S100B protein, cerebral ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging patterns in brain injured preterm infants.

OBJECTIVES: The early detection of preterm infants (PI) at risk for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and neurological sequelae still constitutes an unsolved issue. We aimed at validating the role of S100B protein in the early diagnosis and prognosis of IVH in PI by means of cerebral ultrasound (CUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) today considered standard of care procedures. METHODS: We conducted an observational case-control study in 216 PI of whom 36 with IVH and 180 controls. Standard clinical, laboratory, radiological monitoring procedures and S100B urine measurement were performed at four time-points (first void, 24, 48, 96 h) after birth. Cerebral MRI was performed at 40-42 weeks of corrected gestational age. RESULTS: Elevated (p<0.001, for all) S100B levels were observed in the IVH group at all monitoring time-point particularly at first void when standard monitoring procedures were still silent or unavailable. S100B measured at first void correlated (p<0.001) with the grade of hemorrhage by means of CUS and with the site and extension of neurological lesion (p<0.001, for all) as assessed by MRI. CONCLUSIONS: The present results showing a correlation among S100B and CUS and MRI offer additional support to the inclusion of the protein in clinical daily management of cases at risk for IVH and adverse neurological outcome. The findings open the way to further investigations in PI aimed at validating new neurobiomarkers by means of S100B.

Effectiveness and safety of flexible therapeutic schemes including first- and secondgeneration basal insulins during a pediatric summer diabetes camp.

Outcomes of insulin analogues in pediatric diabetes camps are poorly investigated; no data is available about insulin degludec (IDeg).Our aim was to assess impact of insulin therapy adopted by the participants to a 4-day diabetes camp held in 2017, hypothesizing a possible excess risk of hypoglycemia in patients treated with IDeg. Overall, 40 children with type 1 diabetes (mean age 13.4±3.0 years; 62.5% males) attended the camp (20.0% on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and 80.0% on multiple daily injections - MDI). Among children in MDI regimen, 71.9% were treated with IDeg as basal insulin and 28.1% with glargine U100 (IGlar). All patients used Lispro or Aspart as short-acting insulin. Daily plan of the camp included educational sessions, physical exercise, 3 main meals and 2 snacks. At the arrival, IGlar and short-acting insulin doses were revised according to existing guidelines, while IDeg dose was revised based on an empirical individualized approach. At the arrival, insulin doses were reduced in 22 participants (-19.4±10.5%), while doses were increased in 17 children (+17.8±12.7%), based on individual needs. No statistically significant between-group difference emerged in mean blood glucose and glucose variability. No excess risk of hypoglycemia was found in the IDeg group. The study suggests similar effectiveness and safety of different insulin schemes when associated with appropriate diabetes education and management, and flexible dose adjustments. Despite its longer halflife and the lack of a validated algorithm, IDeg was not associated with an excess risk of hypoglycemia.

Insulin/carbohydrates ratio during the first 6-month therapy with insulin degludec in a paediatric population with type 1 diabetes previously treated with insulin glargine. An observational longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: No data exist about the changes induced by the transition from first-generation long-acting insulins to second-generation long-acting analogues in the paediatric population. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in insulin/carbohydrate ratio (I:CHO) after the first 6 months of degludec therapy in a paediatric population with type 1 diabetes previously treated with glargine U100. SUBJECTS: All patients treated with degludec under routine clinical practice conditions were retrospectively analysed. METHODS: Nonprofit observational retrospective study. Changes during the follow-up in mean CHO/I ratio were assessed using longitudinal linear models for repeated measures. Rate of hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis and adverse events was evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 51 children (mean age 13.8 ± 4.6 years; mean diabetes duration 5.8 ± 3.9 years) started therapy with degludec in the period between April 2017 and April 2018. I:CHO ratio before starting degludec therapy significantly differed among the three meals, being the lowest at breakfast and the highest at dinner. After introducing degludec, I:CHO ratio at lunch (-1.29 95% CI -2.02;-0.57) and at dinner (-3.08 95% CI -4.35;-1.8) significantly decreased, while it slightly increased at breakfast (+1.37 95% CI 0.47;2.28). No episodes of severe hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis and adverse event were recorded during 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the use of degludec is associated with a significant change in the I:CHO ratio at the different meals compared to the previous glargine therapy. This could derive from the flat and prolonged pharmacokinetic profile of degludec. This has important clinical implications for daily insulin dose adjustments.