Access to systemic treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer in Spain: a survey analysis.

BACKGROUND: Novel and highly effective drugs for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) improve patient outcomes, but their high cost strains healthcare systems. Spain's decentralized public health system, managed by 17 autonomous communities (AaCc), raises concerns about equitable access. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey (July-September 2023) was sent to Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM Group) members to assess access to new drugs. FINDINGS: Fifty physicians from 15 Spanish AaCc responded to the survey. Access for drug with approved public reimbursement, Hedgehog inhibitors in basal-cell carcinoma and anti PD-L1 antibody in Merkel carcinoma, was observed in 84% and 86% of centers, respectively. For other EMA-approved treatments, but without reimbursement in Spain access decreased to 78% of centers. Heterogeneity in access was mainly observed intra regions. CONCLUSION: Unequal financial support for drugs for NMSC with creates a patchwork of access across Spanish hospitals, with variations even within the same AaCc.

Encorafenib and binimetinib followed by radiotherapy for patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastases (E-BRAIN/GEM1802 phase II study).

BACKGROUND: Encorafenib plus binimetinib (EB) is a standard of care treatment for advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. We assessed efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastasis (BM) and explored if radiotherapy improves the duration of response. METHODS: E-BRAIN/GEM1802 was a prospective, multicenter, single arm, phase II trial that enrolled patients with melanoma BRAFV600-mutant and BM. Patients received encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg BID, and those who achieved partial response or stable disease at first tumor assessment were offered radiotherapy. Treatment continued until progression.Primary endpoint was intracranial response rate (icRR) after 2 months of EB, establishing a futility threshold of 60%. RESULTS: The study included 25 patients with no BM symptoms and 23 patients with BM symptoms regardless of using corticosteroids. Among them, 31 patients (64.6%) received sequential radiotherapy. After two months, icRR was 70.8% (95% CI: 55.9-83.1); 10.4% complete response. Median intracranial PFS and OS were 8.5 (95% CI: 6.4-11.8) and 15.9 (95% CI: 10.7-21.4) months, respectively (8.3 months for icPFS and 13.9 months OS for patients receiving RDT). Most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased (10.4%). CONCLUSION: Encorafenib plus binimetinib showed promising clinical benefit in terms of icRR, and tolerable safety profile with low frequency of high grade TRAEs, in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and BM, including those with symptoms and need for steroids. Sequential radiotherapy is feasible but it does not seem to prolong response.

Characteristics and outcomes of advanced melanoma patients with complete response and elective discontinuation of first-line anti-programmed death-1 monotherapy: A real-world multicentre observational cohort study.

Anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1) treatment has significantly improved outcomes of advanced melanoma with a considerable percentage of patients achieving complete response (CR). This real-world study analyzed the feasibility of elective anti-PD1 discontinuation in advanced melanoma patients with CR and evaluated factors related to sustained response. Thirty-five patients with advanced cutaneous or primary unknown melanoma with CR to nivolumab or pembrolizumab from 11 centers were included. Mean age was 66.5 years, and 97.1% had ECOG PS 0-1. 28.6% had ≥3 metastatic sites with 58.8% having M1a-M1b disease; 8.6% had liver and 5.7% had brain metastases. At baseline, 80% had normal LDH, and 85.7% had a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≤3. 74.3% of patients had CR confirmed in PET-CT. Median duration of anti-PD1 was 23.4 months (range 1.3-50.5). 24 months after therapy discontinuation, 91.9% of patients were progression-free. Estimated PFS and OS at 36, 48, and 60 months from the start of anti-PD1 were 94.2%, 89.9%, 84.3%, and 97.1%, 93.3%, 93.3%, respectively. Antibiotics use after anti-PD1 discontinuation increased the odds of progression (OR 16.53 [95% CI 1.7, 226.03]). The study confirms the feasibility of elective anti-PD1 discontinuation in advanced melanoma patients with CR and favorable prognostic factors at baseline.

Lower limb cutaneous melanoma surgery: location matters.

