Mohs Surgeons Dominate Cutaneous Reconstructions in Cosmetically and Functionally Sensitive Sites: Medicare Trends From 2013 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Although dermatologists perform more cutaneous reconstructions than any other specialists for the Medicare population, the perception of dermatologists as surgeons may not be as fully recognized. Mohs surgeons are trained in complex reconstructions of cosmetically and functionally sensitive (CFS) sites, although the proportion they account for is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the proportion of cutaneous reconstructions in CFS sites performed by Mohs surgeons compared with other specialists, and to identify trends from 2013 to 2019. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed using the Medicare Public Use Files for 2013 to 2019. Data were stratified by physician specialty, with dermatologists further subdivided into Mohs surgeons and non-Mohs dermatologists. RESULTS: Mohs surgeons performed 75.3% of all reconstructions in 2019, a significant increase from 2013 ( p < .0001). Mohs surgeons dominated nearly every type of CFS cutaneous reconstruction, with significant increases in proportion ( p < .0001) from 2013 to 2019 for every category except interpolation flaps. Complex repairs were the most commonly performed cutaneous reconstruction type. CONCLUSION: Mohs surgeons perform far more cutaneous reconstructive surgeries in CFS sites than any other specialty for the Medicare population, with significant increases in their lead over the study period.

Sebaceous Carcinoma of the Eyelid: Proposed Nomenclature for Multifocal and Multicentric Disease.

PURPOSE: To review clinical presentations of periocular sebaceous carcinoma (SC) and introduce standardized nomenclature for multicentric and multifocal disease presentation. METHODS: A comprehensive PubMed/Medline search was conducted to identify all articles reporting periocular multicentric or multifocal SC presentations. The authors also highlight an additional case of SC presenting with 2 clinically distinct tumor foci and complete secondary invasion of the lacrimal gland. RESULTS: This review summarizes clinical presentations of periocular SC exhibiting discrete foci of microinvasion reported in the literature. Discrete microinvasion was associated with high rates of misdiagnosis (80%), simultaneous involvement of both upper and lower eyelids (80%), pagetoid spread (80%), multinodular growth (33%), local tumor spread (60%), previous eyelid manipulation (40%), and local recurrence (40%). Eyelid multifocality with clinically discrete nodules (42%) was associated with more advanced disease including orbital extension and regional invasion (80%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite previous reported associations with poorer outcomes, there is no consensus in the definition or nomenclature for discrete microinvasive or clinical disease presentations in periocular SC. The authors recommend defining multicentric disease as discrete foci of microinvasive tumor with basement membrane disruption and multifocal disease as discrete clinically evident nodules involving both the upper and lower eyelids. Differentiating between discrete microinvasive (multicentric) and clinically nodular (multifocal) disease may improve risk stratification to most accurately identify patients who require more aggressive management and surveillance.

Varicella Zoster Aseptic Meningitis Presenting as an Atypical Mucocutaneous Eruption Involving All Three Divisions of the Trigeminal Nerve.

Herpes zoster involving all three divisions of the trigeminal nerve is extremely rare and may pose a diagnostic challenge, especially in young and immunocompetent patients. We present a unique case of herpes zoster involving all three divisions of the trigeminal nerve and illustrate that this uncommon eruption can be a presenting sign of varicella zoster aseptic meningitis. This case emphasizes the importance of fundamental morphology recognition, particularly its ability to aid in clinical diagnosis and its potential to decrease patient morbidity and mortality by expediting the initiation of appropriate treatment.

Robotic-Assisted Transperitoneal Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Metastatic Melanoma: Early Outcomes Compared with Open Pelvic Lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of iliac or obturator nodal involvement, the role of pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) for melanoma is controversial, but for select patients, long-term survival can be achieved with the combination of superficial inguinal (inguinofemoral) and PLND. Open PLND (oPLND) is often limited in visual exposure and can be associated with considerable postoperative pain. Robotic PLND (rPLND) is a minimally invasive technique that provides excellent visualization of the iliac and obturator nodes. Outcomes comparing the open and robotic techniques have not been reported previously for patients with melanoma. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed our experience with rPLND for melanoma and compared clinical and pathologic results with oPLND. We evaluated operative times, nodal yield, and short-term oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Thirteen rPLND (2013 to 2015) (15 attempted, 87% success rate) and 25 oPLND (2010 to 2015) consecutive cases were completed. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was combined with an open inguinofemoral dissection in 8 of 13 (62%) robotic and 17 of 25 (68%) open cases. Median length of stay was shorter in the rPLND group, with 1.0 vs 3.5 days for pelvic-only cases (p < 0.001) and 2.5 vs 4.0 days (p < 0.001) for combined ilioinguinal cases. Median operative time (227 vs 230 minutes; p = 0.96) and nodal yield (11 vs 10 nodes; p = 0.53) were not different between rPLND and oPLND. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic PLND offers a safe, effective, minimally invasive approach to resect the pelvic lymph nodes in patients with melanoma, with no significant difference in nodal yield or operative times, but a shorter length of stay compared with oPLND.