Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 82
Filtrar
1.
Intern Emerg Med ; 18(7): 2003-2009, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37633862

RESUMEN

Medical divisions are at high risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) due to patients' frailty and complexity. This sub-analysis of the FADOI-PRACTICE study included patients presenting with diarrhea either at admission or during hospitalization. CDI diagnosis was confirmed when both enzyme immunoassay and A and B toxin detection were found positive. The aim of this sub-analysis was the identification of a new score to predict CDI in hospitalized, medical patients. Five hundred and seventy-two patients with diarrhea were considered. More than half of patients was female, 40% on antibiotics in the previous 4 weeks and 60% on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). CDI diagnosis occurred in 103 patients (18%). Patients diagnosed with CDI were older, more frequently of female sex, recently hospitalized and bed-ridden, and treated with antibiotics and PPIs. Through a backward stepwise logistic regression model, age > 65 years, female sex, recent hospitalization, recent antibiotic therapy, active cancer, prolonged hospital stay (> 12 days), hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3 g/dL), and leukocytosis (white blood cells > 9 × 10^9/L) were found to independently predict CDI occurrence. These variables contributed to building a clinical prognostic score with a good sensitivity and a modest specificity for a value > 3 (79% and 58%, respectively; AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.79, p < 0.001), that identified low-risk (score ≤ 3; 42.5%) and high-risk (score > 3; 57.5%) patients. Although some classical risk factors were confirmed to increase CDI occurrence, the changing landscape of CDI epidemiology suggests a reappraisal of common risk factors and the development of novel risk scores based on local epidemiology.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización , Factores de Riesgo , Diarrea
2.
Intern Emerg Med ; 17(6): 1769-1775, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35460432

RESUMEN

Some patients affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) experience acute hypoxemic respiratory failure progressing toward atypical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a correlation between ratio of peripheral saturation of oxygen (SpO2) and fraction of inspired oxygen (S/F) and ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F) exists in COVID-19-related ARDS as already known in classical ARDS. In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study, consecutive, adult (≥ 18 years) patients with symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to different COVID-19 divisions in Italy between March and December 2020 were included. Patients with SpO2 > 97% or missing information were excluded. We included 1,028 patients (median age 72 years, prevalence of males [62.2%]). A positive correlation was found between P/F and S/F (r = 0.938, p < 0.0001). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that S/F accurately recognizes the presence of ARDS (P/F ≤ 300 mmHg) in COVID-19 patients, with a cut-off of ≤ 433% showing good sensitivity and specificity. S/F was also tested against P/F values ≤ 200 and ≤ 100 mmHg (suggestive for moderate and severe ARDS, respectively), the latter showing great accuracy for S/F ≤ 178%. S/F was accurate in predicting ARDS for SpO2 ≥ 92%. In conclusion, our findings support the routine use of S/F as a reliable surrogate of P/F in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Oxígeno , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0262522, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35020777

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism is a frequent complication of COVID-19 infection. Less than 50% of pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with the evidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities. DVT may also occur in the venous system of the upper limbs especially if provoking conditions are present such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of UEDVT in patients affected by moderate-severe COVID-19 infection and to identify potential associated risk factors for its occurrence. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients affected by moderate-severe COVID-19 infection admitted to our unit. In accordance with the local protocol, all patients had undergone a systematic screening for the diagnosis of UEDVT, by vein compression ultrasonography (CUS). All the patients were receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis according to international guidelines recommendations. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with UEDVT. RESULTS: 257 patients were included in the study, 28 patients were affected by UEDVT with an incidence of 10.9% (95% CI, 7.1-14.7). At univariate analysis UEDVT appeared to be significantly associated (p< 0.05) with pneumonia, ARDS, PaO2/FiO2, D-dimer value higher than the age adjusted cut off value and need for CPAP ventilation. Multivariate analysis showed a significant association between UEDVT and the need for CPAP ventilation (OR 5.95; 95% IC 1.33-26.58). Increased mortality was found in patients affected by UEDVT compared to those who were not (OR 3.71; 95% CI, 1.41-9.78). CONCLUSIONS: UEDVT can occur in COVID-19 patients despite adequate prophylaxis especially in patients undergoing helmet CPAP ventilation. Further studies are needed to identify the correct strategy to prevent DVT in these patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/patología , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/virología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Consumo de Oxígeno , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/diagnóstico , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/etiología
5.
Thromb J ; 19(1): 84, 2021 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34749763

