Development of a validated short-form of the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale, the CADIS-SF15.

BACKGROUND: The Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS) with 45 items may be burdensome to complete. We therefore aimed to develop a CADIS short-form. METHODS: Parents of 300 children completed the prototype CADIS. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the 45-item CADIS version. The most representative items were chosen. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the a priori factor structure. Content validity was assessed in a focus group of patients, parents, clinicians, methodologists and industry delegates. Internal consistency, 48-h test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the newly developed short-form were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 270 families provided data at baseline, 34 after 48 h and 228 after 4 weeks. Fourteen items of three different factors fulfilled the proposed eligibility criteria and were included in the draft short-form. After the content validity rating, one item relating to the child's sleep was added to further improve content validity. The confirmatory factor analyses showed good model fit, and a 15-item short-form was initiated, the CADIS-SF15. The total scale and the three domains showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The correlation between SCORAD and other subjective measures was consistent with our hypotheses. Differences in scores between mild, moderate and severe AD patients were significant, and the CADIS-SF15 was able to detect changes in 'improving' patients over time. CONCLUSION: The CADIS-SF15 with 15 items in three domains is an internally consistent, reliable, valid, responsive and brief measure of QoL in children affected with AD and their parents. Further evaluation of clinical applicability is required.

Evaluation of responsiveness and estimation of smallest detectable change and minimal important change scores for the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale.

BACKGROUND: The Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS) is an instrument to measure quality of life in young children affected by atopic dermatitis, and their parents. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the responsiveness (sensitivity to change), smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimal important change (MIC) of the CADIS. METHODS: Parents and primary caregivers of 300 young children completed the CADIS and a global rating of their child's skin condition at baseline and a 4-week follow-up. Kruskal-Wallis tests, Wilcoxon tests and effect sizes were used to assess responsiveness. The SDC can be seen as a change beyond measurement error. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods, and an integration of both methods were used to estimate the MIC. RESULTS: In total, 270 families provided data at baseline and 228 at follow-up. The CADIS total change score and most of the domain scores had moderate-to-strong correlations with the skin change score. Patients were grouped according to the skin change score, which served as an anchor. Children whose parents noted an improvement of the skin showed lower CADIS scores at follow-up (P < 0·001). For the SDC we obtained score changes of 1·34 points on the total score and < 1·0 points on each domain score. All detected MIC values passed the SDC cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: The CADIS is sensitive to change towards improvement of quality of life. A change > 12% on the total score or each domain score very likely represents a clinically important change. What's already known about this topic? Atopic dermatitis reduces the quality of life of affected children and their parents. The Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS) has been evaluated and translated into two further languages. What does this study add? Further validation of the responsiveness of the CADIS, and whether it is sensitive to change in patients whose condition had changed. Calculation of the smallest detectable change. What are the clinical implications of this work? Estimation of the minimal important change in CADIS provides benchmarks for clinical practice.

Measurement properties of adult quality-of-life measurement instruments for eczema: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has identified quality of life (QoL) as a core outcome domain to be evaluated in every eczema trial. It is unclear which of the existing QoL instruments is most appropriate for this domain. Thus, the aim of this review was to systematically assess the measurement properties of existing measurement instruments developed and/or validated for the measurement of QoL in adult eczema. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase identifying studies on measurement properties of adult eczema QoL instruments. For all eligible studies, we assessed the adequacy of the measurement properties and the methodological quality with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. A best evidence synthesis summarizing findings from different studies was the basis to assign four degrees of recommendation (A-D). RESULTS: A total of 15 articles reporting on 17 instruments were included. No instrument fulfilled the criteria for category A. Six instruments were placed in category B, meaning that they have the potential to be recommended depending on the results of further validation studies. Three instruments had poor adequacy in at least one required adequacy criterion and were therefore put in category C. The remaining eight instruments were minimally validated and were thus placed in category D. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, no QoL instrument can be recommended for use in adult eczema. The Quality of Life Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) are recommended for further validation research.

Report from the third international consensus meeting to harmonise core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME).

This report provides a summary of the third meeting of the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative held in San Diego, CA, U.S.A., 6-7 April 2013 (HOME III). The meeting addressed the four domains that had previously been agreed should be measured in every eczema clinical trial: clinical signs, patient-reported symptoms, long-term control and quality of life. Formal presentations and nominal group techniques were used at this working meeting, attended by 56 voting participants (31 of whom were dermatologists). Significant progress was made on the domain of clinical signs. Without reference to any named scales, it was agreed that the intensity and extent of erythema, excoriation, oedema/papulation and lichenification should be included in the core outcome measure for the scale to have content validity. The group then discussed a systematic review of all scales measuring the clinical signs of eczema and their measurement properties, followed by a consensus vote on which scale to recommend for inclusion in the core outcome set. Research into the remaining three domains was presented, followed by discussions. The symptoms group and quality of life groups need to systematically identify all available tools and rate the quality of the tools. A definition of long-term control is needed before progress can be made towards recommending a core outcome measure.

Oral corticosteroid use is effective for cutaneous hemangiomas: an evidence-based evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of systemic corticosteroid therapy in treating enlarging, problematic cutaneous hemangiomas and to assess the relationship of dose to response and adverse effects. DESIGN: A quantitative systematic literature review was performed and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. SETTING: Patients were treated in primary care, referral centers, and institutional practices. Most patients were ambulatory, although some required hospitalization. PATIENTS: Inclusion criteria were original case series with a minimum of 5 patients with enlarging, problematic cutaneous hemangiomas treated with systemic corticosteroids. Exclusion criteria were being older than 2 years, receiving simultaneous other treatments, being lost to follow-up, or having insufficient information. Twenty-four original case series met inclusion criteria; 10 case series remained (184 patients) after exclusion criteria were applied. INTERVENTION: Patients were given a mean prednisone equivalent daily dose of 2.9 mg/kg (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-3.1 mg/kg) for a mean of 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.5-2.2 months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response and rebound rates and dose-response and adverse effects-response relationships in responders vs nonresponders. RESULTS: Response was 84% (95% CI, 78%-89%; range, 60%-100%) and rebound was 36% (95% CI, 29%-44%; range, 0%-65%). A significant difference was found between the mean dose administered to responders vs nonresponders (P<.001). No significant difference was observed as to the occurrence of adverse effects (P =.3). CONCLUSION: Systemic corticosteroid treatment seems to be effective for problematic cutaneous hemangiomas of infancy.

Pigmented lesions in adolescents.

Accurate diagnosis of congenital and acquired pigmented lesions accompanied by an understanding of their natural history and disease associations is critical for the appropriate management and counseling of adolescents, as well as timely referral to specialists when indicated. The recognition of atypical nevi and other melanoma risk factors in adolescents should lead to institution of preventive measures, such as routine skin examinations and counseling regarding sun protection. Because the incidence of melanoma is increasing in adolescents as well as adults, prompt identification of suspicious melanocytic lesions may lead to early diagnosis and effective treatment of melanoma. Numerous pigmented lesions can also herald the presence of a multisystem disorder; the recognition of syndromes associated with these lesions should result in appropriate evaluation and genetic counseling of affected individuals. This review distinguishes pigmented lesions that histologically represent a proliferation of melanocytes and that may therefore confer an increased risk for melanoma, from pigmented lesions due to increased melanization alone (i.e., increased melanin content) that are not associated with malignancy.

Moles and melanoma.

The melanoma epidemic in adults is well documented, and there is now evidence that the incidence of malignant melanoma in teenagers is increasing. Risk factors for melanoma are recognizable in children and include congenital nevi, numerous common nevi, and atypical nevi. Large congenital nevi overlying the head or spine also carry risk for central nervous system involvement, which, if symptomatic, carries a grave prognosis. Laser therapy has recently been advocated for small congenital nevi but often yields only temporary improvement. Adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b holds promise for patients with metastatic melanoma. Melanoma risk is also linked to sun sensitivity and childhood exposures, and sunscreen use has been promoted for prevention of skin cancer. Because many sunscreens offer protection from ultraviolet (UV) B but not UVA, spectra that may be involved in melanoma induction, pediatricians should counsel their families to practice a full program of sun protection that includes sun avoidance and protective clothing and eyeware in addition to sunscreens.