Blood and Site of Disease Inflammatory Profiles Differ in Patients With Pericardial Tuberculosis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1.

Background: To better understand the pathogenesis of pericardial tuberculosis (PCTB), we sought to characterize the systemic inflammatory profile in people with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with latent TB infection (LTBI), pulmonary TB (PTB), or PCTB. Methods: Using Luminex, we measured the concentration of 39 analytes in pericardial fluid (PCF) and paired plasma from 18 PCTB participants, and plasma from 16 LTBI and 20 PTB participants. Follow-up plasma samples were also obtained from PTB and PCTB participants. HLA-DR expression on Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells was measured in baseline samples using flow cytometry. Results: Assessment of the overall systemic inflammatory profile by principal component analysis showed that the inflammatory profile of active TB participants was distinct from the LTBI group, while PTB patients could not be distinguished from those with PCTB. When comparing the inflammatory profile between PCF and paired blood, we found that the concentrations of most analytes (25/39) were elevated at site of disease. However, the inflammatory profile in PCF partially mirrored inflammatory events in the blood. After TB treatment completion, the overall plasma inflammatory profile reverted to that observed in the LTBI group. Lastly, HLA-DR expression showed the best performance for TB diagnosis compared to previously described biosignatures built from soluble markers. Conclusions: Our results show that the inflammatory profile in blood was comparable between PTB and PCTB. However, at the site of infection (PCF), inflammation was significantly elevated compared to blood. Additionally, our data emphasize the potential role of HLA-DR expression as a biomarker for TB diagnosis.

Corrigendum: Comparison of the frequency and phenotypic profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells between the site of disease and blood in pericardial tuberculosis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1009016.].

Effects of tuberculosis and/or HIV-1 infection on COVID-19 presentation and immune response in Africa.

Few studies from Africa have described the clinical impact of co-infections on SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we investigate the presentation and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in an African setting of high HIV-1 and tuberculosis prevalence by an observational case cohort of SARS-CoV-2 patients. A comparator group of non SARS-CoV-2 participants is included. The study includes 104 adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection of whom 29.8% are HIV-1 co-infected. Two or more co-morbidities are present in 57.7% of participants, including HIV-1 (30%) and active tuberculosis (14%). Amongst patients dually infected by tuberculosis and SARS-CoV-2, clinical features can be typical of either SARS-CoV-2 or tuberculosis: lymphopenia is exacerbated, and some markers of inflammation (D-dimer and ferritin) are further elevated (p < 0.05). Amongst HIV-1 co-infected participants those with low CD4 percentage strata exhibit reduced total, but not neutralising, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8 T cell responses are present in 35.8% participants overall but undetectable in combined HIV-1 and tuberculosis. Death occurred in 30/104 (29%) of all COVID-19 patients and in 6/15 (40%) of patients with coincident SARS-CoV-2 and tuberculosis. This shows that in a high incidence setting, tuberculosis is a common co-morbidity in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is adversely affected by co-existent HIV-1 and tuberculosis.

Adaptive immunity and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern following vaccination in patients with cancer: The CAPTURE study.

CAPTURE (NCT03226886) is a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 immunity in patients with cancer. Here we evaluated 585 patients following administration of two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccines, administered 12 weeks apart. Seroconversion rates after two doses were 85% and 59% in patients with solid and hematological malignancies, respectively. A lower proportion of patients had detectable neutralizing antibody titers (NAbT) against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) vs wildtype (WT). Patients with hematological malignancies were more likely to have undetectable NAbT and had lower median NAbT vs solid cancers against both WT and VOCs. In comparison with individuals without cancer, patients with haematological, but not solid, malignancies had reduced NAb responses. Seroconversion showed poor concordance with NAbT against VOCs. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted NAb response including against VOCs, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with undetectable NAbT. Vaccine-induced T-cell responses were detected in 80% of patients, and were comparable between vaccines or cancer types. Our results have implications for the management of cancer patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Functional antibody and T-cell immunity following SARS-CoV-2 infection, including by variants of concern, in patients with cancer: the CAPTURE study.