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Superior Vena Cava (SVC) syndrome, is a quite rare but serious complication after pacemaker lead implantation; most patients are asymptomatic due to the development of adequate venous collateral circulation. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 75-year-old woman who developed SVC syndrome after transvenous pacemaker implantation with complete resolution of the thrombosis after 3 months of oral anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Generally other causes as malignancy are considered to be the most common etiology of SVC syndrome, but benign iatrogenic causes, mainly intravascular devices (central vein catheters, cardiac defibrillators and pacemaker wires), are becoming increasingly common. Procedures performed on venous vasculature, causing a possible intimal injury or vein stenosis, provoked by transvenous leads, seem to be the most reasonable explanation for the observed complication.

7.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 5(5): 907-915, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396048

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To address the lack of information about clinical sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were attending the outpatient clinic for post-COVID-19 patients (ASST Ovest Milanese, Magenta, Italy) were included in this retrospective study. They underwent blood draw for complete blood count, C-reactive protein, ferritin, D-dimer, and arterial blood gas analysis and chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan. The primary endpoint was the assessment of blood gas exchanges after 3 months. Other endpoints included the assessment of symptoms and chest HRCT scan abnormalities and changes in inflammatory biomarkers after 3 months from hospital admission. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (n = 65 men; 73.9%) were included. Admission arterial blood gas analysis showed hypoxia and hypocapnia and an arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fractional inspired oxygen ratio of 271.4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 238-304.7) mm Hg that greatly improved after 3 months (426.19 [IQR: 395.2-461.9] mm Hg, P<.001). Forty percent of patients were still hypocapnic after 3 months. Inflammatory biomarkers dramatically improved after 3 months from hospitalization. Fever, resting dyspnea, and cough were common at hospital admission and improved after 3 months, when dyspnea on exertion and arthralgias arose. On chest HRCT scan, more than half of individuals still presented with interstitial involvement after 3 months. Positive correlations between the interstitial pattern at 3 months and dyspnea on admission were found. C-reactive protein at admission was positively associated with the presence of interstitial involvement at follow-up. The persistence of cough was associated with presence of bronchiectasis and consolidation on follow-up chest HRCT scan. CONCLUSION: Whereas inflammatory biomarker levels normalized after 3 months, signs of lung damage persisted for a longer period. These findings support the need for implementing post-COVID-19 outpatient clinics to closely follow-up COVID-19 patients after hospitalization.

11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(8): e24552, 2021 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33663062

