Clinical value of foot thermometry in patients with acute limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the severity of foot poikilothermy can be used for better differentiation of grades of acute limb ischemia. Thus, the study aim was evaluation of the value of non-contact foot thermometry, performed using a low-cost infrared medical thermometer, as an adjunct for clinical diagnosis of immediately threatened acute limb ischemia. METHODS: It was a single-center observational prospective study performed over 3 years. Patients with acute limb ischemia of lower limbs grade I-IIB Rutherford treated with urgent revascularization were included. Grade of ischemia was determined independently by two experienced vascular surgeons. Thermometry of the ischemic foot was performed using a medical digital infrared non-contact thermometer (CK-T1501, Cooligg, China) with measuring accuracy of ±0.2°C. Temperature was measured in three points: the dorsal surface of the foot, plantar surface of the foot (both in the metatarsal region), and forehead. The maximal temperature gradient between patient's forehead and foot (∆Tmax F-F) was calculated. Measurements were repeated 6-12 h after revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included. Only 3 (2%) patients presented rest pain without sensory loss and motor deficit, while the majority were diagnosed with mild (63/147, 42.8%) or moderate (27/147, 18.3%) motor deficit. The temperature of the ischemic foot varied from 20 to 36.1°C, while median value of the temperature was 26.7 [24.5-29.9] °C on the dorsal surface and 26.8 [24.5-29.6] °C on the plantar surface of the foot (p = 0.85). Patients with Grade IIB ischemia had significantly lower dorsal foot temperature, plantar foot temperature, and larger ∆Tmax F-F than the patients with grades I-IIA: 25.1 [23.9-26.8] °C versus 29.9 [27.6-30.8] °C; 25.2 [23.8-27.5] °C versus 29.6 [28-31.1] °C; and 11.6 [9.7-12.8] °C versus 7.2 [6-9] °C (p < 0.0001). Areas under ROC curve for diagnosis of Grade IIB ischemia were similar for dorsal foot temperature (0.82), plantar temperature (0.81), and ∆Tmax F-F (0.82). The best cutoff value by Youden was ≥9.5°C for ∆Tmax F-F, ≤26.8°C for dorsal, and ≤27.7°C for plantar temperature. Criterion ∆Tmax F-F offered the highest specificity of 86% (95%CI 74.2-93.7) and positive predictive value of 89.2% (95%CI 79.5-93.2), while plantar temperature offered sensitivity of 82.5% (95%CI 70.1-91.3) and negative predictive value of 69.1% (95%CI 57.6-83.2). In multivariate analysis including age, gender, and etiology of arterial occlusion, the criterion ∆Tmax F-F of ≥9.5°C was a unique variable significantly associated with risk of amputation (adjusted OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.2-5.9, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Current study demonstrated that patients with immediately threatening ALI have significantly lower foot temperature than those with viable and marginally threatened limbs. Severe foot poikilothermy at admission is associated with poor outcomes of revascularization, mostly with limb loss.

Incidence, diagnosis, management and outcome of acute mesenteric ischaemia: a prospective, multicentre observational study (AMESI Study).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicentre prospective observational study was to identify the incidence, patient characteristics, diagnostic pathway, management and outcome of acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI). METHODS: All adult patients with clinical suspicion of AMI admitted or transferred to 32 participating hospitals from 06.06.2022 to 05.04.2023 were included. Participants who were subsequently shown not to have AMI or had localized intestinal gangrene due to strangulating bowel obstruction had only baseline and outcome data collected. RESULTS: AMI occurred in 0.038% of adult admissions in participating acute care hospitals worldwide. From a total of 705 included patients, 418 patients had confirmed AMI. In 69% AMI was the primary reason for admission, while in 31% AMI occurred after having been admitted with another diagnosis. Median time from onset of symptoms to hospital admission in patients admitted due to AMI was 24 h (interquartile range 9-48h) and time from admission to diagnosis was 6h (1-12 h). Occlusive arterial AMI was diagnosed in 231 (55.3%), venous in 73 (17.5%), non-occlusive (NOMI) in 55 (13.2%), other type in 11 (2.6%) and the subtype could not be classified in 48 (11.5%) patients. Surgery was the initial management in 242 (58%) patients, of which 59 (24.4%) underwent revascularization. Endovascular revascularization alone was carried out in 54 (13%), conservative treatment in 76 (18%) and palliative care in 46 (11%) patients. From patients with occlusive arterial AMI, revascularization was undertaken in 104 (45%), with 40 (38%) of them in one site admitting selected patients. Overall in-hospital and 90-day mortality of AMI was 49% and 53.3%, respectively, and among subtypes was lowest for venous AMI (13.7% and 16.4%) and highest for NOMI (72.7% and 74.5%). There was a high variability between participating sites for most variables studied. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of AMI and AMI subtypes varies worldwide, and case ascertainment is challenging. Pre-hospital delay in presentation was greater than delays after arriving at hospital. Surgery without revascularization was the most common management approach. Nearly half of the patients with AMI died during their index hospitalization. Together, these findings suggest a need for greater awareness of AMI, and better guidance in diagnosis and management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05218863 (registered 19.01.2022).

Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization for Acute Limb Ischemia in COVID-19 Patients Comparing to Noninfected Cohort: A Single-Center Observational Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of surgical revascularization for acute limb ischemia (ALI) in 2 groups of patients-with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: During the 2 years (01.01.2020-31.12.2021) all consecutive patients diagnosed with ALI and treated with urgent revascularization were prospectively enrolled. Based on the results of polymerase chain reaction swab for SARS-CoV-2 infection patients were allocated to group A-infected or group B-noninfected. Demographic characteristics, clinical, imaging, laboratory data, and details of treatment were collected prospectively. The composite endpoint of major amputation and/or death at 30 days after surgery was defined as main study outcome. The postoperative ankle-brachial index value, reinterventions, complications, and length of hospital stay were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 130 patients (139 limbs with ALI) were analyzed-21 patients (23 limbs) in group A and 109 patients (116 limbs) in group B. The anatomical site of arterial occlusion, duration, and severity of ischemia did not differ significantly between the groups. Patients with COVID-19 had significantly shorter time from ALI onset till administration of the first dose of anticoagulant: 8 (2.5-24) hr vs. 15.7 (6-72) hr in group B, P = 0.02. Vascular imaging was performed before intervention only in 5 (23.8%) infected patients compared to 78 (71.5%) patients in group B, P < 0.001. The main outcome was registered in 38 (29.2%) patients, significantly more frequent in infected cohort: 12 (57.1%) patients in group A versus 26 (23.8%) in group B, P = 0.003. Difference was preponderantly caused by high mortality in group A-9 (42.8%) patients, compared to 17 (15.5%) patients in group B, P = 0.01. The difference in the rate of limb loss was not statistically significant: 4 (17.3%) limbs were amputated in COVID-19 patients and 12 (10.3%) limbs-in noninfected patients (P = 0.3). Combination of ALI and COVID-19 resulted in increased 30-day mortality-risk ratio (RR) 2.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-5.31), P = 0.002, but did not lead to significantly higher amputation rate-RR 1.6 (95% CI: 0.59-4.75), P = 0.32. In group A initial admission of the patient in the intensive care unit was an independent risk factor for amputation/death. Excepting systemic complications which were more frequently registered among COVID-19 patients: 7 (33%) cases vs. 14 (12.8%) in group B, P = 0.04; no differences in other secondary outcomes were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Study demonstrates the significant negative impact of COVID-19 upon the 30-day amputation-free survival in patients undergoing urgent surgical revascularization for ALI. The difference in outcome is influenced by higher rate of mortality among infected patients, rather than by the rate of limb loss. Severity of COVID-19, namely requirement of intensive care, mostly determines the outcome of ALI treatment.

Urgent surgery versus anticoagulation for treatment of superficial vein thrombosis in patients with varicose veins.

Background: We performed a prospective observational study to compare the results of surgery and anticoagulation in patients with superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). Patients and methods: A total of 190 patients (195 limbs) with varicose veins and SVT were included and treated by anticoagulation or by surgery. Patients were followed-up during 6 months. The primary outcome for treatment efficacy was the composite rate of SVT extension/recurrence; deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary outcome for safety was the rate of wound complications and rate of bleedings. Results: Surgery was performed in 85 (44.7%) patients and 105 patients (5 with bilateral SVT) were treated conservatively. In the whole study cohort the primary outcome for treatment efficacy was registered in 15 (7.6%) cases: 9/85 (10.5%) in surgical group and 6/110 (5.4%) in anticoagulation group. Nine patients treated with surgery were diagnosed with postoperative DVT. In anticoagulation group SVT extension occurred in 3 limbs; SVT recurrence in 2 and DVT in one. There were no cases of PE or death during the follow-up. Time-to-event analysis demonstrated no significant difference between groups (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.17-1.34). The total length of the thrombus was associated with primary efficacy outcome in surgical group (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.11); and duration of anticoagulation (HR 0.91 per day; 95% CI 0.83-0.99) and value of Caprini score (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.1-3.14) in anticoagulation group. Six (7%) wound complications were registered after surgery and 6 (5.71%) bleedings during anticoagulation. Conclusions: Urgent surgery is not associated with reduction of venous thromboembolism compared to anticoagulation in treatment of patients with SVT and varicose veins during 6-months follow-up. However, in patients with isolated thrombosis of varicose tributaries or with limited involvement of the saphenous trunk surgery is relatively safe.

Off-Label Use of a Double-Layer Micromesh Carotid Stent for Hybrid Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurism Complicated by Chronic Distal Embolization.

