Tumefactive brain parenchymal neurosarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Enhancing brain parenchymal disease, and especially tumefactive lesions, are an uncommon manifestation of neurosarcoidosis. Little is known about the clinical features of tumefactive lesions and their impact on management and outcomes, which this study aims to characterize. METHODS: Patients with pathologically-confirmed sarcoidosis were retrospectively reviewed and included if brain lesions were: (1) intraparenchymal, (2) larger than 1 cm in diameter, and (3) associated with edema and/or mass effect. RESULTS: Nine patients (9/214, 4.2%) were included. Median onset age was 37 years. Diagnosis was confirmed by brain parenchymal biopsies in 5 (55.6%). Median modified Rankin scale (mRS) score was 2 (range 1-4) at initial presentation. Common manifestations included headache (77.8%), cognitive dysfunction (66.7%), and seizures (44.4%). Sixteen lesions were present in 9 patients. The frontal lobe (31.3%) was most affected, followed by the subinsular region (12.5%), basal ganglia (12.5%%), cerebellum (12.5%), and pons (12.5%). MRI characteristics of the dominant lesions included spherical morphology (77.8%), perilesional edema (100.0%), mass effect (55.6%), well-demarcated borders (66.7%), and contrast enhancement (100.0%; 55.6% heterogeneous). Leptomeningitis was frequently present (77.8%). All required corticosteroid-sparing treatments, and most (55.6%) needed at least a third line of treatment (infliximab used in 44.4%). All patients relapsed (median 3 relapses, range 1-9). Median last mRS was 1.0 after median follow-up of 86 months, with significant residual deficits in 55.6%. CONCLUSION: Tumefactive brain parenchymal lesions are uncommon, usually affect the supratentorial brain along with leptomeningitis, and are refractory to initial treatments with a high risk of relapse. Significant sequelae were encountered despite a favorable median last mRS.

Adalimumab for CNS sarcoidosis: single-center experience and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha is critical in the development of granulomas and multiple recent reports have highlighted the role of infliximab, an infused TNF alpha inhibitor, in the treatment of neurosarcoidosis. As a self-injected TNF alpha inhibitor, adalimumab has certain advantages over infused medications, including greater patient freedom and autonomy. Experience with adalimumab is not well reported in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To report clinical experience with adalimumab in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) sarcoidosis by combining observations in our center with those that have been reported in the literature. METHODS: Patients were identified from the Mass General Brigham Research Patient Data Registry and in the literature by searching PubMed. Patients with CNS manifestations of sarcoidosis treated with adalimumab were included for retrospective review and analyzed for baseline characteristics, treatment indications, outcomes, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Adalimumab was commonly started after failure of or intolerance to infliximab and methotrexate. Of those with adequate follow-up, 5/10 ultimately improved, remission was maintained in 3/10, and 2/10 with active disease remained stable without further worsening. One patient suffered a relapse, likely multifactorial in etiology, but has remained relapse free on adalimumab for 10 months subsequently. Three patients ultimately discontinued adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests that adalimumab may be a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with neurosarcoidosis affecting the CNS, including those with medically refractory disease.

Differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite immense progress of imaging and updates in the MacDonald criteria, the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis remains difficult as it must integrate history, clinical presentation, biological markers, and imaging. There is a multitude of syndromes resembling multiple sclerosis both clinically or on imaging. The goal of this review is to help clinicians orient themselves in these various diagnoses. We organized our review in two categories: inflammatory and autoimmune diseases that are close or can be confused with multiple sclerosis, and non-inflammatory syndromes that can present with symptoms or imaging mimicking those of multiple sclerosis. METHOD: Review of literature CONCLUSION: Progress of imaging and biological sciences have drastically changed the approach and management of multiple sclerosis. But these developments have also shined a light on a variety of diseases previously unknown or poorly known, therefore greatly expanding the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. While autoimmune, many of these diseases have underlying biological mechanisms that are very different from those of multiple sclerosis, rendering MS therapies usually inefficient. It is crucial to approach these diseases with utmost thoroughness, integrating history, clinical exam, and evolving ancillary tests.