Diagnostic Value of Krebs von den Lungen (KL-6) for Interstitial Lung Disease: A European Prospective Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) is a mucin-1 glycoprotein produced by type II pneumocytes. High levels of KL-6 in blood may be found in patients with lung fibrosis. In Asia this biomarker is used for diagnosis and prognosis in interstitial lung diseases (ILD). There is a lack of information regarding KL-6 cut-off point for diagnosis and prognosis in European population. The aim of this study was to establish the cut-off point for serum KL-6 associated with the presence of ILD in the Spanish population. METHODS: Prospective study including subjects who underwent chest HRCT, PFTs and autoimmune blood analysis. Two groups were created: non-ILD subjects and ILD patients. Serum KL-6 concentrations were measured using a Lumipulse KL-6 reagent assay and the optimal cut-off value was evaluated by a ROC analysis. Data on demographics and smoking history was also collected. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine patients were included, 102 with ILD. Median serum KL-6 values overall were 762U/mL, 1080 (±787)U/mL for the ILD group vs 340 (±152)U/mL for the non-ILD group (p<0.0001). The main radiological pattern was NSIP (43%). ROC analysis showed greater specificity (86%) and sensitivity (82%) for KL-6 465U/mL for detecting ILD patients. The multivariate logistic regression model pointed to the male sex, higher KL-6 values, lower FVC and low DLCO values as independent factors associated with ILD. CONCLUSION: Serum KL-6 values greater than 465U/mL have excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting ILD in our Spanish cohort. Multicentre studies are needed to validate our results.

Prognostic significance of lymphocytic foci composition in minor salivary gland biopsies for severe disease flare and severity in Sjögren's syndrome: a 3-year follow-up cohort study.

Introduction: This was an ambispective cohort study evaluating the prognostic significance of lymphocytic foci and its lymphoid composition in minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) for short-term disease flare and severity in Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Methods: The inclusion criteria comprised individuals meeting the ACR/EULAR 2016 criteria who underwent MSGB with an infiltration of more than 50 lymphocytes and received clinical diagnosis between September 2017 and December 2018. Patients with inadequate biopsy samples were excluded. The number of lymphocytic foci and their lymphoid composition in MSGB were assessed using immunofluorescence staining. Major organ damage and improvements in the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) were measured. Statistical analyses, including Cox and linear regressions, were conducted. Results: A total of 78 patients with at least one lymphocytic focus were included in the study. The presence of higher T-cell counts in lymphocytic foci in MSGB was associated with severe disease flare, and a logarithmic transformation of T-cell count indicated increased risk (HR 1.96, 95% CI 0.91-4.21). Improvements in the ESSDAI were associated with higher total lymphocyte count and T- and B-cell numbers in the lymphoid composition of the lymphocytic foci. Seropositive patients exhibited higher T CD4+ cell numbers. Correlation analysis showed negative associations between age and lymphocytic foci and the T-cell count. Positive correlations were observed between antinuclear antibody (ANA) titers and total lymphocyte numbers. Discussion: Patients with a higher number of T cells in the lymphocytic infiltrates of lymphocytic foci may have a two-fold risk of severe disease flare. The number of B cells and T CD4+ cells in the lymphocytic infiltrates of lymphocytic foci showed a weak but positive relation with the ESSDAI improvement during follow-up. Age and seropositivity appeared to influence the lymphoid composition of the lymphocytic foci.

Impaired Regulation by IL-35 in Systemic Sclerosis.