Patients with cancer have higher COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Here we present the prospective CAPTURE study (NCT03226886) integrating longitudinal immune profiling with clinical annotation. Of 357 patients with cancer, 118 were SARS-CoV-2-positive, 94 were symptomatic and 2 patients died of COVID-19. In this cohort, 83% patients had S1-reactive antibodies, 82% had neutralizing antibodies against WT, whereas neutralizing antibody titers (NAbT) against the Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants were substantially reduced. Whereas S1-reactive antibody levels decreased in 13% of patients, NAbT remained stable up to 329 days. Patients also had detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells and CD4+ responses correlating with S1-reactive antibody levels, although patients with hematological malignancies had impaired immune responses that were disease and treatment-specific, but presented compensatory cellular responses, further supported by clinical. Overall, these findings advance the understanding of the nature and duration of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer.

Cytokine release syndrome in a patient with colorectal cancer after vaccination with BNT162b2.

Patients with cancer are currently prioritized in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination programs globally, which includes administration of mRNA vaccines. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) has not been reported with mRNA vaccines and is an extremely rare immune-related adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We present a case of CRS that occurred 5 d after vaccination with BTN162b2 (tozinameran)-the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-in a patient with colorectal cancer on long-standing anti-PD-1 monotherapy. The CRS was evidenced by raised inflammatory markers, thrombocytopenia, elevated cytokine levels (IFN-γ/IL-2R/IL-18/IL-16/IL-10) and steroid responsiveness. The close temporal association of vaccination and diagnosis of CRS in this case suggests that CRS was a vaccine-related adverse event; with anti-PD1 blockade as a potential contributor. Overall, further prospective pharmacovigillence data are needed in patients with cancer, but the benefit-risk profile remains strongly in favor of COVID-19 vaccination in this population.

Functional antibody and T cell immunity following SARS-CoV-2 infection, including by variants of concern, in patients with cancer: the CAPTURE study.

Patients with cancer have higher COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Here we present the prospective CAPTURE study, integrating longitudinal immune profiling with clinical annotation. Of 357 patients with cancer, 118 were SARS-CoV-2 positive, 94 were symptomatic and 2 died of COVID-19. In this cohort, 83% patients had S1-reactive antibodies and 82% had neutralizing antibodies against wild type SARS-CoV-2, whereas neutralizing antibody titers against the Alpha, Beta and Delta variants were substantially reduced. S1-reactive antibody levels decreased in 13% of patients, whereas neutralizing antibody titers remained stable for up to 329 days. Patients also had detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells and CD4+ responses correlating with S1-reactive antibody levels, although patients with hematological malignancies had impaired immune responses that were disease and treatment specific, but presented compensatory cellular responses, further supported by clinical recovery in all but one patient. Overall, these findings advance the understanding of the nature and duration of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer.

Adaptive immunity and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern following vaccination in patients with cancer: the CAPTURE study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antiviral response in a pan-tumor immune monitoring (CAPTURE) ( NCT03226886 ) is a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 immunity in patients with cancer. Here we evaluated 585 patients following administration of two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccines, administered 12 weeks apart. Seroconversion rates after two doses were 85% and 59% in patients with solid and hematological malignancies, respectively. A lower proportion of patients had detectable titers of neutralizing antibodies (NAbT) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) versus wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2. Patients with hematological malignancies were more likely to have undetectable NAbT and had lower median NAbT than those with solid cancers against both SARS-CoV-2 WT and VOC. By comparison with individuals without cancer, patients with hematological, but not solid, malignancies had reduced neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses. Seroconversion showed poor concordance with NAbT against VOC. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted the NAb response including against VOC, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with undetectable NAbT. Vaccine-induced T cell responses were detected in 80% of patients and were comparable between vaccines or cancer types. Our results have implications for the management of patients with cancer during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Safety implications of combined antiretroviral and anti-tuberculosis drugs.

