RESUMEN
When the binding of one ligand to its receptor is influenced by a second ligand acting on a different receptor, one might assume that the receptors dimerize, enabling allosteric interactions between ligands. This reasoning is frequently used to explain the complex binding curves of ligands of class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Here, we argue that in classical in vitro experiments the lack of GTP makes ligand-binding properties dependent on the available pool of G protein. Under such conditions a 1:1 GPCR-G-protein complex is stabilized, in which the G protein lacks a nucleotide and ligand binding is of high affinity. In vivo, this complex, a key intermediate of G-protein activation, never accumulates because of fast and irreversible GTP binding. In vitro, this complex creates interference in ligand binding when two monomeric GPCRs compete for the same G protein. Interestingly, this competition explains some in vivo effects of orphan GPCRs.
Asunto(s)
Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/fisiología , Unión Competitiva/fisiología , Catálisis , Dimerización , Proteínas de Unión al GTP/metabolismo , Humanos , CinéticaRESUMEN
Rhodopsin, the first purified G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), was characterized as a functional monomer 30 year ago, but dimerization of GPCRs recently became the new paradigm of signal transduction. It has even been claimed, on the basis of recent biophysical and biochemical studies, that this new concept could be extended to higher-order oligomerization. Here this view is challenged. The new studies of rhodopsin and other simple (class 1a) GPCRs solubilized in detergent are re-assessed and are compared to the earlier classical studies of rhodopsin and other membrane proteins solubilized in detergent. The new studies are found to strengthen rather than invalidate the conclusions of the early ones and to support a monomeric model for rhodopsin and other class 1a GPCRs. A molecular model is proposed for the functional coupling of a rhodopsin monomeric unit with a G-protein heterotrimer. This model should be valid even for GPCRs that exist as structural dimers.
Asunto(s)
Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/química , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/clasificación , Rodopsina/química , Rodopsina/fisiología , Animales , Detergentes/química , Humanos , Proteínas de la Membrana/química , Proteínas de la Membrana/clasificación , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Proteínas de la Membrana/fisiología , Micelas , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/fisiología , Rodopsina/metabolismo , SolubilidadRESUMEN
Activation of the Galpha subunit of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins by transmembrane receptors requires the propagation of structural signals from the receptor-binding site to the nucleotide-binding site at the opposite side of the protein. In a previous model, it was suggested that the Gbeta-Ggamma dimer is tilted away from Galpha by a lever-arm motion of the Galpha N-terminal helix. Here, we propose that the motion occurs in the opposite direction, close-packing the Galpha-Gbeta interface and creating a novel interface between the helical domain of Galpha and the N terminus of Ggamma, which determines the specificity of activation.