This study investigated the role of IL-35 in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, focusing on CD4+ T cell response and immunomodulatory cytokine production. By comparing the cytokine levels in healthy donors (HD) and SSc patients using ELISAs, we found a significantly lower plasma IL-35 concentration in the SSc patients (52.1 ± 5.6 vs. 143 ± 11.1, p < 0.001). Notably, the IL-35 levels showed a negative correlation with TGF-ß (p < 0.001) and IL-17 (p = 0.04). Assessing the IL-35R expression across cell types in the SSc patients and HDs via flow cytometry, we found higher levels on monocytes (40.7 + 5.7 vs. 20.3 ± 1.9, p < 0.001) and lower levels on CD8+ T cells (61.8 ± 9.2 vs. 83.4 ± 0.8, p < 0.05) in the SSc patients. The addition of recombinant IL-35 to stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells reduced the IL-17+CD4+ T cell percentage (9.0 ± 1.5 vs. 4.8 ± 0.7, p < 0.05) and increased the IL-35+CD4+ T percentage (4.1 ± 2.3 vs. 10.2 ± 0.8, p < 0.001). In a Treg:Tresponder cell Sco-culture assay with HD and SSc samples, rIL35 decreased the cell proliferation and levels of IL-17A (178.2 ± 30.5 pg/mL vs. 37.4 ± 6.4 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and TGF-ß (4194 ± 777 pg/mL vs. 2413 ± 608 pg/mL, p < 0.01). Furthermore, we observed a positive correlation between the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and TGF-ß (p < 0.001), while there was a negative correlation between mRSS and IL-35 (p = 0.004). Interestingly, higher levels of plasmatic IL-35 were detected in individuals with limited disease compared to those with diffuse disease (60.1 ± 8.0 vs. 832.3 ± 4.1, p < 0.05). These findings suggest that IL-35 exhibits anti-inflammatory properties in SSc and it may serve as a marker for disease severity and a therapeutic target.

The role of TAPSE/sPAP ratio in predicting pulmonary hypertension and mortality in the systemic sclerosis EUSTAR cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to evaluate the predictive role of the echocardiography-derived tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) ratio for pulmonary hypertension (PH) diagnosis and mortality in the European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) cohort. METHODS: Eligible patients were systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients registered in the EUSTAR database with at least one visit recording TAPSE and sPAP data. Individual centres were required to provide TAPSE and sPAP data at 12 ± 3 months before right heart catheterization (RHC). Logistic regression analysis was applied to analyse the predictive ability of TAPSE/sPAP ratio for PH diagnosis. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate TAPSE/sPAP ratio as a predictive factor for all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 2555 SSc patients met the inclusion criteria for this study with 355 SSc patients having available RHC data at baseline. PH was confirmed by RHC in 195 SSc patients (54.9%). TAPSE/sPAP ratio < 0.55 mm/mmHg [OR 0.251 (95% CI 0.084-0.753), p < 0.05] and FVC/DLCO [OR 2.568 (95% CI 1.227-5.375), p < 0.05] were significantly associated with PH diagnosis. In logistic regression analysis with echocardiographic parameters at 12 ± 3 months before RHC, TAPSE/sPAP ratio < 0.55 mm/mmHg [OR 0.265 (95% CI 0.102-0.685), p < 0.01] and FVC/DLCO [OR 2.529 (95% CI 1.358-4.711), p < 0.01] were associated with PH diagnosis. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, TAPSE/sPAP ratio ≤ 0.32 mm/mmHg [HR 0.310 (0.164-0.585), p < 0.001] was the most significant predictive factor for death. CONCLUSIONS: TAPSE/sPAP ratio < 0.55 mm/mmHg is a predictive risk factor for PH. TAPSE/sPAP ratio ≤ 0.32 mm/mmHg is a predictive risk marker for all-cause mortality.

Criterios de cribado de la enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa asociada a la artritis reumatoide: propuesta de expertos basada en metodología Delphi / Screening criteria for interstitial lung disease associated to rheumatoid arthritis: Expert proposal based on Delphi methodology

Objetivo: Elaborar una propuesta multidisciplinar de criterios de cribado de enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa (EPID) en pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) y, a la inversa, que sirvan de referencia en la derivación entre los servicios de Reumatología y Neumología para la detección precoz de estos pacientes. Métodos: Se revisó de forma sistemática la literatura sobre factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de EPID en la AR, la utilidad de los distintos métodos diagnósticos para su identificación en pacientes con AR y las diferentes propuestas de criterios de derivación a Reumatología por sospecha de AR precoz. Basándose en la evidencia disponible y en su experiencia clínica, un comité científico formado por dos reumatólogos y dos neumólogos propuso unos criterios de cribado que fueron evaluados mediante el método Delphi por un panel de siete neumólogos y siete reumatólogos. Todos los participantes eran expertos en esta patología. Resultados: Se han elaborado unos criterios para el cribado de EPID en pacientes diagnosticados de AR, y unos criterios para la detección precoz de AR en casos de EPID de causa no filiada. Se incluyen también propuestas sobre las pruebas complementarias a realizar en los diferentes escenarios clínicos considerados y sobre la periodicidad con la que debe repetirse el cribado. Conclusiones: Se propone por primera vez una estrategia de cribado selectivo para el diagnóstico precoz de los pacientes con EPID-AR. Esta propuesta pretende resolver algunos interrogantes clínicos habituales y facilitar la toma de decisiones. Los criterios propuestos deben ser evaluados en futuros estudios de validación.(AU)

