A retrospective cohort study of genetic referral and diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome in patients with Trichodiscoma and Fibrofolliculoma skin lesions.

BACKGROUND: Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome is a genetic condition caused by pathogenic variants in the FLCN gene resulting in benign skin lesions, spontaneous pneumothorax, and increased risk for a variety of renal tumors. Skin manifestations of BHD include trichodiscoma (TD) and fibrofolliculoma (FF), which may represent the same pathologic entity. These lesions can identify BHD patients, who upon positive genetic testing can be considered for life-long surveillance for renal neoplasms. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients diagnosed with TD and FF including rates and outcomes of genetics referral. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews of patients with confirmed or possible diagnosis of TD or FF at the University of Michigan from September 2002 through October 2020 to assess pathologic findings, personal and family history of BHD manifestations, referral for genetic evaluation, and genetic testing results. RESULTS: 64 patients had a pathologic diagnosis of TD or FF, 16 of whom (25%) were referred to cancer genetics. Fourteen patients completed genetic evaluation, 9 of whom were diagnosed with BHD (64%), with 6 unique pathogenic variants in FLCN. CONCLUSION: Providers should consider referral for genetic evaluation for patients with biopsy-proven TD or FF, as early diagnosis of BHD provides the opportunity for early detection and treatment of other BHD-associated conditions.

Early Detection and Prognostic Assessment of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus on Optimal Practice and the Role of Gene Expression Profile Testing.

Importance: Therapy for advanced melanoma has transformed during the past decade, but early detection and prognostic assessment of cutaneous melanoma (CM) remain paramount goals. Best practices for screening and use of pigmented lesion evaluation tools and gene expression profile (GEP) testing in CM remain to be defined. Objective: To provide consensus recommendations on optimal screening practices and prebiopsy diagnostic, postbiopsy diagnostic, and prognostic assessment of CM. Evidence Review: Case scenarios were interrogated using a modified Delphi consensus method. Melanoma panelists (n = 60) were invited to vote on hypothetical scenarios via an emailed survey (n = 42), which was followed by a consensus conference (n = 51) that reviewed the literature and the rationale for survey answers. Panelists participated in a follow-up survey for final recommendations on the scenarios (n = 45). Findings: The panelists reached consensus (≥70% agreement) in supporting a risk-stratified approach to melanoma screening in clinical settings and public screening events, screening personnel recommendations (self/partner, primary care provider, general dermatologist, and pigmented lesion expert), screening intervals, and acceptable appointment wait times. Participants also reached consensus that visual and dermoscopic examination are sufficient for evaluation and follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions deemed innocuous. The panelists reached consensus on interpreting reflectance confocal microscopy and some but not all results from epidermal tape stripping, but they did not reach consensus on use of certain pigmented lesion evaluation tools, such as electrical impedance spectroscopy. Regarding GEP scores, the panelists reached consensus that a low-risk prognostic GEP score should not outweigh concerning histologic features when selecting patients to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy but did not reach consensus on imaging recommendations in the setting of a high-risk prognostic GEP score and low-risk histology and/or negative nodal status. Conclusions and Relevance: For this consensus statement, panelists reached consensus on aspects of a risk-stratified approach to melanoma screening and follow-up as well as use of visual examination and dermoscopy. These findings support a practical approach to diagnosing and evaluating CM. Panelists did not reach consensus on a clearly defined role for GEP testing in clinical decision-making, citing the need for additional studies to establish the clinical use of existing GEP assays.

The spectrum of clinical and genetic findings in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) with relevance to patient outcomes: a retrospective study from a large academic tertiary referral center.

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) is an autosomal dominant condition attributed to pathogenic variants in fumarate hydratase (FH) and presents with cutaneous leiomyomas (CLMs), uterine leiomyomas (ULMs) and renal cell cancer (RCC). The objective of this study was to characterize the spectrum of clinical and genetic findings in HLRCC at a large academic tertiary care referral center with a focus on dermatologic manifestations. Fifty-seven patients, 41 female and 16 male, with 27 unique pathogenic or likely-pathogenic FH variants were identified from 38 families. Mean age of HLRCC diagnosis was 44.4 years (range 8-82). CLMs were the primary reason for referral in 49.1% (n=28). CLMs were present in 43/56 patients who underwent full skin examination. Three of these 56 patients were diagnosed with cutaneous leiomyosarcoma. Incidence of ULMs was 37/41 female patients; no uterine leiomyosarcomas were observed. RCC was observed in 6/57 patients (mean age of diagnosis: 47.3 years (range 28-79)). CLMs predated RCC in the 3 patients diagnosed with both. Dermatologists have an opportunity to recognize cutaneous manifestations of HLRCC, including cutaneous leiomyomas and rarely cutaneous leiomyosarcomas, and refer for genetic evaluation to provide definitive diagnosis. Identification of HLRCC can promote family cascade testing and screening for RCC.

A retrospective cohort study of genetic referral and diagnosis of Lynch syndrome in patients with cutaneous sebaceous lesions.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cutaneous sebaceous lesions (SL) can be used to screen patients for Lynch syndrome (LS). There is little data on rates of genetic referral and outcomes of genetic testing for patients with SL. This single-center retrospective study characterizes 400 + patients with SL, including IHC results, genetics referrals, and outcomes of genetic testing. Retrospective chart reviews were performed for patients with a pathology-confirmed diagnosis of SL at the University of Michigan between January 2009 and December 2019. 447 patients with 473 SL were identified. Excluding 20 patients with known LS, IHC was conducted in 173 (41%) patients. 92/173 (53%) patients had abnormal results. 69 of these 92 (75%) patients were referred to genetics. 32 additional patients were referred with normal IHC (n = 22) or without IHC (n = 10). Of 101 patients referred, 65 (64%) were seen and 47 (47%) completed genetic testing. 7/47 (15%) had pathogenic variants associated with LS, six with concordant abnormal IHC and one without IHC. Cancer genetics referral of patients with SL, particularly for lesions with abnormal IHC, yields a significant rate of LS diagnosis. Providers should consider genetics referral for patients with SL.

Dermatology residency preparation curriculum: a model for initiating new residents into dermatology clinical care.

Entering dermatology residency is an immersive experience requiring new specialty-specific skills. There is no standard Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) protocol for orienting new dermatology residents. We aimed to design, develop, and evaluate a curriculum for incoming first-year dermatology residents focusing on practical introduction to dermatologic clinical care emphasizing ACGME dermatology milestones. A concentrated 8-hour residency preparation course for first-year dermatology residents was designed and developed by faculty. The course encompassed clinical competencies, procedural techniques, and professionalism and collegiality principles. Teaching methods included lectures, video demonstrations, simulated patient experiences, and one-on-one practical instruction. Surveys were distributed before, immediately after, and 6-months following the course from 2016-2018 to assess participants' skill-based confidence level and perceived usefulness of the course. A total of 24 first-year dermatology residents participated in the residency preparation course over 3 years from 2016-2018. Residents' confidence levels in performing dermatology-specific skills immediately increased following the course and continued to increase 6 months into training. The majority of first-year residents "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the course was helpful for improving clinical competence. Our residency preparation course increased first-year residents' confidence and perceived competence in performing clinical skills related to ACGME dermatology milestones.

Increasing Access to Specialized Dermatology Care: A Retrospective Study Investigating Clinical Operation and Impact of a University-Affiliated Free Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to study the impact and clinical operation of an integrated model for free specialized dermatology care via collaboration between an academic institution and a nonprofit outpatient clinic through an analysis of patient demographics and care provided. METHODS: Hope@UMHS is a partnership between the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) and Hope Clinic (HC) which provides free specialty consultations to uninsured residents of Southeast Michigan. A retrospective chart review was completed for patients referred to the UMHS Dermatology clinic as part of the HOPE@UMHS collaboration from April 2012 through February 2020. RESULTS: Of the 294 referred patients, 264 were managed in 30 clinic sessions over 8 years, staffed by 92 unique volunteers. Patients most commonly presented with atopic dermatitis (10.5%), seborrheic dermatitis (7.9%), and actinic keratosis (7.4%). The majority of patients (68.2%) were prescribed at least one new medication. Nine skin cancers, including one melanoma, were diagnosed and treated. There were 102 procedures performed. Eighty-seven percent of patients received conclusive evaluation and treatment at the time of their consultation. CONCLUSION: Our experience illustrates that providing free, comprehensive dermatology care in a university hospital by partnering with a nonprofit clinic is both feasible and beneficial to the greater community.

Dermatologist demographics and patient satisfaction: A single-center survey study.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is a proxy for quality clinical care. Understanding the factors that drive patient satisfaction scores is important because they are publicly reported, may be used in determining hospital and physician compensation, and may allow patients to preselect physicians. OBJECTIVE: This single-center survey study of adult patients at the Michigan Medicine outpatient dermatology clinics aimed to investigate how patients respond differently to theoretical dermatologic scenarios with varying dermatologist gender. METHODS: Each questionnaire contained one of four clinical scenarios illustrating overall positive or negative encounters with a male or female dermatologist, followed by questions derived from the Press Ganey survey to assess patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 452 completed questionnaires were collected. There were statistically significant differences in overall patient satisfaction scores between positive versus negative female and positive versus negative male dermatologists, but there were no differences in scores between positive female and positive male dermatologists or between negative female and negative male dermatologists. There were also no differences in overall scores after controlling for patient demographic characteristics or patient-dermatologist gender concordance. CONCLUSION: Previous studies have suggested that male physicians receive better patient satisfaction scores compared to female physicians. However, our study found that, in response to hypothetical scenarios of positive and negative dermatology encounters, dermatologist gender did not affect any domain of patient satisfaction scores. Limitations include the use of hypothetical patient-dermatologist encounters and possible lack of generalizability because the study was conducted at one academic center in southeast Michigan with a predominantly Caucasian patient population.

Primary Cutaneous Umbilical Melanoma: The Michigan Experience.

BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous umbilical melanoma is rare. Thorough information regarding its characteristics and treatment, including use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) staging, is difficult to obtain. The unique anatomy of the umbilicus adds to the complexity of diagnosing and treating melanoma at this site. OBJECTIVE: To improve understanding of diagnosis and treatment of primary cutaneous umbilical melanoma through presenting 7 new cases and reviewing 39 cases in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The University of Michigan melanoma database query and review of the literature regarding reported cases of primary umbilical melanoma. RESULTS: In 7 new and 39 previously reported cases of primary cutaneous umbilical melanoma, we describe signs and symptoms, histopathologic features, differential diagnosis, relevant anatomical considerations, and definitive treatment including SLNB when applicable. CONCLUSION: Our series, combined with a thorough literature review and compilation of findings, provides a better understanding and appreciation of melanoma in the unique anatomical site of the umbilicus, with a reminder to carefully examine the umbilicus during a full skin examination in patients at risk of melanoma. Primary umbilical melanoma presents and can be appropriately treated similarly to cutaneous melanoma in other sites, with attention to relevant anatomy.

Comprehensive histopathological comparison of epidermotropic/dermal metastatic melanoma and primary nodular melanoma.

AIMS: Metastatic melanoma involving the epidermis and/or upper dermis may show significant histological overlap with primary cutaneous melanoma, especially the nodular subtype. Proper histopathological classification is crucial to appropriate staging and management, but is often challenging. The aim of this study was to identify helpful histopathological features for differentiating epidermotropic/dermal metastatic melanoma (EDMM) and primary nodular melanoma (PNM). METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of EDMMs (n = 74) and PNMs (n = 75) was retrospectively reviewed for various histopathological features, and the data were compared between groups by the use of univariate analysis. Features significantly associated with EDMM included a tumour size of <2 mm, an absence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and plasma cells, monomorphism, and involvement of adnexal epithelium. Features associated with PNM included a polypoid (exophytic) configuration, prominent tumour-infiltrating plasma cells (TIPs), a tumour size of >10 mm, ulceration, epidermal collarettes, a higher mitotic rate, necrosis, multiple phenotypes, significant pleomorphism, and lichenoid inflammation. In multivariate analysis, a logistic regression model including large tumour size, ulceration, prominent TIPs, lichenoid inflammation and epidermal collarettes was highly predictive of PNM. Six (8%) EDMMs from three patients showed an 'epidermal-only' or 'epidermal-predominant' pattern closely simulating in-situ or microinvasive melanoma. Two of these cases were tested by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation, which confirmed clonal relationships with their corresponding primary melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive histopathological comparison of EDMM and PNM. Recognition of the above histopathological associations should aid in the correct classification and staging of cutaneous melanoma. Epidermotropic metastatic melanomas may occasionally show an epidermal-only/epidermal-predominant pattern; accurate diagnosis requires prudent clinical correlation and, when necessary, ancillary molecular tests.

A new POT1 germline mutation-expanding the spectrum of POT1-associated cancers.

Melanomas are associated with several hereditary conditions. We present a large family with several family members affected with primary melanomas and dysplastic nevi as well as thyroid cancer and other malignant tumors. Clinical work-up did not reveal a mutation in any of the genes usually considered with evaluation for predisposition to melanoma (BRCA1/2, CDKN2A, CDK4, PTEN, TP53). Whole exome sequencing of five affected family members showed a new variant in POT1. POT1 is associated with the telomere shelterin complex that regulates telomere protection and telomerase access. Germline mutations in POT1 were recently shown to be associated with hereditary predisposition to melanoma. Our findings support a role of POT1 germline mutations in cancer predisposition beyond melanoma development, suggesting a broader phenotype of the POT1-associated tumor predisposition syndrome that might also include thyroid cancer as well as possibly other malignant tumors.

Transcriptome profiling identifies HMGA2 as a biomarker of melanoma progression and prognosis.

The genetic alterations contributing to melanoma pathogenesis are incompletely defined, and few independent prognostic features have been identified beyond the clinicopathological characteristics of the primary tumor. We used transcriptome profiling of 46 primary melanomas, 12 melanoma metastases, and 16 normal skin (N) samples to find genes associated with melanoma development and progression. Results were confirmed using immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR and replicated in an independent set of 330 melanomas using AQUA analysis of tissue microarray (TMA). Transcriptome profiling revealed that transcription factor HMGA2, previously unrecognized in melanoma pathogenesis, is significantly upregulated in primary melanoma and metastases (P-values=1.2 × 10(-7) and 9 × 10(-5)) compared with N. HMGA2 overexpression is associated with BRAF/NRAS mutations (P=0.0002). Cox proportional hazard regression model and log-rank test showed that HMGA2 is independently associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio (HR)=6.3, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.8-22.3, P=0.004), overall survival (OS) (stratified log-rank P=0.008), and distant metastases-free survival (HR=6.4, 95% CI=1.4-29.7, P=0.018) after adjusting for American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and age at diagnosis. Survival analysis in an independent replication TMA of 330 melanomas confirmed the association of HMGA2 expression with OS (P=0.0211). Our study implicates HMGA2 in melanoma progression and demonstrates that HMGA2 overexpression can serve as an independent predictor of survival in melanoma.