The anatomical location of cutaneous melanoma is a relevant independent prognostic factor in melanoma. The aim of the study is to know the prognosis of lower limb cutaneous melanoma related to their location within the limb, regardless of the histological type, and if there are any other influencing variables. A real-world data observational study was developed. The lesions were divided depending on the location of the melanoma (thigh, leg and foot). Bivariate and multivariate analysis were performed, and melanoma-specific survival and disease-free survival rates were calculated. When these analysis were done, the results showed that, in melanomas of the lower limb, location on the foot presented a lower melanoma-specific survival rate compared to more proximal locations, and only the anatomical location presents statistical significance to discriminate cases with a higher mortality risk and a lower disease-free survival rate among distal melanomas (mainly on the foot). In conclusion, this study confirms that a more distal location of lower limb cutaneous melanoma is a relevant prognostic factor.Trial registration number NCT04625491 retrospectively registered.

Adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib for patients with resected BRAF -mutated melanoma: DESCRIBE-AD real-world retrospective observational study.

BRAF and MEK inhibitor, dabrafenib plus trametinib, adjuvant therapy is effective for high-risk resected melanoma patients with BRAF - V600 mutations. However, real-world evidence is limited. We aimed to determine the feasibility of this therapy in routine clinical practice. DESCRIBE-AD, a retrospective observational study, collected real-world data from 25 hospitals in Spain. Histologically confirmed and resected BRAF -mutated melanoma patients aged ≥18 years who were previously treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib adjuvant therapy, were included. The primary objectives were treatment discontinuation rate and time to discontinuation. The secondary objectives included safety and efficacy. From October 2020 to March 2021, 65 patients were included. Dabrafenib and trametinib discontinuation rate due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade was 9%. Other reasons for discontinuation included patients' decisions (6%), physician decisions (6%), unrelated adverse events (3%), disease progression (5%), and others (5%). The median time to treatment discontinuation was 9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5-11]. G3-4 TRAEs occurred in 21.5% of patients, the most common being pyrexia (3%), asthenia (3%), and diarrhoea (3%). Unscheduled hospitalisations and clinical tests occurred in 6 and 22% of patients, respectively. After 20-month median follow-up (95% CI, 18-22), 9% of patients had exitus due to disease progression, with a 12-month relapse-free survival and overall survival rates of 95.3% and 100%, respectively. Dabrafenib and trametinib adjuvant therapy proved effective for melanoma patients in a real-world setting, with a manageable toxicity profile. Toxicity frequencies were low leading to low incidence of unscheduled medical visits, tests, and treatment discontinuations.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with melanoma: results of the Spanish Melanoma Group registry

Background The Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM) developed a national registry of patients with melanoma infected by SARS-CoV-2 (“GRAVID”). Methods The main objective was to describe the COVID-19 fatality rate in patients with melanoma throughout the pandemic, as well as to explore the effect of melanoma treatment and tumor stage on the risk of COVID-19 complications. These are the final data of the register, including cases from February 2020 to September 2021. Results One hundred-fifty cases were registered. Median age was 68 years (range 6–95), 61 (40%) patients were females, and 63 (42%) patients had stage IV. Thirty-nine (26%) were on treatment with immunotherapy, and 17 (11%) with BRAF-MEK inhibitors. COVID-19 was resolved in 119 cases, including 85 (57%) patients cured, 15 (10%) that died due to melanoma, and 20 (13%) that died due to COVID-19. Only age over 60 years, cardiovascular disorders, and diabetes mellitus increased the risk of death due to COVID-19, but not advanced melanoma stage nor melanoma systemic therapies. Three waves have been covered by the register: February–May 2020, August–November 2020, and December 2020–April 2021. The first wave had the highest number of registered cases and COVID-19 mortality. Conclusion Tumor stage or melanoma treatments are non-significant prognostic factors for COVID-19 mortality. During the pandemic in Spain there was a downward trend in the number of patients registered across the waves, as well as in the severity of the infection (AU)

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with melanoma: results of the Spanish Melanoma Group registry.