Objective: To develop a joint proposal for screening criteria of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and vice versa, which serves as a guidelines in patient referral between the Rheumatology and Pneumology departments to early detection of these patients. Methods: A systematic literature review was carried out on the risk factors for the development of ILD in RA patients, and for the referral criteria to Rheumatology for suspected early RA. Based on the available evidence, screening criteria were agreed using the Delphi method by a panel of pneumologists and rheumatologists with expertise in these pathologies. Results: Screening criteria for ILD in patients with RA and for the early detection of RA in cases with ILD of unknown etiology have been developed. In both cases, a detection strategy was based on clinical risk factors. Recommendations also included the complementary tests to be carried out in the different clinical scenarios and on the periodicity that screening should be repeated. Conclusion: A selective screening strategy is recommended for the first time in the early diagnosis of patients with ILD-RA. This multidisciplinary proposal aims to solve some common clinical questions and help decision-making, although its usefulness to identify these patients with good sensitivity must be confirmed in a validation study.(AU)

Screening criteria for interstitial lung disease associated to rheumatoid arthritis: Expert proposal based on Delphi methodology.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a joint proposal for screening criteria of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and vice versa, which serves as a guidelines in patient referral between the Rheumatology and Pneumology departments to early detection of these patients. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out on the risk factors for the development of ILD in RA patients, and for the referral criteria to Rheumatology for suspected early RA. Based on the available evidence, screening criteria were agreed using the Delphi method by a panel of pneumologists and rheumatologists with expertise in these pathologies. RESULTS: Screening criteria for ILD in patients with RA and for the early detection of RA in cases with ILD of unknown etiology have been developed. In both cases, a detection strategy was based on clinical risk factors. Recommendations also included the complementary tests to be carried out in the different clinical scenarios and on the periodicity that screening should be repeated. CONCLUSION: A selective screening strategy is recommended for the first time in the early diagnosis of patients with ILD-RA. This multidisciplinary proposal aims to solve some common clinical questions and help decision-making, although its usefulness to identify these patients with good sensitivity must be confirmed in a validation study.

Effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in patients with systemic sclerosis: a propensity score matched controlled observational study of the EUSTAR cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Tocilizumab showed trends for improving skin fibrosis and prevented progression of lung fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc) in randomised controlled clinical trials. We aimed to assess safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in a real-life setting using the European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) database. METHODS: Patients with SSc fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR 2013 classification criteria, with baseline and follow-up visits at 12±3 months, receiving tocilizumab or standard of care as the control group, were selected. Propensity score matching was applied. Primary endpoints were the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and FVC at 12±3 months compared between the groups. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of progressive/regressive patients for skin and lung at 12±3 months. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with SSc treated with tocilizumab and 3180 patients with SSc with standard of care fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Comparison between groups did not show significant differences, but favoured tocilizumab across all predefined primary and secondary endpoints: mRSS was lower in the tocilizumab group (difference -1.0, 95% CI -3.7 to 1.8, p=0.48). Similarly, FVC % predicted was higher in the tocilizumab group (difference 1.5 (-6.1 to 9.1), p=0.70). The percentage of progressive/regressive patients favoured tocilizumab over controls. These results were robust regarding the sensitivity analyses. Safety analysis confirmed previously reported adverse event profiles. CONCLUSION: Although this large, observational, controlled, real-life EUSTAR study did not show significant effectiveness of tocilizumab on skin and lung fibrosis, the consistency of direction of all predefined endpoints generates hypothesis for potential effectiveness in a broader SSc population.

Recomendaciones SER-SEPAR para el manejo de la enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa asociada a la artritis reumatoide. Parte 2: tratamiento / SER-SEPAR recommendations for the the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease. Part 2: Treatment

