Assessing EMS scope of practice for utility and risk: the New Mexico EMS Interventions Assessment Project, Phase One results.

INTRODUCTION: Few emergency medical services (EMS) interventions in New Mexico have been assessed for efficacy, potential harm, or potential benefit. There is concern that many interventions added over the years may be outdated, harmful, or ineffective in the EMS setting. A formal process for reviewing the state EMS scope of practice using literature review and expert consensus is discussed. In Phase One of the project, interventions in the New Mexico EMS scope of practice were prioritized for further review by surveying a national cadre of EMS experts to evaluate EMS interventions using a utilitarian harm/benefit metric. METHODS: An electronic survey based on the 2010 New Mexico EMS Scope of Practice statute was administered from March through June, 2011. A national cadre of 104 respondents was identified. Respondents were either State EMS medical directors or EMS fellowship directors. Respondents were asked to rate the potential harm and the potential benefit of specific EMS interventions on a 5-point ordinal scale. Median harm and benefit scores were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 88 completed surveys were received following 208 emailed invitations to 104 respondents (43% response rate). Twenty-two (22) highest-priority interventions (those with a harm/benefit median score ratio of >1) were identified. Seven additional second-priority interventions were also identified. These interventions will be advanced for formal literature review and expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The New Mexico EMS Interventions Project offers a novel model for assessing a prehospital scope of practice.

Methodological issues in the surveillance of poisoning, illicit drug overdose, and heroin overdose deaths in new Mexico.

New Mexico leads the nation in poisoning mortality, which has increased during the 1990s in New Mexico and the United States. Most of this increase has been due to unintentional deaths from illicit drug overdoses. Medical examiner and/or vital statistics data have been used to track poisoning deaths. In this study, the authors linked medical examiner and vital statistics records on underlying cause of death, coded using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, to assess the extent to which these data sources agreed with respect to poisoning deaths. The authors used multiple-cause files, which are files with several causes listed for each death, to further assess poisoning deaths involving more than one drug. Using vital statistics or medical examiner records, 94.7% of poisoning deaths were captured by each source alone. For unintentional illicit drug and heroin overdose deaths, each data source alone captured smaller percentages of deaths. Deaths coded as E858.8 (unintentional poisoning due to other drugs) require linkage with medical examiner or multiple-cause records, because this code identifies a significant percentage of illicit drug overdose deaths but obscures the specific drug(s) involved. Surveillance of poisoning death should include the use of medical examiner records and underlying- and multiple-cause vital statistics records.