A proof-of-concept and drug-drug interaction study of pamapimod, a novel p38 MAP kinase inhibitor, with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

This study evaluated the potential pharmacokinetic interaction of pamapimod, a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, and methotrexate (MTX) when administered concomitantly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); the study also evaluated the pharmacodynamic effects of pamapimod. Twenty-two RA patients on a stable regimen of MTX (10-25 mg/wk; administered on days 1 and 8) were randomized to receive 300 mg of pamapimod (n = 17) or placebo (n = 5) once daily (qd) for 10 days (days 5-14). Blood and urine samples were collected pre- and postdose on days 1 (MTX alone), 7 (pamapimod alone), and 8 (MTX and pamapimod coadministered). No clinically significant changes were observed in plasma exposures and renal clearance of pamapimod, MTX, or their metabolites, whether administered separately or concomitantly. The combination of pamapimod (300 mg qd) for 10 days and weekly MTX was generally well tolerated. Parameters of RA disease--namely, tender joint count, swollen joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein--generally decreased between days 5 and 14. The results of this study suggest that dose adjustments for either drug are not necessary when concomitantly administered and that pamapimod can decrease pharmacodynamic markers of disease activity.

A longitudinal study of gene expression in healthy individuals.

BACKGROUND: The use of gene expression in venous blood either as a pharmacodynamic marker in clinical trials of drugs or as a diagnostic test requires knowledge of the variability in expression over time in healthy volunteers. Here we defined a normal range of gene expression over 6 months in the blood of four cohorts of healthy men and women who were stratified by age (22-55 years and > 55 years) and gender. METHODS: Eleven immunomodulatory genes likely to play important roles in inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and infection in addition to four genes typically used as reference genes were examined by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), as well as the full genome as represented by Affymetrix HG U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays. RESULTS: Gene expression levels as assessed by qRT-PCR and microarray were relatively stable over time with approximately 2% of genes as measured by microarray showing intra-subject differences over time periods longer than one month. Fifteen genes varied by gender. The eleven genes examined by qRT-PCR remained within a limited dynamic range for all individuals. Specifically, for the seven most stably expressed genes (CXCL1, HMOX1, IL1RN, IL1B, IL6R, PTGS2, and TNF), 95% of all samples profiled fell within 1.5-2.5 Ct, the equivalent of a 4- to 6-fold dynamic range. Two subjects who experienced severe adverse events of cancer and anemia, had microarray gene expression profiles that were distinct from normal while subjects who experienced an infection had only slightly elevated levels of inflammatory markers. CONCLUSION: This study defines the range and variability of gene expression in healthy men and women over a six-month period. These parameters can be used to estimate the number of subjects needed to observe significant differences from normal gene expression in clinical studies. A set of genes that varied by gender was also identified as were a set of genes with elevated expression in a subject with iron deficiency anemia and another subject being treated for lung cancer.

Period correction of the QTc of moxifloxacin with multiple predose baseline ECGs is the least variable of 4 methods tested.

This study compares 4 baseline correction methods on the effect of moxifloxacin on the QT/QTc interval: (1) day -1 time-matched baseline electrocardiograms (ECGs), (2) 3 triplicate predose ECGs, (3) 1 triplicate predose ECG, and (4) no baseline correction. Forty-four healthy subjects receive a single dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg), placebo, and 2 doses of an investigational agent in a 4-period crossover fashion. For all 4 methods, the largest mean difference from placebo in the moxifloxacin study-specific QTc is 11.97 to 13.23 ms and occurs at 3 to 4 hours postdose; the lower 90% confidence interval is greater than 5 ms from 2 to 8 hours. The average standard error of the mean is 1.36 ms for 3 triplicate predose ECGs, 1.40 ms for 1 triplicate predose ECG, 1.60 ms for day -1 time-matched baseline ECGs, and 1.65 ms for no baseline correction. Predose baseline methods (3 or 1 triplicate ECGs) are superior to the day -1 time-matched baseline correction or without baseline correction.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of pamapimod, a p38 MAP kinase inhibitor, in a double-blind, methotrexate-controlled study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of pamapimod (a selective inhibitor of the alpha-isoform of p38 MAP kinase) as monotherapy in comparison with methotrexate (MTX) treatment in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups and received 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. One group received MTX (7.5 mg/week with planned escalation to 20 mg/week), and 3 groups received pamapimod (50, 150, or 300 mg) once daily. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20 response) at 12 weeks. Secondary end points included ACR50 and ACR70 responses, change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), categorical analyses of DAS28/European League Against Rheumatism response, and change from baseline in each parameter of the ACR core set of measures. Safety monitoring included recording of adverse events (AEs), laboratory testing, immunology assessments, administration of electrocardiograms, and assessment of vital signs. RESULTS: Patients assigned to receive MTX and pamapimod had similar demographics and baseline characteristics. At week 12, fewer patients taking pamapimod had an ACR20 response (23%, 18%, and 31% in the 50-, 150-, and 300-mg groups, respectively) compared with patients taking MTX (45%). Secondary efficacy end points showed a similar pattern. AEs were typically characterized as mild and included infections, skin disorders, and dizziness. Pamapimod was generally well tolerated, but the 300-mg dose appeared to be more toxic than either the 2 lower doses or MTX. CONCLUSION: The present results showed that pamapimod was not as effective as MTX in the treatment of active RA.