BACKGROUND: The Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM) developed a national registry of patients with melanoma infected by SARS-CoV-2 ("GRAVID"). METHODS: The main objective was to describe the COVID-19 fatality rate in patients with melanoma throughout the pandemic, as well as to explore the effect of melanoma treatment and tumor stage on the risk of COVID-19 complications. These are the final data of the register, including cases from February 2020 to September 2021. RESULTS: One hundred-fifty cases were registered. Median age was 68 years (range 6-95), 61 (40%) patients were females, and 63 (42%) patients had stage IV. Thirty-nine (26%) were on treatment with immunotherapy, and 17 (11%) with BRAF-MEK inhibitors. COVID-19 was resolved in 119 cases, including 85 (57%) patients cured, 15 (10%) that died due to melanoma, and 20 (13%) that died due to COVID-19. Only age over 60 years, cardiovascular disorders, and diabetes mellitus increased the risk of death due to COVID-19, but not advanced melanoma stage nor melanoma systemic therapies. Three waves have been covered by the register: February-May 2020, August-November 2020, and December 2020-April 2021. The first wave had the highest number of registered cases and COVID-19 mortality. CONCLUSION: Tumor stage or melanoma treatments are non-significant prognostic factors for COVID-19 mortality. During the pandemic in Spain there was a downward trend in the number of patients registered across the waves, as well as in the severity of the infection. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04344002.

Frequency and Clinicopathological Profile Associated with Braf Mutations in Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Spain.

Real-world data on BRAF mutation frequency in advanced melanoma are lacking in Spain. Moreover, data available on clinicopathological profile of patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma are currently limited. This study aimed to assess the frequency of BRAF V600 mutations in Spanish patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma and to identify clinical and histopathological features associated with BRAF-mutated tumors. A multicenter, cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted in 33 Spanish hospitals in adult patients with stage IIIc/IV melanoma. A total of 264 patients were included. The median age was 68 years and 57% were male. Melanoma mainly involved skin with intermittent (40.4%) and low or no sun exposure (43.5%). Most patients (85.6%) had stage IV disease (M1a: 19.3%; M1b: 13.3%; M1c: 22.7%). Serum lactate dehydrogenase levels were elevated in 20% of patients. Superficial spreading melanoma was the most frequent histological type (29.9%). Samples were predominantly obtained from metastases (62.7%), mostly from skin and soft tissues (80%). BRAF mutation analysis was primarily performed using the Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test (92.8%) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue (95.8%). BRAF mutations were detected in 41.3% of samples. Multivariate analysis identified age (odd ratio [OR] 0.975) and stage IV M1a (OR 2.716) as independent factors associated with BRAF mutation. The frequency of BRAF mutations in tumor samples from patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma in Spain was 41.3%. BRAF mutations seem to be more frequent in younger patients and stage M1a patients. This study provides the basis for further investigation regarding BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma in larger cohorts.

Analyzing the capability of PSP, PCT and sCD25 to support the diagnosis of infection in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia.

Background Early diagnosis of infection is essential for the initial management of cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia (FN). In this study, we have evaluated two emerging infection biomarkers, pancreatic stone protein (PSP) and soluble receptor of interleukin 2, known as soluble cluster of differentiation 25 (sCD25), for the detection of an infectious cause in FN, in comparison with other commonly used infection biomarkers, such as procalcitonin (PCT). Methods A total of 105 cancer patients presenting to the emergency department were prospectively enrolled. We observed 114 episodes of chemotherapy-associated FN. At presentation, a blood sample was collected for the measurement of PCT, PSP and sCD25. In order to evaluate the discriminatory ability of these markers for the diagnosis of infection, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves was calculated. Results Infection was documented in 59 FN episodes. PCT, PSP and sCD25 levels were significantly higher in infected patients. PCT was the biomarker with the highest diagnostic accuracy for infection (AUC: 0.901), whereas PSP and sCD25 showed a similar performance, with AUCs of 0.751 and 0.730, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, PCT and sCD25 were shown to be independently associated with infection. Conclusions Two novel biomarkers, PSP and sCD25, correlated with infection in cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated FN, but neither PSP nor sCD25 improved the performance of PCT. Based on the results obtained, the introduction of these novel biomarkers as a tool for the diagnosis of infection in this patient group is not recommended.