Introduction: Antiretroviral and anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs are often co-administered in people living with HIV (PLWH). Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) during TB treatment improves survival in patients with advanced HIV disease. However, safety concerns related to clinically significant changes in drug exposure resulting from drug-drug interactions, development of overlapping toxicities and specific challenges related to co-administration during pregnancy represent barriers to successful combined treatment for HIV and TB.Areas covered: Pharmacokinetic interactions of different classes of ART when combined with anti-TB drugs used for sensitive-, drug-resistant (DR) and latent TB are discussed. Overlapping drug toxicities, implications of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), safety in pregnancy and research gaps are also explored.Expert opinion: New antiretroviral and anti-tuberculosis drugs have been recently introduced and international guidelines updated. A number of effective molecules and clinical data are now available to build treatment regimens for PLWH with latent or active TB. Adopting a systematic approach that also takes into account the need for individualized variations based on the available evidence is the key to successfully integrate ART and TB treatment and improve treatment outcomes.

Association Between Impaired Vα7.2+CD161++CD8+ (MAIT) and Vα7.2+CD161-CD8+ T-Cell Populations and Gut Dysbiosis in Chronically HIV- and/or HCV-Infected Patients.

Both HIV and HCV infections feature increased microbial translocation (MT) and gut dysbiosis that affect immune homeostasis and disease outcome. Given their commitment to antimicrobial mucosal immunity, we investigated mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells and Vα7.2+CD161- T-cell frequency/function and their possible associations with MT and gut dysbiosis, in chronic HIV and/or HCV infections. We enrolled 56 virally infected (VI) patients (pts): 13 HIV+ on suppressive cART (HIV-RNA < 40cp/ml), 13 HCV+ naive to DAA (direct-acting antiviral) anti-HCV agents; 30 HCV+/HIV+ on suppressive cART and naive to anti-HCV. 13 age-matched healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. For Vα7.2+CD161++ and Vα7.2+CD161-CD8+ T cells we assessed: activation (CD69), exhaustion (PD1/CD39), and cytolytic activity (granzymeB/perforin). Following PMA/ionomycin and Escherichia coli stimulation we measured intracellular IL17/TNFα/IFNγ. Markers of microbial translocation (Plasma LPS, 16S rDNA, EndoCAb and I-FABP) were quantified. In 5 patients per group we assessed stool microbiota composition by 16S targeted metagenomics sequencing (alpha/beta diversity, relative abundance). Compared to controls, virally infected pts displayed significantly lower circulating Vα7.2+CD161++CD8+ MAIT cells (p = 0.001), yet expressed higher perforin (p = 0.004) and granzyme B (p = 0.002) on CD8+ MAIT cells. Upon E. coli stimulation, the residual MAIT cells are less functional particularly those from HIV+/HCV+ patients. Conversely, in virally infected pts, Vα7.2+CD161-CD8+ cells were comparable in frequency, highly activated/exhausted (CD69+: p = 0.002; PD-1+: p = 0.030) and with cytolytic potential (perforin+: p < 0.0001), yet were poorly responsive to ex vivo stimulation. A profound gut dysbiosis characterized virally infected pts, especially HCV+/HIV+ co-infected patients, delineating a Firmicutes-poor/Bacteroidetes-rich microbiota, with significant associations with MAIT cell frequency/function. Irrespective of mono/dual infection, HIV+ and HCV+ patients display depleted, yet activated/cytolytic MAIT cells with reduced ex vivo function, suggesting an impoverished pool, possibly due to continuous bacterial challenge. The MAIT cell ability to respond to bacterial stimulation correlates with the presence of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, possibly suggesting an association between gut dysbiosis and MAIT cell function and posing viral-mediated dysbiosis as a potential key player in the hampered anti-bacterial MAIT ability.

Global access of rifabutin for the treatment of tuberculosis - why should we prioritize this?