Objetivo: Elaborar unas recomendaciones multidisciplinares para mejorar el manejo de la enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa asociada a la artritis reumatoide (EPID-AR). Métodos: Un panel de reumatólogos y neumólogos expertos identificó preguntas clínicas de investigación relevantes para el objetivo del documento. Se realizaron revisiones sistemáticas de la evidencia, que se graduó de acuerdo con los criterios del SIGN. Tras ello, se formularon las recomendaciones. Resultados: Se seleccionaron seis preguntas PICO, tres de las cuales específicamente evaluaron la seguridad y la eficacia de los glucocorticoides, fármacos de acción lenta moduladores de la enfermedad (FAME) sintéticos clásicos e inmunosupresores, FAME biológicos, FAME sintéticos dirigidos y antifibróticos en el tratamiento de los pacientes con EPID-AR. Se formularon un total de 12 recomendaciones específicas sobre este tema con base en la evidencia encontrada y/o consenso de expertos. Conclusiones: Se presenta el primer documento oficial SER-SEPAR de recomendaciones específicas para el abordaje terapéutico de la EPID-AR con el fin de ayudar en la toma de decisiones a los clínicos directamente implicados en su manejo.(AU)

Objective: To develop multidisciplinary recommendations to improve the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Methods: Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of rheumatologists and pneumologists selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Specific recommendations were made. Results: Six PICO questions were selected, three of which analysed the safety and effectiveness of glucocorticoids, classical synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other immunosuppressants, biological agents, targeted synthetic DMARDs, and antifibrotic therapies in the treatment of this complication. A total specific of 12 recommendations on this topic were formulated based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus. Conclusions: We present the first official SER-SEPAR document with specific recommendations for RA-ILD management developed to resolve some common clinical questions, reduce clinical healthcare variability, and facilitate decision-making for patients.(AU)

Recomendaciones SER-SEPAR para el manejo de la enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa asociada a la artritis reumatoide. Parte 1: epidemiología, factores de riesgo y pronóstico / SER-SEPAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease. Part 1: Epidemiology, risk factors and prognosis

Objetivo: Elaborar unas recomendaciones multidisciplinares para mejorar el manejo de la enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa asociada a la artritis reumatoide (EPID-AR). Métodos: Un panel de reumatólogos y neumólogos expertos identificó preguntas clínicas de investigación relevantes para el objetivo del documento. Se realizaron revisiones sistemáticas de la evidencia, que se graduó de acuerdo con los criterios del Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Tras ello, se formularon las recomendaciones. Resultados: Se seleccionaron seis preguntas PICO, tres de las cuales específicamente evaluaron la incidencia y la prevalencia de esta complicación, los factores de riesgo para su desarrollo, y los factores pronósticos de mortalidad y de progresión de la EPID-AR. Se formularon un total de 6 recomendaciones específicas sobre estos aspectos, estructuradas por pregunta, con base en la evidencia encontrada y/o consenso de expertos. Conclusiones: Se presenta el primer documento oficial SER-SEPAR de recomendaciones específicas para el abordaje la EPID-AR, con el fin de ayudar en la toma de decisiones a los clínicos directamente implicados en su manejo y aproximar la práctica asistencial a la mejor evidencia posible.(AU)

Objective: To develop multidisciplinary recommendations to improve the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Methods: Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of rheumatologists and pneumologists selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Specific recommendations were made. Results: Six PICO questions were selected, three of which analysed the incidence and prevalence of RA-ILD, associated risk factors, and predictors of progression and mortality. A total of 6 specific recommendations on these topics, structured by question, were formulated based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus. Conclusions: We present the first official SER-SEPAR document with specific recommendations for RA-ILD management developed to resolve some common clinical questions and facilitate decision-making for patients.(AU)

SER-SEPAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease. Part 1: Epidemiology, risk factors and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop multidisciplinary recommendations to improve the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). METHODS: Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of rheumatologists and pneumologists selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Specific recommendations were made. RESULTS: Six PICO questions were selected, three of which analysed the incidence and prevalence of RA-ILD, associated risk factors, and predictors of progression and mortality. A total of 6 specific recommendations on these topics, structured by question, were formulated based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first official SER-SEPAR document with specific recommendations for RA-ILD management developed to resolve some common clinical questions and facilitate decision-making for patients.

SER-SEPAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease. Part 2: Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To develop multidisciplinary recommendations to improve the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). METHODS: Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of rheumatologists and pneumologists selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Specific recommendations were made. RESULTS: Six PICO questions were selected, three of which analysed the safety and effectiveness of glucocorticoids, classical synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other immunosuppressants, biological agents, targeted synthetic DMARDs, and antifibrotic therapies in the treatment of this complication. A total of 12 recommendations were formulated based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first official SER-SEPAR document with specific recommendations for RA-ILD management developed to resolve some common clinical questions, reduce clinical healthcare variability, and facilitate decision-making for patients.

