RESUMEN
Advances in computer technology and image processing now allow us to obtain from angiographic images a large variety of information on coronary physiology without the use of a guide-wire as a diagnostic information equivalent to FFR and iFR but also information allowing for the performance of a real virtual percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and finally the ability to obtain information to optimize the results of PCI. With specific software, it is now possible to have a real upgrading of invasive coronary angiography. In this review, we present the different advances in this field and discuss the future perspectives offered by this technology.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: European guidelines order management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) less than 12 hours. They encourage healthcare networks to rapid coronary reperfusion strategy depending on the distance of the patient from the PCI center. OBJECTIVE: To determine impact of out-of-hospital presentation of patients with STEMI in remote areas within the framework of a care network, and to define the degree of compliance with local recommendations, and its prognostic impact. METHOD: Over three years (2017-2019), from the RESURCOR prospective register, 310 patients with STEMI less than 12 hours were out-of hospital managed and transferred to Metrolpole Savoie Hospital in Chambéry. Depending on the "door in to PCI center" time, patients are divided into 2 groups: "Local area" for a time ≤ 60 min and "Remote area" for a time > 60 min. RESULTS: 51 patients were in the "Local area" group and 259 patients in the "Remote area" group with an average age of 63.36 years, without significant difference between the two groups. We noted more men, smokers and a higher heart rate in the "Local area" group (p = 0.015; p = 0.005 and p = 0.035 respectively). The median "call-EMS care" delay was similar at 24 min in each group. Seventy-five patients (29%) in the "Remote area" group had fibrinolysis versus only one patient in the "Local area" group (p < 0.001). Among them, 42 patients (56%) had rescue PCI, in 40% with 90 min of fibrinolytic administration. The presence of a primary care physicians "PCP" was reported in 39 cases of the "remote area" group. PCP intervention increased the rate of bolus of fibrinolytics within 10 min from STEMI diagnosis (69.2% vs 21.8%, p < 0.001), increased the rate of bolus treatment within 10 min from STEMI diagnosis within 10 min (60% vs 16% p < 0.001) and reduced the rate of rescue PCI (44.4% vs 62.5%, p = 0.035). Total ischemia time was significantly shorter in the "Local area" group (144 min vs 175 min, p = 0.005). No significant difference concerning the in-hospital outcomes was found between 2 groups. Concerning compliance with local recommendations in the "remote area" group, among those eligible for thrombolysis, 135 patients (64,2 %) had an inappropriate primary PCI (error in estimated time from STEMI diagnosis to PCI-mediated reperfusion (< 1 h)), which was associated with a higher rate of serious arrhythmias (11.1% vs 2.7% respectively, p = 0.035). Regardless of the group, if the strategy was primary PCI 22% of patients had angiography within 60 minutes after STEMI diagnosis. CONCLUSION: In this work, the temporal distance from the PCI room does not seem to be responsible for a more pejorative in-hospital outcomes, unlike the proportion of inappropriate primary PCI which increase serious arrhythmias.