INTRODUCTION: Rifabutin, a rifamycin of equivalent potency to rifampicin, has several advantages in its pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile, particularly in HIV co-infected patients on combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). In this commentary, we evaluate evidence supporting increased global use of rifabutin and highlight key recommendations for action. DISCUSSION: Although extrapolation of data from HIV uninfected patients would suggest non-inferiority, there has been no randomized controlled study comparing rifabutin versus rifampicin in the outcomes of relapse-free cure, in drug susceptible tuberculosis (TB), in HIV co-infected patients on currently utilized cART regimens or in paediatric populations. An important advantage of rifabutin is that compared to the dose adjustments required with rifampicin, it can be co-administered with the integrase strand transfer inhibitors raltegravir or dolutegravir without the need for dose adjustments. This strategy would be easier to implement in a programmatic setting and would save costs. We have assessed cost incentives to utilize rifabutin and have estimated generic costs for a range of rifabutin dosage scenarios. Where facilities are present for drug re-challenge and monitoring for drug toxicity and cross-reactivity, rifabutin offers a switch alternative for adverse drug reactions (ADR)s attributed to rifampicin. This would negate the need to prolong treatment in the absence of a rifamycin as part of short-course multidrug therapy. There is evidence of incomplete cross-resistance to rifampicin and rifabutin. Rifabutin may be useful in rifampicin-resistant TB, in an estimated 20% of cases, based on phenotypic or genotypic rifabutin susceptibility testing. CONCLUSIONS: Rifabutin should be available globally as a first-line rifamycin in HIV co-infected individuals and as a switch option in cases of rifampicin associated ADRs. Further studies are needed to ascertain the utility of rifabutin in rifampicin-resistant rifabutin-susceptible TB.

Pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir 100 mg once daily with rifampicin.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) causes 25% of all deaths among individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Rifampicin (RIF) is a potent inducer of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, and co-administration with dolutegravir (DTG) reduces DTG exposure; this can be overcome by doubling the DTG dose to 50 mg twice daily. This study investigated the effect of RIF on DTG exposure when dosed at 100 mg once daily, which could provide an easier option than 50 mg twice daily. METHODS: An open label, pharmacokinetic (PK) study was undertaken. Healthy HIV-negative subjects received DTG 50 mg for 7 days (PK1), DTG 100 mg for 7 days (PK2), RIF for 14 days, DTG 50 mg + RIF for 7 days (PK3) and DTG 100 mg + RIF for 7 days (PK4). Steady-state full DTG PK profiles were evaluated. RESULTS: DTG geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of PK3/PK1 of maximum concentration (Cmax), area under curve (AUC24h) and 24-h post-dose concentration (C24h) were 0.65 [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.75], 0.44 (90% CI 0.37-0.52) and 0.15 (0.13-90% CI 0.17), respectively. GMRs of PK4/PK1 Cmax, AUC24h and C24h were 1.09 (90% CI 0.97-1.21), 0.74 (90% CI 0.64-0.86) and 0.24 (90% CI 0.20-0.28), respectively. Median C24h of DTG 50 mg + RIF and DTG 100 mg + RIF were 251 (range 129-706) ng/mL and 140 (range 73-426) ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although there were substantial reductions in DTG C24h when co-administered with RIF, concentrations of both DTG 50 mg and 100 mg once daily with RIF were still above the protein-binding-adjusted IC90 (drug concentration required to inhibit 90% of in-vitro viral replication) of 64 ng/mL. Further studies in HIV-TB co-infected individuals are warranted to confirm these results.

Rifampicin effect on intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide.

