Octahedral Fe(II) and Ru(II) complexes based on a new bis 1,10-phenanthroline ligand that imposes a well defined axis.

A bis-chelating ligand (L1), made of two 7-(p-anisyl)-1,10-phenanthroline (phen) subunits connected with a p-(CH(2))(2)C(6)H(4)(CH(2))(2) spacer through their 4 positions, has been prepared, using Skraup syntheses and reaction of the anion of 4-methyl-7-anisyl-1,10-phenanthroline with alpha,alpha'-dibromo-p-xylene. Its Fe(II) complex, [FeL1(dmbp)](PF(6))(2), was prepared in one step by reaction of L1 with [Fe(dmbp)(3)](PF(6))(2) (dmbp = 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine). On the other hand, its Ru(II) complex, [RuL1(dmbp)](PF(6))(2), was prepared in two steps from Ru(CH(3)CN)(4)Cl(2) and L1, followed by reaction with dmbp. X-ray crystal structure analyses show that in the two octahedral complexes, ligand L1 coils around the metal by coordination of the axial and two equatorial positions. It defines a 21 A long axis (O.O distance) running through the central metal and the terminal anisyl substituents. The complexes were also characterized by (1)H NMR, mass spectrometry, cyclic voltammetry, electronic absorption, and, in the case of Ru(II), fluorescence spectroscopy.

A [2]catenane and a [2]rotaxane as prototypes of topological and Euclidean molecular "rubber gloves".

A [2]catenane and a [2]rotaxane have been prepared from a C2-symmetric, 2,9-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline-based (dpp-based) macrocycle incorporating a 1,5-dioxynaphthalene subunit by means of the transition metal templated technique. In the case of the catenane, this macrocycle is interlocked with a dpp-based macrocycle that is oriented through the location of a p-tolyl substituent in the 4-position of the phenanthroline subunit. In the case of the rotaxane, the C2-symmetric macrocycle is threaded onto an oriented, dumbbell-shaped molecule, based on the same 4-p-tolyl-1,10-phenanthroline subunit, which bears tetraarylmethane stoppers. Both species are chemically achiral molecules, yet they are composed entirely of asymmetric, mirror-image conformations. Conformational enantiomerization processes therefore take place exclusively by chiral pathways, conferring on these molecules the "rubber glove" property. However, while the molecular graph (constitutional formula) of the [2]rotaxane can be deformed into a planar and, hence, rigidly achiral representation, a feature shared by a few other compounds in the literature that have been characterized as "Euclidean rubber gloves", the molecular graph of the [2]catenane cannot be deformed in this way. It therefore has the unique property of being a chemically achiral "topological rubber glove".

Tuning the mechanism of DNA cleavage photosensitized by ruthenium dipyridophenazine complexes by varying the structure of the two non intercalating ligands.

The influence of the nature of ligands on the efficiency of ruthenium complexes for photosensitizing DNA cleavage was investigated. Ru(bipy)2dppz2+ and Ru(bpz)2dppz2+ were selected as DNA breakers on the basis of their high affinity for DNA due to the presence of a dppz ligand which can partially intercalate in the major groove of DNA. Their photosensitizing properties were compared to those of Ru(bipy)3(2+), a complex which binds to DNA with a far lower constant. Upon irradiation, these complexes promoted the formation of single strand breaks in supercoiled phi X 174 DNA. Unexpectedly, Ru(bipy)2dppz2+ was found to be less efficient than Ru(bipy)3(2+) whatever the dye concentration or the [base pair]/[Ru] molar ratio r. Scavenging experiments have shown that the oxidative DNA cleavage induced by Ru(bipy)2dppz2+ mainly results from a Type II mechanism. The behavior of Ru(bipy)2dppz2+ was different: this compound was clearly more efficient than Ru(bipy)3(2+) as DNA breaker and its efficiency was not modified by the presence of oxygen or by addition of scavengers of reactive oxygen species. In this case, a mechanism involving electron transfer between the excited state of the ruthenium complex and the guanine residue was proposed in agreement emission lifetime measurements. The change in mechanism observed between Ru(bipy)2dppz2+ and Ru (bipy)2dppz2+ results from an increase of the reduction potential of the ruthenium complexes in the excited state, which appears to be the main factor controlling the efficiency.