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Although myocarditis can be a severe cardiac complication of COVID-19 patients, few data are available in the literature about the incidence and clinical significance in patients affected by SARS-CoV-2. This study aims to describe the prevalence and the clinical features of suspected myocarditis in 3 cohorts of patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We retrospectively evaluated all the consecutive patients admitted for COVID-19 without exclusion criteria. Suspect myocarditis was defined according to current guidelines. Age, sex, in-hospital death, length of stay, comorbidities, serum cardiac markers, interleukin-6, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and therapy were recorded. Between March 4 to May 20, 2020, 1169 patients with COVID-19 were admitted in 3 Italian Medicine wards. 12 patients (1%) had suspected acute myocarditis; 5 (41.7%) were men, mean age was 76 (SD 11.34; median 78.5 years); length of stay was 38 days on average (SD 8, median value 37.5); 3 (25%) patients died. 8 (66.7%) had a history of cardiac disease; 7 (58.33%) patients had other comorbidities like diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or renal insufficiency. Myocarditis patients had no difference in sex prevalence, rate of death, comorbidities, elevations in serum cardiac markers as compared with patients without myocardial involvement. Otherwise, there was a significantly higher need for oxygen-support and a higher prevalence of cardiac disease in the myocarditis group. Patients with suspected myocarditis were older, had a higher frequency of previous cardiac disease, and significantly more prolonged hospitalization and a lower value of interleukin-6 than other COVID-19 patients. Further studies, specifically designed on this issue, are warranted.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Miocarditis/etiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Comorbilidad , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Interleucina-6/sangre , Italia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miocarditis/fisiopatología , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores Sexuales
12.
Chest ; 159(6): 2366-2372, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33545162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chest radiography is universally accepted as the method of choice to confirm correct positioning of a nasogastric tube (NGT). Considering also that radiation exposure could increase with multiple insertions in a single patient, bedside abdominal ultrasound (BAU) may be a potentially useful alternative to chest radiography in the management of NGTs. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the accuracy of BAU in confirming the correct positioning of an NGT? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: After a specific course consisting of 10 h of training, the authors studied, in a prospective multicenter cohort, the validity of BAU to confirm correct NGT placement. All patients were also evaluated by auscultation (whoosh test) and by chest radiography. Every involved operator was blind to each other. Interobserver agreement and accuracy analyses were calculated. RESULTS: This study evaluated 606 consecutive inpatients with an indication for NGT insertion. Eighty patients were excluded for protocol violation or incomplete examinations and 526 were analyzed. BAU was positive, negative, and inconclusive in 415 (78.9%), 71 (13.5%), and 40 (7.6%), respectively. The agreement between BAU and chest radiography was excellent. Excluding inconclusive results, BAU had a sensitivity of 99.8% (99.3%-100%), a specificity of 91.0% (88.5%-93.6%), a positive predictive value of 98.3% (97.2%-99.5%), and a negative predictive value of 98.6% (97.6%-99.7%). The accuracy of BAU slightly changed according to the different assignments of the uncertain cases and was improved by the exclusion of patients with an altered level of consciousness. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that BAU has a good positive predictive value and may confirm the correct placement of NGTs when compared with chest radiography. However, considering its suboptimal specificity, caution is necessary before implementing this technique in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagen , Pacientes Internos , Intubación Gastrointestinal/métodos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
13.
Int J Infect Dis ; 105: 141-143, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33607302

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: in the current pandemic emergency, increased attention has given to treating symptoms that cause suffering in patients with COVID-19. This study aims to describe the role of palliative care in the management of these patients. METHODS: palliative consultation was requested by the staff as per protocol. In brief, the criteria for referring patients to a palliative care physician or to undergo palliative care were left to the discretion of the physician in charge. We recorded data regarding age, gender, length of stay, type of discharge (dead or alive, and transfer to long-term or hospice facilities). RESULTS: Between March 18 to May 8, 2020, 412 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the Internal Medicine wards of Magenta Hospital, Italy. The palliative care physician was directly involved in 105 cases (25.5%) and performed 236 consultations. Of the 105 patients who received palliative care counselling, 66 (63%) died. The average number of days in care was 2.26 days. The principal reason for counseling was controlling symptoms (54%) and 12% deal with the end of life management. The prevalent symptom, among those which led to the counseling, was restlessness/agitation (41%), followed by emotional issues (26%) such as anxiety, fear, and demoralization. In only 20% of cases, dyspnoea was the reason for symptomatic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of hospitalized Covid-19 patients are at high risk of clinical deterioration and death. This leads to the opportunity to integrate a palliative physician into the staff, who treat these patients. There is an urgent need for protocol standardization and formal trials to verify the effectiveness of this approach.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Masculino , Derivación y Consulta
15.
Infection ; 47(3): 363-375, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30840201

