriformis muscles, and conformed to the presumed location during the ultrasound procedure. It included all major supplying nerves to the posterior hip capsule, that is the superior gluteal nerve, nerve to quadratus femoris and sciatic nerve. In both patients where this posterior pericapsular deep-gluteal block was applied the pain was substantially reduced (numeric rating scale: 4 to 1 and 7 to 1). Conclusion: We present a successful ultrasound-guided technique targeting the deep gluteal compartment to block all major nerves supplying the hip joint's posterior capsule. This posterior pericapsular deep-gluteal block can be applied as an additional block in hip surgery, with also a possible role in chronic hip pathology.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chloroprocaine provides spinal anesthesia for day-case surgery lasting up to 40 minutes. Intravenous and spinal dexmedetomidine can prolong spinal anesthesia, but no data are available for the combination with chloroprocaine. This double-blind randomized controlled trial compares chloroprocaine with spinal or intravenous dexmedetomidine regarding block characteristics, micturition, and discharge times. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After ethical approval and informed consent, 135 patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy were randomized to receive either 40mg spinal chloroprocaine (Chloro-group), 40mg chloroprocaine with 5 mcg spinal dexmedetomidine (Spinal Dex-group) or 40mg chloroprocaine with 0.5 mcg/kg IV dexmedetomidine (IV DEXgroup). Block characteristics, hemodynamic variables and the use of analgesics were registered. Voiding and discharge times were noted. A scoring system was used for micturition problems and sedation. Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) and other late side effects were evaluated after one week. RESULTS: Demographic data were similar between groups. Block onset times and intensity of motor block were comparable between groups. The time to L2 and Bromage 1 regression was prolonged in the SpinalDEx-group by approximately 30 minutes compared to the other groups (p < 0.01). First voiding as well as discharge from the hospital was prolonged in the Spinal Dex-group by approximately 40 minutes p < 0.01. There was no significant difference between groups regarding treatment of hypotension, sedation, micturition problems or the use of postoperative analgesics (P > 0.8). One patient experienced TNS. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal but not intravenous (0.5 mcg/kg) dexmedetomidine can prolong chloroprocaine (40mg) spinal anesthesia when surgery is expected to last over 40 minutes. Despite a similar incidence of adverse effects, this also led to a postponed hospital discharge time.