A multi-criteria decision analysis on the value of nintedanib for interstitial lung diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess the value of nintedanib for non-idiopathic progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (non-IPF PF-ILD) and systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) in the Spanish context, using a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). METHODS: Following an adaptation of the Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcision Making (EVIDEM) MCDA methodology, the estimated value of nintedanib was obtained by means of an additive linear model that combined individual weights (100-points distribution) of criteria with the individual scoring of nintedanib in each criterion for every indication, assigned by a multidisciplinary committee of twelve clinicians, patients, pharmacists, and decision-makers. To assess the reproducibility, an alternative weighting method was applied, as well as a re-test of weights and scores at a different moment of time. RESULTS: The experts committee recognized nintedanib as an intervention with a positive value contribution in comparison to placebo for the treatment of non-IPF PF-ILD (0.50 ± 0.16, on a scale from -1 to 1) and SSc-ILD (0.40 ± 0.12), diseases which were considered as very severe and with high unmet needs. The drug was perceived as a treatment that provides an added therapeutic benefit for patients (0.06-0.07), given its proven clinical efficacy (0.05-0.06), slight improvements in patient-reported outcomes (0.01-0.02), and similar safety profile than placebo (-0.04-0.00), which will likely be positioned as a recommended therapy in the next clinical practice guidelines updates. CONCLUSIONS: Under this increasingly used methodology, nintedanib has shown to provide a positive value estimate for non-IPF PF-ILD and SSc-ILD when compared to placebo in Spain.

Management of progressive pulmonary fibrosis associated with connective tissue disease.

INTRODUCTION: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent and severe complication of connective tissue disease (CTD). AREAS COVERED: In this narrative review, we update the most relevant differential characteristics of fibrotic ILD associated with CTD (CTD-ILD) and propose a diagnostic and therapeutic approach based on a review of the articles published between 2002 and 2022 through PubMed. EXPERT OPINION: The subset of ILD, mainly the radiological/histological pattern and the degree of fibrotic component, usually determines the prognosis and therapeutic strategy for these patients. Some patients with CTD-ILD can develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) with severe deterioration of lung function, rapid progression to chronic respiratory failure, and high mortality. PPF has been described in many CTDs, mainly in systemic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, and requires a multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach to improve patient outcomes.

Krebs von den Lungen-6 glycoprotein circulating levels are not useful as prognostic marker in COVID-19 pneumonia: A large prospective cohort study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly expanded worldwide. Currently, there are no biomarkers to predict respiratory worsening in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. Small studies explored the use of Krebs von de Lungen-6 circulating serum levels (sKL-6) as a prognostic biomarker of the worsening of COVID-19 pneumonia. We aimed at a large study to determine the prognostic value of sKL-6 in predicting evolving trends in COVID-19. We prospectively analyzed the characteristics of 836 patients with COVID-19 with mild lung disease on admission. sKL-6 was obtained in all patients at least at baseline and compared among patients with or without respiratory worsening. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to find the optimal cutoff level. A total of 159 (19%) patients developed respiratory worsening during hospitalization. Baseline sKL-6 levels were not higher in patients who had respiratory worsening (median {IQR} 315.5 {209-469} vs. 306 {214-423} U/ml p = 0.38). The last sKL-6 and the change between baseline and last sKL-6 were higher in the respiratory worsening group (p = 0.02 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The best sKL-6 cutoff point for respiratory worsening was 497 U/ml (area under the curve 0.52; 23% sensitivity and 85% specificity). sKL-6 was not found to be an independent predictor of respiratory worsening. A conditional inference tree (CTREE) was not useful to discriminate patients at risk of worsening. We found that sKL-6 had a low sensibility to predict respiratory worsening in patients with mild-moderate COVID-19 pneumonia and may not be of use to assess the risk of present respiratory worsening in inpatients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Autoimmunity in the Study of Interstitial Lung Disease: Are Serological Test Enough?