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Enterobacterales are among the most common causes of bacterial infections in the community and among hospitalized patients, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains have emerged as a major threat to human health. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is typical of MDRs, being mainly due to the production of extended spectrum ß-lactamases or AmpC-type ß-lactamases. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to review the epidemiological impact, diagnostic issues and treatment options with AmpC producers. FINDINGS: AmpC enzymes encoded by resident chromosomal genes (cAmpCs) are produced by some species (e.g., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens), while plasmid-encoded AmpCs (pAmpCs) can be encountered also in species that normally do not produce cAmpCs (e.g., Salmonella enterica, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca) or produce them at negligible levels (e.g., Escherichia coli). Production of AmpCs can be either inducible or constitutive, resulting in different resistance phenotypes. Strains producing cAmpCs in an inducible manner (e.g., Enterobacter spp.) usually appear susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins, which are poor inducers, but can easily yield mutants constitutively producing the enzyme which are resistant to these drugs (which are good substrates), resulting in treatment failures. pAmpCs are usually constitutively expressed. Production of pAmpCs is common in community-acquired infections, while cAmpC producers are mainly involved in healthcare-associated infections. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there is no conclusive evidence about the most appropriate treatment for AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. Carbapenems are often the preferred option, especially for severe infections in which adequate source control is not achieved, but cefepime is also supported by substantial clinical evidences as an effective carbapenem-sparing option.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Enterobacteriaceae/fisiología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Humanos , Prevalencia
16.
Ann Fam Med ; 15(6): 535-539, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29133492

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb represent a diagnostic dilemma for general practitioners. Compression ultrasonography (US) is universally recognized as the best test of choice. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of compression US performed by general practitioners given short training in the management of symptomatic proximal DVT. METHODS: From May 2014 to May 2016, we evaluated in a multicenter, prospective cohort study all consecutive outpatients with suspected DVT; bilateral proximal lower limb compression US was performed by general practitioners and by physicians expert in vascular US, each group blinded to the other's findings. In all examinations with a negative or nondiagnostic result, compression US was repeated by the same operator after 5 to 7 days. Inter-observer agreement and accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 1,107 patients. The expert physicians diagnosed DVT in 200 patients, corresponding to an overall prevalence of 18.1% (95% CI, 15.8%-20.3%). The agreement between the trained general practitioners and the experts was excellent (Cohen κ = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88). Compression US performed by general practitioners had a sensitivity of 90.0% (95% CI, 88.2%-91.8%) and a specificity of 97.1% (95% CI, 96.2%-98.1%) with a diagnostic accuracy for DVT of 95.8% (95% CI, 94.7%-97.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, even in hands of physicians not expert in vascular US, compression US can be a reliable tool in the diagnosis of DVT. We found that the sensitivity achieved by general practitioners appeared suboptimal, however, so future studies should evaluate the implementation of proper training strategies to maximize skill.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Pierna/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
17.
Rev. bras. hematol. hemoter ; 39(3): 285-287, July-Sept. 2017. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-898934

Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anemia
18.
20.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 18(7): 467-477, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28509761

RESUMEN

: Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in over-midlife patients. In addition to systolic heart failure, cerebral thromboembolism represents the most dramatic complication of this rhythm disorder, contributing to morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, anticoagulation has been considered the main strategy in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation patients and vitamin K-dependent antagonists have been widely used in clinical practice. Recently, the development of direct oral anticoagulants has certainly improved the management of this disease, providing, for the first time, the opportunity to go beyond vitamin K-dependent antagonists limits. In the RE-LY trial, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and dabigatran 110 mg twice daily was noninferior. Both doses greatly reduced hemorrhagic stroke, and dabigatran 110 mg twice daily significantly reduced major bleeding compared with warfarin. Based on these results, dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was the first direct oral anticoagulant to receive the regulatory approval for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. To date, a specific reversal agent has just been approved as an antidote for this molecule. This review provides a summary of randomized trials, postmarket registries and specific clinical-settings summary on dabigatran in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.


Asunto(s)
Antitrombinas/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Dabigatrán/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Antídotos/uso terapéutico , Antitrombinas/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA