Effectiveness of a systematic vaccination program in patients with autoimmune inflammatory disease treated with anti-TNF alpha drugs.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this is manuscript is to evaluate the impact of a vaccination protocol in the prevention of infection in autoimmune inflammatory disease (AUTID) patients treated with Anti-TNF-alpha therapies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The authors conducted an observational study to test the effect of a vaccination program in AUTID patients that received anti-TNF-alpha therapies in hospital admissions related to infections. This effect was evaluated by comparing patients admitted before the program started (prevaccination period, 2009-2011) and after the program (postvaccination period, 2011-2014). RESULTS: The study included 581 patients: 280 in the pre-vaccination group and 301 in the post-vaccination group. During the prevaccination period, 27.3% of patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha drugs were vaccinated before biological therapy. During the postvaccination period, this percentage increased to 97.0%. Statistically significant differences were detected in emergency room visits per 10.000 treatment days, in hospital admissions related to an infectious disease and in the rate of invasive pneumococcal disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae infection per 10.000 days of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This vaccination program decreases infectious complications and was associated with a lower amount of hospital admissions due to infections, emergency room visits and the rate of invasive pneumococcal disease.

Clinical and economic impact of the use of etanercept 25 mg once weekly in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthropathy and ankylosing spondylitis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and economic impact of etanercept 25 mg/week (ETN25) on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthropathy (PA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients in sustained clinical remission. METHODS: Observational, retrospective cohort of patients treated with etanercept 50 mg/week (ETN50) who achieved and maintained clinical remission (Disease Activity Score 28 < 2.6 or BASDAI < 2) over a period of 1 year and had slow worsening of structural changes were enrolled in an off-label program (January 2006 to June 2013) to switch from ETN50 to ETN25. Economic impact was assessed using Enbrel® official prices for Spain. RESULTS: From 1 January 2006 to 1 June 2013, 98 RA, 40 PA and 47 AS patients were treated with ETN50; 39 (24%) patients (20 women; age = 53 ± 7 years; 24 RA, 7 PA, 8 AS) received ETN25 for at least 0.5 years (2.6 ± 2.0 years; range = 0.5 - 7.3 years). As of 1 June 2013, 29 (74%) patients continued on ETN25. RA patients: 17 patients continued on ETN25, 5 patients discontinued use due to reactivation of RA (4 switched back to ETN50 and 1 switched to adalimumab; all regained clinical remission) and 2 patients discontinued use due to adverse reactions. PA patients: four patients continued on ETN25, two patients discontinued use due to reactivation of PA (switched back to ETN50, regaining clinical remission) and one patient discontinued use due to adverse reaction. All AS patients continued on ETN25. The total savings associated with ETN25 over the 7-year observation period were €622,073, resulting in the ability to treat 52 additional patients with ETN50 for one year without increasing total ETN costs. CONCLUSION: ETN25 produces cost savings while maintaining clinical response in a high proportion of patients after at least one year under clinical remission with ETN50. At a time when the cost of therapy is an unavoidable component of healthcare treatment decisions, ETN25 could be a cost-effective option for selective RA, PA and AS patients.

Generalised erythematous skin eruptions induced by sorafenib: cutaneous toxicity and treatment outcome.

A woman diagnosed of a renal cell carcinoma in 1989 had a metastatic kidney cancer localised in subcutaneous nodules, gut and lung in 2007. Sorafenib treatment was initiated a 400 mg orally twice a day. The patient developed generalised erythematous skin eruptions and two weeks later a widespread erythematous maculopapular eruption located exclusively on the legs and arms, along with an objective response. The most likely cause of the generalised erythematous skin eruptions was considered to be sorafenib because of the close temporal relationship between exposure to the drug and onset of symptoms. Furthermore, a relationship between sorafenib skin toxicity and treatment efficacy was observed. This therapeutic efficacy of EGFR inhibitors and cutaneous side effects should be better assessed in large cohorts or trials to determine whether the skin toxicity of patients can be linked to an objective antitumour response.

Severe myalgia associated with adalimumab treatment in a patient with Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of severe myalgia associated with adalimumab in a patient with Crohn's disease. CASE SUMMARY: A 44-year-old woman was diagnosed as having ileocecal Crohn's disease with perianal fistula lesions. She was treated with 3 infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg, which stabilized her condition. However, when reactivation of Crohn's disease occurred, infliximab was discontinued. Eight weeks after infliximab was suspended, treatment with adalimumab was started, with an initial dose of 160 mg followed by 80 mg in week 2; 48 hours after the first dose, the woman complained of generalized severe pain in her upper and lower extremities. Results of all laboratory tests were within normal limits. A diagnosis of severe drug-related myalgia was made. We suspected that adalimumab was the causative agent since it was the only drug that had been added before the musculoskeletal symptoms appeared. Adalimumab was stopped and treatment with ibuprofen and tramadol was started. Fifteen days after stopping adalimumab, the patient reported complete resolution of her muscle pain. DISCUSSION: Myalgia following administration of adalimumab is uncommon. This adverse reaction rarely is severe enough to result in cessation of the drug. In our patient, the most likely cause of the severe myalgias was considered to be adalimumab. The onset and resolution of the signs and symptoms followed a reasonable temporal sequence following drug initiation and discontinuation. In accordance with the data obtained and based on the Naranjo algorithm, the adverse reaction could be considered probable. CONCLUSIONS: This case documents the importance of recognizing the possibility of musculoskeletal adverse reactions even with medications like adalimumab, which have a good safety profile. These findings should further alert clinicians to the potential for myalgias associated with adalimumab administration.