A rare cause of right-upper quadrant abdominal pain: Epiploic appendagitis of the hepatic flexure.

Epiploic appendagitis (EA) is an uncommon cause of acute abdominal pain that may mimic other causes of acute abdomen. Epiploic appendages are outpouching of fat tissue located on the external wall of the colon, being more numerous in the descending and sigmoid colon that account for up to 80% of EA cases. We present the case of a 59-year-old woman with right upper quadrant pain. Abdominal ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography suggested the diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis of the right colonic flexure. Our case highlights the fact that epiploic appendagitis may occur in unusual locations and must be included in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain, in order to avoid unnecessary medical and surgical treatment.

[The importance of intensive lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndrome: changing the paradigm to improve the achievement of targets]. / L'importanza di una terapia ipolipemizzante intensiva dopo sindrome coronarica acuta: cambiare il paradigma per migliorare il raggiungimento dei target.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of effective lipid-lowering drugs, only few high-risk patients attain their LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) guideline-recommended risk-based goal because of underprescription of combination therapy. We present an 18-month experience with variation of prescription protocols after publication of the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias. METHODS: Overall, 621 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome at Mauriziano Hospital in Turin, Italy, between January 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled. Lipid-lowering therapy recommended at discharge was registered to evaluate how many patients received statin monotherapy, statin plus ezetimibe combination or triple therapy with high-intensity statin plus ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i). At 6-month follow-up, the reduction in LDL-C, adverse events, compliance and cardiovascular recurrences was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 621 patients enrolled, 7 died during hospitalization. During the entire study period, 33% of patients received statin monotherapy, 50% were discharged on statin-ezetimibe combination, and PCSK9i (evolocumab) was prescribed to 17% of patients. Between April 2020 and June 2021, when new recommendations were introduced into clinical practice, 20% of patients received evolocumab, 56% combination therapy and only 24% were discharged on statin monotherapy. At the beginning of observation, evolocumab was prescribed to 3% of patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome, while at the end of the study period 27% of patients were discharged on PCSK9i, with an increase of the prescription rate by 759%; in the same period, prescription of statin monotherapy decreased by 75%. At 6-month follow-up, LDL-C reduction was 77% in patients treated with PCSK9i vs 48% in patients taking statin-ezetimibe combination therapy (p<0.001). All patients on evolocumab reached the guideline-directed goals and a low rate of adverse events was reported, mainly represented by local injection site reactions. Six patients experienced acute coronary syndrome recurrence; only one of them was treated with evolocumab. CONCLUSION: Prescription of intensive lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndrome, eventually with introduction of PCSK9i during hospitalization or at discharge, leads to attainment of guideline-recommended goals for all patients, with a low incidence of adverse events and optimal compliance.

Impact of environmental pollution and weather changes on the incidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Environmental pollution and weather changes unfavorably impact on cardiovascular disease. However, limited research has focused on ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the most severe yet distinctive form of acute coronary syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We appraised the impact of environmental and weather changes on the incidence of STEMI, analysing the bivariate and multivariable association between several environmental and atmospheric parameters and the daily incidence of STEMI in two large Italian urban areas. Specifically, we appraised: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitric oxide (NOX), ozone, particulate matter smaller than 10 µm (PM10) and than 2.5 µm (PM2.5), temperature, atmospheric pressure, humidity and rainfall. A total of 4285 days at risk were appraised, with 3473 cases of STEMI. Specifically, no STEMI occurred in 1920 (44.8%) days, whereas one or more occurred in the remaining 2365 (55.2%) days. Multilevel modelling identified several pollution and weather predictors of STEMI. In particular, concentrations of CO (p = 0.024), NOX (p = 0.039), ozone (p = 0.003), PM10 (p = 0.033) and PM2.5 (p = 0.042) predicted STEMI as early as three days before the event, as well as subsequently, and NO predicted STEMI one day before (p = 0.010), as well as on the same day. A similar predictive role was evident for temperature and atmospheric pressure (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of STEMI is strongly associated with pollution and weather features. While causation cannot yet be proven, environmental and weather changes could be exploited to predict STEMI risk in the following days.

A randomized trial comparing the acute coronary, systemic, and environmental effects of electronic vaping cigarettes versus heat-not-burn cigarettes in smokers of combustible cigarettes undergoing invasive coronary assessment: rationale and design of the SUR-VAPES 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Traditional combustible cigarette (TCC) smoking remains a major cause of preventable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Modified risk products (MRP) such as electronic vaping cigarettes (EVC) and heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC) may be safer than TCC but may still have detrimental oxidative, platelet and vascular effects of particular importance to people with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: We aimed to compare the acute coronary, systemic and environmental effects of two leading MRP in 20 TCC smokers admitted for invasive coronary assessment of CAD and willing to quit or after prior failed quitting attempts. After confirmation at angiography of an intermediate coronary stenosis, coronary flow reserve (CFR) will be appraised. Patients will then be randomized 1:1 to use a single EVC or a single HNBC in the catheterization laboratory, followed by repeat CFR measurement. The primary endpoint will be the change in CFR before and after product use. Quantitative coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) will also be measured. RESULTS: We expected to accrue results able to: 1) test whether MRP have in general a detrimental impact on coronary vascular function in TCC smokers; 2) test whether EVC have a different impact than HNBC on coronary function; 3) provide ancillary pathophysiologic and translational insights on the acute risk and safety profile of MRP in TCC smokers with established cardiovascular disease, including complex correlations between coronary, cardiac, systemic and environmental effects. In addition, by directly informing participants of their individual results, they will be further empowered to quit TCC. CONCLUSIONS: The Sapienza University of Rome-Vascular Assessment of Proatherosclerotic Effects of Smoking (SUR-VAPES) 3 trial will provide important insights into the pathophysiologic cardiovascular impact of EVC and HNBC, also suitable to inform patients and individualize their smoking cessation strategy.