RESUMEN
The World Health Organization emphasizes the importance of providing integrated care for older people. Taiwan is the fastest aging country in the world. In 2016, Taiwan implemented the Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 (TLTCP 2.0), aimed at providing integrated long-term care (LTC) services in communities. However, LTC service agencies have not been able to evaluate the level of integrated care they provide due to the lack of an effective assessment tool. To address this need, this study sets out to develop an integration assessment tool, namely the Self-Assessment for Service Integration in Long-Term Care (SASI-LTC), which will allow LTC agencies to self-evaluate their current level of integration from multiple perspectives. The SASI-LTC was developed based on Evashwick's framework, underwent two rounds of Delphi panels with twenty-six experts, and a pilot test with 243 valid questionnaires from administrators of Tier A agencies who are responsible for integrating LTC. The Delphi experts assessed the content with high levels of agreement using medians, the scale content validity index (SCVI) and item content validity index (ICVI). The SASI-LTC included four domains (inter-entity organization and management, integrated care coordination, integrated resources, and integrated information systems) with thirty items. The SASI-LTC showed good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.94) and good validity, and a confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit index [χ2/df = 1.38; RMSEA = 0.040; CFI = 0.963; SRMR = 0.049] in pilot testing. While the SASI-LTC is a useful and feasible tool for Taiwan's LTC service agencies to evaluate their level of integration in providing LTC services, it could also be used in other countries with minor adjustments to localization of items related to financial integration.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Pneumonia Score Index (PSI) was developed to estimate the risk of dying within 30 days of presentation for community-acquired pneumonia patients and is a strong predictor of 30-day mortality after COVID-19. However, three of its required 20 variables (skilled nursing home, altered mental status and pleural effusion) are not discreetly available in the electronic medical record (EMR), resulting in manual chart review for these 3 factors. The goal of this study is to compare a simplified 17-factor version (PSI-17) to the original (denoted PSI-20) in terms of prediction of 30-day mortality in COVID-19. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between 2/28/20-5/28/20 were identified to compare the predictive performance between PSI-17 and PSI-20. Correlation was assessed between PSI-17 and PSI-20, and logistic regressions were performed for 30-day mortality. The predictive abilities were compared by discrimination, calibration, and overall performance. RESULTS: Based on 1,138 COVID-19 patients, the correlation between PSI-17 and PSI-20 was 0.95. Univariate logistic regression showed that PSI-17 had performance similar to PSI-20, based on AUC, ICI and Brier Score. After adjusting for confounding variables by multivariable logistic regression, PSI-17 and PSI-20 had AUCs (95% CI) of 0.85 (0.83-0.88) and 0.86 (0.84-0.89), respectively, indicating no significant difference in AUC at significance level of 0.05. CONCLUSION: PSI-17 and PSI-20 are equally effective predictors of 30-day mortality in terms of several performance metrics. PSI-17 can be obtained without the manual chart review, which allows for automated risk calculations within an EMR. PSI-17 can be easily obtained and may be a comparable alternative to PSI-20.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Neumonía/mortalidad , Neumonía/diagnóstico , PronósticoRESUMEN
AIM: This study aimed to examine the effects of providing a program that introduced volunteers to make friends with older adults to reduce loneliness and increase loneliness literacy. METHODS: Eight community development associations in Taiwan participated in the study. In the first stage, older people living alone or with only a spouse, or those with a family, but without substantial interactions, were screened for loneliness. Older adults with a higher risk of loneliness were given priority to be invited to participate in this intervention. This 3-month intervention program was designed by each community development association and delivered at the older adults' homes. A total of 87 older persons completed both waves of the interviews. RESULTS: Loneliness was reduced (UCLA-6 Loneliness Scale scores decreased from 13.5 to 11.6), and loneliness literacy improved (loneliness literacy scores increased from 38.9 to 42.0) compared with what it was before the program. In a generalized linear model, when controlling for covariates, loneliness was reduced, but not significantly (B = -0.934, P > 0.05), whereas loneliness literacy improved significantly for older participants (B = 2.088, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Making friends with older adults who are lonely might improve their loneliness literacy. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 240-245.
