Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
3.
Plast Surg Nurs ; 29(4): 266-70, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20029311

RESUMEN

When there is a cacophony of activity happening all at once, it is difficult to find the time for proper hand-offs and the communication that accompanies the hand-off. The patient is very often hustled from one department to another and from one healthcare professional to another-this in spite of everyone's best efforts to keep the patient's "transitions smooth" without any interruptions, catastrophes, or other unbidden woe. This article will focus on the need for hand-off communications that are methodical yet flexible and that promote patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Humanos
4.
Plast Surg Nurs ; 29(3): 179-82, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19752687

RESUMEN

Pay-for-Performance programs reward physicians, hospitals, and other providers of healthcare when the services they provide reach predetermined quality and efficiency goals. On the other hand, the Recovery Audit Contractor program is a form of Pay-for-Performance through which private companies hired by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services identify improper payments made on claims of healthcare services to Medicare beneficiaries. Pay-for-Performance programs and the Recovery Audit Contractor project are discussed in this article in an effort to provide a baseline of understanding about these programs to those working in peri-operative areas.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./organización & administración , Servicios Contratados/organización & administración , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/organización & administración , Reembolso de Incentivo/organización & administración , American Medical Association/organización & administración , Humanos , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/organización & administración , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
5.
Plast Surg Nurs ; 29(1): 64-7, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19289954

RESUMEN

While compliance efforts often occur "behind the scenes," there is much more to compliance than many people believe. This article will provide a brief glimpse at the components of a compliance program and some of the Office of Inspector General-targeted areas that may affect those in the perioperative area.


Asunto(s)
Regulación y Control de Instalaciones , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitales , Jurisprudencia , Humanos , Enfermería Perioperatoria , Estados Unidos
6.
AORN J ; 88(6): 987-95, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19054486

RESUMEN

Surgical procedures can be unpredictable, and safety-compromising events can jeopardize patient safety. Perioperative nurses should be watchful for factors that can contribute to safety-compromising events, as well as the errors that can follow, and know how to avert them if possible. Knowledge is power and increased awareness of patient safety issues and the resources that are available to both health care practitioners and consumers can help perioperative nurses ward off patient safety problems before they occur.


Asunto(s)
Conocimiento , Quirófanos/normas , Poder Psicológico , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Humanos , Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations , Errores Médicos/economía , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Enfermería Perioperatoria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Estados Unidos
7.
Plast Surg Nurs ; 28(4): 205-12, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19092590

RESUMEN

As part of its continuous quality improvement efforts, The Joint Commission began a standards improvement initiative (SII) in October 2006, the result of which will be "felt" by most accredited organizations (ambulatory care organizations, critical access hospitals, home care, hospitals, and office-based surgery) on January 1, 2009. The remaining organizations (behavioral health, laboratory, and long-term care) will go through a similar experience on January 1, 2010. The essence of SII was the changes made by The Joint Commission through consolidating, rewording, revising, and restructuring of chapters, standards, and elements of performance (EPs). Although few new standards have actually been added, there are nuances that, if not noted, may cause considerable difficulty to organizations during upcoming accreditation surveys. This article discusses SII and the standards and EPs that impact and pose "opportunities for improvement" for peri-operative services.


Asunto(s)
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations/organización & administración , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Cuidados Preoperatorios/normas , Gestión de la Calidad Total/organización & administración , Documentación/normas , Quimioterapia/normas , Urgencias Médicas , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Liderazgo , Trasplante de Órganos/normas , Derechos del Paciente , Factores de Riesgo , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
8.
Plast Surg Nurs ; 28(3): 158-61, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18794745