Prognostic value of procalcitonin and lipopolysaccharide binding protein in cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia presenting to an emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia are a heterogeneous group with a significant risk of serious medical complications. In these patients, the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score is the most widely used tool for risk-stratification. The aim of this prospective study was to analyse the value of procalcitonin (PCT) and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) to predict serious complications and bacteraemia in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, compared with MASCC score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 111 episodes of febrile neutropenia admitted consecutively to the emergency department. In all of them, MASCC score was calculated and serum samples were collected for measurement of PCT and LBP by well-established methods. The main and secondary outcomes were the development of serious complications and bacteraemia, respectively. RESULTS: A serious complication occurred in 20 (18%) episodes and in 16 (14%) bacteraemia was detected. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of MASCC score, PCT and LBP to select low-risk patients were 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74 - 0.89), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77 - 0.91) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61 - 0.78), respectively. For bacteraemia, MASCC score, PCT and LBP showed ROC AUCs of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64 - 0.82), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.92) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67 - 0.83), respectively. CONCLUSION: A single measurement of PCT performs similarly as MASCC score to predict serious medical complications in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia and can be a useful tool for risk stratification. Besides, low PCT concentrations can be used to rule-out the presence of bacteraemia.

Experiencia del uso fuera de indicación de Eltrombopag en el tratamiento de la trombocitopenia asociada a tumores sólidos / Experience of off-label use of Eltrombopag in the treatment of thrombocytopenia associated with solid tumors

Objetivo: Describir los resultados del uso fuera de indicación de eltrombopag en pacientes con trombocitopenia limitante de tratamiento quimioterápico y tumores sólidos. Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron todos los pacientes con tumores sólidos tratados con eltrombopag por trombocitopenia durante el tratamiento con quimioterapia entre enero de 2012 y diciembre de 2014. Resultados: Seis pacientes, con tumores sólidos y trombocitopenia limitante de tratamiento, recibieron eltrombopag durante el periodo de estudio con una disminución en el retraso de ciclos de quimioterapia (4,83 ± 4,79 ciclos retrasados antes del inicio de eltrombopag vs 2,50 ± 4,32 ciclos durante el tratamiento con eltrombopag, p=0,492) y un aumento en el porcentaje de dosis real administrada (89,29 ± 13,36% vs 91,43 ± 10,69%, p=0,682). Así mismo, se produjo un aumento en el nadir de plaquetas (55,29 ± 16,45x109 /L vs 76,14 ± 36,38x109 /L, p=0,248) sin requerir en ningún paciente soporte transfusional con plaquetas durante el tratamiento con eltrombopag. Conclusiones: eltrombopag ha resultado ser una alternativa de tratamiento para pacientes con trombocitopenia limitante de tratamiento con quimioterapia, siendo necesarios ensayos clínicos con mayor número de pacientes que confirmen estos resultados (AU)

Purpose: To describe the results of the off-label use of eltrombopag in patients with solid tumors and thrombocytopenia that limits chemotherapy. Methods: Retrospective observational study including all patients with solid tumors who were treated with eltrombopag for thrombocytopenia during the chemotherapy treatment between January 2012 and December 2014. Results: Six patients, with solid tumors and thrombocytopenia that limits chemotherapy treatment, received eltrombopag during the study and it was observed a decrease in the delay of chemotherapy cycles (4.83 ± 4.79 delayed cycles before starting eltrombopag vs 2.50 ± 4.32 delayed cycles during the treatment with eltrombopag, p=0.492) and an increase in the percentage of administrated dosage (89.29 ± 13.36% vs 91.43 ± 10.69%, p=0.682). Also, there was an increase in platelet nadir (55.29 ± 16.45x109 /L vs 76.14 ± 36.38x109 /L, p=0.248) without platelet transfusion support in any patient during treatment with eltrombopag. Conclusions: eltrombopag has resulted to be an alternative in the treatment of patients with thrombocytopenia that limits chemotherapy, clinical trials with more number or patients are needed to confirm these results (AU)

Nab-Paclitaxel asociado a gemcitabina en el tratamiento del adenocarcinoma de páncreas metastásico: experiencia de uso / Nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: experience of use

Objetivo: Describir los resultados obtenidos en el uso de nab-paclitaxel y gemcitabina en el tratamiento de pacientes con adenocarcinoma de páncreas metastático. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se seleccionaron pacientes en tratamiento con nab-paclitaxel asociado a gemcitabina entre enero 2013 y enero 2014. Se recogieron datos demográficos y clínicos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 15 pacientes (edad media: 59,4 ± 10,3 años). Todos ellos recibieron la combinación de nab-paclitaxel y gemcitabina en primera línea para la enfermedad metastásica. Nueve recibieron tratamiento adyuvante antes de que la enfermedad fuera metastásica, siendo la media de líneas de tratamiento previamente al uso de la combinación de 1,1. La mediana de supervivencia libre de progresión fue de 5,6 meses (IC 95%: 4,44 - 8,03). Sólo dos pacientes suspendieron el tratamiento por toxicidad. Conclusiones: El tratamiento con nab-paclitaxel y gemcitabina en nuestros pacientes ha resultado en una supervivencia libre de progresión similar a la de los ensayos clínicos publicados, presentando además una buena tolerancia (AU)

