RESUMEN
PURPOSE: to report an uncommon presentation of Encorafenib-Binimetinib retinal side effects. CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old Caucasian woman, naïve to previous chemotherapies, was started on Encorafenib/Binimetinib for metastatic melanoma. After seven hours from the first 45â mg Binimetinib dose, the patient developed blurry vision with coloured halos. The symptoms were transient and the following day a complete ophthalmological examination revealed the presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) at Optical coherence tomography (OCT). After one week, the patient remained asymptomatic, with no signs of SRF at the follow up reevaluation. However, six weeks later, the symptoms originally experienced with the first drug intake appeared again. This time fundus examination revealed an irregular macular region. At infrared OCT an almond shaped hyporeflective lesion, surrounded by hyperreflectivity, was demonstrated without signs of SRF. Encorafenib/Binimetinib was continued at the same dose and strict monitoring was scheduled, according to the European Medicine's Agency indication to withhold the drug only in presence of symptomatic retinal pigment epithelial detachment. CONCLUSION: Visual symptoms associated with SRF induced by Binimetinib have been described in the literature. In our case, visual symptoms were experienced by the patient at different times, both with and without evidence of SRF. This finding seems to suggest that while Binimetinib-induced SRF is an asymptomatic finding in most cases, with excellent outcome and rapid resolution, visual symptoms could be initially triggered by detectable SRF, yet persist without any further evidence of abnormal fluid accumulation and manifest intermittently.
RESUMEN
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis (CMVR) has been reported rarely in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In addition, little is known about strategies for ophthalmic surveillance and adequate antiviral treatment of CMVR. A case of CMVR in an allogeneic HSCT recipient is described, including clinical signs and therapy. An adult patient received HSCT from a matched unrelated donor for treatment of a Burkitt lymphoma. Donor and recipients were both CMV positive. Starting on day +40, the patient presented multiple CMV reactivation, treated with valganciclovir, foscarnet and a combination of both. On day +160, the patient started complaining of conjunctival hyperaemia and a decrease in visual acuity. Fundoscopy revealed retinal lesions consistent with CMVR, although whole blood CMV DNAemia was negative. Aqueous humor biopsy showed the presence of CMV infection (CMV DNA 230400 UI/ml). CMVR was treated with foscarnet (180 mg i.v. and 1.2 mg intravitreal injection) combined with anti CMV immunoglobulin at 0.5 ml/kg every 2 weeks. After 4 weeks of systemic therapy, 20 weekly doses of intravitreal foscarnet and six cycles of immunoglobulins, a significant improvement of visual acuity was observed. The treatment was well tolerated with no side effect. In conclusion, our case suggests that systemic and local antiviral treatment combined with CMV-specific-IVIG, may reduce CMV load in the eye of patients with CMVR, leading to a consistent improvement of visual acuity. Systematic ophthalmologic examination should be recommended in HSCT recipients with multiple CMV reactivations and high peak CMV DNA levels.