Multicenter prospective comparison of conventional and high-power short duration radiofrequency application for pulmonary vein isolation: the high-power short-duration radiofrequency application for faster and safer pulmonary vein ablation (POWER FAST III) trial.

BACKGROUND: Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PV) with high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency application (RFa) may reduce the duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, without compromising the procedural efficacy and safety in comparison with the conventional approach. This hypothesis has been generated in several observational studies; the POWER FAST III will test it in a randomized multicenter clinical trial. METHODS: It is a multicenter randomized, open-label and non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. AF ablation using 70 W and 9-10 s RFa is compared with the conventional technique using 25-40 W RFa guided by numerical lesion indexes. The main efficacy objective is the incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrences electrocardiographically documented during 1-year follow-up. The main safety objective is the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesions (EDEL). This trial includes a substudy of incidence of asymptomatic cerebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ablation. RESULTS: A randomized clinical trial compares for the first time high-power short-duration and conventional ablation in order to obtain data about the efficacy and safety of the high-power technique in an adequate methodological context. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the POWER FAST III could support the use of the high-power short-duration ablation in clinical practice. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NTC04153747.

Impact of the withdrawal of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors on mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Background: Chronic use of Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEi) and aldosterone-receptor blockers (ARB) is not associated with worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19. However, evidence on the impact of their discontinuation during hospital admission is scarce. Our aim was to determine whether withdrawal of ACEi, ARB and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) is associated with all-cause mortality in a real-life large cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: Observational cohort study from a large referral center from 1 March 2020 to 20 April 2020. Withdrawal of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors was defined as the absence of any received dose during hospital admission in patients receiving chronic treatment. Prescriptions during admission were confirmed by data from the central pharmacy computerized system. Results: A total of 2042 patients (mean age 68.4±17.6, 57.1% male) with confirmed COVID-19 were included. During a median follow-up of 57 (21-55) days, 583 (28.6%) died. Prior to hospital admission 468 (22.9%), 343 (16.8%) and 83 (4.1%) patients were receiving ACEi, ARB and MRA respectively. During the study period, 216 (46.2%), 193 (56.3%) and 41 (49.4%) were withdrawn from the corresponding drug. After adjusting for age, cardiovascular risk factors, baseline comorbidities and in-hospital COVID-19 dedicated treatment, withdrawal of ACE inhibitors (hazard ration [HR] 1.48 [95% confidence interval -CI- 1.16-1.89]) and MRA (HR 2.01 [95% CI 1.30-3.10]) were shown to be independent predictors of all-cause mortality. No independent relationship between ARB withdrawal and mortality was observed. Conclusion: ACEi and MRA withdrawal were associated with higher mortality. Strong consideration should be given to not discontinuing these medications during hospital admission.

Introdução: O uso crónico de inibidores da ECA (IECA) e de antagonistas dos recetores de aldosterona (ARA) não está associado a resultados piores em doentes com Covid-19. No entanto, a evidência relativa ao impacto da sua retirada durante a admissão hospitalar é escassa. O nosso objetivo foi determinar se a retirada do IECA, ARA e antagonistas dos recetores dos mineralocorticóides (ARM) está associada à mortalidade por todas as causas numa grande coorte real de doentes com infeção por SRA-CoV-2. Métodos: Estudo coorte observacional a partir de um grande centro de referência de 1 de março de 2020 a 20 de abril de 2020. A retirada dos inibidores do sistema RAAS foi definida como a ausência de qualquer dose recebida durante a admissão hospitalar em doentes que recebem tratamento prolongado. As prescrições durante a admissão foram confirmadas por dados do sistema informático da farmácia central. Resultados: Um total de 2042 doentes (idade média de 68,4 ±17,6, 57,1% do sexo masculino) com COVID-19 confirmado foram incluídos. Durante um acompanhamento médio de 57 (21-55) dias, 583 (28,6%) morreram. Conclusão: A retirada do IECA e do ARM foi associada a uma mortalidade mais elevada. Deve ser dada grande atenção para não interromper estes medicamentos durante a admissão hospitalar.

Influence of statin treatment in a cohort of patients admitted for COVID-19.

Aims and objectives: Statins have been proposed as potentially useful agents for modulating the host response in COVID-19. However, solid evidence-based recommendations are still lacking. Our aim was to study the association between statin use and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as the specific consequences of chronic treatment withdrawal during hospital admission. Material and methods: Retrospective observational study including 2191 hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: Mean age was 68.0±17.8 years and 597 (27.3%) patients died during follow-up. A total of 827 patients (37.7% of the whole sample), received chronic treatment with statins. Even though they underwent more frequent admissions in critical care units, chronic treatment with statins was not independently associated with all-cause mortality [HR 0.95 (0.72-1.25)]. During the whole hospital admission, 371 patients (16.9%) received at least one dose of statin. Although these patients had a significantly worse clinical profile, both treatment with statins during admission [HR 1.03 (0.78-1.35)] and withdrawal of chronic statin treatment [HR 1.01 (0.78-1.30)] showed a neutral effect in mortality. However, patients treated with statins presented more frequently hepatic cytolysis, rhabdomyolysis and thrombotic/hemorrhagic events. Conclusions: In this large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, statins were not independently associated with all-cause mortality during follow-up. Clinically relevant statin-associated adverse effects should be carefully monitored during hospital admission.

Antecedentes y objetivos: Se ha especulado que las estatinas pueden ser de utilidad en el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19, pero no existen evidencias clínicas sólidas. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer su utilidad en una cohorte de gran tamaño de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19, así como si su retirada se asocia con un peor pronóstico. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo observacional. Se incluyeron 2.191 pacientes hospitalizados con infección confirmada con SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: La edad media fue de 68,0 ± 17,8 años y fallecieron un total de 597 (27,3%) pacientes. Un total de 827 pacientes (37,7% de la muestra) estaban tratados previamente con estatinas. Aunque precisaron con mayor frecuencia de ingreso en camas de críticos, dicho grupo terapéutico no resultó un factor predictor independiente de muerte en el seguimiento [HR 0,95 (0,72-1,25)]. Un total de 371 pacientes (16,9%) recibió al menos una dosis de estatina durante el ingreso. A pesar de ser una población con un perfil clínico más desfavorable, tanto su uso [HR 1,03 (0,78-1,35)] como la suspensión durante el ingreso en pacientes que las recibían crónicamente [HR 1,01 (0,78-1,30)] presentaron un efecto neutro en la mortalidad. No obstante, el grupo con estatinas desarrolló con mayor frecuencia datos de citolisis hepática, rabdomiolisis y más eventos trombóticos y hemorrágicos. Conclusiones: En nuestra muestra, las estatinas no se asociaron de forma independiente a una menor mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19. En aquellos pacientes que tengan indicación de recibirlas por su patología previa es necesario monitorizar estrechamente sus potenciales efectos adversos durante el ingreso hospitalario.

Influencia del tratamiento con estatinas en una cohorte de pacientes ingresados por COVID-19 / Influence of statin treatment in a cohort of patients admitted for COVID-19

Antecedentes y objetivos:Se ha especulado que las estatinas pueden ser de utilidad en el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19, pero no existen evidencias clínicas sólidas. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer su utilidad en una cohorte de gran tamaño de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19, así como si su retirada se asocia con un peor pronóstico.Material y métodos:Estudio retrospectivo observacional. Se incluyeron 2.191 pacientes hospitalizados con infección confirmada con SARS-CoV-2.Resultados:La edad media fue de 68,0 ± 17,8 años y fallecieron un total de 597 (27,3%) pacientes. Un total de 827 pacientes (37,7% de la muestra) estaban tratados previamente con estatinas. Aunque precisaron con mayor frecuencia de ingreso en camas de críticos, dicho grupo terapéutico no resultó un factor predictor independiente de muerte en el seguimiento [HR 0,95 (0,72-1,25)]. Un total de 371 pacientes (16,9%) recibió al menos una dosis de estatina durante el ingreso. A pesar de ser una población con un perfil clínico más desfavorable, tanto su uso [HR 1,03 (0,78-1,35)] como la suspensión durante el ingreso en pacientes que las recibían crónicamente [HR 1,01 (0,78-1,30)] presentaron un efecto neutro en la mortalidad. No obstante, el grupo con estatinas desarrolló con mayor frecuencia datos de citolisis hepática, rabdomiolisis y más eventos trombóticos y hemorrágicos.Conclusiones:En nuestra muestra, las estatinas no se asociaron de forma independiente a una menor mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19. En aquellos pacientes que tengan indicación de recibirlas por su patología previa es necesario monitorizar estrechamente sus potenciales efectos adversos durante el ingreso hospitalario. (AU)

Aims and objectives:Statins have been proposed as potentially useful agents for modulating the host response in COVID-19. However, solid evidence-based recommendations are still lacking. Our aim was to study the association between statin use and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as the specific consequences of chronic treatment withdrawal during hospital admission.Material and methods:Retrospective observational study including 2191 hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.Results:Mean age was 68.0±17.8 years and 597 (27.3%) patients died during follow-up. A total of 827 patients (37.7% of the whole sample), received chronic treatment with statins. Even though they underwent more frequent admissions in critical care units, chronic treatment with statins was not independently associated with all-cause mortality [HR 0.95 (0.72-1.25)]. During the whole hospital admission, 371 patients (16.9%) received at least one dose of statin. Although these patients had a significantly worse clinical profile, both treatment with statins during admission [HR 1.03 (0.78-1.35)] and withdrawal of chronic statin treatment [HR 1.01 (0.78-1.30)] showed a neutral effect in mortality. However, patients treated with statins presented more frequently hepatic cytolysis, rhabdomyolysis and thrombotic/hemorrhagic events.Conclusions:In this large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, statins were not independently associated with all-cause mortality during follow-up. Clinically relevant statin-associated adverse effects should be carefully monitored during hospital admission. (AU)

Influence of statin treatment in a cohort of patients admitted for COVID-19. / Influencia del tratamiento con estatinas en una cohorte de pacientes ingresados por COVID-19.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Statins have been proposed as potentially useful agents for modulating the host response in COVID-19. However, solid evidence-based recommendations are still lacking. Our aim was to study the association between statin use and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as the specific consequences of chronic treatment withdrawal during hospital admission. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study including 2191 hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Mean age was 68.0±17.8 years and 597 (27.3%) patients died during follow-up. A total of 827 patients (37.7% of the whole sample), received chronic treatment with statins. Even though they underwent more frequent admissions in critical care units, chronic treatment with statins was not independently associated with all-cause mortality [HR 0.95 (0.72-1.25)]. During the whole hospital admission, 371 patients (16.9%) received at least one dose of statin. Although these patients had a significantly worse clinical profile, both treatment with statins during admission [HR 1.03 (0.78-1.35)] and withdrawal of chronic statin treatment [HR 1.01 (0.78-1.30)] showed a neutral effect in mortality. However, patients treated with statins presented more frequently hepatic cytolysis, rhabdomyolysis and thrombotic/hemorrhagic events. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, statins were not independently associated with all-cause mortality during follow-up. Clinically relevant statin-associated adverse effects should be carefully monitored during hospital admission.

Characterization of myocardial injury in a cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury has been identified as a common complication in patients with COVID-19. However, recent research has serious limitations, such as non-guideline definition of myocardial injury, heterogenicity of troponin sampling or very short-term follow-up. Using data from a large European cohort, we aimed to overcome these pitfalls and adequately characterize myocardial damage in COVID-19. METHODS: Consecutive patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and available high-sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI), from March 1st to April 20th, 2020 who completed at least 1-month follow-up or died, were studied. RESULTS: A total of 918 patients (mean age 63.2 ± 15.5 years, 60.1% male) with a median follow-up of 57 (49-63) days were included. Of these, 190 (20.7%) fulfilled strict criteria for myocardial injury (21.1% chronic, 76.8% acute non-ischemic, 2.1% acute ischemic). Time from onset of symptoms to maximum hs-TnI was 11 (7-18) days. Thrombotic and bleeding events, arrhythmias, heart failure, need for mechanical ventilation and death were significantly more prevalent in patients with higher hs-TnI concentrations, even without fulfilling criteria for myocardial injury. hs-TnI was identified as an independent predictor of mortality [HR 2.52 (1.57-4.04) per 5-logarithmic units increment] after adjusting for multiple relevant covariates. CONCLUSION: Elevated hs-TnI is highly prevalent among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Even mild elevations well below the 99th URL were significantly associated with higher rates of cardiac and non-cardiac complications, and higher mortality. Future research should address the role of serial hs-TnI assessment to improve COVID-19 prognostic stratification and clinical outcomes.