Objective: To evaluate the results obtained with the combined use of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Materials and methods: Retrospective observational study. Patients treated with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine between January of 2013 and January of 2014 were selected. Demographical and clinical data were gathered. Results: 15 patients (mean age 59,4 ± 10,3 years) were included. All patients received the combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in first-line metastatic disease. Nine received adjuvant treatment before the disease was metastatic. The median progression-free survival rate with combined nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine was 5,6 months (95% CI: 4,44 - 8,03). In two patients the treatment was stopped due to toxicity. Conclusions: The treatment with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in our patients resulted in progression-free survival rates similar to those published in clinical trials with good treatment tolerability (AU)

[Experience of off-label use of Eltrombopag in the treatment of thrombocytopenia associated with solid tumors]. / Experiencia del uso fuera de indicación de Eltrombopag en el tratamiento de la trombocitopenia asociada a tumores sólidos.

PURPOSE: To describe the results of the off-label use of eltrombopag in patients with solid tumors and thrombocytopenia that limits chemotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective observational study including all patients with solid tumors who were treated with eltrombopag for thrombocytopenia during the chemotherapy treatment between January 2012 and December 2014. RESULTS: Six patients, with solid tumors and thrombocytopenia that limits chemotherapy treatment, received eltrombopag during the study and it was observed a decrease in the delay of chemotherapy cycles (4.83 ± 4.79 delayed cycles before starting eltrombopag vs 2.50 ± 4.32 delayed cycles during the treatment with eltrombopag, p=0.492) and an increase in the percentage of administrated dosage (89.29 ± 13.36% vs 91.43 ± 10.69%, p=0.682). Also, there was an increase in platelet nadir (55.29 ± 16.45x109/L vs 76.14 ± 36.38x109/L, p=0.248) without platelet transfusion support in any patient during treatment with eltrombopag. CONCLUSIONS: eltrombopag has resulted to be an alternative in the treatment of patients with thrombocytopenia that limits chemotherapy, clinical trials with more number or patients are needed to confirm these results.

Objetivo: Describir los resultados del uso fuera de indicación de eltrombopag en pacientes con trombocitopenia limitante de tratamiento quimioterápico y tumores sólidos. Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron todos los pacientes con tumores sólidos tratados con eltrombopag por trombocitopenia durante el tratamiento con quimioterapia entre enero de 2012 y diciembre de 2014. Resultados: Seis pacientes, con tumores sólidos y trombocitopenia limitante de tratamiento, recibieron eltrombopag durante el periodo de estudio con una disminución en el retraso de ciclos de quimioterapia (4,83 ± 4,79 ciclos retrasados antes del inicio de eltrombopag vs 2,50 ± 4,32 ciclos durante el tratamiento con eltrombopag, p=0,492) y un aumento en el porcentaje de dosis real administrada (89,29 ± 13,36% vs 91,43 ± 10,69%, p=0,682). Así mismo, se produjo un aumento en el nadir de plaquetas (55,29 ± 16,45x109/L vs 76,14 ± 36,38x109/L, p=0,248) sin requerir en ningún paciente soporte transfusional con plaquetas durante el tratamiento con eltrombopag. Conclusiones: eltrombopag ha resultado ser una alternativa de tratamiento para pacientes con trombocitopenia limitante de tratamiento con quimioterapia, siendo necesarios ensayos clínicos con mayor número de pacientes que confirmen estos resultados.

[Nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: experience of use]. / Nab-Paclitaxel asociado a gemcitabina en el tratamiento del adenocarcinoma de páncreas metastásico: experiencia de uso.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results obtained with the combined use of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study. Patients treated with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine between January of 2013 and January of 2014 were selected. Demographical and clinical data were gathered. RESULTS: 15 patients (mean age 59,4 ± 10,3 years) were included. All patients received the combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in first-line metastatic disease. Nine received adjuvant treatment before the disease was metastatic. The median progression-free survival rate with combined nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine was 5,6 months (95% CI: 4,44 - 8,03). In two patients the treatment was stopped due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in our patients resulted in progression-free survival rates similar to those published in clinical trials with good treatment tolerability.

Objetivo: Describir los resultados obtenidos en el uso de nab-paclitaxel y gemcitabina en el tratamiento de pacientes con adenocarcinoma de páncreas metastático. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se seleccionaron pacientes en tratamiento con nab-paclitaxel asociado a gemcitabina entre enero 2013 y enero 2014. Se recogieron datos demográficos y clínicos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 15 pacientes (edad media: 59,4 ± 10,3 años). Todos ellos recibieron la combinación de nab-paclitaxel y gemcitabina en primera línea para la enfermedad metastásica. Nueve recibieron tratamiento adyuvante antes de que la enfermedad fuera metastásica, siendo la media de líneas de tratamiento previamente al uso de la combinación de 1,1. La mediana de supervivencia libre de progresión fue de 5,6 meses (IC 95%: 4,44 - 8,03). Sólo dos pacientes suspendieron el tratamiento por toxicidad. Conclusiones: El tratamiento con nab-paclitaxel y gemcitabina en nuestros pacientes ha resultado en una supervivencia libre de progresión similar a la de los ensayos clínicos publicados, presentando además una buena tolerancia.

Value of lipopolysaccharide binding protein as diagnostic marker of infection in adult cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: comparison with C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin 6.

PURPOSE: Early detection of infection is essential for initial management of cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia in the emergency department. In this study, we evaluated lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) as predictor for infection in febrile neutropenia and compared with other biomarkers previously studied: C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin (IL)-6. METHODS: A total of 61 episodes of chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia in 58 adult cancer patients were included. Serum samples were collected on admission at emergency department and CRP, LBP, PCT, and IL-6 were measured. Patients were classified into fever of unknown origin and infection, including microbiologically and clinically documented infection, groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for each biomarker for the diagnosis of infection. RESULTS: Thirty-two of the 61 episodes were classified as infection. On admission, CRP, PCT, IL-6, and LBP were significantly increased in patients with infection compared to fever of unknown origin group. Area under the ROC curve (AUC ROC) of CRP, PCT, IL-6, and LBP for discriminating both groups was 0.77, 0.88, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively, without significant difference between them. The combination of IL-6 and PCT or LBP did not lead to a significant improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of PCT or LBP alone. CONCLUSIONS: On admission, LBP has a similar diagnostic accuracy than PCT or IL-6 for the diagnosis of infection and might be used as additional diagnostic tool in adult cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia.

Utilidad de la procalcitonina para predecir bacteriemia en pacientes oncológicos con fiebre / Usefulness of procalcitonin for predicting bacteremia in cancer patients with fever

Introducción. La bacteriemia es una de las principales causas de morbimortalidad en el paciente con cáncer. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la utilidad de la procalcitonina como marcador predictor de bacteriemia en pacientes oncológicos y oncohematológicos que acudieron al Servicio de Urgencias de nuestro hospital. Material y métodos. Se incluyeron en el estudio 152 episodios de fiebre en 134 pacientes adultos oncológicos. Al ingreso en el Servicio de Urgencias una muestra de sangre fue extraída para la medida de proteína C reactiva (PCR) y procalcitonina (PCT). Los episodios febriles se clasificaron en dos grupos en función de los resultados del hemocultivo: bacteriémicos (n = 22) y no bacteriémicos (n = 130). El rendimiento diagnóstico de los biomarcadores como predictores de bacteriemia fue calculado mediante el análisis del área bajo la curva Receiver Operating Characteristic. Resultados. Las concentraciones de PCT y PCR fueron significativamente más altas en los episodios febriles con bacteriemia que en los no bacteriémicos. La PCT presentó un rendimiento diagnóstico más alto que la PCR como predictor de bacteriemia (área bajo la curva Receiver Operating Characteristic: PCT 0,781 (IC 95%: 0,667 - 0,895) vs. PCR: 0,632 (IC 95%: 0,493 - 0,771); p = 0,02). Un punto de corte de 0,20 ng/mL presentó un valor predictivo negativo de 95,8% para descartar bacteriemia. Conclusión. En el Servicio de Urgencias, la medida de PCT en pacientes oncológicos con fiebre es una herramienta útil para descartar bacteriemia y puede contribuir a la toma inicial de decisiones terapéuticas y a racionalizar la solicitud del hemocultivo (AU)

