Translating plasma citrulline concentration in clinical practice: Role of cross-sectional assessment in adult patients with short bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional plasma citrulline concentration (CIT) is considered a marker of enterocyte mass. The role of CIT in clinical practice in patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) is not clearly defined. AIM: To assess the accuracy of CIT to discriminate SBS from healthy controls (HC) and SBS with intestinal failure (SBS-IF), requiring intravenous supplementation (IVS), from SBS with intestinal insufficiency (SBS-II). METHODS: Cross-sectional study on unselected outpatients (31 SBS-II, 113 SBS-IF) and 19 healthy controls (HC). Demographic data, SBS characteristics, nutritional status, oral intake, intestinal fat absorption, renal function and IF severity, categorized by the volume of the required IVS, were collected at time of CIT evaluation (µmol/L). Data as mean±SD. RESULTS: CIT was 36.6 ± 6.0 in HC, 30.2 ± 14.0 in SBS-II and 18.8 ± 12.3 in SBS-IF (p < 0.001). CIT cutoff was 31 for the diagnosis of SBS (sensitivity 79 %, specificity 89 %), and 14 for the discrimination between SBS-IF and SBS-II (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 51 %). Wide ranges of CIT were observed in all SBS-IF severity categories. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected SBS patients, CIT was accurate to diagnose SBS, had high sensitivity to diagnose SBS-IF but showed low specificity for SBS-II. In SBS-IF, CIT was not an accurate marker of IF severity.

Is SARS-CoV-2 infection an emerging risk factor for splanchnic venous thrombosis?

OBJECTIVE: Thrombosis represents one of the most feared complications of the COronaVIrus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis are the most described complications, some investigations reported thrombotic localization also in the splanchnic venous district. METHODS: We describe the case of a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection presenting with abdominal pain and diagnosed with portal vein thrombosis. In addition, we shortly review available literature supporting the possible role of COVID-19 as leading cause of splanchnic venous thrombosis. RESULTS: After in-depth diagnostic workup, we excluded the commonest causes of portal thrombosis and concluded that SARS-CoV-2 infection represented the main explanation of this finding. CONCLUSIONS: Our study warns the clinicians to maintain a high index of suspicion for thrombosis in patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection manifesting gastrointestinal symptoms. An appropriate diagnostic work-up could allow to obtain an early diagnosis and consequently improve the clinical outcome of patients.

A patient with pancreas divisum, recurrent acute pancreatitis, and homozygosity for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator-associated protein 5T allele.

Mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) have been reported to increase the risk of recurrent acute pancreatitis in patients with pancreas divisum. We assessed the CFTR gene in a young male patient with pancreas divisum and recurrent acute pancreatitis. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and computed tomography revealed that the patient had pancreas divisum, with an enlarged and tortuous pancreatic duct; he also had positive results from the cystic fibrosis sweat test. Genetic analysis did not identify any common CFTR mutations, but did show that he was homozygous for the 5T allele in intron 8 IVS8 5T-12TG (which affects splicing at intron 8). Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stenting of papilla minor was performed. The IVS8 5T-12TG variant has been associated with abnormal organ development, therefore it is possible that CFTR has an important role in the development of the pancreatic duct. We propose this patient has recurrent acute pancreatitis resulting from a developmental defect associated with a suboptimal CFTR function.

Proton pump inhibitor treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough: a comparison between two different daily doses of lansoprazole.

AIM: To compare two different daily doses of lansoprazole given for 12 weeks and to assess the role of gastrointestinal (GI) investigations as criteria for selecting patients. METHODS: Out of 45 patients referred for unexplained chronic persistent cough, 36 had at least one of the GI investigations (endoscopy, 24-h esophageal pH-metry and a 4-week trial of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy) positive and were randomly assigned to receive either 30 mg lansoprazole o.d. or 30 mg lansoprazole b.i.d. for 12 weeks. Symptoms were evaluated at baseline (visit 1) after the PPI test (visit 2) and after the 12-week lansoprazole treatment period (visit 3). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed the study protocol. Twenty-one patients (60.0%) reported complete relief from their cough with no difference between the two treatment groups (58.8% and 61.1% had no cough in 30 mg lansoprazole and 60 mg lansoprazole groups, respectively). More than 80% of the patients who had complete relief from their cough at the end of the treatment showed a positive response to the PPI test. CONCLUSION: Twelve weeks of lansoprazole treatment even at a standard daily dose, is effective in patients with chronic persistent cough. A positive response to an initial PPI test seems to be the best criterion for selecting patients who respond to therapy.