We report our initial experience in off-label use of the double-layer micromesh (DLM) Roadsaver® stent for the hybrid treatment of a fusiform popliteal artery aneurism complicated by distal embolization and chronic limb threatening ischemia in a COVID-19-positive young male. A 36-year-old male patient was admitted with chronic limb threatening ischemia of the left lower limb. The duplex ultrasound and computer tomography angiography (CTA) demonstrated a fusiform popliteal artery aneurism with a maximal diameter of 14 mm and distal occlusion of peroneal and both tibial arteries. Urgent hybrid intervention was performed, starting with an open thrombectomy from the distal posterior tibial artery via a retromalleolar access followed by percutaneous deployment of the DLM Roadsaver® stent (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) for the exclusion of the popliteal artery aneurism. The flow diverting effect was observed immediately with contrast stagnation in the asymmetrical part of the aneurism sac (grade C2 of the O'Kelly-Marotta flow diversion scale). The procedure was uneventful, with the regaining of an adequate foot perfusion and palpable pulse at the posterior tibial artery. On the 2nd postoperative day, the patient was diagnosed with a symptomatic form of COVID-19 infection and transferred to a dedicated facility. At a one-month follow-up, the patient had no symptoms of limb ischemia and CTA showed complete thrombosis of the aneurism sac, absence of endoleaks, and patency of the treated arterial segment. This case demonstrates the possibility of off-label use of the DLM Roadsaver® stent for hybrid treatment of popliteal artery aneurism complicated by distal embolization and critical limb ischemia.

Management of Superficial Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Survey among Members of National Surgical Society from Republic of Moldova.

PURPOSE: Management of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) in patients with varicose veins (VV) is not currently standardized. We performed a survey aimed to demonstrate patterns in the management of SVT in the Republic of Moldova. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive study whereby members of the National Surgical Society were asked to complete an online questionnaire. In the questionnaire, multiple-choice questions were supplemented with four clinical vignettes of real patients with SVT. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 102 participants (31.1% response rate). In the treatment of SVT, duplex ultrasound was routinely used by 74.5% of respondents, and anticoagulants were used by 70.5%. The full therapeutic dose of anticoagulants was recommended by 63.3% of surgeons, intermediate dose by 21.1%, and prophylactic dose by 15.6%. Only 50% of respondents were prescribed anticoagulants for 1 month or more. In case of surgical intervention for SVT, crossectomy and stripping were performed by 84.0% of surgeons, while isolated crossectomy by 10.7%. In all clinical vignettes, the majority of respondents opted for urgent surgical treatment. The rate of proponents of surgery varied from 43% in cases of isolated thrombosis of tributaries, and up to 72.5% in cases of thrombosis up to the sapheno-femoral junction. CONCLUSION: Management of patients with SVT and VV in the Republic of Moldova is far from standardized. Prescribed doses of anticoagulants, as well as the duration of anticoagulation are highly variable and often contradict the recommendations of current guidelines. Urgent crossectomy and stripping dominate the pattern of current therapeutic approaches.

Giant thrombosed saphenofemoral junction aneurysm: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Although saphenofemoral junction aneurysms are not so rare, only scarce of the published cases reported thrombosis of the aneurysmal sac and saphenous trunk. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 65-year-old male with varicose disease, developed acute ascending superficial vein thrombosis of the left greater saphenous vein, involving the 6-cm saphenofemoral junction aneurysm. The patient underwent common femoral vein thrombectomy, aneurysm removal, and greater saphenous vein excision with uneventful postoperative course. CONCLUSION: Thrombosed giant saphenofemoral junction aneurysms require emergent surgical intervention aimed at preventing potential progression to deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Warfarin associated venous limb gangrene in cancer-related DVT (case report).

INTRODUCTION: Warfarin anticoagulation of oncologic patients with DVT may paradoxically progress to phlegmasia cerulea dolens and limb gangrene, due to cancer-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation. This case report, written in line with the SCARE criteria, endorses venous thrombectomy in selected patients to attempt limb salvage. A young woman's warfarin associated acute ileofemoral phlegmasia that developed over cervical cancer radiation therapy induced DVT, was successfully resolved by clot removal. Extracting venous thrombus at the onset, while still as unorganized masses, preserves ambulation and prevents post-thrombotic syndrome development, an improvement of quality of life especially significant for oncologic patients with limited life-expectancy. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 34 years old female, with history of stage 3 cervical cancer following radiation therapy, was admitted in regards to left lower limb painful pitting oedema with cramps. Doppler scan revealed a left ileofemoral DVT. She was set on LMWH, but on fourth day of warfarin co-administration, phlegmasia cerulea dolens developed. An emergency venous thrombectomy with fasciotomy was performed. Postoperatively, dry foot gangrene developed, which dictated transmetatarsal amputation. The patient was discharged after 2 months of inpatient treatment, preserving ambulation. DISCUSSION: Venous thrombectomy (with fasciotomy) in oncologic phlegmasia, ±serial debridement, becomes an attractive opportunity for limb salvage when feasible at acute presentation, available in a limited resource setting. CONCLUSION: Due to severe procoagulant/anticoagulant balance disturbances in cancer patients' warfarin-bridged for DVT, phlegmasia onset should not defer surgical approach, unless a rapid response to conservative treatment.