ANTECEDENTES: El daño miocárdico parece una complicación frecuente en pacientes con COVID-19. Sin embargo, la literatura al respecto presenta serias limitaciones, como definiciones incorrectas, heterogeneidad de las determinaciones de troponina o seguimientos cortos. Utilizando datos de una cohorte amplia, el objetivo del trabajo fue caracterizar adecuadamente el daño miocárdico en pacientes con COVID-19 utilizando una metodología adecuada. MÉTODOS: Se estudió a pacientes consecutivos con infección confirmada y determinaciones disponibles de troponina I de alta sensibilidad (hs-TnI), desde el 1 de marzo hasta el 20 de abril del 2020, que hubieran completado al menos un mes de seguimiento o fallecieran durante el periodo de estudio. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 918 pacientes (edad 63,2 ± 15,5 años, 60,1% varones) con un seguimiento mediano de 57 (49-63) días. De estos, 190 (20,7%) cumplían criterios estrictos de lesión miocárdica (21,1% crónica, 76,8% aguda no isquémica, 2,1% aguda isquémica). El tiempo desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la hs-TnI máxima fue de 11 (7-18) días. Los eventos trombóticos y hemorrágicos, las arritmias, la insuficiencia cardíaca, la necesidad de ventilación mecánica y la muerte fueron significativamente más frecuentes en pacientes con concentraciones elevadas de hs-TnI, incluso por debajo del nivel de lesión miocárdica. La hs-TnI resultó un predictor independiente de mortalidad (HR 2,52 [(1,57-4,04] por cada 5 unidades logarítmicas). CONCLUSIÓN: La hs-TnI elevada es altamente prevalente entre los pacientes con COVID-19. Elevaciones leves muy por debajo del límite para definir lesión miocárdica se asociaron con más complicaciones y mayor mortalidad. La determinación protocolizada de hs-TnI en estos enfermos podría mejorar su estratificación pronóstica y los resultados clínicos.

Characterization of myocardial injury in a cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection / Caracterización de la lesión miocárdica en una cohorte de pacientes infectados por el SARS-CoV-2

Background: Myocardial injury has been identified as a common complication in patients with COVID-19. However, recent research has serious limitations, such as non-guideline definition of myocardial injury, heterogenicity of troponin sampling or very short-term follow-up. Using data from a large European cohort, we aimed to overcome these pitfalls and adequately characterize myocardial damage in COVID-19.MethodsConsecutive patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and available high-sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI), from March 1st to April 20th, 2020 who completed at least 1-month follow-up or died, were studied.ResultsA total of 918 patients (mean age 63.2±15.5 years, 60.1% male) with a median follow-up of 57 (49–63) days were included. Of these, 190 (20.7%) fulfilled strict criteria for myocardial injury (21.1% chronic, 76.8% acute non-ischemic, 2.1% acute ischemic). Time from onset of symptoms to maximum hs-TnI was 11 (7–18) days. Thrombotic and bleeding events, arrhythmias, heart failure, need for mechanical ventilation and death were significantly more prevalent in patients with higher hs-TnI concentrations, even without fulfilling criteria for myocardial injury. hs-TnI was identified as an independent predictor of mortality [HR 2.52 (1.57–4.04) per 5-logarithmic units increment] after adjusting for multiple relevant covariates.ConclusionElevated hs-TnI is highly prevalent among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Even mild elevations well below the 99th URL were significantly associated with higher rates of cardiac and non-cardiac complications, and higher mortality. Future research should address the role of serial hs-TnI assessment to improve COVID-19 prognostic stratification and clinical outcomes. (AU)

Antecedentes: El daño miocárdico parece una complicación frecuente en pacientes con COVID-19. Sin embargo, la literatura al respecto presenta serias limitaciones, como definiciones incorrectas, heterogeneidad de las determinaciones de troponina o seguimientos cortos. Utilizando datos de una cohorte amplia, el objetivo del trabajo fue caracterizar adecuadamente el daño miocárdico en pacientes con COVID-19 utilizando una metodología adecuada.MétodosSe estudió a pacientes consecutivos con infección confirmada y determinaciones disponibles de troponina I de alta sensibilidad (hs-TnI), desde el 1 de marzo hasta el 20 de abril del 2020, que hubieran completado al menos un mes de seguimiento o fallecieran durante el periodo de estudio.ResultadosSe incluyó a 918 pacientes (edad 63,2±15,5 años, 60,1% varones) con un seguimiento mediano de 57 (49-63) días. De estos, 190 (20,7%) cumplían criterios estrictos de lesión miocárdica (21,1% crónica, 76,8% aguda no isquémica, 2,1% aguda isquémica). El tiempo desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la hs-TnI máxima fue de 11 (7-18) días. Los eventos trombóticos y hemorrágicos, las arritmias, la insuficiencia cardíaca, la necesidad de ventilación mecánica y la muerte fueron significativamente más frecuentes en pacientes con concentraciones elevadas de hs-TnI, incluso por debajo del nivel de lesión miocárdica. La hs-TnI resultó un predictor independiente de mortalidad (HR 2,52 [(1,57-4,04] por cada 5 unidades logarítmicas).ConclusiónLa hs-TnI elevada es altamente prevalente entre los pacientes con COVID-19. Elevaciones leves muy por debajo del límite para definir lesión miocárdica se asociaron con más complicaciones y mayor mortalidad. La determinación protocolizada de hs-TnI en estos enfermos podría mejorar su estratificación pronóstica y los resultados clínicos. (AU)

Characterization of myocardial injury in a cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury has been identified as a common complication in patients with COVID-19. However, recent research has serious limitations, such as non-guideline definition of myocardial injury, heterogenicity of troponin sampling or very short-term follow-up. Using data from a large European cohort, we aimed to overcome these pitfalls and adequately characterize myocardial damage in COVID-19. METHODS: Consecutive patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and available high-sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI), from March 1st to April 20th, 2020 who completed at least 1-month follow-up or died, were studied. RESULTS: A total of 918 patients (mean age 63.2±15.5 years, 60.1% male) with a median follow-up of 57 (49-63) days were included. Of these, 190 (20.7%) fulfilled strict criteria for myocardial injury (21.1% chronic, 76.8% acute non-ischemic, 2.1% acute ischemic). Time from onset of symptoms to maximum hs-TnI was 11 (7-18) days. Thrombotic and bleeding events, arrhythmias, heart failure, need for mechanical ventilation and death were significantly more prevalent in patients with higher hs-TnI concentrations, even without fulfilling criteria for myocardial injury. hs-TnI was identified as an independent predictor of mortality [HR 2.52 (1.57-4.04) per 5-logarithmic units increment] after adjusting for multiple relevant covariates. CONCLUSION: Elevated hs-TnI is highly prevalent among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Even mild elevations well below the 99th URL were significantly associated with higher rates of cardiac and non-cardiac complications, and higher mortality. Future research should address the role of serial hs-TnI assessment to improve COVID-19 prognostic stratification and clinical outcomes.

Prediction of thromboembolic events and mortality by the CHADS2 and the CHA2DS2-VASc in COVID-19.

AIMS: Age, sex, and cardiovascular disease have been linked to thromboembolic complications and poorer outcomes in COVID-19. We hypothesize that CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores may predict thromboembolic events and mortality in COVID-19. METHODS AND RESULTS: COVID-19 hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from 1 March to 20 April 2020 who completed at least 1-month follow-up or died were studied. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were calculated. Given the worse prognosis of male patients in COVID-19, a modified CHA2DS2-VASc score (CHA2DS2-VASc-M) in which 1 point was given to male instead of female was also calculated. The associations of these scores with laboratory results, thromboembolic events, and death were analysed. A total of 3042 patients (mean age 62.3 ± 20.3 years, 54.9% male) were studied and 115 (3.8%) and 626 (20.6%) presented a definite thromboembolic event or died, respectively, during the study period [median follow 59 (50-66) days]. Higher score values were associated with more marked abnormalities of inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers. Mortality was significantly higher with increasing scores for CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VASc-M (P < 0.001 for trend). The CHA2DS2-VASc-M showed the best predictive value for mortality [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.820, P < 0.001 for comparisons]. All scores had poor predictive value for thromboembolic events (AUC 0.497, 0.490, and 0.541, respectively). CONCLUSION: The CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VASc-M scores are significantly associated with all-cause mortality but not with thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients. They are simple scoring systems in everyday use that may facilitate initial 'quick' prognostic stratification in COVID-19.

