Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Stroke in a Witnessed Late Time Window Versus Early Time Window.

Introduction: Thrombectomy is the standard treatment for anterior circulation stroke due to large vessel occlusions in a late time window (6 to 24 hours) for patients selected based on perfusion imaging. Most patients treated in late time window studies presented as unwitnessed or wake-up strokes. Whether patients presenting with unwitnessed stroke have an actual time window greater than 6 hours is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of thrombectomy in the treatment of patients presenting with anterior circulation large vessel stroke in an actual late time window of more than 6 hours. Methods: This single-center registry of thrombectomy in the treatment of stroke caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusions (LVOs) included 430 patients treated between 2011 and 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups: an early time window (≤ 6 hours) group and a late time window group (> 6 hours). Results: Outcomes of the early and the late time window groups, respectively, were recanalization of 86.8% vs 82.7% (P = .29), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage of 8.2% vs 5.7% (P = .40), good clinical outcome of 45.4% vs 41.3% (P = .46), and mortality of 20.2% vs 25% (P = .30) at 3 months. Conclusions: Thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusions after 6 hours of symptoms onset seems to be as safe and effective as the standard thrombectomy within 6 hours from symptoms onset, even without perfusion analysis. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Performance evolution over 645 acute stroke thrombectomies in a public Brazilian healthcare institution.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the impact of the thrombectomy learning curve on clinical outcomes is essential for developing healthcare system protocols. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of thrombectomy case volume on procedural and clinical outcomes in a Brazilian registry. METHODS: A total of 645 patients with acute ischemic stroke treated by thrombectomy were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into two groups regarding the period of treatment: the early period group and the late period group. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, treatment in the late period was an independent predictor of recanalization (odds ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.28-2.86) and excellent neurologic outcomes at three months (odds ratio 1.77, 95% CI 1.04-3.01). Treatment in the late period had no significant association with mortality (odds ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.55-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in thrombectomy case volume for the treatment of AIS over time was an independent predictor of recanalization and excellent neurologic outcome.

Surgical or endovascular management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: an agreement study.

OBJECTIVE: Ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) can be managed surgically or endovascularly. In this study, the authors aimed to measure the interobserver agreement in selecting the best management option for various patients with an RIA. METHODS: The authors constructed an electronic portfolio of 42 cases of RIA in which an angiographic image along with a brief clinical vignette for each patient were displayed. Undisclosed to the responders was that the RIAs had been categorized as International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) (small, anterior-circulation, non-middle cerebral artery location, n = 18) and non-ISAT (n = 22) aneurysms; the non-ISAT group also included 2 basilar apex aneurysms for which a high number of endovascular choices was expected. The portfolio was sent to 132 clinicians who manage patients with RIAs and circulated to members of an American surgical association. Judges were asked to choose between surgical and endovascular management, to indicate their level of confidence in the choice of treatment on a quantitative 0-10 scale, and to determine whether they would include the patient in a randomized trial in which both treatments are compared. Eleven clinicians were asked to respond twice at least 1 month apart. Responses were analyzed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Eighty-five clinicians (58 cerebrovascular surgeons, 21 interventional neuroradiologists, and 6 interventional neurologists) answered the questionnaire. Overall, endovascular management was chosen more frequently (n = 2136 [59.8%] of 3570 answers). The proportions of decisions to clip were significantly higher for non-ISAT (50.8%) than for ISAT (26.2%) aneurysms (p = 0.0003). Interjudge agreement was only fair (kappa 0.210, 95% CI 0.158-0.276) for all cases and judges, despite high confidence levels (mean score > 8 for all cases). Agreement was no better within subgroups of clinicians with the same specialty, years of experience, or location of practice or across capability groups (ability to clip or coil, or both). When agreement was defined as > 80% of responders choosing the same option, agreement occurred for only 7 of 40 cases, all of which were ISAT aneurysms, for which coiling was preferred. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between clinicians regarding the best management option was infrequent but centered around coiling for some ISAT aneurysms. Surgical clipping was chosen more frequently for non-ISAT aneurysms than for ISAT aneurysms. Patients with such an aneurysm might be candidates for inclusion in randomized trials.

Experience on Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke Treatment in a Brazilian University Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Brazil is a developing country struggling to reduce its extreme social inequality, which is reflected on shortage of health-care infrastructure, mainly to the low-income class, which depends exclusively on the public health system. In Brazil, less than 1% of stroke patients have access to intravenous thrombolysis in a stroke unit, and constraints to the development of mechanical thrombectomy in the public health system increase the social burden of stroke. OBJECTIVE: Report the feasibility of mechanical thrombectomy as part of routine stroke care in a Brazilian public university hospital. METHODS: Prospective data were collected from all patients treated for acute ischemic stroke with mechanical thrombectomy from June 2011 to March 2016. Combined thrombectomy was performed in eligible patients for intravenous thrombolysis if they presented occlusion of large artery. For those patients ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis, primary thrombectomy was performed as long as there was no evidence of significant ischemia for anterior circulation stroke (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score >6) within a 6-hour time window, and also for those patients with wake-up stroke or posterior circulation stroke, regardless of the time of symptoms onset. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were evaluated, resulting in an overall successful recanalization rate of 76% and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate of 6.8%. At 3 months, 36% of the patients had modified Rankin Scale score less than or equal to 2. The overall mortality rate was 23%. CONCLUSION: Our study, the first ever large series of mechanical thrombectomy in Brazil, demonstrates acceptable efficacy and safety results, even under restricted conditions outside the ideal scenario of trial studies.