Asunto(s)
Amigos , Soledad , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hogares para Ancianos , Voluntarios , Taiwán , Aislamiento SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) nodal staging does not account for lymph node (LN) tumor burden. The LN anatomical compartment involved with the tumor or the quantified extent of extranodal extension (ENE) have not yet been studied in relation to biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). METHODS: Histopathological slides of 66 pN1 PCa patients who underwent extended pelvic lymph node dissection were reviewed. We recorded metrics to quantify LN tumor burden. We also characterized the LN anatomical compartments involved and quantified the extent of ENE. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 38 months. The median number of total LNs obtained per patient was 30 (IQR 23-37). In the risk-adjusted cox regression model, the following variables were associated with BRFS: mean size of the largest LN deposit per patient (log2: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.91, p < 0.001), the mean total span of all LN deposits per patient (2.07, p < 0.001), and the mean percent surface area of the LN involved with the tumor (1.58, p < 0.001). There was no significant BRFS association for the LN anatomical compartment or the quantified extent of ENE. CONCLUSION: LN tumor burden is associated with BRFS. The LN anatomical compartments and the quantified extent of ENE did not show significant association with BRFS.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural effusions are common in advanced malignancy and associated with overall poor survival. The presence of sarcopenia (decreased muscle mass) is associated with poor outcomes in numerous disease states, however, its relationship to malignant pleural disease has not been defined. We sought to understand if there was an association between decreased survival and decreased muscle mass in patients with malignant pleural effusion. METHODS: Patients with malignant pleural disease undergoing indwelling tunneled pleural catheter placement were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography was reviewed and cross-sectional area of pectoralis and paraspinous muscle areas were calculated. Overall survival and associations with muscle mass were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients were available for analysis, with a median age of 67 years and the majority female (58%). The median survival was 129 days from initial pleural drainage to death. Regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis did not reveal an association with survival and muscle mass for the entire population. However, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the lung cancer subgroup revealed the presence of decreased muscle mass and decreased survival time. CONCLUSION: The presence of decreased muscle mass within a lung cancer population that has malignant pleural effusions are associated with decreased survival. However, the presence of decreased muscle mass within a heterogenous population of malignant pleural disease was not associated with decreased overall survival time. Further study of the role that sarcopenia may play in malignant pleural disease is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Derrame Pleural Maligno , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Derrame Pleural Maligno/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Catéteres de Permanencia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Drenaje/métodos , MúsculosRESUMEN
Introduction: This paper provides a glimpse into gender issues in a university-based medical science laboratory setting in northern Taiwan. In this study, gender issues with respect to perceptions regarding gender, the degree of gender neutrality in the work environment, and the influence of gender on researchers' academic careers were analyzed. Methods: From July to August 2021, semistructured interviews to understand the perspectives of five faculty members at Chang Gung University School of Medicine regarding gender issues were conducted. The data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Subsequently, coding was performed using ATLAS.ti Web (Version 4.0.10). Results and discussion: It was found that gender is not perceived to correlate with performance in the medical sciences. Although the medical science laboratories in the study institution are mostly gender-neutral, instances of discrimination might have been concealed elsewhere because of underreporting. Nevertheless, medical science research culture in Chang Gung University appears to promote respect and equality owing to increased general awareness regarding such issues as well as robust policies that protect women's rights and promote gender equality. Marriage, motherhood, and family obligations remain key challenges to the academic career of female scientists in the institution. To achieve more equitable representation of male and female scientists as well as to prevent female scientists from leaving medical science laboratories in Taiwan, institutional and national policies that provide tailored support for female scientists intending to start families must continue to be implemented.