Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 243: 108376, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865803

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: This study was a multicenter retrospective analysis of cervical spine gunshot wound (GSW) patients. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to evaluate the management and outcomes of vascular injuries following GSW involving the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Gunshot wounds (GSW) injuring the cervical spine are associated with high rates of vascular injury. METHODS: Charts of patients with GSW involving the cervical spine at two Level 1 trauma centers were reviewed from 2010 to 2021 for demographics, injury characteristics, management and follow-up. Statistical analysis included T tests and ANOVA for comparisons of continuous variables and chi-square testing for categorical variables, non-parametric tests were used when indicated. Beta-binomial models were used to estimate the probabilities outcomes. Bayesian regression models were utilized to compute risk ratios (RR) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) to enhance the inferential robustness. RESULTS: 40 patients with cervical spine GSW and associated cerebrovascular injury were included in our analysis. 15 % of patients had Biffl grade (BG) V injuries, 50 % grade IV, and 35 % grade III-I. Angiography was performed in 35 % of patients. 5 of these patients (BG V-III) required endovascular treatment for pseudoaneurysm obliteration or parent vessel sacrifice. 7 patients (22 %) showed evidence of progression. 70 % of patients were placed on antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention. Bayesian regression models with a skeptical prior for cerebral ischemia revealed a mean RR of 4.82 (95 % CI 1.02-14.48) in the BG V group, 0.75 (95 % CI 0.13-2.26) in the BG IV group, and 0.61 (95 % CI 0.06-2.01) in the combined BG III-I group. For demise the mean RR was 3.41 (95 % CI 0.58-10.65) in the BG V group and 1.69 (95 % CI 0.29-5.97) in the BG IV group. In the high BG (V, IV) group, 54.55 % of patients treated with antiplatelet therapy had complications. None of the patients that were treated with antiplatelet therapy in the low BG (III-I) group had complications. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical spine GSWs are associated with high-grade vascular injuries and may require early endovascular intervention. Additionally, a high rate of injury progression was seen on follow up imaging, requiring subsequent intervention. Reintervention and demise were common and observed in high BG (V, IV) groups. The incidence of stroke was low, especially in low BG (I-III) groups, suggesting that daily aspirin prophylaxis is adequate for long-term stroke prevention.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares , Vértebras Cervicales , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones , Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Traumatismos Vertebrales , Procedimientos Endovasculares
2.
Spine J ; 24(9): 1553-1560, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740190

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the vertebral column represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, constituting approximately 20% of all spinal injuries. The management of these injuries is an understudied and controversial topic, given its heterogeneity and lack of follow-up data. PURPOSE: To characterize the management and follow-up of GSWs to the spine. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A multi-institutional retrospective review of the experience of two urban Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with GSWs to the spine between 2010-2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures included work status, follow-up healthcare utilization, and pain management were collected. METHODS: Charts were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, surgery and medical management, and follow-up. Statistical analysis included T-tests and ANOVA for comparisons of continuous variables and chi-square testing for categorical variables. All statistics were performed on SPSS v24 (IBM, Armonk, NY). RESULTS: A total of 271 patients were included for analysis. The average age was 28 years old, 82.7% of patients were black, 90% were male, and 76.4% had Medicare/Medicaid. The thoracic spine (35%) was most commonly injured followed by lumbar (33.9%) and cervical (25.6%). Cervical GSW was associated with higher mortality (p<.001); 8.7% of patients developed subsequent osteomyelitis/discitis, 71.3% received prophylactic antibiotics, and 56.1% of cervical GSW had a confirmed vertebral or carotid artery injury. ASIA scores at presentation were most commonly A (26.9%), D (20.7%), or E (19.6%), followed by C (7.4%) and B (6.6%). 18.8% of patients were unable to be assessed at presentation. ASIA score declined in only 2 patients, while 15.5% improved over their hospital stay. Those who improved were more likely to have ASIA B injury (p<.001). Overall, 9.2% of patients underwent spinal surgery. Of these, 33% presented as ASIA A, 21% as ASIA B, 29% as ASIA C, and 13% as ASIA D. Surgery was not associated with an improvement in ASIA score. CONCLUSIONS: Given the ubiquitous and heterogeneous experience with GSWs to the spine, rigorous attempts should be made to define this population and its clinical and surgical outcomes. Here, we present an analysis of 11 years of patients presenting to two large trauma centers to elucidate patterns in presentation, management, and follow-up. We highlight that GSWs to the cervical spine are most often seen in young black male patients. They were associated with high mortality and high rates of injury to vertebral arteries and that surgical intervention did not alter rates of discitis/osteomyelitis or propensity for neurologic recovery; moreover, there was no incidence of delayed spinal instability in the study population.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Vertebrales , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/terapia , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos Vertebrales/terapia , Traumatismos Vertebrales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Vertebrales/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adolescente
3.
Cureus ; 14(10): e30417, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36407276

RESUMEN

Lumbosacral facet dislocations are rare lesions typically seen in high-energy trauma. This type of injury is a severe flexion-distraction injury and is extremely rare, with only six other documented reports. A recent case series proposed a classification for lumbosacral injuries which would classify the present case as a 1C, meaning a bilateral dislocation with anterior slippage of the L5 vertebra without fractures of the articulating processes (AP), pars interarticularis (PI), or vertebral bodies (VB). In this case report, we discuss the third case of a class 1C injury in a pediatric patient, review the associated literature and discuss the presentation, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of these rare dislocations.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA