Tenecteplase real-world data: A three phase sequential comparison.

INTRODUCTION: The New Zealand (NZ) Central Region Stroke Network, serving 1.17 million catchment population, changed to tenecteplase for stroke thrombolysis in 2020 but was forced to revert to Alteplase in 2021 due to a sudden cessation of drug supply. We used this unique opportunity to assess for potential before and after temporal trend confounding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In NZ all reperfused patients are entered prospectively into a national database for safety monitoring. We assessed Central Region patient outcomes and treatment metrics over three time periods: alteplase use (January 2018-January 2020); during switch to tenecteplase (February 2020-February 2021) and after reverting to alteplase (February 2021-December 2022) adjusting regression analyses for hospital, age, onset-to-needle, NIHSS, pre-morbid mRS and thrombectomy. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2022, we treated 1121 patients with Alteplase and 286 with tenecteplase. Overall, patients treated with tenecteplase had greater odds of favorable outcome ordinal mRS [aOR = 1.43 (95% CI = 1.11-1.85)]; shorter door-to-needle (DTN) time [median 52 (IQR 47-83) vs 61 (45-84) minutes, p < 0.0001] and needle to groin (NTG) times [118 (74.5-218.5) vs 185 (118-255); p = 0.02)]. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) rate was lower in tenecteplase group [aOR 0.29 (0.09-0.95)]. Findings similarly favored tenecteplase when comparing tenecteplase to only the second alteplase phase. There was no inter-group difference when comparing the two alteplase phases. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that previously reported benefits from tenecteplase in a real-world setting were not likely attributable to a temporal confounding.

Stroke clot retrieval from Taranaki, New Zealand: a real-world regional experience.

AIM: Stroke clot retrieval (SCR) is now considered a standard of care for select stroke patients with proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation. Here we present the experience of regional Taranaki patients transferred by air for SCR and compare this to metropolitan Auckland patients who were transferred by road. The aim is to present and compare process metrics and outcomes between the regional and metropolitan centres. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with anterior LVO transferred to Auckland City Hospital (ACH) for SCR from Taranaki, Waitemata and Counties Manukau district health boards (DHBs) between November 2017 and December 2020. RESULTS: Thirty Taranaki patients were transferred for SCR, compared to 244 patients from Waitemata and Counties Manukau DHBs. Taranaki patients were seven years older and less ethnically diverse but similar in other characteristics. The proportion of patients with an independent Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between 0 and 2 at three months was the same as for the regional and metropolitan centres. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, regional stroke patients can achieve similar SCR outcomes to metropolitan patients. Overcoming the post-code lottery for hyperacute stroke care can be achieved in a New Zealand setting.