Characterization of NT-proBNP in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients.

AIMS: Extensive research regarding the association of troponin and prognosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been performed. However, data regarding natriuretic peptides are scarce. N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) reflects haemodynamic stress and has proven useful for risk stratification in heart failure (HF) and other conditions such as pulmonary embolism and pneumonia. We aimed to adequately characterize NT-proBNP concentrations using a large cohort of patients with COVID-19, and to investigate its association with prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and available NT-proBNP determinations, from March 1st to April 20th, 2020 who completed at least 1-month follow-up or died, were studied. Of 3080 screened patients, a total of 396 (mean age 71.8 ± 14.6 years, 61.1% male) fulfilled all the selection criteria and were finally included, with a median follow-up of 53 (18-62) days. Of those, 192 (48.5%) presented NT-proBNP levels above the recommended cut-off for the identification of HF. However, only 47 fulfilled the clinical criteria for the diagnosis of HF. Patients with higher NT-proBNP during admission experienced more frequent bleeding, arrhythmias and HF decompensations. NT-proBNP was associated with mortality both in the whole study population and after excluding patients with HF. A multivariable Cox model confirmed that NT-proBNP was independently associated with mortality after adjusting for all relevant confounders (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.44, per logarithmic unit). CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP is frequently elevated in COVID-19. It is strongly and independently associated with mortality after adjusting for relevant confounders, including chronic HF and acute HF. Therefore, its use may improve early prognostic stratification in this condition.

Heart failure in COVID-19 patients: prevalence, incidence and prognostic implications.

AIMS: Data on the impact of COVID-19 in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients and its potential to trigger acute heart failure (AHF) are lacking. The aim of this work was to study characteristics, cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and a prior diagnosis of heart failure (HF). Further aims included the identification of predictors and prognostic implications for AHF decompensation during hospital admission and the determination of a potential correlation between the withdrawal of HF guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and worse outcomes during hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data for a total of 3080 consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and follow-up of at least 30 days were analysed. Patients with a previous history of CHF (n = 152, 4.9%) were more prone to the development of AHF (11.2% vs. 2.1%; P < 0.001) and had higher levels of N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide. In addition, patients with previous CHF had higher mortality rates (48.7% vs. 19.0%; P < 0.001). In contrast, 77 patients (2.5%) were diagnosed with AHF, which in the vast majority of cases (77.9%) developed in patients without a history of HF. Arrhythmias during hospital admission and CHF were the main predictors of AHF. Patients developing AHF had significantly higher mortality (46.8% vs. 19.7%; P < 0.001). Finally, the withdrawal of beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers was associated with a significant increase in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COVID-19 have a significant incidence of AHF, which is associated with very high mortality rates. Moreover, patients with a history of CHF are prone to developing acute decompensation after a COVID-19 diagnosis. The withdrawal of GDMT was associated with higher mortality.

Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by point-by-point radiofrequency application (PPRF) results in longer procedures than that achieved by single-shot ablation techniques. In addition, it is associated with significant risk of oesophageal injury. The POWER-FAST pilot study evaluated the feasibility and safety of PVI by high-power short-duration (HPSD) PPRF. METHODS: HPSD PPRF around the PVs was done in 48 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation. Fifty watts was delivered until a predefined lesion index value was reached (LSI ≥ 5 or Abl-I ≥ 350) and 60 W during 7-10 s in the first 18 and last 30 patients, respectively. A control group of 47 consecutive patients who had undergone PVI before the HPSD group with conventional PPRF (30 W for 30 s) was included for reference. Echocardiography and oesophageal endoscopy was performed shortly after ablation in all patients. RESULTS: PVI of all targeted veins was achieved in 98% and 100% of patients of the conventional and HPSD groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Total radiofrequency time was 34 ± 11, 24 ± 8, and 15 ± 5 min in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W (p < 0.001). Audible steam pops occurred in 4 out of 48 (8%) patients in the HPSD group, accounting for 4 (0.08%) out of 5 269 HPSD radiofrequency applications. No patient in the HPSD group developed pericardial effusion. The incidence of oesophageal lesions was 28%, 22%, and 0% in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W, respectively (p = 0.007) CONCLUSIONS: PVI can be achieved with HPSD PPRF in most patients. This approach appears safe and associated with low risk of esophageal damage.

Eficacia de la acupuntura en el tratamiento del síndrome de dolor miofascial de la musculatura masticatoria / Efficacy of acupuncture for the treatment of myofascial pain síndrome of the masticatory musculature

Objetivos: El síndrome de dolor miofascial (SDM) de la musculatura masticatoria (MM) constituye la patología más frecuente dentro de los trastornos temporomandibulares (TTM). En cuanto al tratamiento del SDM de la MM, no existen protocolos estandarizados. Hay evidencia de que la acupuntura es eficaz en el tratamiento del dolor miofascial. El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar la eficacia de la acupuntura en el tratamiento del SDM de la MM en términos de reducción de la intensidad del dolor y la duración de la reducción del dolor en el tiempo. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional prospectivo en 30 pacientes diagnosticados de SDM de la MM que fueron tratados mediante 15 sesiones de acupuntura. Las variables del estudio fueron: 1) Porcentaje de pacientes que alcanzan una respuesta clínica relevante a lo largo del seguimiento (disminución del dolor de, al menos, un 50 % en la escala visual analógica con respecto al inicial o bien una reducción total del dolor a < 30 mm en la misma escala). 2) Reducción del dolor muscular orofacial después del tratamiento, expresado en milímetros (mm), dentro de la escala visual analógica (EVA). 3) Máxima apertura oral (MAO) expresada en mm. 4) Estabilidad del efecto terapéutico. Las variables fueron evaluadas antes del tratamiento, a los 3, 6, 9 y 12 meses. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue de 42 años (33-53). Con respecto al sexo, 28 de los 30 pacientes (93 %) fueron mujeres. El seguimiento fue completo para los 30 pacientes. Al final del seguimiento, 20 de los 30 pacientes (67 %, IC 95% 49-81) mantuvieron una reducción del dolor a la categoría leve (EVA < 30 %) o bien una reducción > 50 % del basal. A lo largo del estudio, el porcentaje de pacientes que alcanzó el criterio de respuesta clínica relevante preestablecido se mantuvo estable (67-80 %), no variando significativamente a lo largo del tiempo. Conclusiones: Los resultados del estudio demuestran que la acupuntura es eficaz en el control del dolor del SDM de la MM. Los efectos terapéuticos de la acupuntura son de inicio temprano (< 3 meses), estables y se mantienen hasta el final del seguimiento de un año

Objectives: Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) of the Masticatory Muscles (MM) is one of the most prevalent diseases included in the Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome. Regarding its treatment, there are not standarized protocols. There is some evidence that acupuncture is effective in MPS of the MM treatment. The objective of the present study is to analyze the efficacy of acupuncture for the treatment of MPS of the MM, in terms of pain intensity reduction and duration of the pain reduction along time. Patients and methods: This is an observational prospective study. Thirty patients diagnosed of MPS of the MM were treated with 15 sessions of acupuncture. The variables of the study included were: 1) Percentage of patients that achieved a relevant clinical response (pain reduction of at least 50 % from the initial value, in a visual analogue scale, or a visual analogue scale pain value less than 30 milimeters). 2) Pain reduction after treatment, measured in milimeters in a visual analogue scale (VAS). 3) Maximal mouth opening measured in milimeters. 4) Stability of the pain reduction. The variables were evaluated before treatment and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after. Results: The median of age was 42 years (33-53). Twenty eight patients were female (93 %). The follow up period lasted one year and all the patients completed it. At the end of the follow up period, 20 of the 30 patients (67 %, IC 95 % 49-81) maintained a pain reduction in a mild category (VAS < 30 %) or a total reduction of > 50 % from de initial pain value. Along the follow-up period, the percentage of patients that achieved a relevant clinical response maintained stable (67-80 %). Conclusions: The results of the study show that acupuncture is effective in the treatment of MPS of the MM. Treatment effects appear early (< 3 months) and maintain stable within the first year