No disponible

Myo-Spain: Registro de pacientes con miopatía inflamatoria idiopática de España. Metodología / Myo-Spain: Spanish Registry of Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy. Methodology

Objetivos: Describir la metodología del Registro de pacientes con miopatía inflamatoria idiopática (MII) de España (Myo-Spain), así como sus fortalezas y limitaciones. El objetivo principal del proyecto es analizar la evolución y el manejo clínico de una cohorte de pacientes con MII. Material y método: Estudio observacional, longitudinal, ambispectivo y multicéntrico de una cohorte de pacientes con MII atendidos en servicios de reumatología de España. Se incluirán todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de MII en seguimiento habitual por los centros participantes, sin tener en cuenta la edad de inicio del proceso. Los casos incidentes serán todos los pacientes que al inicio del estudio en cada centrosu estén diagnosticados desde hace menos de 12 meses y casos prevalentes desde hace más de 12 meses. Se construirá un registro en el que se incluirán los datos de la visita basal, del año y dos años. Se recogerán variables sociodemográficas, clínicas, analíticas, complicaciones, comorbilidad, asociación con otras enfermedades reumáticas, ingresos hospitalarios, mortalidad y tratamientos. Además, se determinarán índices, escalas y cuestionarios de actividad, afectación muscular, daño, discapacidad y calidad de vida. El periodo de reclutamiento será de 23 meses. El propósito es conseguir una cohorte de 400 pacientes con MII. Conclusion: esEl estudio Myo-Spain constituye la oportunidad para desarrollar una cohorte de pacientes incidentes y prevalentes con MII en España. Myo-Spain permitirá evaluar en detalle, las características clínicas de la enfermedad en diferentes momentos. Se espera que la información exhaustiva recogida en las visitas suponga una amplia fuente de datos para futuros análisis.(AU)

Objectives: To describe the methods of the Spanish Registry of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) (Myo-Spain), as well as its strengths and limitations. The main objective of the project is to analyse the evolution and clinical management of a cohort of patients with IIM. Methods: Observational, longitudinal, ambispective and multicentre study of a cohort of patients with IIM seen in rheumatology units in Spain. All patients with a diagnosis of IMM will be included in the regular follow-up of the participating centres, regardless of age on initiation of the process. Incident cases will be all patients who at the beginning of the study have been diagnosed for less than 12 months and prevalent cases for more than 12 months. The registry will include data from the visit at baseline, one year and two years. Socio-demographic, clinical, analytical variables, complications, comorbidities, association with other rheumatic diseases, hospital admissions, mortality and treatments will be collected. In addition, indices, scales and questionnaires of activity, muscle involvement, damage, disability, and quality of life will be determined. The recruitment period will be 23 months. The purpose is to obtain a cohort of 400 patients with IMM. Conclusions: Myo-Spain registry provides the opportunity to develop a cohort of incident and prevalent patients with IMM in Spain. Myo-Spain will be able to assess in detail the clinical characteristics of the disease at different times. The comprehensive information collected during the visits is expected to provide a broad source of data for future analysis.(AU)

Impacto de la COVID-19 en la consulta de enfermería reumatológica / Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Rheumatology Nursing Consultation

Objetivo: Comparar el cambio en la actividad asistencial realizada en una consulta de enfermería reumatológica antes y durante la pandemia. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo y observacional de 254 pacientes consecutivos antes y 251 durante. Resultados: El tipo de visita programada presencial disminuyó durante la COVID-19 (46,5% vs. 1,6%), aumentando la visita programada telefónica (2,8% vs. 52,2%) y las consultas espontáneas a través del teléfono o email (28,3% vs. 45%). Las funciones realizadas en las programadas fueron el control del paciente estable (20% vs. 37%) y la gestión (12% vs. 38%). El motivo de consulta espontánea incrementó durante la COVID-19, sobre todo: dudas respecto a medidas de prevención y optimización de tratamiento (13,8% vs. 31,1%). Conclusiones: La primera ola de la COVID-19 generó en la consulta de enfermería un incremento global de todas las actividades: en el número de visitas/día, en el número de controles de pacientes estables, en gestión y en la resolución de dudas.(AU)

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought major changes to the model of patient care in Rheumatology. Our aim was to compare the change in the care delivered in a rheumatology nursing consultation before and during the pandemic. Material and methods: Descriptive and observational study in 254 patients before and in 251 during the pandemic outbreak. Results: The type of scheduled face-to-face visit decreased during COVID-19 (46.5% vs. 1.6%), with the number of scheduled telephone visits increasing (2.8% vs. 52.2%) and spontaneous consultations over the phone or email (28.3% vs. 45%). The functions performed in the programmed ones were the stable patient control (20% vs. 37%) and management (12% vs. 38%). The reason for spontaneous consultation increased during COVID-19, especially doubts regarding prevention measures and treatment optimization (13.8% vs. 31.1%). Conclusions: The first wave of COVID-19 brought to rheumatology nursing consultation a global increase in all activities in the number of visits per day, in the number of stable patient controls, in monitoring and answering patient concerns.(AU)

