Characterization of the genetic polymorphism linked to the ß-casein A1/A2 alleles using different molecular and biochemical methods.

The 2 major subvariants of ß-casein (A1 and A2), coded by CSN2 gene, have received great interest in the last decade both from the scientific community and the dairy sector due to their influence on milk quality. The consumption of the A1 variant, compared with the A2 variant, has a potential negative effect on human health after its digestion but, at the same time, its presence improves the milk technological properties. The aim of the present study was to compare the best method in terms of time required, costs, and technical engagement for the identification of ß-casein A1 and A2 variants (homozygous and heterozygous animals) in milk to offer a reliable service for large-scale screening studies. Two allele-specific PCR procedures, namely RFLP-PCR and amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS-PCR), and one biochemical technique (HPLC) were evaluated and validated through sequencing. Manual and automated DNA extraction protocols from milk somatic cells were also compared. Automated DNA extraction provided better yield and purity. Chromatographic analysis was the most informative and the cheapest method but unsuitable for large-scale studies due to lengthy procedures (45 min per sample). Both allele-specific PCR techniques proved to be fast and reliable for differentiating between A1 and A2 variants but more expensive than HPLC analysis. Specifically, RFLP-PCR was the most expensive and labor-demanding among the evaluated techniques, whereas ARMS-PCR was the fastest while also requiring less technical expertise. Overall, automated extraction of DNA from milk matrix combined with ARMS-PCR is the most suitable technique to provide genetic characterization of the CSN2 gene on a large scale.

Genome-wide analysis reveals the patterns of genetic diversity and population structure of 8 Italian local chicken breeds.

The aim of this study was to conduct a genome-wide comparative analysis of 8 local Italian chicken breeds (Ermellinata di Rovigo, Millefiori di Lonigo [PML], Polverara Bianca, Polverara Nera, Padovana, Pepoi [PPP], Robusta Lionata, and Robusta Maculata), all under a conservation plan, to understand their genetic diversity and population structure. A total of 152 animals were analyzed using the Affymetrix Axiom 600 K Chicken Genotyping Array. The levels of genetic diversity were highest and lowest in PML and PPP, respectively. The results of genomic inbreeding based on runs of homozygosity (ROH; FROH) showed marked differences among breeds and ranged from 0.161 (PML) to 0.478 (PPP). Furthermore, in all breeds, short ROH (<4 Mb in length) were more frequent than long segments. Patterns of genetic differentiation, model-based clustering, and neighbor networks showed that most breeds formed nonoverlapping clusters and were clearly separate populations. The 2 Polverara breeds shared a similar genetic background and showed the lowest genetic differentiation in comparison with purebred lines; the local populations showed separated groups. PPP and PML were closer to the group of the purebred broiler lines (BRSA, BRSB, BRDA, and BRDB). Six genomic regions are presented as hotspots of autozygosity among the Italian chicken breeds, with candidate genes involved in multiple morphological phenotypes as breast muscle, muscle dry matter content, and body weight. This study is the first exhaustive genome-wide analysis of the diversity of these Italian local chickens from Veneto region. We conclude that breeds have conserved authentic genetic patterns. The results are of significant importance because they will help design and implement conservation strategies. In fact, the conservation of these breeds may also have positive impacts on the local economy, niche traditional markets, and offering a source of high-quality products to consumers. In this context, genomic information may play a crucial role in the management of local breeds.