Utility of intracardiac echocardiography for catheter ablation of complex cardiac arrhythmias in a medium-volume training center.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: New electrophysiology tools like intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) might help to minimize and early detect complications during cardiac ablation procedures. The aim of the study was to assess the utility and vascular safety of ICE during catheter ablation of complex cardiac arrhythmias in a medium-volume training center. METHODS: Prospective, observational study consisted of consecutive patients who underwent catheter-based ablation of complex cardiac arrhythmias. All procedures were performed using three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping and routine cannulation of right and left femoral veins. The ICE probe was initially positioned at the mid-level of the right atrium and properly moved to monitor different steps of the procedure and identify complications. All procedure-related vascular complications were registered. RESULTS: One hundred two patients (age 61.4 ± 13.1 years, 69 male) underwent 110 ablation procedures. Pulmonary vein isolation was the most common ablation substrate (55.4%). Ventricular tachycardia (17.2%) and left atrial flutter procedures (16.4%) were also common. The use of ICE enabled us to early initiate anticoagulation and to optimize the transseptal puncture. It also provided the capability to early detect life-threatening complications such as tamponade (3.6%), along with important information during the procedure such as exact catheter location, lesion formation, and stability during radiofrequency delivery. Such benefits were not associated with a higher number of vascular complications. CONCLUSION: The use of ICE during catheter-based ablation of complex cardiac substrates provides technical features that may decrease complications and increase accuracy while applying radiofrequency, especially in training centers where fellows start to perform complex procedures.

Implantation of cardioverter defibrillators with minimal fluoroscopy using a three-dimensional navigation system: a feasibility study.

AIMS: Fluoroscopy is necessary to implant cardioverter defibrillators using the conventional approach. Modern electroanatomic navigation systems allow the visualization of multiple catheters and, as they are capable of rendering precise geometrical reconstructions of cardiac chambers, have been used for fluoroscopy-free electrophysiological procedures. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of non-fluoroscopic implants using a three-dimensional navigation system. METHODS AND RESULTS: The NavX system was used to create the virtual anatomies of heart chambers and thoracic veins. Defibrillator leads were placed at stable positions using exclusively the electrical and anatomical information provided by the navigator. A single fluoroscopy shot confirmed final lead positions. Thirty-five consecutive patients had 30 single-chamber and 5 dual-chamber defibrillators implanted. Cardiac chambers geometries were developed in 10 ± 4.3 min. Ventricular and atrial leads were implanted, with suitable positions and electrical parameters being achieved, in 18 ± 22 and 16 ± 9 min, respectively. The final confirmatory shot was the only fluoroscopy needed in 31 (89%) cases. Two patients needed fluoroscopy-guided relocation of the ventricular lead due to high defibrillation threshold and a breakdown of the active-fixation mechanism, respectively. In one patient the ventricular lead was totally extracted and reimplanted because a loop has formed in the vena cava, and one patient required fluoroscopy-guided subclavian puncture. In five cases (16%), the position of the proximal defibrillation coil was minimally modified with fluoroscopy due to incomplete geometric reconstruction of the superior vena cava. CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopy-free defibrillators implantation is feasible using a navigation system. Suitable placement of the proximal coil is a critical stage and requires a reliable and complete reconstruction of the superior vena cava.

Osseointegrated implant rehabilitation of irradiated oral cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to analyze implant survival in patients who received radiotherapy treatment for oral malignancies and in patients who had suffered mandibular osteoradionecrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively 225 implants placed in 30 patients who had received radiotherapy as part of the oncologic treatment. Radiation doses ranged between 50 and 70 Gy. 39 implants were placed after a combined treatment of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Data referred to tumour type and reconstruction, presence of osteoradionecrosis, region of implant installation and type of prostheses were recorded. Survival rates were calculated with cumulative Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared between different groups with a log-rank test. RESULTS: 152 osseointegrated implants were placed in patients who presented previous reconstruction procedure. Five patients developed osteorradionecrosis as a complication of the radiotherapy treatment. Once osteoradionecrosis had healed in these patients, 41 implants were installed. The overall 5 year survival rate in irradiated patients was 92.6%. Irradiated patients had a marginally significantly higher implant loss than non-irradiated patients. (p = 0.063). The 5 year survival rate in the osteoradionecrosis group was of 48.3% and in the non-osteoradionecrosis group 92.3%, with a statistically significant difference between both groups. (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Osseointegrated implants enhance oral rehabilitation in most irradiated patients, even being an acceptable option for patients who had suffered osteoradionecrosis. Totally implant supported prostheses are recommended after irradiation providing functional, stable and aesthetically satisfactory rehabilitation.