RESUMEN

The changes to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Inpatient Prospective Payment System published in the Federal Register (, Vol. 72, No. 162) on August 22, 2007, introduced the term preventable "hospital-acquired conditions" (HACs). These printed rules and regulations came about through a provision in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (Pub. No. 109-171) and required the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to track and report on conditions considered to be high cost, high volume (or both); assigned a higher paying "diagnosis related group" (DRG) when present as a secondary diagnosis; and were thought to be reasonably preventable when evidence-based guidelines were employed. In order to comply with this mandate, the CMS, a federal agency within Health and Human Services, was assigned the task of choosing "preventable" HACs, also referred to as "serious preventable events," for which reporting and tracking would be conducted; with the added opportunity of reporting and tracking data regarding a patient's "present on admission" condition. These preventable HACs become of particular interest to hospitals on October 1, 2008. That is the day CMS begins freeing itself from paying hospitals for the targeted preventable HACs that afflict Medicare patients during their hospital stay and which were not present at the time of the patients' admission to the hospital. It is a form of pay-for-performance.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Errores Médicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./legislación & jurisprudencia , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Errores Médicos/economía , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Medicare/economía , Estados Unidos
9.
Plast Surg Nurs ; 28(2): 96-8, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18562901

RESUMEN

The Patient Safety and Quality Improvement "proposed rule" (2008) was published in the Federal Register on February 12, 2008. This "proposed rule," with a comment period extending to April 14, 2008, was created for the purpose of implementing specific facets of the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005; those dealing with the establishment of Patient Safety Organizations (PSOs), confidentiality protection for patient safety activities, and patient safety work product, and reporting by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to Congress regarding successful strategies that have reduced medical errors and have thereby increased patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Errores Médicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Confidencialidad , Humanos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Estados Unidos
10.
AORN J ; 87(3): 547-56, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18328277

RESUMEN

In 2003, the joint commission began publishing National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs) and requiring accredited health care organizations to comply with these goals in an effort to reduce the number of medical errors. THE NPSGS are updated yearly with new requirements to promote specific improvements in patient safety. This article provides a review of the 2008 NPSGs and suggests ways in which information technology systems can address health care organizations' compliance with some of these goals.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Comunicación , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Objetivos , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes/normas , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Humanos
12.
AORN J ; 86(6): 958-69, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18068401

RESUMEN

New and emerging technologies can help increase the quality of health care, but implementing these technologies in a perioperative setting can create many challenges. Practitioners need to be aware of premises underlying future trends in health care and the kinds of technological changes that they can expect. Robots, digital displays, patient tracking systems, artificial organs, and magnetic sensors are some of the emerging technologies that are changing the perioperative landscape. Practitioners must be prepared to implement strategies that address the practical aspects of integrating these new technologies into the perioperative area.


Asunto(s)
Tecnología Biomédica/tendencias , Informática Médica/tendencias , Quirófanos , Enfermería Perioperatoria/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Humanos
13.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 21(1): 6-11, 2006 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16446238

RESUMEN

The Joint Commission of Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations released their first set of National Patient Safety Goals in 2002, which became effective in January 2003. This original set of goals is reviewed and a new set published every year. This article provides a review of the 2006 National Patient Safety Goals with an emphasis on perioperative/perianesthesia implications.


Asunto(s)
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations/organización & administración , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes/normas , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Quimioterapia/normas , Seguridad de Equipos/normas , Incendios/prevención & control , Objetivos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Objetivos Organizacionales , Enfermería Posanestésica/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos
15.
AORN J ; 81(2): 336-41; quiz 343-6, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15768544

RESUMEN

Each year sice 2003, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has established National Patient Safety Goals for accredited health care organizations. The goals are developed to promote improvement in patient safety by helping health care organizations address specific safety concerns. This article discusses the current goals and highlights new information for 2005.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations , Objetivos Organizacionales , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Comunicación , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Bombas de Infusión/normas , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes/normas , Estados Unidos
17.
AORN J ; 75(3): 550-3, 2002 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11921822

RESUMEN

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' sedation standards detail the differences between sedation and anesthesia. These standards, however, note that it is important that those applying sedation be trained to rescue patients who may slip from moderate sedation into deep sedation or from deep sedation into anesthesia.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/normas , Sedación Consciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/enfermería , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Sedación Consciente/enfermería , Humanos , Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/enfermería , Monitoreo Fisiológico/normas , Evaluación en Enfermería/métodos , Evaluación en Enfermería/normas , Enfermería de Quirófano/métodos , Enfermería de Quirófano/normas , Semántica , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA