Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 38(2): 942-956, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37932603

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of mesh is the standard for the prevention of incisional hernia (IH). However, the effect of surgical site occurrence (SSO) has never been compared. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence of SSO and measure its negative effect through the calculation of the number needed to treat for net effect (NNT net). METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of SSO and IH, and the secondary objective was to determine the NNT net as a metric to measure the combined benefits and harms. Only published clinical trials were included. The risk of bias was analyzed, and the random effects model was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies comparing 2344 patients were included. The incidence of IH was significantly lower in the mesh group than in the control group, with an OR of 0.29 (95% CI 0.16-0.49, p = 0.0001). The incidence of SSO was higher in the mesh group than in the control group, with an OR of 1.21 (95% CI 0.85-1.72, p = 0.0001) but without statistical significance. Therefore, the way to compare the benefits and risks of each of the studies was done with the calculation of the NNT net, which is the average number of patients who need to be treated to see the benefit exceeding the harm by one event, and the result was 5, which is the average number of patients who need to be treated to see the benefit exceeding the harm by one event. CONCLUSION: The use of mesh reduces the prevalence of IH and it does not increases the prevalence of SSO, the NNT net determined that the use of mesh continues to be beneficial for the patient.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Incisional , Humanos , Incidencia , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Mallas Quirúrgicas
2.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 268, 2023 Jul 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37418033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia (IH) is the main complication after laparotomy. In an attempt to reduce this complication, mesh techniques and studies in which the closure technique is modified have been proposed. Both types are characterized by comparison with the closure described as standard or conventional: 1 × 1, mass, and continuous closure. For this study, modified closure techniques (MCTs) were considered as those techniques in which an extra suture is placed (reinforced tension line (RTL), retention), the closure point is modified in distance (small bites) or shape (CLDC, Smead Jones, interrupted, Cardiff point) and which aim to reduce these complications. The objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate the effectiveness of MCTs for reducing the incidence of IH and abdominal wound dehiscence (AWD) to provide objective support for their recommendation. METHODS: An NMA was performed according to the PRISMA-NMA guidelines. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of IH and AWD, and the secondary objective was to determine the incidence of postoperative complications. Only published clinical trials were included. The risk of bias was analyzed, and the random-effects model was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Twelve studies comparing 3540 patients were included. The incidence of HI was lower in RTL, retention suture, and small bites, these techniques showed statistical differences with pooled ORs (95% CI) of 0.28 (0.09-0.83), 0.28 (0.13-0.62), and 0.44 (0.31-0.62), respectively. Associated complications, including hematoma, seroma, and postoperative pain, could not be analyzed; however, MCTs did not increase the risk of surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Small bites, RTL, and retention sutures decreased the prevalence of IH. RTL and retention suture decreased the prevalence of AWD. RTL was the best technique as it reduced both complications (IH and AWD) and had the best SUCRA and P-scores, and the number needed to treat (NNT) for net effect was 3. REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42021231107.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Hernia Incisional , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Laparotomía/métodos , Metaanálisis en Red , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Abdomen , Suturas/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/efectos adversos , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/epidemiología , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/etiología , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/prevención & control
3.
Cureus ; 14(4): e23856, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35530873

RESUMEN

Neoplastic lesions (benign or malignant) in the nail region are rare when compared to lesions in the rest of the skin. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, their diagnosis is frequently delayed or overlooked for days, months, or even years when they are misrecognized or when their approach is not appropriate. Undoubtedly, malignant tumors are the most important lesions since an inopportune diagnosis or treatment can drastically change the patient's prognosis. A review of all the scientific evidence on the two main malignant neoplasms of the nail apparatus (melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma) was carried out using the PubMed search engine from 2003 to 2022, in order to expose the appropriate diagnostic approach and treatment of these nail lesions to avoid delays that obscure the prognosis of patients. This review does not include reconstruction modalities after lesion resection, but the emphasis is placed on the great functional impact they produce. Surgical treatment in the early stages is the most important when talking about prognosis and emphasizing it; systemic oncological management of advanced stages is not so deep.

4.
Cureus ; 13(12): e20420, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35047259

RESUMEN

Main bronchus stenosis as a sequel of pulmonary tuberculosis is infrequent and should raise suspicion of other presentations of the infection. Given its non-specific symptomatology and the absence of a specific diagnostic method, tracheobronchial tuberculosis is usually not suspected and diagnosed despite its great impact on quality of life due to the high incidence of stenosis as a consequence. Ogilvie's syndrome, an uncommon condition, requires careful management and surveillance given the risk of ischemia and colonic perforation intrinsic to the disease. We present a case of a patient with main bronchus stenosis secondary to tuberculosis infection and Ogilvie's syndrome post-surgery.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...