Experts document on methotrexate use in combined therapy with biological or targeted synthetic disease modifying drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop recommendations for the management of methotrexate (MTX) when considering the combination with biological (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Eleven experts on RA were selected. Two coordinators formulated 13 questions about the combination therapy of MTX with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. A systematic review was conducted to answer the questions. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established as well as the search strategies (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2019). Two reviewers selected the articles and collected data. Simultaneously, EULAR and ACR meeting abstracts were evaluated. Based on this evidence, the coordinators proposed preliminary recommendations that the experts discussed and voted in a nominal group meeting. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation was established using the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine and the level of agreement with a Delphi. Agreement was established if at least 80% of the experts voted 'yes' (yes/no). RESULTS: The systematic review retrieved 513 citations of which 61 were finally included. A total of 10 recommendations were generated, voted and accepted. The level of agreement was very high in all of them and it was achieved in the first Delphi round. Final recommendations cover aspects such as the optimal MTX dosage, tapering strategy or patients' risk management. CONCLUSIONS: This document is intended to help clinicians solve usual clinical questions and facilitate decision making when treating RA patients with MTX in combination with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs.

Experts document on methotrexate use in combined therapy with biological or targeted synthetic disease modifying drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis / Documento de expertos sobre el uso de terapia combinada de metotrexato con terapias biológicas o terapias dirigidas a pacientes con artritis reumatoide

Objective: We aimed to develop recommendations for the management of methotrexate (MTX) when considering the combination with biological (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Eleven experts on RA were selected. Two coordinators formulated 13 questions about the combination therapy of MTX with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. A systematic review was conducted to answer the questions. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established as well as the search strategies (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2019). Two reviewers selected the articles and collected data. Simultaneously, EULAR and ACR meeting abstracts were evaluated. Based on this evidence, the coordinators proposed preliminary recommendations that the experts discussed and voted in a nominal group meeting. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation was established using the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine and the level of agreement with a Delphi. Agreement was established if at least 80% of the experts voted ‘yes’ (yes/no). Results: The systematic review retrieved 513 citations of which 61 were finally included. A total of 10 recommendations were generated, voted and accepted. The level of agreement was very high in all of them and it was achieved in the first Delphi round. Final recommendations cover aspects such as the optimal MTX dosage, tapering strategy or patients’ risk management. Conclusions: This document is intended to help clinicians solve usual clinical questions and facilitate decision making when treating RA patients with MTX in combination with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs.(AU)

Objetivo: Desarrollar recomendaciones sobre el uso de metotrexato (MTX) en combinación con medicamentos modificadores de la enfermedad (DMARD) biológicos (b) o sintéticos específicos (ts) en la artritis reumatoide (AR). Métodos: Se seleccionaron 11 expertos en AR. Dos coordinadores formularon 13 preguntas sobre la terapia combinada de MTX con bDMARD o tsDMARD. Se realizó una revisión sistemática para responder las preguntas. Se establecieron criterios de inclusión y exclusión, así como las estrategias de búsqueda (se realizaron búsquedas en Medline, Embase y la Biblioteca Cochrane hasta enero de 2019). Dos revisores seleccionaron los artículos y recopilaron datos. Simultáneamente, se evaluaron los resúmenes de las reuniones EULAR y ACR. Con base en esta evidencia, los coordinadores propusieron recomendaciones preliminares que los expertos discutieron y votaron en una reunión de grupo nominal. El nivel de evidencia y el grado de recomendación se establecieron utilizando el Centro de Oxford para Medicina Basada en Evidencia y el nivel de acuerdo con un Delphi. El acuerdo se estableció si al menos el 80% de los expertos votaron «sí» (sí/no). Resultados: La revisión sistemática recuperó 513 citas, de las cuales finalmente se incluyeron 61. Se generaron, votaron y aceptaron un total de 10 recomendaciones. El nivel de acuerdo fue muy alto en todas ellas y se logró en la primera ronda de Delphi. Las recomendaciones finales cubren aspectos como la dosis óptima de MTX, la estrategia de reducción o la gestión del riesgo de los pacientes. Conclusiones: Este documento está destinado a ayudar a los médicos a resolver preguntas clínicas habituales y facilitar la toma de decisiones al tratar a pacientes con AR con MTX, en combinación con bDMARD o tsDMARD.(AU)