Fifteen-Year Experience with the Ghent Technique of Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Demand for male-to-female gender-affirmation surgery is rising. Creation of a vaginal vault and a feminine vulva remains challenging, especially in circumcised patients. The authors present the 15-year results of the technique developed by the senior author (S.M.). METHODS: A retrospective case review was performed of all penile inversion vaginoplasties carried out by the senior author between 2003 and 2017. Age, hormonal therapy time, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, circumcision, and the need for full-thickness skin grafts to lengthen the vaginal vault were investigated as potential risk factors for postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 384 penile inversion vaginoplasties were retained, with 85.7 percent of patients requiring a full-thickness skin graft to lengthen the vaginal vault. Rectum perforation occurred in six patients (1.6 percent). Early revisions were necessary in 8.4 percent of patients and late revision surgery was performed in 37.1 percent of cases. There was no independent risk factor for early complications. Diabetes was an independent risk factor for late revision surgery. After vaginoplasty, 97.2 percent of patients reported being able to engage in penetrative intercourse, and 83.4 percent of patients reported having orgasms. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginoplasty is possible in all trans women, with most patients being able to engage in penetrative intercourse and reach an orgasm. To reach the desired depth of 14 cm, the neovaginal vault is usually lined with full-thickness skin grafts from the scrotum and/or abdomen. Diabetes was the only independent risk factor for revision surgery. Rectal tears are a rare complication and can usually be managed conservatively. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

High post-operative pain scores despite multimodal analgesia in ambulatory anorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Background: Ambulatory surgery for anorectal procedures has become widely accepted. Recent reviews recommend a multimodal approach to pain management. However, these recommendations are largely based on single intervention studies. Our goal was to evaluate post-operative pain in patients receiving a multimodal analgesic regimen. Methods: All patients undergoing an ambulatory anorectal procedure between December 2015 and September 2016 received a pain diary. Mean pain throughout the day and pain during defecation where recorded on day 0-14 and day 21 postoperatively using a numeric rating scale-11. Use of oral analgesics was also recorded. Results: Forty-two patients completed the pain diary. The use of local anesthetic infiltration did not result in a significant difference in pain scores in this study. Patients who received written information on postoperative pain management and hygienic measures had higher intake of oral analgesics. Despite receiving multimodal analgesic treatment, patients undergoing surgery for hemorrhoids or anal fissures reported pain scores ≥4 and used analgesics longer. Conclusion: A multimodal analgesic approach consisting of local anesthetic infiltration, multiple oral analgesics and written information seems to be insufficient for certain patient groups after ambulatory anorectal surgery. Especially patients undergoing surgery for hemorrhoids or an anal fissure should receive adequate analgesia. Pain during defecation is problematic and finding a solution for this problem remains challenging. Further research into the combined use of different analgesic modalities is recommended.