Aim. Bacteraemia is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of procalcitonin for predicting bacteraemia in febrile oncology and oncohaematology patients admitted to the Emergency Department of our hospital. Material and methods. The study included a total of 152 febrile episodes in 134 adult cancer patients. A blood sample was collected on admission to the Emergency Department to measure C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). Febrile episodes were classified into two groups according to the blood culture results: bacteraemia episodes (n = 22) and non-bacteraemia episodes (n = 130). Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis was performed for each biomarker as a predictor of bacteraemia. Results. PCT and CRP levels were significantly higher in the bacteraemia episodes group when compared with non-bacteraemia episodes group. PCT showed a diagnostic accuracy higher than CRP for predicting bacteraemia (AUC Receiver Operating Characteristic: PCT 0,781 (95% CI: 0,667 - 0,895) vs. CRP: 0,632 (95% CI: 0,493 - 0,771); p = 0,02). A cut-off value of 0,20 ng/mL was associated with a negative predictive value of 95,8% to rule-out bacteraemia. Conclusion. PCT measurement in febrile cancer patients in the Emergency Department is a useful tool to rule-out bacteraemia, and may contribute in initial therapeutic decision making and rationalise the request for blood culture (AU)

Phase II trial of oxaliplatin and capecitabine after progression to first-line chemotherapy in androgen-independent prostate cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Docetaxel plus prednisone is the current standard of care in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. However, there is no agent proven as effective after progression to standard docetaxel-based therapy. Platins and capecitabine have shown activity in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 14 patients were included in this prospective, single-center trial. All patients had progressed to first-line docetaxel-based treatment. Patients received oxaliplatin 100 mg/sqm on D1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/sqm/bid on days 1 to 14 every 21 days. RESULTS: Median number of cycles was 3. No unexpected toxicity was observed. Only grade 3 toxicity reported was grade 3 anemia. Of the 14 patients, 3 presented grade 2 neuropathy which was spontaneously resolved. Prostate-specific antigenresponse rate was 57%, with a median time to progression of 14.5 weeks, and overall survival of 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In the second-line setting, after receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy, the combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine offers promising activity with an excellent safety profile.

Clinicopathologic study of 85 colorectal serrated adenocarcinomas: further insights into the full recognition of a new subset of colorectal carcinoma.

Colorectal serrated adenocarcinoma represents a subtype of colorectal carcinoma that originates from serrated adenomas. Previous studies have suggested a more aggressive course, but this has not been verified. The aim of this work was to test the diagnostic reproducibility of previously proposed histologic criteria for serrated adenocarcinoma and to analyze the clinicopathologic features and outcome that would warrant its recognition as a new subtype of colorectal cancer. Nine hundred twenty-seven consecutive colorectal cancer specimens were used to search for cases fulfilling the criteria of serrated adenocarcinoma and matched controls. Clinicopathologic findings of 85 serrated adenocarcinomas were compared with a matched control group of conventional cancers. Serrated adenocarcinomas were encountered in 9.1% (n = 85) of cases. Residual serrated adenoma was present in 44 (51.7%). Absence of residual adenoma did not have any influence on the parameters studied. Interobserver variation between 2 Spanish and a Finnish pathologist showed moderate agreement (κ = .5873). Compared with their matched controls, serrated adenocarcinomas were more often accompanied by synchronous residual serrated adenomas (P < .0001), remote serrated adenomas (P = .0035), and serrated adenocarcinomas or cancers representing partial features of these tumors (P = .002). They had a less favorable 5-year survival than conventional cancers (P = .048 Breslow, Kaplan-Meier), and left-sided ones had the worst prognosis (P = .001). Serrated adenocarcinoma is an identifiable subset of colorectal cancer; and the histopathologic differences, in addition to its less favorable prognosis, may justify its recognition as a distinct subset of colorectal cancer warranting the search for specific clinical management strategies.