RESUMEN
Introduction: Combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) has become a standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged >75 years or who have comorbidities that preclude intensive induction chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a monocentric retrospective analysis on adult patients affected by treatment-naïve AML not eligible for standard induction therapy or refractory/relapsed (R/R) AML treated with venetoclax combinations outside clinical trials. Venetoclax was administered at the dose of 400 mg/daily after a short ramp-up and reduced in case of concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitors. Results: Sixty consecutive AML were identified. Twenty-three patients (38%) were affected by treatment-naïve AML and 37 (62%) by R/R AML. Median age was 70 years. Among R/R AML 30% had received a prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In combination with venetoclax, 50 patients (83%) received azacitidine. Antifungal prophylaxis was performed in 33 patients (55%).Overall response rate was 60%, with 53% of complete remission (CR; 78% for treatment-naïve and 49% for R/R, p 0.017). Median overall survival was 130 days for R/R patients and 269 days for treatment-naïve patients; median event free survival was 145 days for R/R cohort and 199 days for treatment-naïve AML.Measurable residual disease was negative in 26% of evaluable patients in CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery after 2 cycles and in 50% after 4 cycles, with no significant association with survival.Eleven patients (18%) received an allo-HSCT after venetoclax combinations. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were infectious (51% of the patients), or hematological without infections (25% of the patients). Use of CYP3A4 inhibitors was associated with a trend to shorter cytopenias and with a lower rate of infections. Invasive fungal infections were less frequent among patients receiving azole prophylaxis (6% vs 26%; p 0.0659). Discussion: Venetoclax-based regimens are a viable option for AML considered not eligible for standard induction therapy and a valid rescue therapy in the R/R setting.Azole prophylaxis did not significantly affect response and it was associated with a lower rate of invasive fungal infections. Despite a limited number of patients, the association of venetoclax and HMAs proved to be also a feasible bridging therapy to transplantation.
RESUMEN
Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare neoplasm resulting from extracutaneous infiltration of clonal mast cells (MC). The clinical features of SM are very heterogenous and treatment should be highly individualized. Up to 40% of all SM cases can be associated with another hematological neoplasm, most frequently myeloproliferative neoplasms. Here, we present a patient with indolent SM who subsequently developed a myeloid neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement with complete response to low-dose imatinib. The 63-year-old patient presented with eosinophilia and elevated serum tryptase level. Bone marrow analysis revealed aberrant MCs in aggregates co-expressing CD2/CD25 and KIT D816V mutation (0.01%), and the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene was not identified. In the absence of 'B' and 'C' findings, we diagnosed an indolent form of SM. For 2 years after the diagnosis, the absolute eosinophil count progressively increased. Bone marrow evaluation showed myeloid hyperplasia and the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene was detected. Thus, the diagnosis of myeloid neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement was established. The patient was treated with imatinib 100 mg daily and rapidly obtained a complete molecular remission. The clinical, biological, and therapeutic aspects of SM might be challenging, especially when another associated hematological disease is diagnosed. Little is known about the underlying molecular and immunological mechanisms that can promote one entity prevailing over the other one. Currently, the preferred concept of SM pathogenesis is a multimutated neoplasm in which KIT mutations represent a "phenotype modifier" toward SM. Our patient showed an evolution from KIT mutated indolent SM to a myeloid neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement; when the eosinophilic component expanded, a regression of the MC counterpart was observed. In conclusion, extensive clinical monitoring associated with molecular testing is essential to better define these rare diseases and consequently their prognosis and treatment.
RESUMEN
Host immune homeostasis as an independent prognostic indicator has been inadequately evaluated in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). The present study addresses the prognostic significance in aggressive NHLs of the immunologic profile evaluated by pretreatment serum levels of immunoglobulins (Ig) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR). In this series of 90 patients with aggressive lymphoma, the median level for IgG was 1,024mg/dl (range 436-2236), and for LMR was 2.2 (range 0.2-13.8). CR rate was higher with IgG levels ≥1,024mg/dL (91% vs 77% p=0.059). LMR ≤ 2.2 was associated with lower 1-year PFS (73% vs. 92%, p 0.016). Patients with good/very good R-IPI showed a reduced PFS if IgG or LMR was low, while patients with poor R-IPI did better if LMR or IgG levels were high. We combined both parameters with the R-IPI and produced a four-risk prognostic score showing one-year PFS of 95% (95% CI 68%-99%), 100% (95% CI 100%-100%), 73% (95% CI 52%-86%), and 59% (95% CI 31%-79%), in patients with zero, one, two and three risk factors, respectively. The results indicate for the first time the value of baseline serum Ig levels in the prognostic assessment of aggressive lymphoma.