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Achieving optimal surgical outcomes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma requires a combination of both curative-intent resection to oncologic standards and stage-specific neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. This investigation sought to examine factors associated with receipt of standard-adherent surgery (SAS) and guideline-recommended therapy (GRT) and determine the impact of compliance on patient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the 2006-2016 National Cancer Database, 21,304 patients underwent resection for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. SAS was defined as pancreatic resection with negative margins and ≥ 15 lymph nodes examined. Stage-specific GRT was defined by current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable models were used to determine predictors of adherence to SAS and GRT and prognostic impact on overall survival. RESULTS: Overall, SAS was achieved in 39% and GRT in 65% of patients, but only 30% received both SAS and GRT. Increasing age, minority race, uninsured status, and greater comorbidities were associated with a decreased odds of receiving both SAS and GRT (all p < 0.05). SAS (HR 0.79; CI 0.76-0.81; p < 0.001) and GRT (HR 0.67; CI 0.65-0.69; p < 0.001) were each independently associated with a survival advantage. Receipt of both SAS and GRT was associated with significant improvement in median OS compared with receiving neither (2.2 years vs 1.1 years; p < 0.001) which was independently associated with a 78% increased risk of death (HR 1.78; CI 1.70-1.86; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite survival benefits associated with adherence to operative standards and receipt of guideline-recommended therapy, compliance remains poor. Future efforts must be directed toward improved education and implementation efforts around both operative standards and therapy guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Combinada , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends standard operating procedures for patients with sepsis. Real-world evidence about sepsis order set implementation is limited. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect of sepsis order set usage on hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four acute care hospitals in the United States from December 1, 2020 to November 30, 2022 involving 104,662 patients hospitalized for sepsis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital mortality. RESULTS: The sepsis order set was used in 58,091 (55.5%) patients with sepsis. Initial mean sequential organ failure assessment score was 0.3 lower in patients for whom the order set was used than in those for whom it was not used (2.9 sd [2.8] vs 3.2 [3.1], p < 0.01). In bivariate analysis, hospital mortality was 6.3% lower in patients for whom the sepsis order set was used (9.7% vs 16.0%, p < 0.01), median time from emergency department triage to antibiotics was 54 minutes less (125 interquartile range [IQR, 68-221] vs 179 [98-379], p < 0.01), and median total time hypotensive was 2.1 hours less (5.5 IQR [2.0-15.0] vs 7.6 [2.5-21.8], p < 0.01) and septic shock was 3.2% less common (22.0% vs 25.4%, p < 0.01). Order set use was associated with 1.1 fewer median days of hospitalization (4.9 [2.8-9.0] vs 6.0 [3.2-12.1], p < 0.01), and 6.6% more patients discharged to home (61.4% vs 54.8%, p < 0.01). In the multivariable model, sepsis order set use was independently associated with lower hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.73). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a cohort of patients hospitalized with sepsis, order set use was independently associated with lower hospital mortality. Order sets can impact large-scale quality improvement efforts.
RESUMEN
A method to hide private information (PI) in private information protection liquid crystal displays (PIPLCDs) using periodical waveplates and pixel quaternity is reported in this study. The PIPLCD structure and its operation mechanism are conceptually elucidated. Users employing wide-view broadband circular polarizers (WVBCPs) can see PI hidden in images displayed on the PIPLCDs in PIP mode. However, people who do not use WVBCPs can only see the displayed images but not the PI at almost any viewing angles. The issues of the PIPLCD in PIP mode and possible fabrications of the periodical waveplates are also discussed.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Due to the aging population, the number of older patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will continue to rise. STUDY DESIGN: Utilizing the NCDB from 2010 to 2016, patients with early stage, clinically node negative PDAC who were ≥70 years old and had a Whipple were identified. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine independent factors for R0 resection and NAT. Cox-proportional-hazards regression analyses examined for the impact of NAT on the risk of death. RESULTS: Of 5086 patients, 51.7% received upfront surgery + adjuvant therapy (UFS + AT), followed by 29.9% UFS only, and the remainder NAT. NAT significantly improved OS compared to a combined cohort of those that had UFS ± AT. NAT retained its independent survival benefit when compared to only patients that had UFS + AT. CONCLUSION: For older patients diagnosed with early stage PDAC, NAT was associated with improved R0 resection rates and a significant survival benefit when compared to the current standard of care.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Anciano , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Pancreatectomía , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High-volume centers (HVC), academic centers (AC), and longer travel distances (TD) have been associated with improved outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). Effects of mediating variables on these associations remain undefined. The purpose of this study is to examine the direct effects of hospital volume, facility type, and travel distance on overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing surgery for PAC and characterize the indirect effects of patient-, disease-, and treatment-related mediating variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, patients with non-metastatic PAC who underwent resection were stratified by annual hospital volume (< 11, 11-19, and ≥ 20 cases/year), facility type (AC versus non-AC), and TD (≥ 40 versus < 40 miles). Associations with survival were evaluated using multiple regression models. Effects of mediating variables were assessed using mediation analysis. RESULTS: In total, 19,636 patients were included. Treatment at HVC or AC was associated with lower risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, confidence interval (CI) 0.88-0.92; HR 0.89, CI 0.86-0.91, respectively]. TD did not impact OS. Patient-, disease-, and treatment-related variables explained 25.5% and 41.8% of the survival benefit attained from treatment at HVC and AC, reducing the survival benefit directly attributable to each variable to 4.9% and 6.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of PAC at HVC and AC was associated with improved OS, but the magnitude of this benefit was less when mediating variables were considered. From a healthcare utilization and cost-resource perspective, further research is needed to identify patients who would benefit most from selective referral to HVC or AC.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Early referral of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to outpatient palliative care has been shown to increase survival and reduce unnecessary healthcare resource utilization. We aimed to determine outpatient palliative care referral rate and subsequent resource utilization in patients with stage IV NSCLC in a multistate, community-based hospital network and identify rates and reasons for admissions within a local healthcare system of Washington State. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a multistate hospital network and a local healthcare system. Patients were identified using ICD billing codes. In the multistate network, 2844 patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between January 1, 2013, and March 1, 2018, were reviewed. In the state healthcare system, 283 patients between August 2014 and June 2017 were reviewed. RESULTS: Referral for outpatient palliative care was low: 8% (217/2844) in the multistate network and 11% (32/283) in the local healthcare system. Early outpatient palliative care (6%, 10/156) was associated with a lower proportion of patients admitted into the intensive care unit in the last 30 days of life compared to no outpatient palliative care (15%, 399/2627; p = 0.003). Outpatient palliative care referral was associated with improved overall survival in Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Within the local system, 51% (104/204) of admissions could have been managed in outpatient setting, and of the patients admitted in the last 30 days of life, 59% (87/147) experienced in-hospital deaths. CONCLUSION: We identified underutilization of outpatient palliative care services within stage IV NSCLC patients. Many patients with NSCLC experience hospitalization the last month of life and in-hospital death.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Hospitalización , HospitalesRESUMEN
Limited evidence-based management guidelines for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) currently exist. Using a large population-based cancer registry; the utilization rates and outcomes for patients with clinical stages I-III ICC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) in relation to other treatment strategies were investigated, as were the predictors of treatment regimen utilization. Oncologic outcomes were compared between treatment strategies. Amongst 2736 patients, chemotherapy utilization was low; however, NAT use increased from 4.3% to 7.2% (p = 0.011) over the study period. A higher clinical stage was predictive of the use of NAT, while higher pathologic stage and margin-positive resections were predictive of the use of adjuvant therapy (AT). For patients with more advanced disease, the receipt of NAT or AT was associated with significantly improved survival compared to surgery alone (cStage II, p = 0.040; cStage III, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients receiving NAT were more likely to undergo margin-negative resections compared to those treated with AT (72.5% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.027), despite having higher-risk tumors. This analysis of treatment strategies for resectable ICC suggests a benefit for systemic therapy. Prospective and randomized studies evaluating the sequencing of treatments for patients with high-risk resectable ICC are needed.
RESUMEN
Importance: The number of older patients (80 years and older) diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is expected to increase. Although current guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) followed by resection, little is known about management and outcomes in this older population. Objective: To assess the trends in management of older patients diagnosed with LARC who had a surgical resection. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients 80 years and older who had a surgical resection for LARC were identified in the 2004-2016 National Cancer Database. Patients were grouped based on therapy sequence: (1) surgery followed by adjuvant therapy (AT), ie, chemotherapy or radiation; (2) surgery alone; or (3) NACRT followed by surgical resection. Data were analyzed in May 2021. Exposures: NACRT followed by surgery, and surgery with or without AT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to examine the association of NACRT with the risk of death. Results: Of 3868 patients with LARC who underwent surgical resection, 2042 (52.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 83.4 (3.0) years. A total of 2273 (58.8%) received NACRT followed by surgical resection. Factors independently associated with NACRT were more recent diagnosis, age 80 to 85 years (vs 86 years and older), fewer comorbidities, larger tumors, and node-positive disease. The Kaplan-Meier analyses with IPTW showed that 3-year and 5-year OS for NACRT (3-year: 68.9%; 95% CI, 67.0-70.8; 5-year: 51.1%; 95% CI, 49.0-53.4) vs surgery with AT (3-year: 64.4%; 95% CI, 59.0-70.2; 5-year: 43.0%; 95% CI, 37.4-49.5) vs surgery alone (3-year: 55.8%; 95% CI, 52.0-60.0; 5-year: 34.7%; 95% CI, 30.8-39.0) was significantly different (P < .001). After adjusting for confounders, patients who received NACRT were more likely to undergo an R0 resection (adjusted odds ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.62-2.88), which independently improved OS (P < .001). Moreover, receipt of NACRT was independently associated with a 25% decreased risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82) compared with alternative treatment sequences. Conclusions and Relevance: Approximately 40% of older patients with LARC did not receive the current standard of care. In this cohort, NACRT was associated with a higher likelihood of an R0 resection and improved OS. Clinicians should advocate for receipt of NACRT in older patients with LARC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recto , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II) led to a change in the management of tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from completion node dissection (CLND) to nodal observation. This study aimed to evaluate prognostic factors for predicting sentinel node basin recurrence (SNBR) using data from MSLT-II trial participants. METHODS: In MSLT-II, 1076 patients were treated with observation. Patients were included in the current study if they had undergone a post-sentinel node basin ultrasound (PSNB-US) within 4 months after surgery. The study excluded patients with positive SLN by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or incomplete SLN pathologic data. Primary tumor, patient, PSNB-US, and SLN characteristics were evaluated. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine independent prognostic factors associated with SNBR. RESULTS: The study enrolled 737 patients: 193 (26.2%) patients with SNBR and 73 (9.9%) patients with first abnormal US. The patients with an abnormal first US were more likely to experience SNBR (23.8 vs. 5.0%). In the multivariable analyses, increased risk of SNBR was associated with male gender (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.9; p = 0.049), increasing Breslow thickness (aHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.2; p = 0.038), presence of ulceration (aHR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.42-2.6; p < 0.001), sentinel node tumor burden greater than 1 mm (aHR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.10-3.3; p = 0.022), lymphovascular invasion (aHR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.00-2.3; p = 0.048), and presence of abnormal PSNB-US (aHR, 4.29; 95% CI, 3.02-6.1; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The first postoperative US together with clinical and pathologic factors may play an important role in predicting SNBR.
Asunto(s)
Linfadenopatía , Melanoma , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Masculino , Humanos , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/cirugía , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Pronóstico , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Melanoma/cirugía , Melanoma/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Linfadenopatía/cirugía , SíndromeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Randomized, controlled trials comparing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with mastectomy have demonstrated equivalent overall survival (OS), but recent observational studies have shown improved OS in patients undergoing BCT. These studies provide limited data on young patients who are traditionally offered mastectomy due to perceived higher disease risk. This study examines the OS in a contemporary series of young women with breast cancer undergoing upfront BCT compared with mastectomy. METHODS: Women ≤40 years old with primary invasive T1-T2, N0-N1 breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2016. Patient cohorts were based according to locoregional treatment: BCT, mastectomy alone (Mx), and mastectomy with radiotherapy (Mx/RT). Kaplan-Meier method followed by Cox proportional-hazards regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to account for treatment selection bias effects in OS. RESULTS: A total of 15,611 patients met the study criteria; 9,509 patients (60.9%) had BCT, 4,020 (25.8%) had Mx/RT, and 2,082 (13.3%) had Mx alone. The median follow-up was 4.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.0-6.4). After IPTW-adjustment, the 5-year OS was similar for BCT (95%), Mx (95%), and Mx/RT (94%), and there was no significant difference in OS in Mx (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.51) and Mx/RT (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.88-1.34) compared with BCT. Mx/RT was associated with decreased survival in patients with pT2N0 (HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.12-2.84). CONCLUSIONS: Among young patients with early-stage breast cancer, overall survival was equivalent regardless of surgical approach. Breast-conserving therapy remains a safe option in young women despite the clinical tendency to offer upfront mastectomy in young patients.