RESUMEN
It is well established that some patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and the negative end of treatment PET-CT (EOT-PET-CT) will relapse, while a proportion with positive uptake can still obtain long-term EFS. We reviewed data of 200 consecutive, previously untreated patients with DLBCL recorded in Italy and Israel between 2007 and 2015. We found that patients with negative EOT-PET-CT with AMC > 630/mmc have a 3-years EFS of 72%, compared to those with AMC ≤ 630/mmc that have an EFS of 84%. Furthermore, considering patients with positive EOT-PET-CT, those with AMC > 630/mmc have a 3-years EFS of 8%, while those with AMC ≤ 630/mmc have an EFS of 38%. Thus, it appears that combining the gold standard for response evaluation EOT-PET-CT with a simple and inexpensive parameter like AMC at diagnosis, further improves prognostication in DLBCL. Applying this simple method can be useful for all doctors working in lymphoma clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Recuento de Leucocitos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/sangre , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Monocitos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monocitos/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Carcinoids enter the differential diagnosis of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Bronchial carcinoids have been traditionally considered as FDG-PET negative but recent studies have found an higher sensitivity of integrated FDG-PET/CT for the detection of these neoplasms. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of integrated FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of SPN suspected to be carcinoids. METHODS: All patients with pathologically proven bronchial carcinoids who had FDG-PET/CT scans between 2006 and 2012 have been retrospectively reviewed. PET/CT was performed with the same scanner and the same technique for all patients. The following data were retrieved: age, sex CT findings (side, location, size, shape, margins), SUVmax, type of operation, pathological findings (size and number of mitoses). Regarding PET findings, only SUVmax was considered, whereas the visual assessment was not undertaken. Carcinoids were defined as typical and atypical and as central and peripheral. The long-term follow-up was also recorded. The SUVmax was compared with the other clinical, radiological and pathological variables to find any significant difference or correlation. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were retrieved, 24 typical and one atypical carcinoid, 21 peripheral and 4 central lesions. The mean diameter on CT-scan was 25.3 mm and the clinical size correlated well with the pathological size. Sixty percent of the tumors were ovoid and 68% had smooth margins. The mean SUVmax was 3.6 (range 1.4-12.9). All the lesions were completely resected. The regression analysis showed a direct correlation between the SUVmax and the tumor size (p = 0.004). No further correlations were found between the SUVmax and the other variables. None of the patients had recurrent disease or died during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that FDG-PET/CT might be a useful tool in the evaluation of SPNs suspected to be bronchial carcinoids. When a solitary pulmonary nodule shows an ovoid/round shape and smooth margins on the CT scan and demonstrates an FDG uptake higher than that of the normal lung and with a SUVmax value >1-1.5, a carcinoid should be suspected. If benign lesions can be presumably excluded, surgical resection or at least a biopsy of the lesion is recommended.