OBJECTIVES: Tenofovir alafenamide produces lower plasma tenofovir and higher intracellular tenofovir diphosphate (DP) concentrations than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate but it is likely a victim of interactions with rifampicin. We aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine with rifampicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy volunteers received tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine at 25/200 mg once daily, followed by tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine + rifampicin daily followed by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Plasma tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir, emtricitabine and intracellular tenofovir-DP and emtricitabine triphosphate pharmacokinetics and genetic polymorphisms were assessed. RESULTS: Tenofovir alafenamide exposure decreased when tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine + rifampicin was used compared with tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine [geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% CI): 0.45 (0.33-0.60)]. Plasma tenofovir and intracellular tenofovir-DP concentrations decreased with rifampicin [GMR (90% CI): 0.46 (0.40-0.52) and 0.64 (0.54-0.75), respectively]. GMR (90% CI) of intracellular tenofovir-DP AUC0-24 for tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine + rifampicin versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was 4.21 (2.98-5.95). Rifampicin did not affect emtricitabine pharmacokinetics. CYP3A4*22 rs35599367 was associated with higher plasma tenofovir alafenamide AUC0-24 at day 56. CONCLUSIONS: Following tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine administration with rifampicin, intracellular tenofovir-DP concentrations were still 4.21-fold higher than those achieved by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, supporting further study during HIV/TB co-infection.

Pharmacological impact of antiretroviral therapy on platelet function to investigate human immunodeficiency virus-associated cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Some clinical studies have reported increased myocardial infarction in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) taking the antiretroviral abacavir sulphate (ABC). Given that clinical studies contain confounding variables (e.g., HIV-associated factors), we investigated the pharmacological effects of antiretrovirals on platelet function in HIV-negative volunteers in order to identify mechanisms of increased cardiovascular risk. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Platelets were isolated from healthy volunteers and HIV-negative subjects enrolled on a Phase I clinical trial and platelet function evaluated using aggregometry and flow cytometry. In vivo platelet thromboembolism was monitored in anaesthetized mice. KEY RESULTS: Human platelet aggregation was unaffected by all antiretrovirals tested, but ABC treatment led uniquely to increased platelet granule release. ABC also interrupted NO-mediated inhibition of platelet aggregation and increased in vivo aggregation in mice. Another antiretroviral, tenofovir, did not affect platelet function. Furthermore, aggregation and activation of platelets isolated from 20 subjects taking clinically relevant doses of tenofovir were comparable to baseline samples. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: ABC can enhance platelet activation, independently of variables that confound clinical studies, suggesting a potential pharmacological effect that is absent with tenofovir. Mechanistically, we propose that ABC enhances platelet degranulation and interrupts NO-mediated platelet inhibition. The interaction of ABC with NO signalling is demonstrated by ABC-mediated enhancement of aggregation in vivo and in vitro that persisted in the presence of NO. Although an association between ABC and platelet activation has not been confirmed in patients, these findings provide evidence of a mechanistic link between platelet activation and antiretroviral therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of Efavirenz 400 mg Once Daily Coadministered With Isoniazid and Rifampicin in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Individuals.

Background: The World Health Organization recommends efavirenz 400 mg (EFV400) as first-line antiretroviral therapy, with a disclaimer that no data with anti-tuberculosis (TB) treatment exist. Many people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) require TB treatment with isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF), which affect cytochrome P450 and antiretroviral exposure. Methods: PLWH receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC)/EFV 600 mg with a viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL switched to TDF/FTC/EFV400. Genetic polymorphisms and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of EFV400 without (PK1) and with INH/RIF following 4 (PK2) and 12 (PK3) weeks of coadministration were evaluated. Results: Twenty-six PLWH were enrolled; 22 completed PK2. All maintained VL <50 copies/mL throughout the study. Geometric mean ratio (GMR) PK2/PK1 of EFV400 maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC), and concentration at 24 hours postdose (C24h) were 0.91 (90% confidence interval [CI], .83-.99), 0.91 (90% CI, .79-1.05), and 0.85 (90% CI, .72-.99), respectively. GMRs (90% CI) of PK3/PK2 and PK3/PK1 Cmax, AUC, and C24h were 0.95 (.86-1.05) and 0.92 (.83-1.01), 0.88 (.75-1.03) and 0.84 (.75-.93), and 0.84 (.72-.99) and 0.75 (.62-.92), respectively. Eleven of 22 participants carried polymorphisms in the CYP2B6 gene associated with slow EFV metabolism. Conclusions: INH/RIF coadministration was associated with limited changes in EFV400 AUC (<25%), and EFV400 concentrations were maintained within ranges of those measured in PLWH in the ENCORE-1 study, irrespective of CYP2B6 genotype. The coadministration of EFV400 with anti-TB treatment can be considered and this is being confirmed in PLWH with TB. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02832778.

Pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir with and without darunavir/cobicistat in healthy volunteers.

Background: Dolutegravir combined with darunavir/cobicistat is a promising NRTI-sparing and/or salvage strategy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Methods: This Phase I, open-label, 57 day, crossover, pharmacokinetic (PK) study, enrolled healthy volunteers aged 18-65 years, who were randomized to one of two groups. Group 1 received dolutegravir (50 mg) once daily for 14 days followed by a 7 day washout, then a 14 day dolutegravir/darunavir/cobicistat (DTG/DRV/COBI) once-daily co-administration period followed by a 7 day washout and finally a 14 day period of darunavir/cobicistat (800/150 mg) once daily. Group 2 followed the same sequence starting with darunavir/cobicistat and concluding with dolutegravir. Each group underwent intensive PK sampling over 24 h on day 14 of each drug period and DTG/DRV/COBI concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Results: Twenty participants completed all PK phases. Thirteen were female and median age and BMI were 33.5 years and 27 kg/m2. Dolutegravir geometric mean ratios (GMR, DTG/DRV/COBI versus dolutegravir alone) and 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-24 and C24 were 1.01 (0.92-1.11), 0.95 (0.87-1.04) and 0.9 (0.8-1.0), respectively. Darunavir GMR (DRV/COBI/DTG versus darunavir/cobicistat alone) and 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-24 and C24 were 0.90 (0.83-0.98), 0.93 (0.86-1.00) and 0.93 (0.78-1.11), respectively. No grade 3 or 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were observed. Conclusions: Concentrations of dolutegravir and darunavir, when boosted with cobicistat, decreased by <10% during co-administration, suggesting this combination can be prescribed safely in the treatment of HIV-1, with no adjustment to current guideline-recommended dosages.

Improvement of ALT decay kinetics by all-oral HCV treatment: Role of NS5A inhibitors and differences with IFN-based regimens.

BACKGROUND: Intracellular HCV-RNA reduction is a proposed mechanism of action of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), alternative to hepatocytes elimination by pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin (PR). We modeled ALT and HCV-RNA kinetics in cirrhotic patients treated with currently-used all-DAA combinations to evaluate their mode of action and cytotoxicity compared with telaprevir (TVR)+PR. STUDY DESIGN: Mathematical modeling of ALT and HCV-RNA kinetics was performed in 111 HCV-1 cirrhotic patients, 81 treated with all-DAA regimens and 30 with TVR+PR. Kinetic-models and Cox-analysis were used to assess determinants of ALT-decay and normalization. RESULTS: HCV-RNA kinetics was biphasic, reflecting a mean effectiveness in blocking viral production >99.8%. The first-phase of viral-decline was faster in patients receiving NS5A-inhibitors compared to TVR+PR or sofosbuvir+simeprevir (p<0.001), reflecting higher efficacy in blocking assembly/secretion. The second-phase, noted δ and attributed to infected-cell loss, was faster in patients receiving TVR+PR or sofosbuvir+simeprevir compared to NS5A-inhibitors (0.27 vs 0.21 d-1, respectively, p = 0.0012). In contrast the rate of ALT-normalization, noted λ, was slower in patients receiving TVR+PR or sofosbuvir+simeprevir compared to NS5A-inhibitors (0.17 vs 0.27 d-1, respectively, p<0.001). There was no significant association between the second-phase of viral-decline and ALT normalization rate and, for a given level of viral reduction, ALT-normalization was more profound in patients receiving DAA, and NS5A in particular, than TVR+PR. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support a process of HCV-clearance by all-DAA regimens potentiated by NS5A-inhibitor, and less relying upon hepatocyte death than IFN-containing regimens. This may underline a process of "cell-cure" by DAAs, leading to a fast improvement of liver homeostasis.